Plant and Soil

, Volume 303, Issue 1–2, pp 1–34 | Cite as

Assessing and analyzing 3D architecture of woody root systems, a review of methods and applications in tree and soil stability, resource acquisition and allocation

Marschner Review

Abstract

In numerous studies dealing with roots of woody plants, a description of the root system architecture is needed. During the twentieth century, several manual measurement methods were used, depending on the objectives of study. Due to the difficulties in accessing the roots and the duration of measurements, the studies generally involved a low number of root systems, were often qualitative and focused only on one specific application. Quantitative methods in plant architecture were largely developed in the last 40 years for aerial architecture. However, root systems have particular features and often need specific procedures. Since the end of the 1990s, new devices and techniques have been available for coarse root architecture measurements including volume location techniques (non-invasive or destructive) and manual or semi-automatic 3D digitising. Full 3D root system architecture dynamics was also reconstructed from partial measurements using modelling procedures. On the one hand, non-invasive and automatic techniques need more development to obtain full 3D architecture, i.e. geometry and topology. On the other hand, both one inexpensive manual and one semi-automatic digitizing procedure are now available to measure precisely and rapidly the full 3D architecture of uprooted and excavated coarse root systems. Specific software and a large number of functions are also available for an in-depth analysis of root architecture and have already been used in a dozen of research papers including a fairly large sample of mature trees. A comprehensive analysis of root architecture can be achieved by classifying individual roots in several root types through architectural analysis. The objective of this paper is both to give a detailed overview of the state of the art techniques for 3D root system architecture measurement and analysis and to give examples of applications in this field. Practical details are also given so that this paper can be used as a sort of manual for people who want to improve their practice or to enter this quite new research field.

Keywords

Architectural analysis Tree root system architecture Topology Measurement method Plasticity Three-dimensional digitizer Tree stability 

References

  1. Achim A, Nicoll B, Mochan S, Gardiner B (2003) Wind stability of trees on slopes. In: Ruck B, Kottmeier C, Mattheck C, Quine C and Wilhelm G (eds) Proc. Int. Conf. ‘Wind Effects on Trees’ September 16–18, 2003, Universität Karlsruhe, Germany., pp 231–237Google Scholar
  2. Adam B (1999) POL95 – software to drive a Polhemus Fastrak 3 SPACE 3D digitiser Version 1.0. UMR PIAF INRA-UBP, Clermont-FerrandGoogle Scholar
  3. Adam B, Sinoquet H, Godin C, Donès N (1999) 3A – software for the acquisition of plant architecture. Version 2.0. UMR PIAF INRA-UBP, Clermont-Ferrand., 20 ppGoogle Scholar
  4. al Hagrey SA (2007) Geophysical imaging of root-zone, trunk, and moisture heterogeneity. J Exp Bot 58:839–854Google Scholar
  5. Atger C, Edelin C (1994) Premières données sur l’architecture comparée des systèmes racinaires et caulinaires. Can J Bot 72:963–975Google Scholar
  6. Atger C, Edelin C (1995) A case of sympodial branching based on endogenous determinism in root system: Platanus hybrida. Brot Acta Bot Gallica 142:23–30Google Scholar
  7. Balandier P, Lacointe A, le Roux X, Sinoquet H, Cruiziat P, le Dizes S (2000) SIMWAL: a structural-functional model simulating single walnut tree growth in response to climate and pruning. Ann For Sci 57:571–585Google Scholar
  8. Barthélémy D, Caraglio Y (2007) Plant architecture: a dynamic, multilevel and comprehensive approach to plant form, structure and ontogeny. Ann Bot 99:375–407PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Barton CVM, Montagu KD (2004) Detection of tree roots and determination of root diameters by ground penetrating radar under optimal conditions. Tree Physiol 24:1323–1331PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Berntson GM (1994) Root systems and fractals – how reliable are calculations of fractal dimensions. Ann Bot 73:281–284Google Scholar
  11. Berntson GM, Stoll P (1997) Correcting for finite spatial scales of self-similarity when calculating the Fractal Dimensions of real-world structures. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 264:1531–1537Google Scholar
  12. Bert D, Danjon F (2006) Carbon concentration variations in the roots, stem and crown of mature Pinus pinaster (Ait.). For Ecol Manag 222:279–295Google Scholar
  13. Berthier S (2001) Effets des sollicitations aérodynamiques sur la croissance et le développement du pin maritime (Pinus pinaster Aït.): influence sur la morphogénèse aérienne et racinaire, et sur la formation du bois de coeur. PhD Thesis No. 2443, Université Bordeaux I, France, 142 ppGoogle Scholar
  14. Blaise F, Fourcaud T, Stokes A, de Reffye P (2000) A model simulating interactions between plant shoot an root architecture in a non-homogeneous environment. In: Stokes A (ed) Proc. Int. Conf. “The Supporting Roots of Trees and Woody Plants: Form, Function and Physiology”, Bordeaux, 20–24 July, 1998, Series: ‘Developments in plant and soil sciences’, vol 87. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 61–76Google Scholar
