Skip to main content
Log in

Root penetration through a high bulk density soil layer: differential response of a crop and weed species

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
Plant and Soil Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Weed control remains one of the greatest problems in agro-ecological systems. An important factor controlling crop and weed competition for below ground resources is the presence of compacted soil layers or ‘hard pans’. In a series of experiments, we investigated the ability of roots of soybean (Glycine max L.) and the weeds sicklepod (Senna obtusifolia L.) and Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri S. Wats) to penetrate through a compacted soil layer and acquire N from lower in the soil profile. Soil columns were constructed to simulate a compacted soil layer with different bulk densities ~8 cm beneath the soil surface. Results indicated that roots of the two weed species penetrated high bulk density soil layers more effectively than those of four soybean lines. Root penetration was not related with growth rates among the species or soybean genotypes. Overall root and shoot growth of the weeds was sustained when downward root growth was inhibited, while both declined with soybean, even under high fertility conditions. The weeds also acquired relatively high amounts of \(^{15} {\text{N}} - {\text{NO}}_{\text{3}}^ - \) from buried patches beneath the high bulk density layers compared to soybean. The results indicate that the weed species would have a competitive advantage when plow pans are present, and an attempt is made to relate this advantage with competitive dynamics observed in the field.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bengough AG, Mullins CE (1990) Mechanical impedance to root growth: a review of experimental techniques and root growth responses. J Soil Sci 41:341–358

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennie ATP (1996) Growth and mechanical impedance. In: Waisel Y, Eshel A, Kafkafi U (eds) Plant roots: the hidden half. Dekker Publishers, New York, pp 453–470

    Google Scholar 

  • Bensch CN, Horak MJ, Peterson D (2003) Interference of redroot pigweed, Palmer amaranth, and common waterhemp in soybean. Weed Sci 51:37–43

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Buol SW, Southard RJ, Graham RC, McDaniel PA (2003) Soil genesis and classification, 5th edn. Iowa State University Press, Ames, pp 1–494

  • Bushamuka VN, Zobel RW (1998) Differential genotypic and root type penetration of compacted soil layers. Crop Sci 38:776–781

    Google Scholar 

  • Busscher WJ, Lipiec J, Bauer PJ, Carter TE Jr (2000) Improved root penetration of soil hard layers by a selected genotype. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 31:3089–3101

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell RB, Reicosky DC, Doty CW (1974) Physical properties and tillage of Paleudults in the southeastern coastal plains. J Soil Water Conserv 29:220–224

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell BD, Grime JP, Mackey JML (1991) A trade-off between scale and precision in resource foraging. Oecologia 87:532–538

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carmi A, Heuer B (1981) The role of roots in control of bean shoot growth. Ann Bot 48:519–527

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carter TE Jr, Rufty TW (1993) Soybean plant introductions exhibiting drought and aluminum tolerance. In: Adaptation of food crops to temperature and water stress: proceedings of an international symposium, Taiwan. Asian Vegetable Research and Development Center, Shanhua, Taiwan, pp 335–346

  • Champoux MC, Wang G, Sarkarung S, Mackill DJ, O’Toole JC, Huang N, McCouch SR (1995) Locating genes associated with root morphology and drought avoidance in rice via linkage to molecular markers. Theor Appl Genet 90:969–981

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cook A, Marriott CA, Seel W, Mullins CE (1996) Effects of soil mechanical impedance on root and shoot growth of Lolium perenne L., Agrostis capillaries and Trifolium repens L. J Exp Bot 47:1075–1084

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Crick JC, Grime JP (1987) Morphological plasticity and mineral nutrient capture in two herbaceous species of contrasted ecology. New Phytol 107:403–414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Culpepper AS, Grey TL, Vencill WK, Kichler JM, Webster TM, Brown SM, York AC, Davis JW, Hanna WW (2006) Glyphosate-resistant Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) confirmed in Georgia. Weed Sci 54:620–626

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Drew MC, Saker LR (1975) Nutrient supply and growth of the seminal root system in barley. II. Localized, compensatory increases in lateral root growth and rates of nitrate uptake when nitrate supply is restricted to only part of the root system. J Exp Bot 26:79–90

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dunbabin V (2007) Simulating the role of rooting traits in crop–weed competition. Field Crops Res 104:44–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman LJ (1984) Regulation of root development. Annu Rev Plant Physiol 35:223–242

