Plant and Soil

, 321:409 | Cite as

Novel approaches in plant breeding for rhizosphere-related traits

  • Matthias WissuwaEmail author
  • Mark Mazzola
  • Christine Picard
Review Article


Selection of modern varieties has typically been performed in standardized, high fertility systems with a primary focus on yield. This could have contributed to the loss of plant genes associated with efficient nutrient acquisition strategies and adaptation to soil-related biotic and abiotic stresses if such adaptive strategies incurred a cost to the plant that compromised yield. Furthermore, beneficial interactions between plants and associated soil organisms may have been made obsolete by the provision of nutrients in high quantity and in readily plant available forms. A review of evidence from studies comparing older traditional varieties to modern high yielding varieties indeed showed that this has been the case. Given the necessity to use scarce and increasingly costly fertilizer inputs more efficiently while also raising productivity on poorer soils, it will be crucial to reintroduce desirable rhizosphere-related traits into elite cultivars. Traits that offer possibilities for improving nutrient acquisition capacity, plant–microbe interactions and tolerance to abiotic and biotic soil stresses in modern varieties were reviewed. Despite the considerable effort devoted to the identification of suitable donors and of genetic factors associated with these beneficial traits, progress in developing improved varieties has been slow and has so far largely been confined to modifications of traditional breeding procedures. Modern molecular tools have only very recently started to play a rather small role. The few successful cases reviewed in this paper have shown that novel breeding approaches using molecular tools do work in principle. When successful, they involved close collaboration between breeders and scientists conducting basic research, and confirmation of phenotypes in field tests as a ‘reality check’. We concluded that for novel molecular approaches to make a significant contribution to breeding for rhizosphere related traits it will be essential to narrow the gap between basic sciences and applied breeding through more interdisciplinary research that addresses rather than avoids the complexity of plant–soil interactions.


Beneficial rhizobacteria Mycorrhizal fungi Nutrient acquisition Nutrient deficiency Nutrient toxicity Soilborne disease tolerance 


  1. Andrews M, James EK, Cummings SP, Zavalin AA, Vinogradova LV, McKenzie BA (2003) Use of nitrogen fixing bacteria inoculants as a substitute for nitrogen fertiliser for dryland graminaceous crops: Progress made, mechanisms of action and future potential. Symbiosis 35:209–229Google Scholar
  2. App A, Watanabe I, Ventura TS, Bravo M, Jurey CD (1986) The effect of cultivated and wild rice varieties on the nitrogen balance of flooded soil. Soil Sci 141:448–452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baldani JL, Reis VM, Baldani VLD, Dobereiner J (2002) A brief story of nitrogen fixation in sugarcane—reasons for success in Brazil. Funct Plant Biol 29:417–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bänziger M, Diallo AO (2001) Progress in developing drought and N stress tolerant maize cultivars for Eastern and Southern Africa. Seventh Eastern and Southern Africa Regional Maize Conference, 11–15 February 2001, pp 189–194Google Scholar
  5. Bänziger M, Betran FJ, Lafitte HR (1997) Efficiency of high-nitrogen selection environments for improving maize for low-nitrogen target environments. Crop Sci 37:1103–1109Google Scholar
  6. Batten GD (1992) A review of phosphorus efficiency in wheat. Plant Soil 146:163–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Berg G, Roskot N, Steidle A, Eberl L, Zock A, Smalla K (2002) Plant-dependent genotypic and phenotypic diversity of antagonistic rhizobacteria isolated from different Verticillium host plants. Appl Environ Microbiol 68:3328–3338PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Berg G, Zachow C, Lottmann J, Götz M, Costa R, Smalla K (2005) Impact of plant species and site on rhizosphere-associated fungi antagonistic to Verticillium dahliae Kleb. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:4203–4213PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bliss FA (1993) Breeding common bean for improved biological nitrogen-fixation. Plant Soil 152:71–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bosco M, Baruffa E, Picard C (2006) Organic breeding should select for plant genotypes able to efficiently exploit indigenous Probiotic Rhizobacteria. In: Andreasen CB, Elsgaard L, Sondegaard SL, Hansen G (eds) Organic farming and European rural development. Proceedings of the European Joint Organic Congress, pp 376–377Google Scholar
  11. Broglie KE, Chet I, Holliday M, Cressman R, Biddle O, Knowlton S et al (1991) Transgenic plants with enhanced resistance to the fungal pathogen Rhizoctonia solani. Science 254:1194–1197PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Browne GT, Mircetich SM (1993) Relative resistance of thirteen apple rootstocks to three species of Phytophthora. Phytopathology 83:744–749CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Caniato F, Guimarães C, Schaffert R, Alves V, Kochian L, Borém A et al (2007) Genetic diversity for aluminum tolerance in sorghum. Theor Appl Genet 114:863–876PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Carroll BJ, McNeil DL, Gresshoff PM (1985) Isolation and properties of soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] mutants that nodulate in the presence of high nitrate concentrations. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 82:4162–4166PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ceccarelli S (1994) Specific adaptation and breeding for marginal conditions. Euphytica 77:205–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ceccarelli S, Grando S (2007) Decentralized-participatory plant breeding: an example of demand driven research. Euphytica 155:349–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cook RJ (2006) Toward cropping systems that enhance productivity and sustainability. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103:18389–18394PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cook RJ, Thomashow LS, Weller DM, Fujimoto DK, Mazzola M, Bangera G et al (1995) Molecular mechanisms of defense by rhizobacteria against root disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 92:4197–4201PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cregan PB (1989) Host plant effects on nodulation and competitiveness of the Bradyrhizobium japonicum serotype strains constituting serocluster 123. Appl Environ Microbiol 55:2532–2536PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. da Mota FF, N’obrega A, Marriel IE, Paiva E, Seldin L (2002) Genetic diversity of Paenibacillus polymyxa populations isolated from the rhizosphere of four cultivars of maize (Zea mays) planted in Cerrado soil. Appl Soil Ecol 20:119–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dalmastri C, Chiarini L, Cantale C, Bevivino A, Tabacchioni S (1999) Soil type and maize cultivar affect the genetic diversity of maize root-associated Burkholderia cepacia populations. Microb Ecol 38:273–284PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Datta K, Tu J, Oliva N, Ona I, Velazhahan R, Wew TW et al (2001) Enhanced resistance to sheath blight by constitutive expression of infection-related rice chitinase in transgenic elite indica rice cultivars. Plant Sci 160:405–414PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Dawson J, Murphy K, Jones S (2007) Decentralized selection and participatory approaches in plant breeding for low-input systems. Euphytica (in press) doi: 10.1007/s10681-007-9533-0
  24. Delhaize E, Hebb DM, Ryan PR (2001) Expression of a Pseudomonas aeruginosa citrate synthase gene in tobacco is not associated with either enhanced citrate accumulation of efflux. Plant Physiol 125:2059–2067PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Delhaize E, Ryan PR, Hebb DM, Yamamota Y, Sasaki T, Matsumoto H (2004) Engeneering high-level aluminum tolerance in barley with the ALMT1 gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101:15249–15254PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Drinkwater LE, Snapp SS (2007) Understanding and managing the rhizosphere in agroecosystems. In: ZG Cardon, JL Whitbeck (eds) The rhizosphere—an ecological perspective. Elsevier, pp 155–178Google Scholar
  27. Duvick DN, Cassman KG (1999) Post-green revolution trends in yield potential of temperate maize in the North-Central United States. Crop Sci 39:1622–1630Google Scholar
  28. Egle K, Manse G, Roemer W, Vlek PLG (1989) Improved phosphorus efficiency of three new wheat genotypes from CIMMYT in comparison with an older Mexican variety. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 162:353–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. El Mohtar CA, Atamian HS, Dagher RB, Abou-Jawdah Y, Salus MS, Maxwell DP (2007) Marker-assisted selection of tomato genotypes with the I-2 gene for resistance to Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici race 2. Plant Dis 91:758–762CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ela SW, Anderson MA, Brill WJ (1982) Screening and selection of maize to enhance associative bacterial nitrogen fixation. Plant Physiol 70:1564–1567PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Engelhard M, Hurek T, Reinhold-Hurek B (2000) Preferential occurrence of diazotrophic endophytes, Azoarcus spp., in wild rice species and land races of Oryza sativa in comparison with modern races. Environ Microbiol 2:131–141PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Evenson RE, Gollin D (2003) Assessing the impact of the Green Revolution, 1960 to 2000. Science 300:758–762PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Fairbairn DJ, Cavallaro AS, Bernard M, Mahalinga-Iyer J, Graham MW, Botella JR (2007) Host-delivered RNAi: an effective strategy to silence genes in plant parasitic nematodes. Planta 226:1525–1533PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Fazio G, Mazzola M (2005) Target traits for the development of marker assisted selection of apple rootstocks—prospects and benefits. Acta Hortic 663:823–827Google Scholar
  35. Fazio G, Robinson T, Aldwinckle H, Mazzola M, Leinfelder M, Parra R (2006) Traits of the next wave of geneva apple rootstocks. Compact Fruit Tree 38:7–11Google Scholar
  36. Fu Y-B, Peterson GW, Richards KW, Somers D, DePauw RM, Clarke JM (2005) Allelic reduction and genetic shift in the Canadian hard red spring wheat germplasm released from 1845 to 2004. Theor Appl Genet 110:1505–1516PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Gahoonia TS, Nielsen NE (2004) Barley genotypes with long root hairs sustain high grain yields in low-P field. Plant Soil 262:55–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Generation Challenge Programme (2007) Project mid-year and final reports: Competitive and commissioned project. Generation Challenge Programme, Texcoco, Mexico, pp 42–46.Google Scholar
  39. George TS, Richardson AE, Hadobas PA, Simpson RJ (2004) Characterisation of transgenic Trifolium subterraneum L. which expresses phyA and releases extracelular phytase: growth and P nutrition in laboratory media and soil. Plant Cell Environ 27:1351–1361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. George TS, Richardson AE, Smith JB, Hadobas PA, Simpson RJ (2005) Limitations to the Potential of transgenic Trifolium subterraneum L. plants that exude phytase when grown in soils with a range of organic P content. Plant Soil 278:263–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Grau Nersting L, Bode Andersen S, von Bothmer R, Gullord M, Bagger Jørgensen R (2006) Morphological and molecular diversity of Nordic oat through one hundred years of breeding. Euphytica 150:327–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Gu Y-H, Mazzola M (2003) Modification of fluorescent pseudomonad community and control of apple replant disease induced in a wheat cultivar-specific manner. Appl Soil Ecol 24:57–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Gutierrez JA, Cramer CS (2005) Screening short-day onion cultivars for resistance to fusarium basal rot. HortScience 40:157–160Google Scholar
  44. Hallauer AR, Miranda Fo JB (1988) Quantitative genetics in plant breeding. Iowa State Univ. Press, Ames, pp 337–348Google Scholar
  45. Hede A, Skovmand B, Lopez-Cesati J (2001) Acid soils and aluminum toxicity. In: Reynolds M (ed) Application of physiology in wheat breeding. CIMMYT, Mexico, pp 172–182Google Scholar
  46. Herman R, Perl-Treves R (2007) Characterization and inheritance of a new source of resistance to Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. melonis race 1.2 in Cucumis melo. Plant Dis 91:1180–1186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Herridge D, Rose I (2000) Breeding for enhanced nitrogen fixation in crop legumes. Field Crops Res 65:229–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Hetrick BAD, Wilson GWT, Cox TS (1992) Mycorrhizal dependence of modern wheat-varieties, landraces, and ancestors. Can J Bot 70:2032–2040CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Hetrick BAD, Wilson GWT, Cox TS (1993) Mycorrhizal dependence of modern wheat cultivars and ancestors—a synthesis. Can J Bot 71:512–518Google Scholar
  50. Hetrick BAD, Wilson GWT, Gill BS, Cox TS (1995) Chromosome location of mycorrhizal responsive genes in wheat. Can J Bot 73:891–897CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Hetrick BAD, Wilson GWT, Todd TC (1996) Mycorrhizal response in wheat cultivars: Relationship to phosphorus. Can J Bot 74:19–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Hinsinger P, Gobran GR, Gregory PJ, Wenzel WW (2005) Rhizosphere geometry and heterogeneity arising from root-mediated physical and chemical processes. New Phytol 168:293–303PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Hoffland E, Wei C, Wissuwa M (2006) Organic anion exudation by lowland rice (Oryza sativa L.) at Zinc and Phosphorus deficiency. Plant Soil 283:155–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Huang G, Allen R, Davis EL, Baum TJ, Hussey RS (2006) Engineering broad root-knot resistance in transgenic plants by RNAi silencing of a conserved and essential root-knot nematode parasitism gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103:14302–14306PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Hungria M, Phillips DA (1993) Effects of a seed color mutation on rhizobial nod-gene-inducing flavanoids and nodulation in common bean. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 6:418–422Google Scholar
  56. Iruela M, Castro P, Rubio J, Cubero JI, Jacinto C, Millań T et al (2007) Validation of a QTL for resistance to ascochyta blight linked to resistance to fusarium wilt race 5 in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Eur J Plant Pathol 119:29–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Ishimaru Y, Suzuki M, Tsukamoto T, Suzuki K, Nakazono M, Kobayashi T et al (2006) Rice plants take up iron as an Fe3+-phytosiderophore and as Fe2+. Plant J 45:335–346PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Ishimaru Y, Kim S, Tsukamoto T, Oki H, Kobayashi T, Watanabe S et al (2007) Mutational reconstructed ferric chelate reductase confers enhanced tolerance in rice to iron deficiency in calcareous soil. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104:7373–7378PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Ishitani M, Rao I, Wenzl P, Beebe S, Tohme J (2004) Integration of genomics approach with traditional breeding towards improving abiotic stress adaptation: drought and aluminum toxicity as case studies. Field Crops Res 90:35–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Ismail AM, Heuer S, Thomson JT, Wissuwa M (2007) Genetic and genomic approaches to develop rice germplasm for problem soils. Plant Mol Biol 65:547–570PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Jagnow G (1990) Differences between cereal crop cultivars in root-associated nitrogen-fixation. Possible causes of variable yield response to seed inoculation. Plant Soil 123:255–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Kaeppler SM, Parke JL, Mueller SM, Senior L, Stuber C, Tracy WF (2000) Variation among maize inbred lines and detection of quantitative trait loci for growth at low phosphorus and responsiveness to arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Crop Sci 40:358–364Google Scholar
  63. Keel C, Schnider U, Maurhofer M, Voisard C, Laville J, Burger P et al (1992) Suppression of root diseases by Pseudomonas fluorescens CHA0: importance of the secondary metabolite 2,4-diacetylphlorglucinol. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 5:4–13Google Scholar
  64. Khanizadeh S, Granger R (1998) An overview on history, progress, present and future objectives of the Quebec apple cultivar and rootstock breeding program. Acta Hortic 513:477–482Google Scholar
  65. Khush GS (1999) Green revolution: preparing for the 21st century. Genome 42:646–655PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Kim MY, Van K, Lestari P, Moon JK, Lee SH (2005) SNP identification and SNAP marker development for a GmNARK gene controlling supernodulation in soybean. Theor Appl Genet 110:1003–1010PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Kirkpatrick MT, Rothrock CS, Rupe JC, Gbur EE (2006) The effect of Pythium ultimum and soil flooding on two soybean cultivars. Plant Dis 90:597–602CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Kochian LV, Hoekenga OA, Pineros MA (2004) How do plants tolerate acid soils? Mechanisms of aluminum tolerance and phosphorus efficiency. Annu Rev Plant Biol 55:459–493PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Lambers H, Shane MW, Cramer MD, Pearse SJ, Veneklaas EJ (2006) Root structure and functioning for efficient acquisition of Phosphorus: Matching morphological and physiological traits. Ann Bot (Lond) 98:693–713CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Larkin RP, Hopkins DL, Martin FN (1993) Effect of successive watermelon plantings on Fusarium oxysporum and other microorganisms suppressive and conducive to Fusarium wilt of watermelon. Phytopathology 83:1097–1105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Larkin RP, Hopkins DL, Martin FN (1996) Suppression of Fusarium wilt of watermelon by nonpathogenic Fusarium oxysporum and other microorganisms recovered from a disease suppressive soil. Phytopathology 86:812–819CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Latour X, Corberand T, Laguerre G, Allard F, Lemanceau P (1996) The composition of fluorescent pseudomonad populations associated with roots is influenced by plant and soil type. Appl Environ Microbiol 62:2449–2456PubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. Lemanceau P, Corberand T, Gardan L, Latour X, Laguerre G, Boeufgras J-M et al (1995) Effect of two plant species, flax (Linum usitatissinum L.) and tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.), on diversity of soilborne populations of fluorescent pseudomonads. Appl Environ Microbiol 61:1004–1012PubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. Lilley CJ, Bakhetia M, Charlton WL, Urwin PE (2007) Recent progress in the development of RNA interference for plant parasitic nematodes. Mol Plant Pathol 8:701–711CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Line RF, Chen X (1995) Successes in breeding for and managing durable resistance to wheat rusts. Plant Dis 79:1254–1255Google Scholar
  76. Luterbacher MC, Asher MJC, Beyer W, Mandolino G, Scholtern OE, Frese L et al (2005) Sources of resistance to diseases of sugar beet in related Beta germplasm: II. Soil-borne diseases. Euphytica 141:49–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Lynch JP (2007) Roots of the Second Green Revolution. Aust J Bot 55:493–512CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Mackill DJ (2006) Breeding for resistance to abiotic stresses in rice: the value of quantitative trait loci. In: Lamkey KR, Lee M (eds) Plant breeding: the Arnel R Hallauer International Symposium. Blackwell, Ames, IA, pp 201–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Magalhaes JV, Liu J, Guimaraes CT, Lana UGP, Alves VMC, Wang Y-H et al (2007) A gene in the multidrug and toxic compound extrusion (MATE) family confers aluminum tolerance in sorghum. Nat Genet 39:1156–1161PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Magnavaca R, Bahia Filho AFC (1993) Success in maize acid soil tolerance. In: Maranvill JW (ed) Adaptation of plants to soil stress. Intsormil Publ. No. 94-2. University of Nebraska, Lincoln, pp 209–220Google Scholar
  81. Marschner P, Yang C-H, Lieberei R, Crowley DE (2001) Soil and plant specific effects on bacterial community composition in the rhizosphere. Soil Biol Biochem 33:1437–1445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Marshall D, Tunali B, Nelson LR (1999) Occurrence of fungal endophytes in species of wild Triticum. Crop Sci 39:1507–1512Google Scholar
  83. Mazzola M (1998) Elucidatin of the microbial complex having a causal role in development of apple replant disease in Washington. Phytopathology 88:930–938PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Mazzola M, Gu Y-H (2002) Wheat genotype-specific induction of soil microbial communities suppressive to Rhizoctonia solani AG 5 and AG 8. Phytopathology 92:1300–1307PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Mazzola M, Funnell DL, Raaijmakers JM (2004) Wheat cultivar-specific selection of 2,4-diacetylphloroglucinol-producing fluorescent Pseudomonas species from resident soil populations. Microb Ecol 48:338–348PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Miethling R, Wieland G, Backhaus H, Tebbe CC (2000) Variation of microbial rhizosphere communities in response to crop species, soil origin, and inoculation with Sinorhizobium meliloti L33. Microb Ecol 41:43–56Google Scholar
  87. Morris M, Bellon M (2004) Participatory plant breeding research: opportunities and challenges for the international crop improvement system. Euphytica 136:21–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Nangju D (1980) Soybean response to indigenous rhizobia as influenced by cultivar origin. Agron J 72:403–406Google Scholar
  89. Neyra CA, Dobereiner J (1977) Nitrogen fixation in grasses. Adv Agron 29:1–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Notz R, Maurhofer M, Schnider-Keel U, Duffy B, Haas D, Défago G (2001) Biotic factors affecting expression of the 2,4-diacetylphloroglucinol biosynthesis gene phlA in Pseudomonas fluorescens biocontrol strain CHA0 in the rhizosphere. Phytopathology 91:873–881PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Ochoa IE, Blair MW, Lynch JP (2006) QTL analysis of adventitious root formation in common bean under contrasting phosphorus availability. Crop Sci 46:1609–1621CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Oehl F, Sieverding E, Mäder P, Dubois D, Ineichen K, Boller T et al (2004) Impact of long-term conventional and organic farming on the diversity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Oecol 138:574–583CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Okubara PA (2006) Molecular responses of wheat to soilborne fungal pathogens. Kado Lab Science Colloquium, July 22, Davis, CA. Abstract no. 7, pp 17–19Google Scholar
  94. Ori N, Eshed Y, Paran I, Presting G, Aviv D, Tanksley S et al (1997) The I2C family from the wilt disease resistance locus I2 belongs to the nucleotide binding leucine-rich repeat superfamily of plant resistance genes. Plant Cell 9:521–532PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Panella L (1998) Screening and utilizing Beta genetic resources with resistance to Rhizoctonia root rot and Cercospora leaf spot in a sugar beet breeding programme. In: L Frese, L Panella, HM Srivastava, W Lange (eds.) 4th International Beta Genetic resources Workshop & World Beta Network Conference, Izmir, Turkey. IPGRI, RomeGoogle Scholar
  96. Paponov IA, Sambo P, Schulte auf’m Erley G, Presterl T, Geiger HH, Engels C (2005) Kernel set in maize genotypes differing in nitrogen use efficiency in response to resource availability around flowering. Plant Soil 272:101–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Particka CA, Hancock JF (2005) Field evaluation of strawberry genotypes for tolerance to black root rot on fumigated and nonfumigated soil. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 130:688–693Google Scholar
  98. Perchepied L, Dogimont C, Pitrat M (2005) Strain-specific and recessive QTLs involved in the control of partial resistance to Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. melonis race 1.2 in a recombinant inbred line population of melon. Theor Appl Genet 111:431–438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Picard C, Bosco M (2003) Soil antimony pollution and plant growth stage affect the biodiversity of auxin-producing bacteria isolated from the rhizosphere of Achillea ageratum L. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 46:73–80CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  100. Picard C, Bosco M (2005) Maize heterosis affects the structure and dynamics of indigenous rhizospheric auxins-producing Pseudomonas populations. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 53:349–357PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Picard C, Bosco M (2006) Heterozygosis drives maize hybrids to select elite 2,4-diacethylphloroglucinol-producing Pseudomonas strains among resident soil populations. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 58:193–204PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Picard C, Bosco M (2008) Genotypic and phenotypic diversity in populations of plant-probiotic Pseudomonas spp. colonizing roots. Naturwissenschaften 95:1–16PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Picard C, Di Cello F, Ventura M, Fani R, Guckert A (2000) Frequency and biodiversity of 2,4-diacetylphloroglucinol-producing bacteria isolated from the maize rhizosphere at different stages of plant growth. Appl Environ Microbiol 66:948–955PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Picard C, Frascaroli E, Bosco M (2004) Frequency and biodiversity of 2,4-diacetylphloroglucinol-producing rhizobacteria are differentially affected by the genotype of two maize inbred lines and their hybrid. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 49:207–215CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  105. Picard C, Carriero F, Petrozza A, Zamariola L, Baruffa E, Bosco M (2007) Selecting tomato (Solanum lycopersicon L.) lines for mycorrhizal competence: a pre-requisite for breeding the plants for the future. International Congress Rhizosphere 2. 26–31 August 2007, Montpellier, FranceGoogle Scholar
  106. Picard C, Baruffa E, Bosco M (2008) Enrichment and diversity of plant-probiotic microorganisms in the rhizosphere of hybrid maize during four growth cycles. Soil Biol Biochem 40:106–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Pieczarka DJ, Abawi GS (1978) Effects of interaction between Fusarium, Pythium, and Rhizoctonia on severity of bean root rot. Phytopathology 68:403–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Presterl T, Groh S, Landbeck M, Seitz G, Schmidt W, Geiger HH (2002) Nitrogen uptake and utilization efficiency of European maize hybrids developed under conditions of low and high nitrogen input. Plant Breed 121:480–486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Raaijmakers JM, Weller DM (2001) Exploiting genotypic diversity of 2,4-diacetylphloroglucinol-producing Pseudomonas spp.: characterization of superior root colonizing P. fluorescens strain Q8r1 M-96. Appl Environ Microbiol 63:881–887Google Scholar
  110. Raaijmakers JM, Bonsall RF, Weller DM (1999) Effect of population density of Pseudomonas fluorescens on production of 2,4-diacetylphloroglucinol in the rhizosphere of wheat. Phytopathology 89:470–475PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Rajam MV, Chandola N, Saiprasad, Goud P, Singh D, Kashyap V, Choudhary ML, Sihachakr D (2007) Thaumatin gene confers resistance to fungal pathogens as well as tolerance to abiotic stress in transgenic tobacco plants. Biol Plant 51:135–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Rao IM, Zeigler RS, Vera R, Sarkarung S (1993) Selection and breeding for acid-soil tolerance in crops. Bioscience 43:454–465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Rengel Z (2002) Breeding for better symbiosis. Plant Soil 245:147–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Rengel Z, Marschner P (2005) Nutrient availability and management in the rhizosphere: exploiting genotypic differences. New Phytol 168:305–312PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. Richardson AE, Hadobas PA, Hayes JE (2001) Extracellular secretion of Aspergillus phytase from Arabidopsis roots enables plants to obtain phosphorus from phytate. Plant J 25:641–649PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Roesh LFW, Olivares FL, Pereira Passaglia LM, Selbach PA, Saccol de Sa EL, Oliveira de Camargo FA (2006) Characterization of diazotrophic bacteria associated with maize: effect of plant genotype, ontogeny and nitrogen-supply. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 22:967–974CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Rolfe BG, Djordjevic MA, Weinman JJ, Mathesius U, Pittock C, Gartner E et al (1997) Root morphogenesis in legumes and cereals and the effect of bacterial inoculation on root development. Plant Soil 194:131–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Rubio G, Liao H, Yan X, Lynch JP (2003) Topsoil foraging and its role in plant competitiveness for phosphorus in common bean. Crop Sci 43:598–607Google Scholar