  15. Böhm W (1979) In: Billing WD, Golley F, Lange OL, Olson JS (eds) Methods of studying root systems ecological studies n° 33. Springer, Berlin, Germany 188 ppGoogle Scholar
  16. Brown TN, Kulasiri D (1994) Simulation of Pinus radiata root system structure for ecosystem management applications. Simulation 62:42–57Google Scholar
  17. Brown DP, Pratum TK, Bledsoe C, Ford ED, Cothern SC, Perry D (1991) Noninvasive studies of conifer roots: nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) imaging of douglas-fir seedlings. Can J For Res 21:1559–1566Google Scholar
  18. Brown TN, Kulasiri D, Gaunt RE (1997) A root-morphology based simulation for plant/soil microbial ecosystem modelling. Ecol Model 99:275–287Google Scholar
  19. Brunner I, Godbold DL (2007) Tree roots in a changing world. J For Res 12:78–82Google Scholar
  20. Butnor JR, Doolittle JA, Kress L, Cohen S, Johnsen KH (2001) Use of ground-penetrating radar to study tree roots in the southeastern United States. Tree Physiol 21:1269–1278PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Butnor JR, Doolittle JA, Johnsen KH, Samuelson L, Stokes T, Kress L (2003) Utility of ground-penetrating radar as a root biomass survey tool in forest systems. Soil Sci Soc Am J 67:1607–1615CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Chopard J (2004) 3D modelling of water transfers in soil and roots systems. In: Godin C, Hanan J, Kurth W, Lacointe A, Takenaka A, Prusinkiewicz P, de Jong T, Beveridge C, Andrieu B (eds) Proc. 4th Int. Workshop on Functional-Structural Plant Models, 7–11 June 2004 Montpellier. pp 154–158. UMR AMAP, Montpellier, FranceGoogle Scholar
  23. Clausnitzer V, Hopmans JW (1994) Simultaneous modeling of transient three-dimensional root growth and soil water flow. Plant Soil 164:299–314Google Scholar
  24. Colas H (1997) Association de cultures cocotier-cacaoyer Modélisation de leur système racinaire. Etudes préliminaires sur l’interaction racinaire et la consommation en eau de deux plantes. Thèse de doctorat – Université Montpellier II. 277pGoogle Scholar
  25. Colin F, Danjon F, Wehrlen L (1995) Etudes racinaires au sein du programme “Croissance” de l’INRA (Quercus petraea et Pinus pinaster). Rev For Fr 46:165–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Collet C, Löf M, Pagès L (2006) Root system development of oak seedlings analysed using an architectural model. Effects of competition with grass. Plant Soil 279:367–383Google Scholar
  27. Commins PJ, McBratney AB, Koppi AJ (1991) Development of a technique for the measurement of root geometry in the soil using resin-impregnated blocks and image-analysis. J Soil Sci 42:237–250Google Scholar
  28. Coners H, Leuschner C (2002) In situ water absorption by tree fine roots measured in real time using miniature sap-flow gauges. Funct Ecol 16:696–703Google Scholar
  29. Coutts MP (1983) Root architecture and tree stability. Plant Soil 71:171–188Google Scholar
  30. Coutts MP (1987) Developmental processes in tree root systems. Can J For Res 17:761–767Google Scholar
  31. Coutts MP, Lewis GJ (1983) When is structural root system determined in Sitka spruce? Plant Soil 71:155–160Google Scholar
  32. Coutts MP, Nielsen CN, Nicoll BC (1999) The development of symmetry, rigidity and anchorage in the structural root system of conifers. Plant Soil 217:1–15Google Scholar
  33. Danjon F, Bert D, Godin C, Trichet P (1999a) Structural root architecture of 5-year-old Pinus pinaster measured by 3D digitising and analysed with AMAPmod. Plant Soil 217:49–63Google Scholar
  34. Danjon F, Sinoquet H, Godin C, Colin F, Drexhage M (1999b) Characterisation of structural tree root architecture using 3D digitising and AMAPmod software. Plant Soil 211:241–258Google Scholar
  35. Danjon F, Berthier S, Gouskou K (2004) Root system topological and fractal branching analysis in P. Pinaster. In: Godin C, Hanan J, Kurth W, Lacointe A, Takenaka A, Prusinkiewicz P, de Jong T, Beveridge C, Andrieu B (eds) Proc. 4th Int. Workshop on Functional-Structural Plant Models, 7–11 June 2004 Montpellier. UMR AMAP, Montpellier, France, pp 75–78Google Scholar
  36. Danjon F, Fourcaud T, Bert D (2005) Root architecture and wind-firmness of mature Pinus pinaster. New Phytol 168:387–400PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Danjon F, Pagès L, Descorps MC (2006a) Root diameter as predictor of borne root volume Estimating the missing root characteristics in Pinus pinaster (Ait) root systems. Proc. COST E38 meeting, Sede Boqer, Israël, 4–8 February 2006Google Scholar
  38. Danjon F, Bert D, Galionis D (2006b) Carbon storage in Pinus Pinaster coarse roots: assessing infra-density distribution in mature root system. Proc. COST E38 meeting, Rovaniemi, Finland, 10–12 September 2006Google Scholar
  39. Danjon F, Barker D, Drexhage M, Stokes A (2007a) Using 3D root architecture in models of shallow slope stability. Ann Bot (in press). DOI 10.1093/aob/mcm199
  40. Danjon F, Barker D, Drexhage M, Stokes A (2007b) Analysis of 3D structural root architecture data of trees grown on slopes. Proc. 2nd international symposium on plant growth modelling, simulation, visualization and applications. Beijing (China P. R.), November 13–17, 2006, IEEE-proceedings (in press)Google Scholar
