Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Farmer-oriented assessment of soil quality using field, laboratory, and VNIR spectroscopy methods

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
Plant and Soil Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Soil quality and health are terms describing similar concepts, but the latter appeals to farmers and crop consultants as part of a holistic approach to soil management. We regard soil health as the integration and optimization of the physical, biological and chemical aspects of soils for improved productivity in an economic and sustainable manner. This paper describes the process used for the selection of soil quality/health indicators that comprise the new Cornell Soil Health Test. Over 1,500 samples collected from controlled research experiments and commercial farms were initially analyzed for 39 potential soil quality indicators. Four physical and four biological indicators were selected based on sensitivity to management, relevance to functional soil processes, ease and cost of sampling, and cost of analysis. Seven chemical indicators were also selected as they are part of the standard soil nutrient test. Soil health test reports were developed to allow for an overall assessment, as well as the identification of specific soil constraints. The new soil health test is being offered on a for-fee basis starting in 2007. In addition, visible near infrared reflectance spectroscopy was evaluated as a possible tool for low-cost soil health assessment. From preliminary analyses, the methodology shows promise for some but not all of the soil quality indicators. In conclusion, an inexpensive soil health test was developed for integrative assessment of the physical, biological, and chemical aspects of soils, thereby facilitating better soil management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abawi GS, Widmer TL (2000) Impact of soil health management practices on soilborne pathogens, nematodes and root diseases of vegetable crops. Appl Soil Ecol 15:37–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abawi GS, Ludwig JW, Petzoldt CH (2004) Assessing root health by a soil bioassay with beans as an indicator of soil health. Phytopathology 94:S1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amezketa E (1999) Soil aggregate stability: a review. J Sustain Agric 14:83–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrews SS, Carroll CR (2001) Designing a soil quality assessment tool for sustainable agroecosystem management. Ecol Appl 1:1573–1585

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrews SS, Karlen DL, Cambardella CA (2004) The soil management assessment framework: a quantitative soil quality evaluation method. Soil Sci Soc Am J 68:1945–1962

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Dor E, Banin A (1995) Near infrared analysis as a rapid method to simultaneously evaluate several soil properties. Soil Sci Soc Am J 59:364–372

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brady NC, Weil RR (2002) The nature and properties of soils, 13th edn. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Brejda JJ, Moorman TB, Karlen DL, Dao TH (2000) Identification of regional soil quality factors and indicators: I. Central and southern high plains. Soil Sci Soc Am J 64:2115–2124

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brown DJ, Shepherd KD, Walsh MG, Mays MD, Reinsch TG (2005) Global soil characterization with VNIR diffuse reflectance spectroscopy. Geoderma 132(2–3):273–290

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter MR (2002) Soil quality for sustainable land management: organic matter and aggregation interactions that maintain soil functions. Agron J 94:38–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang CW, Laird DA, Mausbach MJ, Maurice J, Hurburgh JR (2001) Near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy—principal components regression analyses of soil properties. Soil Sci Soc Am J 65:480–490

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Czyz EA (2004) Effects of traffic on soil aeration, bulk density and growth of spring barley. Soil Till Res 79:153–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dalal RC, Henry RJ (1986) Simultaneous determination of moisture, organic carbon, and total nitrogen by near infrared reflectance spectrophotometry. Soil Sci Soc Am J 50:120–123

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dexter AR (2004) Soil physical quality—preface. Soil Till Res 79:129–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doran JW, Parkin TB (1994) Defining and assessing soil quality. In: Doran JW, Coleman DC, Bezdicek DF, Stewart BA (eds) Defining soil quality for a sustainable environment. SSSA Special Publication 35, Madison, WI, pp 3–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Francis GS, Kemp RA (1990) Morphological and hydraulic-properties of a silt loam soil in New-Zealand as affected by cropping history. Soil Use Manage 6:145–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gugino BK, Idowu OJ, Schindelbeck RR, van Es HM, Wolfe DW, Thies JE, Abawi GS (2007) Cornell soil health assessment training manual edition 1.2. Cornell University, Geneva, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Idowu OJ, van Es H, Schindelbeck R, Abawi G, Wolfe D, Thies J, Gugino B, Moebius B, Clune D (2007) The new Cornell Soil Health Test: Protocols and interpretation. What’s Cropping Up? 17(1):6–7 (http://www.css.cornell.edu/extension/WCU/Vol17No12007Jan-Feb.pdf)

