Advertisement

Plant and Soil

, Volume 363, Issue 1–2, pp 77–86 | Cite as

Variation of carbon age of fine roots in boreal forests determined from 14C measurements

  • S. P. SahEmail author
  • C. L. Bryant
  • J. Leppälammi-Kujansuu
  • K. Lõhmus
  • I. Ostonen
  • H.-S. Helmisaari
Regular Article

Abstract

Background and aims

The main objectives of this study were to determine how the carbon age of fine root cellulose varies between stands, tree species, root diameter and soil depth. In addition, we also compared the carbon age of fine roots from soil cores of this study with reported values from the roots of the same diameter classes of ingrowth cores on the same sites.

Methods

We used natural abundance of 14C to estimate root carbon age in four boreal Norway spruce and Scots pine stands in Finland and Estonia.

Results

Age of fine root carbon was older in 1.5–2 mm diameter fine roots than in fine roots with <0.5 mm diameter, and tended to be older in mineral soil than in organic soil. Fine root carbon was older in the less fertile Finnish spruce stands (11–12 years) than in the more fertile Estonian stand (3 and 8 years), implying that roots may live longer in less fertile soil. We further observed that on one of our sites carbon in live fine roots with the 1.5–2 mm diameter was of similar C age (7–12 years) than in the ingrowth core roots despite the reported root age in the ingrowth cores – being not older than 2 years.

Conclusions

From this result, we conclude that new live roots may in some cases use old carbon reserves for their cellulose formation. Future research should be oriented towards improving our understanding of possible internal redistribution and uptake of C in trees.

Keywords

Boreal forest Carbon Root age 14Pine Spruce 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research work was funded by the Academy of Finland (grant no. 122281). We thank the teams of people who contributed to sampling and sorting of the original root material: the staff of the Salla Office of the Finnish Forest Research Institute and Mr. Risto Ikonen and Dr. Kirsi Makkonen. We gratefully acknowledge the 14C sample preparation and analysis carried out by staff at NERC Radiocarbon Facility and SUERC AMS Facility, East Kilbride. Root studies in Estonia were supported by the Estonian Science Foundation (grant 2487) and the EU through the European Regional Development Fund (Centre of Excellence ENVIRON).

References

  1. Boutton TW, Wong WW, Hachey DL, Lee LS, Cabrera MP, Klein PD (1983) Comparison of quartz and pyrex tubes for combustion of organic samples for stable carbon isotope analysis. Anal Chem 55:1832–1833CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cajander AK (1949) Forest types and their significance. Acta For Fenn 56:1–69Google Scholar
  3. Dixon RK, Solomon AM, Brown S, Houghton RA, Trexier MC, Wisniewski J (1994) Carbon pools and flux of global forest ecosystems. Science 263(5144):185–190PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Eissenstat DM, Yanai RD (1997) The ecology of root lifespan. Adv Ecol Res 27:1–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Espeleta JF, Eissenstat DM, Graham JH (1999) Citrus root responses to localized drying soil: a new approach to studying mycorrhizal effects on the roots of mature trees. Plant Soil 206:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fahey TJ, Hughes JW (1994) Fine root dynamics in a northern hardwood forest ecosystem. Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest, NH. Ecology 82:533–548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fogel R (1990) Root turnover and production in forest trees. Hortscience 25:270–273Google Scholar
  8. Freeman SPHT, Dougans A, McHargue L, Wilcken KM, Xu S (2008) Performance of the new single stage accelerator mass spectrometer at the SUERC. Nucl Instrum Methods 66:2225–2228Google Scholar
  9. Fröberg M (2012) Residence time of fine-root carbon using radiocarbon measurements of samples collected from a soil archive. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 175:46–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gaudinski JB, Trumbore SE, Davidson EA, Cook AC, Markewitz D, Richter DD (2001) The age of fine-root carbon in three forests of the eastern United States measured by radiocarbon. Oecologia 129(3):420–429Google Scholar
  11. Gaudinski JB, Torn MS, Riley WJ, Dawson TE, Joslin JD, Majdi H (2010) Measuring and modeling the spectrum of fine-root turnover times in three forests using isotopes, minirhizotrons, and the Radix model. Glob Biogeochem Cycles 24:GB3029. doi: 10.1029/2009GB003649 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gaul D, Hertel D, Leuschner C (2008) Effects of experimental soil frost on the fine root system of mature Norway spruce. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 171:690–698CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gaul D, Hertel D, Leuschner C (2009) Estimating fine root longevity in a temperate Norway spruce forest using three independent methods. Funct Plant Biol 36(1):11–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Graefe S, Hertel D, Leuschner Ch (2008) Estimating fine root turnover in tropical forests along an elevational transect using minirhizotrons. Biotropica 40(5):536–542CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Graham JH (1995) Root regeneration and tolerance of citrus rootstocks to root rot caused by Phytophthora nicotianae. Phytopathology 85:111–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Guo DL, Mitchell RJ, Hendricks JJ (2004) Fine root branch orders respond differentially to carbon source–sink manipulations in a longleaf pine forest. Oecologia 140:450–457PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Guo DL, Li H, Mitchell RJ, Han W, Hendricks JJ, Fahey TJ, Hendrick RL (2008) Fine root heterogeneity by branch order: exploring the discrepancy in root turnover estimates between minirhizotron and carbon isotopic methods. New Phytol 172:523–535Google Scholar
  18. Helmisaari H-S, Makkonen K, Kellomäki S, Valtonen E, Mälkönen E (2002) Below- and aboveground biomass, production and nitrogen use in Scots pine stands in eastern Finland. For Ecol Manage 165:317–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Helmisaari H-S, Derome J, Nöjd P, Kukkola M (2007) Fine root biomass in relation to site and stand characteristics in Norway spruce and Scots pine stands. Tree Physiol 27:1493–1504PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Helmisaari H-S, Ostonen I, Lõhmus K, Derome J, Lindroos A-J, Merilä P, Nöjd P (2009) Ectomycorrhizal root tips in relation to site and stand characteristics in Norway spruce and Scots pine stands in boreal forests. Tree Physiol 29(3):445–456PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hendrick RL, Pregitzer KS (1992) The demography of fine roots in a northern hardwood forest. Ecology 73:1094–1104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hendrick RL, Pregitzer KS (1993) The dynamics of fine root length, biomass, and nitrogen content in two Northern hardwood ecosystems. Can J For Res 23:2507–2520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hendricks JJ, Hendrick RL, Wilson CA, Mitchell RJ, Pecot SD, Guo DL (2006) Assessing the patterns and controls of fine root dynamics: an empirical test and methodological review. J Ecol 94:40–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hobbie EA, Weber NS, Trappe JM, van Klinken GJ (2002) Using radiocarbon to determine the mycorrhizal status of fungi. New Phytol 156:129–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Högberg P, Nordgren A, Agren GI (2002) Carbon allocation between tree root growth and root respiration in boreal pine forest. Oecologia 132:579–581CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hyvönen R et al (2007) The likely impact of elevated CO2, nitrogen deposition, increased temperature and management on carbon sequestration in temperate and boreal forest ecosystems: a literature review. New Phytol 173:463–480PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Janssens IA, Sampson DA, Curiel-Yuste J, Carrara A, Ceulemans R (2002) The carbon cost of fine root turnover in a Scots pine forest. For Ecol Manag 168(1–3):231–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Johnson MG, Phillips DL, Tingey DT, Storm MJ (2000) Effects of elevated CO2, N-fertilization, and season on survival of ponderosa pine fine roots. Can J For Res 30:220–228Google Scholar
  29. Joslin JD, Wolfe MH (1999) Disturbances during minirhizotron installation can affect root observation data. Soil Sci Soc Am J 63:218–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Joslin JD, Gaudinski JB, Torn MS, Riley WJ, Hanson PJ (2006) Fine-root turnover patterns and their relationship to root diameter and soil depth in a 14C-labeled hardwood forest. New Phytol 172(3):523–535PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Keel SG, Siegwolf RTW, Korner C (2006) Canopy CO2 enrichment permits tracing the fate of recently assimilated carbon in a mature deciduous forest. New Phytol 172:319–329PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lal R (2005) Forest soils and carbon sequestration. For Ecol Manag 220:242–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Leake JR, Read DJ (1990) Chitin as a nitrogen source for mycorrhizal fungi. Mycol Res 94:993–995CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Levin I, Kromer B (2004) The tropospheric 14CO2 level in mid-latitudes of the Northern Hemisphere (1959–2003). Radiocarbon 46:1261–1272Google Scholar
  35. Lipson DA, Schmidt SK, Monson RK (1999) Links between microbial population dynamics and nitrogen availability in an alpine ecosystem. Ecology 80:1623–1631CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Luo YQ, White L, Hui DF (2004) Comment on ‘Impacts of fine root turnover on forest NPP and soil C sequestration potential’. Science 304:1745PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Majdi H, Andersson P (2005) Fine root production and turnover in a Norway spruce stand in northern Sweden: effects of nitrogen and water manipulation. Ecosystems 8:191–199Google Scholar
  38. Majdi H, Kangas P (1997) Demography of fine roots in response to nutrient applications in a Norway spruce stand in southwestern Sweden. Ecoscience 4:199–205Google Scholar
  39. Majdi H, Pregitzer KS, Moren AS, Nylund JE, Agren GI (2005) Measuring fine root turnover in forest ecosystems. Plant Soil 276:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. McClaugherty CA, Aber JD (1982) The role of fine roots in the organic matter and nitrogen budgets of two forested ecosystems. Ecology 63:1481–1490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. McEnroe N, Helmisaari H-S (2001) Decomposition of coniferous forest litter along a heavy metal pollution gradient, south-west Finland. Environ Pollut 113(1):11–18PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Näsholm T, Ekblad A, Nordin A, Giesler R, Hogberg M, Hogberg P (1998) Boreal forest plants take up organic nitrogen. Nature 392:914–916CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Olsson BA, Hansson K, Persson T, Beuker E, Helmisaari H-S (2012) Heterotrophic respiration and nitrogen mineralisation in soils of Norway spruce, Scots pine and silver birch stands in contrasting climates. For Ecol Manag 269:197–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Ostonen I, Lõhmus K, Helmisaari H-S, Truu J, Meel S (2007) Fine root morphological adaptations in Scots pine, Norway spruce and silver birch along a latitudinal gradient in boreal forests. Tree Physiol 27(11):1627–1634PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Ostonen I, Helmisaari H-S, Borken W, Tedersoo L, Kukumägi M, Bahram M, Lindroos A-J, Nöjd P, Uri V, Merilä P, Asi E, Lõhmus K (2011) Fine root foraging strategies in Norway spruce forests across European climate gradient. Glob Chang Biol 17:3620–3632CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Paungfoo-Lonhienne C, Lonhienne TGA, Rentsch D, Robinson N, Christie M, Webb RI, Gamage HK, Carroll BJ, Schenk PM, Schmidt S (2008) Plants can use protein as a nitrogen source without assistance from other organisms. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105(11):4524–4529PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Persson HA (1983) The distribution and productivity of fine roots in boreal forests. Plant Soil 71:87–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Pregitzer KS, Hendrick RL, Fogel R (1993) The demography of fine roots in response to patches of water and nitrogen. New Phytol 125:575–580CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Pregitzer KS, Kubiske ME, Yu CK, Hendrick RL (1997) Relationships among roof branch order, carbon, and nitrogen in four temperate species. Oecologia 111:302–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Pregitzer KS, DeForest JL, Burton AJ, Allen MF, Ruess RW, Hendrick RL (2002) Fine root architecture of nine North American trees. Ecol Monogr 72:293–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Pritchard SG, Strand AE (2008) Can you believe what you see? Reconciling minirhizotron and isotopically derived estimates of fine root longevity. New Phytol 177:287–291PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Richter D, Markewitz D, Trumbore S, Wells C (1999) Rapid carbon accumulation and turnover in an aggrading forest. Nature 400:56–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Riley WJ, Gaudinski JB, Torn MS, Dawson TE, Joslin JD, Majdi H (2009) Fine root mortality rates in a temperate forest: estimates using radiocarbon data and numerical modelling. New Phytol 184:387–398PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Sah SP, Jungner H, Oinonen M, Kukkola M, Helmisaari HS (2011) Does the age of fine root carbon indicate the age of fine roots in boreal forests? Biogeochemistry 104:91–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Schlesinger WH et al (2006) In: Nosberger JJ et al (eds) Managed ecosystems and CO2 case studies, processes, and perspectives. Springer, New York, pp 197–212Google Scholar
  56. Scott EM (2003) The Third International Radiocarbon Intercomparison (TIRI) and the Fourth International Radiocarbon Intercomparison (FIRI), 1990–2002. Results, analyses, and conclusions. Radiocarbon 45(2):135–408Google Scholar
  57. Slota PJ, Jull AJT, Linick TW, Toolin LJ (1987) Preparation of small samples for 14C accelerator targets by catalytic reduction of CO. Radiocarbon 29:303–306Google Scholar
  58. Sørensen LH (1987) Organic matter and microbial biomass in a soil incubated in the field for 20 years with 14C-labelled barley straw. Soil Biol Biochem 19:39–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Strand AE, Pritchard SG, McCormack ML, Davis MA, Oren R (2008) Irreconcilable differences: fine-root life spans and soil carbon persistence. Science 319(5862):456–458PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Stuiver M, Polach HA (1977) Discussion: reporting of 14C data. Radiocarbon 19(3):355–363Google Scholar
  61. Tierney GL, Fahey TJ (2002) Fine root turnover in a northern hardwood forest: a direct comparison of the radiocarbon and minirhizotron methods. Can J For Res 32(9):1692–1697CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Treseder KK, Czimczik CI, Trumbore SE, Allison SD (2008) Uptake of an amino acid by ectomycorrhizal fungi in a boreal forest. Soil Biol Biochem 40(7):1964–1966CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Trumbore SE (1993) Comparison of carbon dynamics in two soils using measurements of radiocarbon in pre-and post-bomb soils. Global Biogeochem Cycles 7:275–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Trumbore S, Da Costa ES, Nepstad DC, De Camargo PB, Martinelli LIZA, Ray D, Restom T, Silver W (2006) Dynamics of fine root carbon in Amazonian tropical ecosystems and the contribution of roots to soil respiration. Glob Chang Biol 12(2):217–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Vargas R, Allen MF (2008) Dynamics of fine root, fungal rhizomorphs and soil respiration in a mixed temperate forest: integrating sensors and observations. Vadose Zone J 7:1055–1064CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Vargas R, Trumbore SE, Allen MF (2009a) Evidence of old carbon used to grow new fine roots in a tropical forest. New Phytol 182(3):710–718PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Vargas R, Allen EB, Allen MF (2009b) Effects of vegetation thinning on above- and belowground carbon in a seasonally dry tropical forest in Mexico. Biotropica 41(3):302–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Vogt KA, Vogt DJ, Bloomfield J (1998) Analysis of some direct and indirect methods for estimating root biomass and production of forests at an ecosystem level. Plant Soil 200:71–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Wallenda T, Read DJ (1999) Kinetics of amino acid uptake by ectomycorrhizal roots. Plant Cell Environ 22(2):179–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Wells CE, Eissenstat DM (2001) Marked differences in survivorship among apple roots of different diameters. Ecology 82:882–892CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Wipf DB, Tegeder M, Frommer WB (2002) Characterization of a general amino acid permease from Hebeloma cylindrosporum. FEBS Lett 528:119–124PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Withington JM, Reich PB, Oleksyn J, Eissenstat DM (2006) Comparisons of structure and life span in roots and leaves among temperate trees. Ecol Monogr 76:381–397CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. P. Sah
    • 1
    Email author
  • C. L. Bryant
    • 2
  • J. Leppälammi-Kujansuu
    • 1
  • K. Lõhmus
    • 3
  • I. Ostonen
    • 3
  • H.-S. Helmisaari
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Forest SciencesUniversity of HelsinkiHelsinkiFinland
  2. 2.NERC Radiocarbon Facility, Scottish Enterprise Technology ParkEast KilbrideUnited Kingdom
  3. 3.University of Tartu, Institute of Ecology and Earth SciencesTartuEstonia

Personalised recommendations