  41. Danjon F, Bert D, Porté A, Meredieu C, Trichet P, Lagane F, Issenhuth B (2007c) Effect of fertilisation on 3D root architecture in 12-year-old Pinus pinaster trees. Proc. 4th Int. Symp. on Dynamics of Physiological Processes in Roots of Woody Plants. 16th–19th September 2007, Bangor, UK, p 36Google Scholar
  42. Da Silva D, Boudon F, Godin C, Puech O, Smith C, Sinoquet H (2006) A critical appraisal of the box counting method to assess the fractal dimension of tree crowns. Lecture Notes in Computer Sciences (Proceedings of ISVC 2006), 4291, 751–760Google Scholar
  43. de Reffye P (1979) Modélisation de l’architecture des arbres par des processus stochastiques. Simulation spatiale des modèles tropicaux sous l’effet de la pesanteur. Application au Coffea robusta. Thèse de doctorat d’Etat. Université de Paris-Sud Orsay, 194 pGoogle Scholar
  44. de Reffye P, Elguero E, Costes E (1991) Growth units construction in trees: a stochastic approach. Acta Biotheor 39:325–342Google Scholar
  45. de Reffye P, Houllier F, Blaise F, Barthélémy D, Dauzat J, Auclair D (1995) A model simulating above- and below-ground tree architecture with agroforestry applications. Agroforest Syst 30:175–197Google Scholar
  46. Di Iorio A, Lasserre B, Scippa GS, Chiatante D (2005) Root system architecture of Quercus pubescens trees growing on different sloping conditions. Ann Bot 95:351–361PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Di Iorio A, Lasserre B, Scippa GS, Chiatante D (2007) Pattern of secondary thickening in a Quercus cerris root system. Tree Physiol 27:407–412PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Donès N, Adam B, Sinoquet H (2006) PiafDigit – software to drive a Polhemus Fastrak 3 SPACE 3D digitiser and for the acquisition of plant architecture. Version 1.0. UMR PIAF INRA-UBP, Clermont-Ferrand 15 ppGoogle Scholar
  49. Doussan C, Vercambre G, Pagès L (1999) Water uptake by two contrasting root systems (maize, peach tree): results from a model of hydraulic architecture. Agronomie 19:255–263Google Scholar
  50. Doussan C, Pagès L, Pierret A (2003) Soil exploration and resource acquisition by plant roots: an architectural and modelling point of view. Agronomie 23:419–431Google Scholar
  51. Drexhage M, Chauvière M, Colin F, Nielsen CNN (1999) Development of structural root architecture and allometry of Quercus petraea. Can J For Res 29:600–608Google Scholar
  52. Drouet J-L, Pagès L (2003) GRAAL: a model of GRowth, Architecture and carbon ALlocation during the vegetative phase of the whole maize plant. Model description and parameterisation. Ecol Model 165:147–173Google Scholar
  53. Drouet J-L, Pagès L (2007) GRAAL-CN: a model of GRowth, Architecture and ALlocation for carbon and nitrogen dynamics within whole plants formalised at the organ level. Ecol Model 206:231–249Google Scholar
  54. Dupuy L (2003) Modélisation de l’ancrage racinaire des arbres forestiers. PhD thesis, Université de Bordeaux I, France, n° 2788. http://archives.disvu.u-bordeaux1.fr/pdf/2003/DUPUY_LIONEL_2003.pdf
  55. Dupuy L, Drénou C, Fourcaud T (2003a) Sols, racines et ancrage des arbres forestiers. Forêt Entreprise 153:39–43Google Scholar
  56. Dupuy L, Fourcaud T, Lac P, Stokes A (2003b) Modelling the influence of morphological and mechanical properties on the anchorage of root systems. In: Ruck B, Kottmeier C, Mattheck C, Quine C, Wilhelm G (eds) Proc. Int. Conf. ‘Wind Effects on Trees’ September 16–18, 2003, Universität Karlsruhe, Germany, pp 315–322Google Scholar
  57. Dupuy L, Fourcaud T, Stokes A (2005a) A numerical investigation into factors affecting the anchorage of roots in tension. Eur J Soil Sci 56:319–327Google Scholar
  58. Dupuy L, Fourcaud T, Stokes A (2005b) A numerical investigation into the influence of soil type and root architecture on tree anchorage. Plant Soil 278:119–134Google Scholar
  59. Dupuy L, Fourcaud T, Stokes A, Danjon F (2005c) A density-based approach for the modelling of root architecture: application to Maritime pine (Pinus pinaster Ait.) root systems. J Th Biol 236:323–334Google Scholar
  60. Dupuy L Fourcaud F, Lac P, Stokes A (2007) A generic 3D finite element model of tree anchorage integrating soil mechanics and real root system architecture. Am J Bot 94:1506–1514Google Scholar
  61. Edwards JG (2003) Field based 3D digitising of woody root architecture – techniques and results. Proc. 3rd Int. Symp. on Dynamics of Physiological Processes in Woody Roots, 28 Sept–3 Oct, Perth, Australia p 36Google Scholar
  62. Eis S (1974) Root system morphology of Western Hemlock, Western Red Cedar, and Douglas-Fir. Can J For Res 4:28–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Eshel A (1998) On the fractal dimensions of a root system. Plant Cell Environ 21:247–251Google Scholar
  64. Eshel A, Srinivasa Rao C, Benzioni A, Waisel Y (2001) Allometric relationships in young seedlings of faba bean (Vicia faba L.) following removal of certain root types. Plant Soil 233:161–166Google Scholar
  65. Eschenbach C (2005) Emergent properties modelled with the functional structural tree growth model ALMIS: computer experiments on resource gain and use. Ecol Model 186:470–488Google Scholar
  66. Fayle DCF (1968) Radial growth in tree root systems – distribution, timing, anatomy. Tech. Rep. No. 9. Faculty of Forestry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont. Canada. 183 ppGoogle Scholar
  67. Ferraro P, Godin C (2000) A distance measure between plant architectures. Ann For Sci 57:445–461Google Scholar
  68. Ferraro P, Godin C (2003) An edit distance between quotiented trees. Algorithmica 36:1–39Google Scholar
  69. Ferraro P, Godin C, Prusinkiewicz P (2004) A structural method for assessing self-similarity in plants. In: Godin C, Hanan J, Kurth W, Lacointe A, Takenaka A, Prusinkiewicz P, de Jong T, Beveridge C, Andrieu B (eds) Proc. 4th Int. Workshop on Functional-Structural Plant Models, 7–11 June 2004 Montpellier, UMR AMAP, Montpellier, France, pp 56–60Google Scholar
  70. Fisher JB, Honda H (1979) Branch geometry and effective leaf area: a study of Terminalia branching pattern. 2 Survey of real trees. Am J Bot 66:645–655Google Scholar
  71. Fitter AH (1985) Functional significance of root morphology and root system architecture. In: Fitter AH, Atkinson D, Read DJ, Usher MB (eds) Ecological interactions in soil: plants, microbes and animals. British Ecological Society Special Publication no. 4. Blackwell, Oxford, UK, pp 87–106Google Scholar
  72. Fitter AH (1987) An architectural approach to the comparative ecology of plant root systems. New Phytol 106(Suppl):61–67Google Scholar
  73. Fitter AH (2002) Characteristics and functions of root systems. In: Weisel Y, Eshel A, Kafkafi U (eds) Plant roots: the hidden half. 3rd edn. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 15–32Google Scholar
  74. Fitter AH, Stickland TR (1992a) Fractal characterization of root-system architecture. Funct Ecol 6:632–635Google Scholar
  75. Fitter AH, Stickland TR (1992b) Architectural analysis of plant-root systems 3 studies on plants under field conditions. New Phytol 121:243–248Google Scholar
  76. Foroutan-Pour K, Dutilleul P, Smith DL (1999) Soybean canopy development as affected by population density and intercropping with corn: fractal analysis in comparison with other quantitative approaches. Crop Sci 39:1784–1791CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Fourcaud T, Danjon F, Dupuy L (2003) Numerical analysis of the anchorage of Maritime pine trees in connection with root structure. In: Ruck B, Kottmeier C, Mattheck C, Quine C, Wilhelm G (eds)Proc. Int. Conf. ‘Wind effects on trees’ September 16–18, 2003, Universität Karlsruhe, Germany, pp 323–330Google Scholar
  78. Fourcaud T, Dupuy L, Sellier D, Ancelin P, Lac P (2004) Analysis of the relationship between tree structure and biomechanical functions. In: Godin C, Hanan J, Kurth W, Lacointe A, Takenaka A, Prusinkiewicz P, de Jong T, Beveridge C, Andrieu B (eds) Proc. 4th Int. Workshop on Functional-Structural Plant Models, 7–11 June 2004 Montpellier, UMR AMAP, Montpellier, France, pp 302–306Google Scholar
  79. Fourcaud F, Ji J-N, Zhang Z-Q, Stokes A (2007) Understanding the impact of root morphology on overturning mechanisms: a modelling approach. Ann Bot (in press). DOI 10.1093/aob/mcm245
  80. Gärtner H, Denier C (2006) Application of a 3D Laser scanning device to acquire the structure of whole root systems – a pilot study. In: Heinrich I, Gärtner H, Monbaron M, Schleser G (eds) TRACE – Tree Rings in Archaeology, Climatology and Ecology 4, 288–294Google Scholar
  81. Gijsman AJ, Floris J, van Noordwijk M, Brouwer G (1991) An inflatable minirhizotron system for root observations with improved soil/tube contact. Plant Soil 134:261–269Google Scholar
  82. Godin C (2000) Representing and encoding plant architecture: a review. Ann For Sci 57:413–438Google Scholar
  83. Godin C, Caraglio Y (1998) A multiscale model of plant topological structures. J Theor Biol 191:1–46PubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. Godin C, Costes E, Caraglio Y (1997) Exploring plant topological structure with the AMAPmod software: an outline. Silva Fennica 31:355–366Google Scholar
  85. Godin C, Costes E, Sinoquet H (1999a) A method for describing plant architecture which integrates topology and geometry. Ann Bot 84:343–357Google Scholar
  86. Godin C, Guedon Y, Costes E (1999b) Exploration of a plant architecture database with the AMAPmod software illustrated on an apple tree hybrid family. Agronomie 19:163–184Google Scholar
  87. Gray DH, Leiser AT (1982) Biotechnical slope protection and erosion control. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  88. Green SR, Clothier BE (1995) Root water uptake by kiwifruit wines following partial wetting of the root zone. Plant Soil 173:317–328Google Scholar
  89. Gregory PJ (2006) Plant roots: growth, activity and interaction with soils. Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  90. Gregory PJ, Hutchison DJ, Read DB, Jenneson PM, Gilboy WB, Morton EJ (2003) Non-invasive imaging of roots with high resolution X-ray micro-tomography. Plant Soil 255:351–359Google Scholar
  91. Gross R (1995) Construction application of hydraulic soil excavation. In: Watson G, Weeley D (eds) Proceedings: trees and building sites. International Society of Arboricultural, Savoy, IL, pp 177–184Google Scholar
  92. Gross R, Julene M (2002) Supersonic air jets preserve tree roots in underground pipeline installation. USDA Forest Service Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-GTR-184Google Scholar
  93. Hallé F, Oldemann RAA (1970) Essai sur l’architecture et la dynamique de croissance des arbres tropicaux. Masson, Paris 178 ppGoogle Scholar
  94. Hanan JS, Hearn AB (2003) Linking physiological and architectural models of cotton. Agric Syst 75:47–77Google Scholar
  95. Hanan JS, Room PM (1997) Practical aspects of virtual plant research. In: Michalewicz MT (ed) Plants to ecosystems. Advances in computational life sciences. CSIRO Publishing, Brisbane, Australia, pp 28–44Google Scholar
  96. Hanan JS, Room PM (2002) Floradig, user manual. CPAI, Brisbane, Australia, p 52Google Scholar
  97. Hanan JS, Wang Y (2004) Floradig: a configurable program for capturing plant architecture. In: Godin C, Hanan J, Kurth W, Lacointe A, Takenaka A, Prusinkiewicz P, de Jong T, Beveridge C, Andrieu B (eds) 4th Int. Workshop on Functional-Structural Plant Models, 7–11 June 2004 Montpellier, UMR AMAP, Montpellier, France, pp 407–411Google Scholar
  98. Hanan J, Loch B, McAleer T (2004) Processing laser scanner plant data to extract structural information. In: Godin C, Hanan J, Kurth W, Lacointe A, Takenaka A, Prusinkiewicz P, de Jong T, Beveridge C, Andrieu B (eds) Proc. 4th Int. Workshop on Functional-Structural Plant Models, 7–11 June 2004, Montpellier, UMR AMAP, Montpellier, France, pp 9–12Google Scholar
  99. Harrington CA, DeBell DS (1996) Above- and below-ground characteristics associated with wind toppling in a young Populus plantation. Trees 11:109–118Google Scholar
  100. Heeraman DA, Hopmans JW, Clausnitzer V (1997) Three dimensional imaging of plant roots in situ with X-ray Computed Tomography. Plant Soil 189:167–179Google Scholar
  101. Henderson R, Ford ED, Renshaw E (1983a) Morphology of the structural root system of sitka spruce 2. Computer simulation of rooting pattern. Forestry 56:137–153Google Scholar
  102. Henderson R, Ford ED, Renshaw E, Deans JD (1983b) Morphology of the structural root system of Sitka spruce 1. Analysis and quantitative description. Forestry 56:121–135Google Scholar
  103. Hendricks JJ, Hendrick RL, Wilson CA, Mitchell RJ, Pecot SD, Guo D (2006) Assessing the patterns and controls of fine root dynamics: an empirical test and methodological review. J Ecol 94:40–57Google Scholar
  104. Heth D, Donald DGM (1978) Root biomass of Pinus radiata D Don. S Afr For J 107:60–70Google Scholar
  105. Heuret P, Meredieu C, Coudurier T, Barthélémy D (2006) Ontogenetic trends in the morphological features of main stem annual shoots of Pinus pinaster (Pinaceae). Am J Bot 93:1577–1587Google Scholar
  106. Jourdan C (1995) Modélisation de l’architecture et du développement du système racinaire du palmier à huile. PhD thesis – Université de Montpellier II, p 243Google Scholar
  107. Jourdan C (2005) Manuel d’utilisation du logiciel Rhizodigit V1.3, p 12, CIRAD, Montpellier, FranceGoogle Scholar
  108. Jourdan C, Rey H (1997a) Architecture and development of the oil-palm (Elaeis guineensis Jacq.) root system. Plant Soil 189:33–48Google Scholar
  109. Jourdan C, Rey H (1997b) Modelling and simulation of the architecture and development of the oil-palm (Elaeis guineensis Jacq.) root system. I. The model. Plant Soil 190:217–233Google Scholar
  110. Jourdan C, Rey H (1997c) Modelling and simulation of the architecture and development of the oil-palm (Elaeis guineensis Jacq.) root system. II. Estimation of root parameters using the RACINES postprocessor. Plant Soil 190:235–246Google Scholar
  111. Jourdan C, Rey H, Guedon Y (1995) Architectural analysis and modelling of the branching process of the young oil-palm root system. Plant Soil 177:63–72Google Scholar
  112. Kaestner A, Schneebeli M, Graf F (2006) Visualizing three-dimensional root networks using computed tomography. Geoderma 136:459–469Google Scholar
  113. Kenkel NC, Walker DJ (1996) Fractals in the biological sciences. Coenoses 11:77–100Google Scholar
  114. Khuder H (2007) Etude de l’effet d’une pente sur l’architecture et les propriétés mécaniques des systèmes racinaires de semis d’arbres. PhD thesis – Université de Bordeaux IGoogle Scholar
  115. Khuder H, Danjon F, Stokes A, Fourcaud T (2006) Growth response and root architecture of black locust seedlings growing on slopes and subjected to mechanical perturbation. In: Salmen L (ed) Proc. 5th Plant Biomechanics Conference – Stockholm, August 28–September 1, pp 299–303Google Scholar
  116. Khuder H, Stokes A, Danjon F, Gouskou K, Lagane F (2007) Is it possible to manipulate root anchorage in young trees? Plant Soil 294:87–102 erratum Plant Soil 295:293–295)Google Scholar
  117. Kokutse N, Fourcaud T, Kokou K, Neglo K, Lac P (2006) 3D numerical modelling and analysis of forest structure on hill slopes stability. In: Marui H, Marutani T, Watanabe N, Kawabe H, Gonda Y, Kimura M, Ochiai H, Ogawa K, Fiebiger G, Heumader J, Rudolf-Miklau F, Kienholz H, Mikos M (eds) Interpraevent, 2006: disaster mitigation of Debris flows, slope failures and landslides, September 25–27, 2006, Niigata, Japan. Universal Academy Press, Tokyo, Japan, pp 561–567Google Scholar
  118. Köstler JN, Brückner E, Bibelriether H (1968) Die Wurzeln der Waldbäume. Paul Parey, Hamburg, Germany 284 pGoogle Scholar
  119. Kramer MG, Sollins P, Sletten RS (2004) Soil carbon dynamics across a windthrow disturbance sequence in southeast Alaska. Ecology 85:2230–2244Google Scholar
  120. Kurth W (1994) Growth grammar interpreter GROGRA 24 Berichte des Forschungszentrum Waldökosysteme, vol B. Universität Göttingen, p 192Google Scholar
  121. Kurth W (2000) Towards universality of growth grammars: models of Bell, Pagès, and Takenaka revisited. 2nd International workshop on functional-structural tree models, Clermont-Ferrand, France, 12–14 October 1998. Ann For Sci 57:543–554Google Scholar
  122. Lang ARG (1973) Leaf orientation of a cotton plant. Agric Meteorol 11:37–51Google Scholar
  123. Le Goff N, Ottorini JM (2001) Root biomass and biomass increment in a beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) stand in North-East France. Ann For Sci 58:1–13Google Scholar
  124. Lindenmayer A (1968) Mathematical models for cellular interaction in development, I and II. J Theor Biol 18:280–315PubMedGoogle Scholar
  125. Lindsey PA, Gross R, Milano R (1995) An investigation to assess the importance of street infrastructure improvement on roots of adjacent cork oak tree. In: Watson G, Neely D (eds) Trees and building sites. International Society of Arboricultural, Savoy, Illinois, pp 22–32Google Scholar
  126. Lo E, Wang Zhang M, Lechowicz M, Messier C, Nikinmaa E, Perttunen J, Sievanen R (2001) Adaptation of the LIGNUM model for simulations of growth and light response in Jack pine. For Ecol Man 150:279–291Google Scholar
  127. Lontoc-Roy M, Dutilleul P, Prasher SO, Smith DL (2004) 3D visualisation and quantitative analysis of plant root systems using helical CT scanning. In: Proc. 4th Int. Workshop on Functional-Structural Plant Models, 7–11 June 2004 Montpellier. Eds C Godin, J Hanan, W Kurth, A Lacointe, A Takenaka, P Prusinkiewicz, T de Jong, C Beveridge, B Andrieu. pp 13–16. UMR AMAP, Montpellier, FranceGoogle Scholar
  128. Lontoc-Roy M, Dutilleul P, Prasher SO, Han LW, Smith DL (2005) Computed tomography scanning for three-dimensional imaging and complexity analysis of developing root systems. Can J Bot 83:1434–1442Google Scholar
  129. Lynch JP, Nielsen KL, Davis RD, Jablokow AG (1997) SimRoot: modelling and visualization of root systems. Plant Soil 188:139–151Google Scholar
  130. Mandelbrot BB (1975) Stochastic-models for earths relief, shape and fractal dimension of coastlines, and number-area rule for islands. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 72:3825–3828PubMedGoogle Scholar
  131. Mason EG (1985) Causes of juvenile instability of Pinus radiata in New Zealand. N Z J For Sci 15:263–280Google Scholar
  132. McMinn RG (1963) Characteristics of Douglas-fir root systems. Can J Bot 41:105–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  133. Mou P, Mitchell RJ, Jones RH (1997) Root distribution of two tree species under a heterogeneous nutrient environment. J Appl Ecol 34:645–656Google Scholar
  134. Moulia B, Sinoquet H (1993) Tree-dimensional digitizing systems for plant canopy geometrical structure: a review. In: Varlet-Granchet C, Bonhomme R, Sinoquet H (eds) Crop structure and light microclimate. Characterization and applications. INRA Editions, Paris, France, pp 183–193Google Scholar
  135. Mulatya JM, Wilson J, Ong CK, Deans JD, Sprent JI (2002) Root architecture of provenances, seedlings and cuttings of Melia volkensii: implications for crop yield in dryland agroforestry. Agrofor Syst 56:65–72Google Scholar
  136. Nadezhdina N, Cermák J, Neruda J, Prax A, Ulrich R, Nadezhdin V, Gaspárek J, Pokorný E (2006) Roots under the load of heavy machinery in spruce trees. Eur J For Res 125:111–128Google Scholar
  137. Nicoll BC, Easton EP, Milner A, Walker CD, Coutts MP (1997) Wind stability factors in tree selection: distribution of biomass within root systems of sitka spruce clones. In: Coutts MP, Grace J (eds) Wind and wind related damage to trees. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 276–301Google Scholar
  138. Nicoll BC, Berthier S, Achim A, Gouskou K, Danjon F, van Beek LPH (2006) The architecture of Picea sitchensis structural root systems on horizontal and sloping terrain. Trees 20:701–712Google Scholar
  139. Nielsen CCN, Hansen JK (2006) Root CSA-Root biomass prediction models in six tree species and improvement of models by inclusion of root architectural parameters. Plant Soil 280:339–356Google Scholar
  140. Nieuwenhuis MA, Wills JM (2002) The effect of cultivation technique on root architecture of young Sitka spruce (Picea sitchensis (Bong.) Carr.) trees on surface water gleys. New For 24:195–213Google Scholar
  141. Noguchi K, Konôpka B, Satomura T, Kaneko S, Takahashi M (2007) Biomass and production of fine roots in Japanese forests. J For Res 12:83–95Google Scholar
  142. Nygren P, Ozier-Lafontaine H, Lu M (2004) A comparison of two fractal models for describing whole tree structure. In: Godin C, Hanan J, Kurth W, Lacointe A, Takenaka A, Prusinkiewicz P, de Jong T, Beveridge C, Andrieu B (eds) Proc. 4th Int. Workshop on Functional-Structural Plant Models, 7–11 June 2004 Montpellier, UMR AMAP, Montpellier, France, pp 110–114Google Scholar
  143. Oliveira RS, Dawson TE, Burgess SSO, Nepstad DC (2005) Hydraulic redistribution in three Amazonian trees. Oecologia 145:354–363PubMedGoogle Scholar
  144. Oppelt AL, Kurth W, Dzierzon H, Jentschke G, Godbold DL (2000) Structure and fractal dimensions of root systems of four co-occurring fruit tree species from Botswana. Ann For Sci 57:463–475Google Scholar
  145. Oppelt AL, Kurth W, Godbold DL (2001) Topology, scaling relations and Leonardo’s rule in root systems from African tree species. Tree Physiol 21:117–128PubMedGoogle Scholar
  146. Oppelt AL, Kurth W, Godbold DL (2005) Contrasting rooting patterns of some arid-zone fruit tree species from Botswana – II. Coarse root distribution. Agrofor Syst 64:13–24Google Scholar