  • Karlen DL, Stott DE (1994) A framework for evaluating physical and chemical indicators of soil quality. In: Doran JW, Coleman DC, Bezdicek DF, Stewart BA (eds) Defining soil quality for a sustainable environment. SSSA Special Publication 35, Madison, WI, pp 3–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Karlen DL, Mausbach MJ, Doran JW, Cline RG, Harris RF, Schuman GE (1997) Soil quality: a concept, definition, and framework for evaluation. Soil Sci Soc Am J 61:4–10

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kemper WD, Rosenau RC (1986) Aggregate stability and size distribution. In: Klute A (ed) Methods of soil analysis, Part I—Physical and mineralogical methods, 2nd edn. ASA, Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, pp 425–442

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson WE, Pierce FJ (1991) Conservation and enhancement of soil quality. Evaluation for sustainable land management in the developing world. Conference, IBSRAM Proc., 12th, vol. 2. Int. Board for Soil Res. and Manage, Jatujak Thailand, Bangkok, Thailand, pp 175–203

  • Lindsey AA (1955) Testing and line-strip method against full tallies in diverse forest types. Ecology 36:485–495

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luxmoore RJ (1981) Micro-, meso-, and macroporosity of soil. Soil Sci Soc Am J 45:671

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magdoff F, van Es H (2000) Building soils for better crops. Sustainable Agriculture Network, Burlington, Vermont

    Google Scholar 

  • Mausbach MJ, Seybold CA (1998) Assessment of soil quality. In: Lal R (ed) Soil quality and agricultural sustainability. Ann Arbor Press, Chelsea, Michigan, pp 33–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Moebius BN (2006) Evaluation of laboratory-measured soil physical properties as indicators of soil health. M.S. thesis, Cornell University, Ithaca New York

  • Ogden CB, van Es HM, Schindelbeck RR (1997) Miniature rain simulator for field measurement of soil infiltration. Soil Sci Soc Am J 61:1041–1043

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Savitzky A, Golay MJE (1964) Smoothing and differentiation of data by simplified least squares procedures. Anal Chem 36:1627–1639

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Soil Survey Division Staff (1993) Soil survey manual. Soil Conservation Service. US Department of Agriculture Handbook 18

  • Sojka RE, Upchurch DR (1999) Reservations regarding the soil quality concept. Soil Science Soil Sci Soc Am J 63:1039–1054

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Topp GC, Reynolds WD, Cook FJ, Kirby JM, Carter MR (1997) Physical attributes of soil quality. In: Gregorich EG, Carter MR (eds) Soil quality for crop production and ecosystem health, vol 25. Elsevier, New York, pp 21–58

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • van Es HM, Schindelbeck RR, Melkonian A, Moebius BN, Idowu OJ (2006) Assessment of soil aggregate stability using small rainfall simulators. Department of Crop and Soil Sciences Research Series 06-01. Cornell University, Ithaca, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Weil RR, Islam KR, Stine MA, Gruver JB, Samson- Liebig SE (2003) Estimating active carbon for soil quality assessment: a simplified method for lab and field use. Am J Altern Agric 18:3–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler SJ, Pickering GJ (2003) Optimizing grape quality through soil management practices. Food Agric Environ 1:190–197

    Google Scholar 

  • White RE (2003) Soils for fine wines. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Wienhold BJ, Andrews SS, Karlen DL (2004) Soil quality: a review of the science and experiences in the USA. Environ Geochem Health 26:89–95

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge support from the USDA Northeast Sustainable Agriculture Research and Education Program (USDA 2003-3860-12985), the Northern New York Agricultural Development Program, USDA-Hatch funds, and the Computational Agriculture Initiative at Cornell University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Cornell University, 1005 Bradfield Hall, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA

    Omololu J. Idowu, Harold M. van Es, George S. Abawi, David W. Wolfe, Judith I. Ball, Beth K. Gugino, Bianca N. Moebius, Robert R. Schindelbeck & Ali V. Bilgili

Authors
  1. Omololu J. Idowu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Harold M. van Es
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. George S. Abawi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. David W. Wolfe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Judith I. Ball
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Beth K. Gugino
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Bianca N. Moebius
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Robert R. Schindelbeck
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Ali V. Bilgili
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Harold M. van Es.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Peter M. Neumann.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Idowu, O.J., van Es, H.M., Abawi, G.S. et al. Farmer-oriented assessment of soil quality using field, laboratory, and VNIR spectroscopy methods. Plant Soil 307, 243–253 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-007-9521-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-007-9521-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation