Plant and Soil

, Volume 360, Issue 1–2, pp 405–419 | Cite as

Landform and vegetation patch type moderate the effects of grazing-induced disturbance on carbon and nitrogen pools in a semi-arid woodland

  • Jane G. Smith
  • David J. Eldridge
  • Heather L. Throop
Regular Article

Abstract

Background and aims

Dryland soil organic carbon (C) pools account for a large portion of soil C globally, but their response to livestock grazing has been difficult to generalize. We hypothesized that some difficulty generalizing was due to spatial heterogeneity in dryland systems. We examined the importance of heterogeneity at vegetation and landform scales on the response of litter and soil C and nitrogen (N) to grazing.

Methods

Litter and soil C and N pools were quantified in different vegetation microsites (tree, shrub, open) and landform elements (dune, swale) across a grazing disturbance gradient in an eastern Australia semi-arid woodland.

Results

Vegetation, landform, and grazing disturbance affected litter and soil C and N pools singly and through interactions. Resource pools were distributed unevenly across vegetation and landforms, and were largest beneath trees in swales. Grazing reduced pools in vegetation-landform combinations where pools were greatest. Pool increases from high to moderate disturbance sites were minimal.

Conclusions

Litter and soil C and N pools are strongly affected by livestock grazing, although responses to grazing relaxation may be non-linear. Accurately predicting C and N responses to grazing in drylands will require accounting for patch differences at multiple spatial scales.

Keywords

Litter Nutrient pools Patch heterogeneity Soil organic carbon Spatial scale 

Abbreviations

SOC

Soil organic carbon

C

Carbon

N

Nitrogen

[SOC]

SOC concentration

[N]