  147. Ozier-Lafontaine H, Lecompte F, Sillon J-F (1999) Fractal analysis of the root architecture of Gliricidia sepium for the spatial prediction of root branching, size and mass. Model development and evaluation in agroforestry. Plant Soil 209:167–180Google Scholar
  148. Pagès L (1999a) Root system architecture: from its representation to the study of its elaboration. Agronomie 19:295–304Google Scholar
  149. Pagès L (1999b) Why model root system architecture? In: Stokes A (ed) Proc conf “The supporting roots of trees and woody plants: form, function and physiology”, Bordeaux, 20–24 July, 1998. Series: ‘Developments in plant and soil sciences’, vol 87. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 187–194Google Scholar
  150. Pagès L (2002) Modelling root system architecture. In: Weisel Y, Eshel A, Kafkafi U (eds) Plant roots: the hidden half. 3rd edn. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 175–186Google Scholar
  151. Pagès L, Asseng S, Pellerin S, Diggle A (2000a) Modelling root system growth and architecture. In: Smith AL (ed) Root methods: a handbook. Springer, Berlin, pp 113–146Google Scholar
  152. Pagès L, Doussan C, Vercambre G (2000b) An introduction on below-ground environment and resource acquisition, with special reference on trees. Simulation models should include plant structure and function. Ann For Sci 57:513–520Google Scholar
  153. Pagès L, Vercambre G, Drouet J-L, Lecompte F, Collet C, Le Bot J (2004) Root Typ: a generic model to depict and analyse the root system architecture. Plant Soil 258:103–119Google Scholar
  154. Pateña G, Ingram KT (2000) Digital acquisition and measurement of peanut root minirhizotron images. Agron J 92:541–544CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  155. Perttunen J, Sievanen R (2005) Incorporating Lindenmayer systems for architectural development in a functional-structural tree model. Ecol Model 181:479–491Google Scholar
  156. Plourde A (2007) Croissance, développement et architecture des structures aériennes et souterraines de pins gris (Pinus banksiana Lamb.) dans un peuplement naturel et une plantation. PhD Thesis, Université du Quebec à Chicoutimi et à Montréal, p 141Google Scholar
  157. Pradal C, Dufour-Kowalski S, Boudon F, Dones N (2007) The architecture of OpenAlea: a visual programming and component based software for plant modelling. Proc. 5th Int. Workshop on functional-structural plant models, 4–9 November, Napier, New Zealand, pp 25–1 to 25–4Google Scholar
  158. Prusinkiewicz P (2004) Modeling plant growth and development. Curr Opin Plant Biol 7:79–83PubMedGoogle Scholar
  159. Prusinkiewicz P, Rolland-Lagan AG (2006) Modelling plant morphogenesis. Cur Opin Plant Biol 9:83–88Google Scholar
  160. Puhe J (1994) Die Wurzelentwicklung der Fichte (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) bei unterschiedlichen chemischen Bodenbedingungen. Berichte des Forschungszentrums Waldökosysteme Reihe A (Göttingen) 108 128 ppGoogle Scholar
  161. Reubens B, Poesen J, Danjon F, Geudens G, Muys B (2007a) The role of fine and coarse roots in shallow slope stability and soil erosion control with a focus on root system architecture: a review. Trees 21:385–402Google Scholar
  162. Reubens B, Windey J, Danjon F, Poesen J, Muys B (2007b) Root system architecture of woody species important for erosion control in Tigray, Northern Ethiopia. Proc. 4th Int. Symp. on Dynamics of Physiological Processes in Roots of Woody Plants. 16th–19th September 2007, Bangor, UK, p 87Google Scholar
  163. Richardson A (2000) Coarse root elongation rate estimates for interior Douglas-fir. Tree Physiol 20:825–829PubMedGoogle Scholar
  164. Richardson AD, zu Dohna H (2003) Predicting root biomass from branching patterns of Douglas-fir root systems. Oikos 100:96–104Google Scholar
  165. Ritson P, Sochacki S (2003) Measurement and prediction of biomass and carbon content of Pinus pinaster trees in farm forestry plantations, south-western Australia. For Ecol Manag 175:103–117Google Scholar
  166. Rizzo DM, Gross R (2000) Distribution of armillaria on pear root systems and a comparison of root excavation techniques. In: Stokes A (ed) Proc. conf. “The supporting roots of trees and woody plants: form, function and physiology”, Bordeaux, 20–24 July, 1998. Series: ‘Developments in plant and soil sciences’, vol 87. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 61–76Google Scholar
  167. Salas E, Ozier-Lafontaine H, Nygren P (2004) A fractal root model applied for estimating the root biomass and architecture in two tropical legume tree species. Ann For Sci 61:337–345Google Scholar
  168. Segura V, Ouangraoua A, Ferraro P, Costes E (2007) Comparison of tree architecture using tree edit distances: application to 2-year-old apple hybrids. Euphytica (in press). DOI 10.1007/s10681-007-9430-6
  169. Shinozaki K, Yoda K, Hozumi K, Kira T (1964) A quantitative analysis of plant form – the pipe model theory. I. Basic analysis. Jpn J Ecol 14:97–105Google Scholar
  170. Sievanen R, Nikinmaa E, Nygren P, Ozier-Lafontaine H, Perttunen J, Hakula H (2000) Components of functional-structural tree models. Ann For Sci 57:399–412Google Scholar
  171. Sinoquet H, Rivet P (1997) Measurement and visualization of the architecture of an adult tree based on a three-dimensional digitising device. Trees 11:265–270Google Scholar
  172. Sinoquet H, Rivet P, Godin C (1997) Assessment of the three-dimensional architecture of walnut trees using digitising. Silva Fennica 31:265–273Google Scholar
  173. Soethe N (2006) Structure and function of root systems at different altitudes of a south Ecuadorian montane forest. PhD Thesis, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, p 146Google Scholar
  174. Soethe N, Lehmann J, Engels C (2006) Root morphology and anchorage of six native tree species from a tropical montane forest and an elfin forest in Ecuador. Plant Soil 279:173–185Google Scholar
  175. Soethe N, Lehmann J, Engels C (2007) Root tapering between branching points should be included in fractal root system analysis. Ecol Model 207:363–366Google Scholar
  176. Stoeckeler JH, Kluender WA (1938) The hydraulic method of excavating the root systems of plants. Ecology 19:355–369Google Scholar
  177. Stokes A (2002) Biomechanics of tree root anchorage. In: Weisel Y, Eshel A, Kafkafi U (eds) Plant roots: the hidden half. 3rd edn. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 175–186Google Scholar
  178. Stokes A, Fourcaud T, Hruska J, Cermak J, Nadyezhdhina N, Nadyezhdin V, Praus L (1999) An evaluation of different methods to investigate root systems architecture of urban trees in situ: I. ground-penetrating radar. J Arboriculture 28:1–9Google Scholar
  179. Stone EL, Kalisz PJ (1991) On the maximum extent of tree roots. For Ecol Manag 46:59–102Google Scholar
  180. Sundström E, Keane M (1999) Root architecture, early development and basal sweep in containerized and bare-rooted Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii). Plant Soil 217:65–78Google Scholar
  181. Tamasi E, Stokes A, Lasserre B, Danjon F, Berthier S, Fourcaud T, Chiatante D (2005) Influence of wind loading on root system development and architecture in oak seedlings (Quercus robur L.). Trees 19:374–384Google Scholar
  182. Tatsumi J (1995) Fractal geometry in root systems: quantitative evaluation of distribution pattern. Jpn J Crop Sci 64:50–57Google Scholar
  183. Taylor HM, Upchurch DR, Mcmichael BL (1990) Applications and limitations of rhizotrons and minirhizotrons for root studies. Plant Soil 129:29–35Google Scholar
  184. Teobaldelli M, Zenone, Puig D, Matteucci M, Seufert G, Sequeira V (2007) Structural tree modelling of above and belowground poplar tree using direct and indirect measurements: Terrestrial laser scanning, WGROGRA, AMAPmod and JRC-Reconstructor. In: Prusinkiewicz P and Hanan J (eds) Proc. 5th International Workshop on Functional Structural Plant Models, November 4–9, 2007, Napier, New Zealand, pp 20–1 to 20–4Google Scholar
  185. Thomas C, Walk CT, Jaramillo R, Lynch JP (2006) Architectural tradeoffs between adventitious and basal roots for phosphorus acquisition. Plant Soil 279:347–366Google Scholar
  186. Tobin B, Cermák J, Chiatante D, Danjon F, Di Iorio A, Dupuy L, Eshel A, Jourdan C, Kalliokoski T, Laiho R, Nadezhdina N, Nicoll B, Pagès L, Silva J, Spanos I (2007) Towards developmental modelling of tree root systems. Plant Biosyst 141:481–501Google Scholar
  187. Van Beek LPH, Wint J, Cammeraat LH, Edwards JP (2005) Observation and simulation of root reinforcement on abandoned Mediterranean slopes. Plant Soil 278:55–74Google Scholar
  188. van der Heijden GWAM, de Visser PHB, Heuvelink E (2007) Measurements for functional-structural plant models. In: Vos J, Marcelis LFM, de Visser PHB, Struik PC, Evers JB (eds) Functional-structural plant modelling in crop production. Wageningen UR Frontis Series, vol 22. Springer, Belin, pp 13–25Google Scholar
  189. van Noordwijk M, Mulia R (2002) Functional branch analysis as tool for fractal scaling above- and belowground trees for their additive and non-additive properties. Ecol Model 149:41–51Google Scholar
  190. van Noordwijk M, Purnomosidhi P (1995) Root architecture in relation to tree-soil-crop interactions and shoot pruning in agroforestry. Agrofor Syst 30:161–173Google Scholar
  191. van Noordwijk M, Spek LY, Willigen P (1994) Proximal root diameter as predictor of total root size for fractal branching models. 1. Theory. Plant Soil 164:107–117Google Scholar
  192. Vercambre G, Pagès L, Doussan C, Habib R (2003) Architectural analysis and synthesis of the plum tree root system in an orchard using a quantitative modelling approach. Plant Soil 251:1–11Google Scholar
  193. Walk TC, Van Erp E, Lynch JP (2004) Modelling applicability of fractal analysis to efficiency of soil exploration by roots. Ann Bot 94:119–128PubMedGoogle Scholar
  194. Walk TC, Jaramillo R, Lynch JP (2006) Architectural tradeoffs between adventitious and basal roots for phosphorus acquisition. Plant Soil 279:347–366Google Scholar
  195. Watson A, O’Loughlin C (1990) Structural root morphology and biomass of three age-classes of Pinus radiata. N Z J For Sci 20:97–110Google Scholar
  196. West BJ, Brown JH, Enquist BJ (1997) A general model for the origin of allometric scaling laws in biology. Science 276:122–126PubMedGoogle Scholar
  197. West GB, Brown JH, Enquist BJ (1999) The fourth dimension of life: fractal geometry and allometric scaling of organisms. Science 284:1677–1679PubMedGoogle Scholar
  198. Wilson BF (1975) Distribution of secondary thickening in tree root systems. In: Torrey JG, Clarkson DT (eds) The development and function of roots. Academic, London, pp 197–219Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.INRACestasFrance
  2. 2.K.U. Leuven, Division Forest, Nature and LandscapeLeuvenBelgium

Personalised recommendations