  119. Runge-Metzger A (1995) Closing the cycle: obstacles to efficient P management for improved global food security. In: Tiessen H (ed) Phosphorus in the global environment: transfers, cycles and management. John Wiley and Sons, New York, pp 27–42Google Scholar
  120. Sareena S, Poovannan K, Kumar KK, Raja JAJ, Samiyappan R, Sudhakar D et al (2006) Biochemical responses in transgenic rice plants expressing a defence gene deployed against the sheath blight pathogen, Rhizoctonia solani. Curr Sci 91:1529–1532Google Scholar
  121. Sarkarung S (1986) Screening upland rice for aluminum tolerance and blast resistance. In: Progress in Upland Rice Research. International Rice Research Institute, Manila, pp 271–281Google Scholar
  122. Sarniguet A, Lucas P, Lucas M (1992) Relationship between take-all, soil conduciveness to the disease, populations of fluorescent pseudomonads and nitrogen fertilizers. Plant Soil 145:17–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. Sasaki T, Yamamoto Y, Ezaki B, Katsuhara M, Ahn SJ, Ryan PR et al (2004) A wheat gene encoding an aluminum-activated malate transporter. Plant J 37:645–653PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. Segal G, Sarfatti M, Schaffer MA, Zamier D, Fluhr R (1992) Correlation of genetic and physical structure in the region surrounding the I-2 Fusarium oxysporum locus in tomato. Mol Gen Genet 231:179–185PubMedGoogle Scholar
  125. Sharma KD, Muehlbauer FJ (2007) Fusarium wilt of chickpea: physiological specialization, genetics of resistance and resistance gene tagging. Euphytica 157:1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. Shaw DV, Larson KD (1996) Relative performance of strawberry cultivars from California and other North American sources in fumigated and nonfumigated soils. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 121:764–767Google Scholar
  127. Shull GH (1908) The composition of a field of maize. Rep Am Breeders Assoc 4:296–301Google Scholar
  128. Shrestha RK, Ladha JK (1996) Genotypic variation in promotion of rice dinitrogen fixation as determined by nitrogen-15 dilution. Soil Sci Soc Am J 60:1815–1821Google Scholar
  129. Singh B, Natesan SKA, Singh RK, Usha K (2005) Improving zinc efficiency of cereals under zinc deficiency. Curr Sci 88:36–84Google Scholar
  130. Smith KP, Goodman RM (1999) Host variation for interactions with beneficial plant-associated microbes. Annu Rev Phytopathol 37:473–491PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  131. Smith KP, Handelsman J, Goodman RM (1997) Modeling dose–response relationships in biological control: partitioning host responses to the pathogen and biocontrol agent. Phytopathology 87:720–729PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  132. Smith KP, Handelsman J, Goodman RM (1999) Genetic basis in plants for interactions with disease-suppressive bacteria. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 96:4786–4790PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  133. Subbarao G, Rondon M, Ito O, Ishikawa T, Rao I, Nakahara K et al (2007) Biological nitrification inhibition (BNI) is it a widespread phenomenon. Plant Soil 294:5–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  134. Suzuki M, Morikawa KC, Nakanishi H, Takahashi M, Saigusa M, Mori S et al (2008) Transgenic rice lines that include barley genes have increased tolerance to low iron availability in a calcareous paddy soil. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 54:77–85Google Scholar
  135. Takahashi M, Nakanishi H, Kawasaki S, Nishizawa NK, Mori S (2001) Enhanced tolerance of rice to low iron availability in alkaline soils using barley nicotianamine aminotransferase genes. Nat Biotechnol 19:466–469PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  136. Tanksley SD, McCouch R (1997) Seed banks and molecular maps: unlocking genetic potential from the wild. Science 277:1063–1066PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  137. Tawaraya K (2003) Arbuscular mycorrhizal dependency of different plant species and cultivars. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 9:655–668Google Scholar
  138. Tilman D, Cassman KG, Matson PA, Naylor R, Polasky S (2002) Agricultural sustainability and intensive production practices. Nature 418:671–677PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  139. Tirol-Padre A, Ladha JK, Singh U, Laureles E, Punzalan G, Akita S (1996) Grain yield performance of rice genotypes at suboptimal levels of soil N as affected by N uptake and utilization efficiency. Field Crops Res 46:127–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  140. Urwin PE, Lilley CJ, Atkinson H (2002) Ingestion of double-stranded RNA by preparasitic juvenile cyst nematodes leads to RNA interference. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 15:747–752PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  141. Vance CP, Uhde-Stone C, Allan DL (2003) Phosphorus acquisition and use: critical adaptations by plants for securing a nonrenewable resource. New Phytol 157:423–447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  142. Virk DS, Singh DN, Prasad SC, Gangwar JS, Witcombe JR (2003) Collaborative and consultative participatory plant breeding of rice for the rainfed uplands of eastern India. Euphytica 132:95–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  143. von Uexküll HR, Mutert E (1995) Global extent, development and economic impact of acid soils. Plant Soil 171:1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  144. Wang Y, Xue Y, Li J (2005) Towards molecular breeding and improvement of rice in China. Trends Plant Sci 10:610–614PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  145. Wang J, Raman H, Zhou M, Ryan P, Delhaize E, Hebb D et al (2007) High-resolution mapping of the Alp locus and identification of a candidate gene HvMATE controlling aluminium tolerance in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Theor Appl Genet 115:265–276PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  146. Wissuwa M (2003) How do plants achieve tolerance to phosphorus deficiency? Small causes with big effects. Plant Physiol 133:1947–1958PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  147. Wissuwa M (2005) Mapping nutritional traits in crop plants. In: Broadley MR, White PJ (eds) Plant nutritional genomics. Blackwell, Oxford, UK, pp 220–241Google Scholar
  148. Wissuwa M, Ae N (2001) Genotypic variation for tolerance to phosphorus deficiency in rice and the potential for its exploitation in rice improvement. Plant Breed 120:43–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  149. Wissuwa M, Wegner J, Ae N, Yano M (2002) Substitution mapping of Pup1: a major QTL increasing phosphorus uptake of rice from a phosphorus-deficient soil. Theor Appl Genet 105:890–897PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  150. Wu P, Zhang G, Ladha JK, McCouch SR, Huang N (1995) Molecular-marker facilitated investigation on the ability to stimulated N2 fixation in the rhizosphere by irrigated rice plants. Theor Appl Genet 91:1177–1183Google Scholar
  151. Xavier LJC, Germida JJ (1998) Response of spring wheat cultivars to Glomus clarum NT4 in a P-deficient soil containing arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Can J Soil Sci 78:481–484Google Scholar
  152. Yan X, Liao H, Beebe SE, Blair MW, Lynch JP (2004) QTL mapping of root hair and acid exudation traits and their relationship to phosphorus uptake in common bean. Plant Soil 265:17–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  153. Yan X, Wu P, Ling H, Xu G, Xu F, Zhang Q (2006) Plant nutriomics in China: an Overview. Ann Bot (Lond) 98:473–482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  154. Yano M, Katayose Y, Ashikari M, Yamanouchi U, Monna L, Fuse T et al (2000) Hd1, a major photoperiod sensitivity quantitative trait locus in rice, is closely related to the Arabidopsis flowering time gene CONSTANS. Plant Cell 12:2473–2483PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  155. Yi K, Wu Z, Zhou J, Du L, Guo L, Wu Y et al (2005) OsPTF1, a novel transcription factor involved in tolerance to phosphate starvation in rice. Plant Physiol 138:2087–2096PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  156. You MP, Barbetti MJ, Nichols PGH (2005) New sources of resistance identified in Trifolium subterraneum breeding lines and cultivars to root rot caused by Fusarium avenaceaum and Pythium irregulare and their relationship to seedling survival. Australas Plant Pathol 34:237–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  157. Zhai W, Wang W, Zhou Y, Li X, Zhang Q, Wang G et al (2002) Breeding bacterial blight-resistant hybrid rice with the cloned bacterial blight resistance gene Xa21. Mol Breed 8:285–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  158. Zhu YG, Smith SE, Barritt AR, Smith FA (2001) Phosphorus (P) efficiencies and mycorrhizal responsiveness of old and modern wheat cultivars. Plant Soil 237:249–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Matthias Wissuwa
    • 1
    Email author
  • Mark Mazzola
    • 2
  • Christine Picard
    • 3
  1. 1.Crop Production and Environment DivisionJapan International Research Center for Agricultural Sciences (JIRCAS)TsukubaJapan
  2. 2.USDA-ARS Tree Fruit Research LaboratoryWenatcheeUSA
  3. 3.Dipartimento di Scienze e Tecnologie Agroambientali, Area di Microbiologia, Alma Mater StudiorumUniversità di BolognaBolognaItaly

Personalised recommendations