Soil nitrogen concentration

SOCarea

SOC mass per area in g m−2

Narea

Soil N mass per area in g m−2

litterarea

Litter mass per area in g m−2

References

  1. Abanda PA, Compton JS, Hannigan RE (2011) Soil nutrient content, above-ground biomass and litter in a semi-arid shrubland, South Africa. Geoderma 164:128–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson MJ, Gorley RN, Clarke KR (2008) PERMANOVA + for PRIMER: guide to software and statistical methods. PRIMER-E, Plymouth, p 214Google Scholar
  3. Andrew MH, Lange RT (1986) Development of a new piosphere in arid chenopod shrubland grazed by sheep. 1. Changes to the soil surface. Aust J Ecol 11:395–409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Archer S, Schimel DS, Holland EA (1995) Mechanisms of shrubland expansion—land-use, climate or CO2. Clim Chang 29:91–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Asner GP, Archer SR (2010) Livestock and the global carbon cycle. In: Steinfeld H, Mooney H, Schneider F, Neville L (eds) Livestock in a changing landscape: drivers, consequences, and responses. Island Press, Washington, D.C., pp 69–82Google Scholar
  6. Asner GP, Elmore AJ, Olander LP, Martin RE, Harris T (2004) Grazing systems, ecosystem responses, and global change. Annu Rev Environ Resour 29:261-C–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bagchi S, Ritchie ME (2010) Introduced grazers can restrict potential soil carbon sequestration through impacts on plant community composition. Ecol Lett 13:959–968PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Bird SB, Herrick JE, Wander MM, Wright SF (2002) Spatial heterogeneity of aggregate stability and soil carbon in semi-arid rangeland. Environ Pollut 116:445–455PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bowker MA, Maestre FT, Escolar C (2010) Biological crusts as a model system for examining the biodiversity - ecosystem function relationship in soils. Soil Biol Biochem 42:405–417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bowker MA, Mau RL, Maestre FT, Escolar C, Castillo-Monroy AP (2011) Functional profiles reveal unique ecological roles of various biological soil crust organisms. Funct Ecol 25:787–795CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bradstock RA (1990) Relationships between fire regimes, plant species and fuels in mallee communities. In: Noble JC, Joss PJ, Jones GK (eds) The mallee lands: a conservation perspective. CSIRO, East Melbourne, pp 218–223Google Scholar
  12. Briske DD, Fuhlendorf SD, Smeins FE (2006) A unified framework for assessment and application of ecological thresholds. Rangel Ecol Manag 59:225–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bromham L, Cardillo M, Bennett AF, Elgar MA (1999) Effects of stock grazing on the ground invertebrate fauna of woodland remnants. Aust J Ecol 24:199–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Derner JD, Schuman GE (2007) Carbon sequestration and rangelands: a synthesis of land management and precipitation effects. J Soil Water Conserv 62:77–85Google Scholar
  15. Derner JD, Briske DD, Boutton TW (1997) Does grazing mediate soil carbon and nitrogen accumulation beneath C4, perennial grasses along an environmental gradient? Plant Soil 191:147–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Diaz S, Lavorel S, McIntyre SUE, Falczuk V, Casanoves F, Milchunas DG, Skarpe C, Rusch G, Sternberg M, Noy-Meir I, Landsberg J, Zhang WEI, Clark H, Campbell BD (2007) Plant trait responses to grazing—a global synthesis. Glob Chang Biol 13:313–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Eldridge DJ, Mensinga A (2007) Foraging pits of the short-beaked echidna (Tachyglossus aculeatus) as small-scale patches in a semi-arid Australian box woodland. Soil Biol Biochem 39:1055–1065CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Eldridge DJ, Val J, James AI (2011) Abiotic effects predominate under prolonged livestock-induced disturbance. Aust Ecol 36:367–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. FAO (2007) Reconciling livestock and environment. In: Food and agriculture organisation of the United Nations: agriculture and consumer protection department. Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United NationsGoogle Scholar
  20. Field JP, Breshears DD, Whicker JJ, Zou CB (2011) Interactive effects of grazing and burning on wind- and water-driven sediment fluxes: rangeland management implications. Ecol Appl 21:22–32PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Garcia-Moya E, McKell CM (1970) Contribution of shrubs to the nitrogen economy of a desert-wash plant community. Ecology 51:81–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Golluscio R, Austin A, García Martínez G, Gonzalez-Polo M, Sala O, Jackson R (2009) Sheep grazing decreases organic carbon and nitrogen pools in the Patagonian steppe: combination of direct and indirect effects. Ecosystems 12:686–697CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Golodets C, Boeken B (2006) Moderate sheep grazing in semiarid shrubland alters small-scale soil surface structure and patch properties. Catena 65:285–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gonzalez-Polo M, Austin AT (2009) Spatial heterogeneity provides organic matter refuges for soil microbial activity in the Patagonian steppe, Argentina. Soil Biol Biochem 41:1348–1351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Harris D, Horwáth WR, van Kessel C (2001) Acid fumigation of soils to remove carbonates prior to total organic carbon or CARBON-13 isotopic analysis. Soil Sci Soc Am J 65:1853–1856CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Houghton RA, Hackler JL, Lawrence KT (1999) The US carbon budget: contributions from land-use change. Science 285:574–578PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. James AI, Eldridge DJ, Hill BM (2009) Foraging animals create fertile patches in an Australian desert shrubland. Ecography 32:723–732CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. James AI, Eldridge DJ, Moseby KE (2010) Foraging pits, litter and plant germination in an arid shrubland. J Arid Environ 74:516–520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. King EG, Hobbs RJ (2006) Identifying linkages among conceptual models of ecosystem degradation and restoration: towards an integrative framework. Restor Ecol 14:369–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lee J, Hopmans JW, Rolston DE, Baer SG, Six J (2009) Determining soil carbon stock changes: simple bulk density corrections fail. Agric Ecosyst Environ 134:251–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Loginow W, Wisniewski W, Gonet SS, Ciescinska B (1987) Fractionation of organic carbon based on susceptibility to oxidation. Pol J Soil Sci 20:47–52Google Scholar
  32. McClaran MP, Moore-Kucera J, Martens DA, van Haren J, Marsh SE (2008) Soil carbon and nitrogen in relation to shrub size and death in a semi-arid grassland. Geoderma 145:60–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. McKeon GM, Stone GS, Syktus JI, Carter JO, Flood NR, Ahrens DG, Bruget DN, Chilcott CR, Cobon DH, Cowley RA, Crimp SJ, Fraser GW, Howden SM, Johnston PW, Ryan JG, Stokes CJ, Day KA (2009) Climate change impacts on northern Australian rangeland livestock carrying capacity: a review of issues. Rangel J 31:1–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Midgley GF, Bond WJ, Kapos V, Ravilious C, Scharlemann JPW, Woodward FI (2010) Terrestrial carbon stocks and biodiversity: key knowledge gaps and some policy implications. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 2:264–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Morton SR (1990) The impact of European settlement on the vertebrate animals of arid Australia: a conceptual model. Proc Ecol Soc Aust 16:201–213Google Scholar
  36. Piñeiro G, Paruelo JM, Oesterheld M, Jobbágy EG (2010) Pathways of grazing effects on soil organic carbon and nitrogen. Rangel Ecol Manag 63:109–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Scholes RJ, Archer SR (1997) Tree-grass interactions in savannas. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 28:517–544CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Schuman GE, Reeder JD, Manley JT, Hart RH, Manley WA (1999) Impact of grazing management on the carbon and nitrogen balance of a mixed-grass rangeland. Ecol Appl 9:65–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Scurlock JMO, Hall DO (1998) The global carbon sink: a grassland perspective. Glob Chang Biol 4:229–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Soliveres S, Eldridge DJ, Maestre FT, Bowker MA, Tighe M, Escudero A (2011) Microhabitat amelioration and reduced competition among understory plants as drivers of facilitation across environmental gradients: towards a unifying framework. Perspect Plant Ecol Evol Syst 13:247–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Suding KN, Gross KL, Houseman GR (2004) Alternative states and positive feedbacks in restoration ecology. Trends Ecol Evol 19:46–53PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Throop HL, Archer SR (2008) Shrub (Prosopis velutina) encroachment in a semidesert grassland: spatial-temporal changes in soil organic carbon and nitrogen pools. Glob Chang Biol 14:2420–2431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Throop HL, Archer SR, Monger HC, Waltman S (2012) When bulk density methods matter: implications for estimating soil organic carbon pools in rocky soils. J Arid Environ 77:66–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Tiver F, Andrew MH (1997) Relative effects of herbivory by sheep, rabbits, goats and kangaroos on recruitment and regeneration of shrubs and trees in eastern South Australia. J Appl Ecol 34:903–914CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. VandenBygaart AJ, Angers DA (2006) Towards accurate measurements of soil organic carbon stock change in agroecosystems. Can J Soil Sci 86:465–471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Walker PJ (1991) Land systems of western New South Wales: technical report no. 25. Soil Conservation Service of NSW, SydneyGoogle Scholar
  47. Weil RR, Islam KR, Stine MA, Gruver JB, Samson-Liebig SE (2003) Estimating active carbon for soil quality assessment: a simplified method for laboratory and field use. Am J Altern Agric 18:3–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Witt GB, Noël MV, Bird MI, Beeton RJS, Menzies NW (2011) Carbon sequestration and biodiversity restoration potential of semi-arid mulga lands of Australia interpreted from long-term grazing exclosures. Agric Ecosyst Environ 141:108–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jane G. Smith
    • 1
  • David J. Eldridge
    • 2
  • Heather L. Throop
    • 1
  1. 1.Biology DepartmentNew Mexico State UniversityLas CrucesUSA
  2. 2.Evolution and Ecology Research Centre, School of Biological, Earth and Environmental SciencesUniversity of New South WalesSydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations