Abstract
Crop growth and yield are the result of the efficiency of the chosen agricultural management system within the boundaries of the agro-ecological environment. Linking spatial variability in crop performance to differences in soil attributes could identify the limiting factors driving the system, since patterns of crop performance will follow the spatial variability of the underlying limiting soil attributes. The Greenseeker handheld NDVI sensor was used to determine the within-plot spatial variability of crop performance in the different management treatments of a long-term (started 1991) tillage and residue management trial. Soil quality was measured spatially in the same plots. Under zero tillage with residue removal, soil quality and crop performance followed micro-topography with higher values where elevation was lower. Under zero tillage with residue retention soil quality was high throughout the field, ensuring uniform crop growth and under conventional tillage, soil quality was intermediate. Crop performance followed the same pattern as soil moisture and the related attributes infiltration, soil structure and organic matter. Thus soil moisture is the main limiting factor of the system and it is essential for the sustainability of any management practice developed for the subtropical highlands that soil water capture and storage are optimal. Zero tillage with residue retention is therefore the practice that will result in the most sustainable management and the most stable yields for this target area.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barthès B, Roose E (2002) Aggregate stability as an indicator of soil susceptility to runoff and erosion; validation at several levels. Catena 47:133–149 doi:10.1016/S0341-8162(01)00180-1
Bremner JM, Mulvaney CS (1982) Nitrogen-total. In: Page AL (ed) Methods of soil analysis: cemical methods part 2. ASA, Madison, WI, pp 595–624
Doorenbos J, Kassam AK (1979) Yield response to water. Irrigation and Drainage Paper 33. FAORomep 176
Environmental Systems Research Institute (ESRI) (2006) ArcGIS 9.2 geostatistical analyst. ESRI, Redlands, California, USA
Esbensen KH (2002) Multivariate data analysis— in practice, 5th edn. CAMO Process AS, Oslo, Norway, p 598
Fischer RA, Santiveri F, Vidal IR (2002a) Crop rotation, tillage and crop residue management for wheat and maize in the subhumid tropical highlands I. Wheat and legume performance. Field Crops Res 79:107–122 doi:10.1016/S0378-4290(02)00157-0
Fischer RA, Santiveri F, Vidal IR (2002b) Crop rotation, tillage and crop residue management for wheat and maize in the subhumid tropical highlands II. Maize and system performance. Field Crops Res 79:123–137 doi:10.1016/S0378-4290(02)00158-2
Frogbrook ZL, Oliver MA, Salahi M, Ellis RH (1999) Comparing the relations in the spatial variation of soil and crop attributes. In: Stafford JV (ed) Precis agriculture‘99, part 1. Sheffield Academic Press, Sheffield, pp 397–406
Ginting D, Moncrief JF, Gupta SC (2003) Performance of a variable tillage system based on interactions with landscape and soil. Precis Agric 4:19–34 doi:10.1023/A:1021806920399
Govaerts B, Sayre KD, Deckers J (2005) Stable high yields with zero tillage and permanent bed planting? Field Crops Res 94:33–42 doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2004.11.003
Govaerts B, Sayre KD, Deckers J (2006a) A minimum data set for soil quality assessment of wheat and maize cropping in the highlands of Mexico. Soil Tillage Res 87:163–174 doi:10.1016/j.still.2005.03.005
Govaerts B, Mezzalama M, Sayre KD, Crossa J, Nicol JM, Deckers J (2006b) Long-term consequences of tillage, residue management, and crop rotation on maize/wheat root rot and nematode populations. Appl Soil Ecol 32:305–315 doi:10.1016/j.apsoil.2005.07.010
Govaerts B, Verhulst N, Sayre KD, De Corte P, Goudeseune B, Lichter K, Crossa J, Deckers J, Dendooven L (2007a) Evaluating spatial within plot crop variability for different management practices with an optical sensor? Plant Soil 299:29–42 doi:10.1007/s11104-007-9358-6
Govaerts B, Fuentes M, Sayre KD, Mezzalama M, Nicol JM, Deckers J, Etchevers J, Figueroa-Sandoval B (2007b) Infiltration, soil moisture, root rot and nematode populations after 12 years of different tillage, residue and crop rotation managements. Soil Tillage Res 87:163–174 doi:10.1016/j.still.2005.03.005
Govaerts B, Mezzalama M, Sayre KD, Crossa J, Lichter K, Troch V, Vanherck K, De Corte P, Deckers J (2007c) Long-term consequences of tillage, residue management, and crop rotation on selected soil micro-flora groups in the subtropical highlands. Appl Soil Ecol 38:197–210 doi:10.1016/j.apsoil.2007.10.009
Govaerts B, Mezzalama M, Unno Y, Sayre KD, Luna-Guido M, Vanherck K, Dendooven L, Deckers J (2007d) Influence of tillage, residue management, and crop rotation on soil microbial biomass and catabolic diversity. Appl Soil Ecol 37:18–30 doi:10.1016/j.apsoil.2007.03.006
IUSS Working Group WRB (2006) World reference base for soil resources 2006, 2nd edn. World Soil Resources Reports No. 103. FAO, Rome, p 128
Kemper WD, Chepil WS (1965) Size distribution of aggregates. In: Black CA (ed) Methods of soil analysis. part I. Agronomy series no. 9. ASA, Madison, WI, pp 499–509
Kemper WD, Rosenau RC (1986) Aggregate stability and size distribution. In: Klute A, Campbell GS, Jackson RD, Mortland MM, Nielsen DR (eds) Methods of soil analysis. Part I. ASA and SSSA, Madison, WI, pp 425–442
Kravchenko AN, Bullock DG (2000) Correlation of corn and soybean grain yield with topography and soil properties. Agron J 92:75–83 doi:10.1007/s100870050010
Kravchenko AN, Robertson GP, Thelen KD, Harwood RR (2005) Management, topographical en weather effects on spatial variability of crop grain yields. Agron J 97:514–523
Limon-Ortega A, Sayre KD, Drijber RA, Francis CA (2002) Soil attributes in a furrow-irrigated bed planting system in northwest Mexico. Soil Tillage Res 63:123–132 doi:10.1016/S0167-1987(01)00230-6
Lopez-Noverola U (1995) El C, N y P de la biomasa microbiana en suelos con diversos manejos. Tesis de Maestria en Ciencias. Colegio de Postgraduados en Ciencias Agrícolas. Instituto de Recursos Naturales. Programa Edafología. Montecillo, Estado de Mexico, Mexico, pp 150
Machado S, Bynum ED Jr, Archer TL, Bordovsky J, Rosenow DT, Peterson C, Bronson K, Nesmith DM, Lascano RJ, Wilson LT, Segarra E (2002) Spatial and temporal variability of sorghum grain yield: Influence of soil, water, pests, and diseases relationships. Precis Agric 3:389–406 doi:10.1023/A:1021597023005
Martens H, Naes T (1998) Multivariate calibration. Wiley, Chichester, p 438
Martin KL, Hodgen PJ, Freeman KW, Melchiori R, Arnall DB, Teal RK, Mullen RW, Desta K, Phillips SB, Solie JB, Stone ML, Caviglia O, Solari F, Bianchini A, Francis DI, Schepers JS, Hatfield J, Raun WR (2005) Plant-to-plant variability in corn production. Agron J 97:1603–1611 doi:10.2134/agronj2005.0129
SAS Institute (1994) SAS user’s guide. SAS Inst., Cary, NC, USA.
Scholenberger S (1992) In: The council on soil testing and plant analysis, handbook on reference methods for soil analysis. Athens, Georgia
Scopel E, Da Silva FAM, Corbeels M, Affholder FO, Maraux F (2004) Modelling crop residue mulching effects on water use and production of maize under semi-arid and humid tropical conditions. Agronomie 24:383–395 doi:10.1051/agro:2004029
Shatar TM, McBratney AB (1999) Empirical modeling of relationships between sorghum yield and soil properties. Precis Agric 1:249–276 doi:10.1023/A:1009968907612
Soil Survey Staff (2003) Keys to soil taxonomy. United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Washington DC, p 332
Stafford JV, Ambler B, Lark RM, Catt J (1996) Mapping and interpreting the yield variation in cereal crops. Comput Electron Agric 14:101–119 doi:10.1016/0168-1699(95)00042-9
Wong MTF, Asseng S (2006) Determining the causes of spatial and temporal variability of wheat yields at sub-field scale using a new method of upscaling a crop model. Plant Soil 283:203–215 doi:10.1007/s11104-006-0012-5
Acknowledgements
N.V. received a PhD fellowship of the Research Foundation-Flanders. We thank A. Martinez, M. Martinez, H. González-Juárez, J. Garcia-Ramirez and M. Perez for technical assistance; V. Hernandez-Rodriguez, E. Carrasco-Beltran and D. Hodson for help with the generation of the maps; J. M. Ceballos-Ramírez and M. Luna-Guido for help with the lab analyses. The research was funded by the International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT, Int.).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Len Wade.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Verhulst, N., Govaerts, B., Sayre, K.D. et al. Using NDVI and soil quality analysis to assess influence of agronomic management on within-plot spatial variability and factors limiting production. Plant Soil 317, 41–59 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-008-9787-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-008-9787-x