Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Erratum to: Plant Soil (2010) 332:193–206
DOI 10.1007/s11104-010-0285-6
Unfortunately, erroneous data of the trial were provided and the corrections are as follows: the sum of precipitation and irrigation (in mm) was 5 (J), 5 (F), 15 (M), 96 (A), 118 (M), 50 (J), 204 (J), 114 (A), 47 (S), 110 (O), 88 (N) and 3 (D). The soil organic carbon data has to be divided by 1.724 to obtain t C ha–1.
This affects the test of the three models m1 to m3 as follows: Model 3 is the most successful model and the model efficiencies decrease in the order NT-N2P1straw0 (0.93)>CT-N2P0straw1 (0.87)>NT-N0P2straw1 (0.41)>NT-N1P0straw2 (0.24)>CT-N1P2straw0 (0.13)>CT-N0P1straw2 (-0.54)>CT-N1P1straw1 (-1.6)>CT-N0P0straw0 (-2.9)>CT-N2P2straw2 (-3.4).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Ingrid Koegel-Knabner.
The online version of the original article can be found under at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11104-010-0285-6.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ludwig, B., Hu, K., Niu, L. et al. Erratum to: Modelling the dynamics of organic carbon in fertilization and tillage experiments in the North China Plain using the Rothamsted Carbon Model—initialization and calculation of C inputs. Plant Soil 355, 417 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-012-1189-4
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-012-1189-4