Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Early growth and nutritional response to resource competition in cocoa-shade intercropped systems

  • Regular article
  • Published:
Plant and Soil Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Intercropping is often promoted for effective mutualism between species, thus compensating for external inputs. However, for optimal farm design resulting in superior production and nutrition, an accurate assessment of plant inter- and intra-specific competition is required. In predominant shade tree-cocoa (Theobroma cacao) systems, inconclusive evidence remains on species interactions, limitations to resource availability and subsequent growth and nutritional response, particularly in early growth. We examined cocoa biomass and foliar nutrition as well as nutrient supply through rates of decomposition and N mineralization after 1-year growth. Our approach employed fertilization and mixed planting treatments in an additive design of cocoa in monoculture (control), under artificial shade, and intercropped under two separate shade species (Terminalia superba and Newbouldia laevis). Intercropping had no effect on cocoa biomass production in comparison to monoculture cocoa. However, artificial shading stimulated foliage and root production both with and without fertilization, suggesting strong effects of light regulation on growth in the absence of belowground competition. Nutritionally, intercropping suppressed K uptake in cocoa foliage as K concentration was reduced by 20–25%, signifying dilution of this nutrient, presumably due to interspecific competition for mobile elements. Foliar N content under N. laevis was raised, where N concentration kept up with growth under this intercropped species. Intercropping also delayed decomposition rates, suggesting slower but sustained release of available nutrients into the topsoil. Cocoa under artificial shade, both with and without fertilization, exhibited the greatest nutrient responses as compared to unfertilized monoculture cocoa, where P uptake was stimulated most (175 and 112%), followed by K (69 and 71%), and then N (54 and 42%). Intercropping with shade trees failed to increase cocoa biomass, however, nutrient uptake was sustained for N and P, suggesting low interspecific competition. When fertilizers are undesirable or unavailable, intercropping of appropriately selected shade trees will not competitively suppress early growth of cocoa but will improve light regulation and nutritional status of cocoa saplings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen SE (1974) Chemical analysis of ecological materials. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Amanor KS (1994) The new frontier; Farmers response to land degradation. A West African study. UNRISD, London, England

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson JM, Swift MJ (1983) Decomposition in tropical forests. In: Sutton SL, Whitmore TC, Chadwick AC (eds) Tropical rain forests: ecology and management. Special publication 2. British Ecological Society, Blackwell Scientific, Oxford, England

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson JM, Ingram JSI (1993) Tropical soil biology and fertility: a handbook of methods, 2nd ed. CAB International, Wallingford, Oxford, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Beer J, Muschler R, Kass D, Somarriba E (1998) Shade management in coffee and cacao plantations. Agrofor Syst 38:139–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham RK, Arnold PW (1962) The shade and fertilizer requirements of cacao (Theobroma cacao) in Ghana. J Sci Food Agric 13:213–221

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Duguma B, Gockowski J, Bakala J (2001) Smallholder Cacao (Theobroma cacao Linn.) cultivation in agroforestry systems of West and Central Africa: challenges and opportunities. Agrofor Syst 51:177–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fassbender HW, Beer J, Heuveldop J, Imback A, Enriquez G, Bonnemann A (1991) Ten year balances of organic matter and nutrients in agroforestry systems at CATIE, Costa Rica. For Ecol Manag 45:173–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gap Light Analyzer, Version 2 (1999) Simon Fraser University, British Columbia, Canada and the Institute of Ecosystem Studies, New York, USA

  • Galyuon IKA, McDavid FB, Lopez FB, Spence JA (1996) The effect of irradiance level on cocoa (Theobroma cacao) L.: 1. Growth and leaf adaptations. Trop Agric (Trin) 73:23–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcıa-Barrios L, Ong CK (2004) Ecological interactions, management lessons and design tools in tropical agroforestry systems. Agrofor Syst 61:221–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Groulez J, Wood PJ (1985) Terminalia superba: A monograph. Centre Technique Forestier Tropical, Nogent-sur-Marne, France and Commonwealth Forestry Institute, Oxford, UK

  • Haase DL, Rose R (1995) Vector analysis and its use for interpreting plant nutrient shifts in response to silvicultural treatments. For Sci 41:54–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Haggar JP, Beer JW, Tanner EVJ, Rippin M (1993) Nitrogen dynamics of tropical agroforestry and annual cropping systems. Soil Biol Biochem 25:1363–1378

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hartemink AE (2005) Nutrient stocks, nutrient cycling, and soil changes in cocoa ecosystems: a review. Adv Agron 86:227–253

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hooper DU, Vitosek P (1998) The role of complementarity and competition in ecosystem responses to variation in plant diversity. Ecology 79:704–719

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ICCO, International Cacao Organization (1997) Quarterly Bulletin of Cacao Statistics, June. International Cacao Organization, London, England

  • Isaac ME, Timmer VR (2007) A comparison of in-situ methods for measurement of nitrogen mineralization under mock precipitation regimes. Can J Soil Sci 87:39–42

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Isaac ME, Timmer VR, Quashie-Sam SJ (2007) Shade tree effects in an 8-year-old cocoa agroforestry system: biomass and nutrient diagnosis of Theobroma cacao by vector analysis. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 78:155–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jose S, Gillespie AR, Pallardy SG (2004) Interspecific interactions in temperate agroforestry. Agrofor Syst 61:237–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keeney DR, Nelson DW (1982) Nitrogen – Inorganic form. In: Page AL, Miller HR, Keeney DR (eds) Methods of soil analysis. Part 2. Chemical and microbiological properties. 2nd edn. American Society of Agronomy Madison, Wisconsin, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelty MJ, IR Cameron (1995) Plot designs for the analysis of species interactions in mixed stands. Commonw For Rev 74(4):322–332

    Google Scholar 

  • Kummerow J, Kummerow M, Da Silva WS (1982) Fine root growth dynamics in cacao (Theobroma cacao). Plant Soil 65:193–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montagnini F, Jordan CF, Machado RM (2000) Nutrient cycling and nutrient use efficiency in agroforestry systems. In: Ashton MS, Montagnini F (eds) Silvicultural basis for agroforestry systems. CRC Press LLC, Florida, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Monteith JL, Ong CK, Corlett JE (1991) Microclimate interactions in agroforestry systems. For Ecol Manag 45:31–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Okali DUU, Owusu JK (1975) Growth analysis and photosynthetic rates of cocoa (Theobroma cacao L.) seedlings in relation to varying shade and nutrient regimes. Ghana J Agric Sci 8:51–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Paul EA, Clark FE (1996) Soil microbiology and biochemistry. Academic Press, California, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowell DL (1994) Soil science: methods and applications. Longman Scientific & Technical, UK

  • Salifu KF, Timmer VR (2003) Optimizing nitrogen loading of Picea mariana seedlings during nursery culture. Can J For Res 33:1287–1294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schroth G (1999) A review of belowground interactions in agroforestry, focusing on mechanisms and management options. Agrofor Syst 43:5–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schroth G, Lehmann J, Rodrigues MRL, Barros E, Macedo JL (2001) Plant–soil interactions in multistrata agroforestry in the humid tropics. Agrofor Syst 53:85–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seneviratne G (2000) Litter quality and nitrogen release in tropical agriculture: a synthesis. Biol Fertil Soils 31:60–64

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Soil Survey Division (1969) Great soil groups. Survey of Ghana, Accra, Ghana

  • Thevathesan NV, Gordon AM (2004) Ecology of tree intercropping systems in the North temperate region: Experiences from southern Ontario, Canada. Agrofor Syst 61:257–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tilman D (1982) Resource competition and community structure. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J., USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Timmer VR (1991) Interpretation of seedling analysis and visual symptoms. In: van den Driessche R (ed) Mineral nutrition of conifer seedlings. CRC Press, Boca Raton, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Vandermeer J (1989) The ecology of intercropping. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanlauwe B, Nwoke OC, Sanginga N, Merckx R (1996) Impact of residue quality on the C and N mineralization of leaf and root residues of three agroforestry species. Plant Soil 183:221–231

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • van Noordwijk M, Cadisch G (2002) Access and excess problems in plant nutrition. Plant Soil 247:25–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zuidema PA, Leffelaar PA, Gerristsma W, Mommer L, Anten NPR (2005) A physiological production model for cocoa (Theobroma cacao): Model presentation, validation and application. Agric Syst 84:95–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to the Faculty of Renewable Natural Resources, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Ghana, for research support. We would like to acknowledge field and laboratory assistance by A. Owusu, E. Dawoe, E. Adjei and Y. Teng and constructive comments by two anonymous journal reviewers. Financial support for this study was provided by the Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. E. Isaac.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Elizabeth (Liz) A. Stockdale.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Isaac, M.E., Ulzen-Appiah, F., Timmer, V.R. et al. Early growth and nutritional response to resource competition in cocoa-shade intercropped systems. Plant Soil 298, 243–254 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-007-9362-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-007-9362-x

Keywords

Navigation