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fitter AH (1994) Architecture and biomass allocation as components of the plastic response of root systems to soil heterogeneity. In: Caldwell MM, Pearcy RW (eds) Exploitation of environmental heterogeneity by plants. Academic, San Diego, pp 305–323

    Google Scholar 

  • Foy CD (1984) Physiological effects of hydrogen, aluminum, and manganese toxicities in acid soil. In: Adams F (ed) Soil acidity and liming. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, pp 57–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman M, Henika PR (1991) Mutagenicity of toxic weed seeds in the Ames test: jimsonweed (Datura stramonium), velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti), morning glory (Ipomoea spp.) and sicklepod (Cassia obtusifolia). J Agric Food Chem 39:494–501

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gent JA, Ballard R, Hassan AE, Cassel DK (1984) Impact of harvesting and site preparation on physical properties of Piedmont forest soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 48:173–177

    Google Scholar 

  • Granato TC, Raper CD (1989) Proliferation of maize roots in response to localized supply of nitrate. J Exp Bot 40:263–275

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Grime JP (1994) The role of plasticity in exploiting environmental heterogeneity. In: Caldwell MM, Pearcy RW (eds) Exploitation of environmental heterogeneity by plants. Academic, San Diego, pp 1–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Grime JP, Crick JC, Rincon JE (1986) The ecological significance of plasticity. In: Jennings DH, Trewavas AJ (eds) Plasticity in plants. Biologists Limited, Cambridge, pp 4–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Harry-O’Kuru RE, Wu YV, Evangelista R, Vaughn SF, Rayford W, Wilson RF (2005) Sicklepod (Senna obtusifolia) seed processing and potential utilization. J Agric Food Chem 53:4784–4787

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson RB, Caldwell MM (1989) The timing and degree of root proliferation in fertile-soil microsites for three cold-desert perennials. Oecologia 81:149–153

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson LE, Koch GW (1997) The ecophysiology of crops and their wild relatives. In: Jackson LE (ed) Ecology in agriculture. Academic, San Diego, pp 3–37

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson RB, Manwaring JH, Caldwell MM (1990) Rapid physiological adjustment of roots to localized soil enrichment. Nature 344:58–60

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson WC, Jackson LE, Ochoa O, van Wijk R, Peleman J, St Clair DA, Michelmore RW (2000) Lettuce, a shallow-rooted crop, and Lactuca serriola, its wild progenitor, differ at QTL determining root architecture and deep soil water exploitation. Theor Appl Genet 101:1066–1073

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jones RE Jr, Walker RH, Wehtje G (1997) Soybean (Glycine max), common cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium), and sicklepod (Senna obtusifolia) sap flow in interspecific competition. Weed Sci 45:409–413

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kasperbauer MJ, Busscher WJ (1991) Genotypic differences in cotton root penetration of a compacted subsoil layer. Crop Sci 31:1376–1378

    Google Scholar 

  • Keeley PE, Carter CH, Thullen RJ (1987) Influence of plant date on growth of Palmer amaranth. Weed Sci 35:199–204

    Google Scholar 

  • Kembel SW, Cahill JF (2005) Plant phenotypic plasticity belowground: a phylogenetic perspective on root foraging trade-offs. Am Nat 166:216–230

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Klingaman TE, Oliver LR (1994) Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) interference in soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci 42:523–527

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kubo K, Jitsuyama K, Iwama K, Hasegawa T, Watanabe N (2004) Genotypic difference in root penetration ability by durum wheat (Triticum turgidum L. var. durum) evaluated by a pot with paraffin-Vaseline discs. Plant Soil 262:169–177

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lazof DB, Rufty TW, Redinbaugh MG (1992) Localization of nitrate absorption and translocation within morphological regions of the corn root. Plant Physiol 100:1251–1258

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Masle J (1992) Genetic variation in the effects of root impedance on growth and transpiration rates of wheat and barley. Aust J Plant Physiol 19:109–125

    Google Scholar 

  • Masle J, Passioura JB (1987) The effect of soil strength on the growth of young wheat plants. Aust J Plant Physiol 14:643–656

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masle J, Farquhar GD, Gifford RM (1990) Growth and carbon economy of wheat seedlings as affected by soil resistance to penetration and ambient partial pressure of CO2. Aust J Plant Physiol 17:465–487

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Materechera SA, Dexter AR, Alston AM (1991) Penetration of very strong soils by seedling roots of different plant species. Plant Soil 135:31–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Materechera SA, Alston AM, Kirby JM, Dexter AR (1992) Influence of root diameter on the penetration of seminal roots into a compacted subsoil. Plant Soil 144:297–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • May OL, Kasperbauer MJ (1999) Genotypic variation for root penetration of a soil pan. J Sustain Agric 13:87–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monks DW, Oliver LR (1988) Interactions between soybean (Glycine max) cultivars and selected weeds. Weed Sci 36:770–774

    Google Scholar 

  • Moyer-Henry KA, Burton JM, Israel DW, Rufty TW (2006) Nitrogen transfer between plants: a 15N natural abundance study with crop and weed species. Plant Soil 282:7–20

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Naderman GC (1990) Subsurface compaction and subsoiling in North Carolina, an Overview. North Carolina Agricultural Extension Service, Publication AG-353

  • National Agricultural Statistics Service [NASS] (2006) Released May, 2007. Accessed on March 2, 2008 at (http://usda.mannlib.cornell.edu)

  • Nice GRW, Buehring NW, Shaw DR (2001) Sicklepod (Senna obtusifolia) response to shading, soybean (Glycine max) row spacing, and population in three management systems. Weed Technol 15:155–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norsworthy JK (2004) Soybean canopy formation effects on pitted morningglory (Ipomoea lacunosa), common cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium), and sicklepod (Senna obtusifolia) emergence. Weed Sci 52:954–960

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Passioura JB (1991) Soil structure and plant growth. Aust J Soil Res 29:717–728

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearson RW (1974) Significance of rooting pattern to crop production and some problems of root research. In: Carson EW (ed) The plant root and its environment. The University Press of Virginia, Charlottesville, pp 247–270

    Google Scholar 

  • Price AH, Steele KA, Moore BJ, Barraclough PB, Clark LJ (2000) A combined RFLP and AFLP linkage map of upland rice (Oryza sativa L.) used to identify QTLs for root-penetration ability. Theor Appl Genet 100:49–56

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Radosevich S, Holt J, Ghersa C (1997) Physiological aspects of competition (Chapter 6). In: Weed ecology, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York, pp 217–299

  • Ray JD, Yu L, McCouch SR, Champoux MG, Wang G, Nguyen HT (1996) Mapping quantitative trait loci associated with root penetration ability in rice. Theor Appl Genet 92:627–636

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts JA, Hussain A, Taylor IB, Colin R, Black CR (2002) Use of mutants to study long-distance signalling in response to compacted soil. J Exp Bot 53:45–50

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson D (1994) The responses of plants to non-uniform supplies of nutrients. New Phytol 127:635–674

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Russell RS (1977) Plant root systems: their function and interaction with the soil. McGraw-Hill, England, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell RS, Goss MJ (1974) Physical aspects of soil fertility – the response of roots to mechanical impedance. Neth J Agric Sci 22:305–318

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlichting CD (1986) The evolution of phenotypic plasticity in plants. Ann Rev Ecolog Syst 17:667–693

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sellers BA, Smeda RJ, Johnson WG, Kendig JA, Ellersieck MR (2003) Comparative growth of six Amaranth species in Missouri. Weed Sci 51:329–333

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor HM (1974) Root behavior as affected by soil structure and strength. In: Carson EW (ed) The plant root and its environment. The University Press of Virginia, Charlottesville, pp 271–290

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas JF, Downs RJ, Saravitz CH (2006) Phytotron Procedural Manual. North Carolina State University. Technical Bulletin 244

  • Unger PW, Kaspar TC (1994) Soil compaction and root growth: a review. Agron J 86:759–766

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Uexkull H, Mutert E (1995) Global extent, development and economic impact of acid soils. Plant Soil 171:1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webster TM (2005) Weed survey – southern states: broadleaf crops subsection. Proc South Weed Sci Soc 58:291–304

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster TM, MacDonald GE (2001) A survey of weeds in various crops in Georgia. Weed Technol 15:771–790

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilcox JR (2004) World distribution and trade of soybean. In: Boerma HR, Specht JE (eds) Soybeans: improvement, production, and uses. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, Wisconsin, pp 1–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright SR, Jennette MW, Coble HD, Rufty TW (1999) Root morphology of young Glycine max, Senna obtusifolia, and Amaranthus palmeri. Weed Sci 47:706–711

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zimdahl RL (1999) Fundamentals of weed science. Academic, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas Rufty.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Len Wade.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Place, G., Bowman, D., Burton, M. et al. Root penetration through a high bulk density soil layer: differential response of a crop and weed species. Plant Soil 307, 179–190 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-008-9594-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-008-9594-4

Keywords

Navigation