Contribution of winter cover crop amendments on global warming potential in rice paddy soil during cultivation
- 1.1k Downloads
Background and aims
Winter cover crop cultivation during the fallow season has been strongly recommended in mono-rice paddy soil to improve soil quality, but its impact in increasing the greenhouse gases (GHGs) emissions during rice cultivation when applied as green manure has not been extensively studied. In order to recommend a preferable cover crop which can increase soil productivity and suppress GHG emission impact in paddy soil, the effect of winter cover crop addition on rice yield and total global warming potential (GWP) was studied during rice cultivation.
Two cover crops (Chinese milk vetch, Astragalus sinicus L., hereafter vetch, and rye, Secale cerealis) having different carbon/nitrogen (C/N) ratios were cultivated during the rice fallow season. The fresh above-ground biomasses of vetch [25 Mg fresh weight (FW) ha−1, moisture content (MC) 86.9 %, C/N ratio 14.8] and rye (29 Mg rye FW ha−1, MC 78.0 %, C/N ratio 64.3) were incorporated as green manure 1 week before rice transplanting (NPK + vetch, and NPK + rye). The NPK treatment was installed for comparison as the control. During the rice cultivation, methane (CH4) and nitrous oxide (N2O) gases were collected simultaneously once a week using the closed-chamber method, and carbon dioxide (CO2) flux was estimated using the soil C balance analysis. Total GWP impact was calculated as CO2 equivalents by multiplying the seasonal CH4, CO2, and N2O fluxes by 25, 1, and 298, respectively.
Methane mainly covered 79–81 % of the total GWP, followed by CO2 (14–17 %), but the N2O contribution was very small (2–5 %) regardless of the treatment. Seasonal CH4 fluxes significantly increased to 61 and 122 % by vetch and rye additions, respectively, compared to that of the NPK treatment. Similarly, the estimated seasonal CO2 fluxes increased at about 197 and 266 % in the vetch and rye treatments, respectively, compared with the NPK control plots. Based on these results, the total GWP increased to 163 and 221 % with vetch and rye applications, respectively, over the control treatment. Rice productivity was significantly increased with the application of green manure due to nutrient supply; however, vetch was more effective. Total GWP per grain yield was similar with the vetch (low C/N ratio) and NPK treatments, but significantly increased with the rye (high C/N ratio) application, mainly due to its higher CH4 emission characteristic and lower rice productivity increase.
A low C/N ratio cover crop, such as vetch, may be a more desirable green manure to reduce total GWP per grain yield and to improve rice productivity.
KeywordsGreenhouse gases Green manure Methane Nitrous oxide Global warming potential Paddy soil Rice
- Cho JY, Han KW, Choi JK (2000) Balance of nitrogen and phosphorus in a paddy field of Central Korea. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 46(2):343–354Google Scholar
- RDA (Rural Development Administration, Korea) (1995) Standard Investigation Methods for Agriculture Experiment, SuwonGoogle Scholar
- Dubey SK (2005) Microbial ecology of methane emission in rice agroecosystem: a review. Appl Ecol Env Res 3(2):1–27Google Scholar
- Feller C, Francois C, Villemin G, Portal JM, Tontain F, Morel JL (1991) Nature des matieres organiques associees aux fractions argileuses d’un sol ferrallitique. CR Acad Sci Paris 312:1491–1497Google Scholar
- Ghani A, Dexter M, Sarathchandra U, Perrott KW, Singleon P (2000) Assessment of extractable hot-water carbon as an indicator of soil quality on soils under long-term pastoral cropping, market gardening and native vegetation. Proceedings of Australian and New Zealand Second Joint Soils Conference. Lincoln, New Zealand, pp 119–120Google Scholar
- Granli T, Bockman OC (1994) Nitrous oxide from agriculture. Norw J Agric Sci Suppl 12:7–128Google Scholar
- Han KW, Cho JY, Son JG (1998) Losses of chemical components by infiltration water during the rice cultivation at silt moam paddy soil. Korean J Environ Agric 17(3):268–273Google Scholar
- IPCC (2007) Technical summary. In: Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, Tignor M, Miller HL (eds) Climate change: the physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group 1 to the Forth Assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Kim SY, Lee BJ, Kim JH, Oh SH, Hwang WH, Hwang DY, Ahn JW, Oh BJ, Ku YC (2007) The timing for incorporating Chinese milk vetch plant into soil for natural reseeding in the southern part of Korean peninsula. Korean J Crop Sci 52:127Google Scholar
- Kim GY, Ko BG, Jeong HC, Roh KA, Shim KM, Lee JT, Lee DB, Hong SY, Kwon SI (2009) Estimating carbon fixation of 14 crops in Korea. Korean J Environ Agric 42(6):460–466 (in Korean)Google Scholar
- Ladha J, Pareek RP, Beeker M (1992) Stem-nodulating legume – Rhizobium symbiosis and its agronomic use in lowland rice. Adv Soil Sci 20:148–192Google Scholar
- Linguist B, van Groenigen KJ, Adviento-Borbe MA, Pittelkow C, van Kessel C (2012) An agronomic assessment of greenhouse gas emissions from major cereal crops. Glob Change Biol 18(1): 194-209Google Scholar
- Na CS, Lee YH, Hong SH, Jang CS, Kang BH, Lee JK, Kim TH, Kim W (2007) Change of seed quality of Chinese milk vetch (Astragalus sinicus L.) during seed developmental stages. Korean J Crop Sci 52:363–369Google Scholar
- Pusatjapong W, Kerdchoechuen O, Towprayoon S (2003) Glucose, fructose, and sucrose accumulation in root and root exudates of rice cv. Supandari 1. KMUTT Res Develop J 26(3):339–350Google Scholar
- Rath AK, Swain B, Ramakrishnan B, Panda D, Adhya TK, Rao VR, Sethunathan N (1999) Influence of fertilizer management and water regime on methane emission from rice fields. Agric Ecosyst Environ 76:99–107Google Scholar
- RDA (Rural Development Administration, Korea) (1988) Methods of soil chemical analysis. National Institute of Agricultural Science and Technology, SuwonGoogle Scholar
- RDA (Rural Development Administration, Korea) (1999) Fertilization standard of crop plants. National Institute of Agricultural Science and Technology, SuwonGoogle Scholar
- Rolston DE (1986) Gas flux. In: Klute A (ed) Methods of soil analysis part 1. 2nd edn. Agron Monogr 9. ASA and SSSA, Madison, pp 1103–1119Google Scholar
- SAS Institute (2003) System for Windows Release 9.1. SAS Institute, CaryGoogle Scholar
- Sinha SK (1995) Global methane emission from rice paddies: excellent methodology but poor extrapolation. Curr Sci 68:643–646Google Scholar
- Zinder SH (1993) Physiological ecology of methanogens. In: Ferry JG (ed) Methanogens: Ecology, physiology, biochemistry and genetics. Chapman and Hall, New York, pp 128–206Google Scholar