Skip to main content
Log in

Growth of hybrid poplar as affected by dandelion and quackgrass competition

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
Plant and Soil Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A pot experiment was conducted in a growth chamber to investigate the effects of dandelion (Taraxacum officinale) and quackgrass (Elymus repens) on the growth of hybrid poplar (Populus deltoides × Populus × petrowskyana var. Walker). Single hybrid poplar seedlings were grown in pots either alone (SHP) or with four or eight dandelion plants per pot or with one or three quackgrass plants per pot in two soils collected from sites previously managed for alfalfa and pasture near Meadow Lake, Saskatchewan, Canada. Hybrid poplar and weed species were harvested approximately 7 and 14 weeks after planting. Approximately 14 weeks after planting, hybrid poplar shoot biomass in the SHP treatment was 28 g for the pasture soil and 22 g for the alfalfa soil. Corresponding shoot biomass for hybrid poplar grown with the dandelion and quackgrass treatments varied from 0.54 to 0.81 g and 0.3 to 3.66 g, respectively. Other hybrid poplar growth parameters including stem height, root collar diameter and fresh root biomass were similarly reduced by competition with the weed species. During the growing period, soil solution N and K concentrations decreased several-fold in both soils; however, the magnitude of decrease was comparatively higher in the weed treatments. Nitrogen, P and K uptake by hybrid poplar was greater in the SHP treatment in both the soils (337–425, 38–49 and 396–463 mg pot−1, respectively) compared to the weed treatments (4–28, 0.4–6.2 and 0.6–54.0 mg pot−1, respectively) by the end of the experiment. The presence of quackgrass and dandelion severely affects the growth of hybrid poplar by causing intense below-ground competition for nutrients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Balandier P, Collet C, Miller JH, Reynolds PE, Zedaker SM (2006) Designing forest vegetation management strategies based on the mechanisms and dynamics of crop tree competition by neighbouring vegetation. Forestry 79:3–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barber SA (1995) Soil nutrient bioavailability – a mechanistic approach. Wiley, New York, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergez JE, Auclair D, Bouvarel L (1989) 1st-year growth of hybrid poplar shoots from cutting or coppice origin. For Sci 35:1105–1113

    Google Scholar 

  • Berntson GM (1992) A computer program for characterizing root system branching patterns. Plant Soil 140:145–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackshaw RE, Brandt RN, Janzen HH, Entz T, Grant CA (2003) Differential response of weed species to added nitrogen. Weed Sci 51:532–539

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Buhler DD, Netzer DA, Riemenschneider DE, Hartzler RG (1998) Weed management in short rotation poplar and herbaceous perennial crops grown for biofuel production. Biomass Bioenergy 14:385–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bungart R, Huttl RF (2004) Growth dynamics and biomass accumulation of 8-year-old hybrid poplar clones in a short-rotation plantation on a clayey-sandy mining substrate with respect to plant nutrition and water budget. Eur J For Res 123:105–115

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Casper BB, Jackson RB (1997) Plant competition underground. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 28:545–570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casselman CN, Fox TR, Burger JA, Jones AT, Galbraith JM (2006) Effects of silvicultural treatments on survival and growth of trees planted on reclaimed mine lands in the Appalachians. For Ecol Manag 223:403–414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elkhatib EA, Hern JL, Staley TE (1987) A rapid centrifugation method for obtaining soil solution. Soil Sci Soc Am J 51:578–583

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Epp GA, Aarssen LW (1989) Predicting vegetation patterns from attributes of plant-growth in grassland species. Can J Bot 67:2953–2959

    Google Scholar 

  • Francis RC, Brown AF, Bosshart RR, Balch S, Waite DM (2005) Four additional hybrid poplars with paper making properties superior to aspen. Tappi J 4:13–17

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gaudet CL, Keddy PA (1988) A comparative approach to predicting competitive ability from plant traits. Nature 334:242–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grace JB, Tilman D (1990) Perspectives on plant competition. Please check PublisherAcademic Press Inc., San Diego, CA, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagin RD (1989) Isolation and identification of 5-hydroxyindole-3-acetic acid and 5-hydroxytryptophan, major allelopathic aglycons in quackgrass (Agropyron repens L. Beauv.). J Agric Food Chem 37:1143

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen EA (1991) Poplar woody biomass yields - a look to the future. Biomass Bioenergy 1:1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen EA, Netzer DA (1985) Weed control using herbicides in short rotation intensively cultured poplar plantations. Research Paper NC-260. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, North Central Forest Experiment Station, St. Paul, MN, USA

  • Heilman PE, Ekuan G, Fogle D (1994) Above- and below-ground biomass and fine roots of 4-year-old hybrids of Populus trichocarpa x Populus deltoides and parental species in short-rotation culture. Can J For Res 24:1186–1192

    Google Scholar 

  • Heilman PE, Stettler RF, Hanley DP, Carkner RW (1995) High yield hybrid poplar plantations in the Pacific Northwest. PNW Ext. Bull. No. 356. WSU Coop. Extension, Puyallup, WA, USA

  • Jug A, Hofmann-Schielle C, Makeschin F, Rehfuess KE (1999) Short-rotation plantations of balsam poplars, aspen and willows on former arable land in the Federal Republic of Germany. II. Nutritional status and bioelement export by harvested shoot axes. For Ecol Manag 121:67–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jungk A, Claassen N (1997) Ion diffusion in the soil-root system. Adv Agron 61:53–110

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kage H (1997) Relative contribution of mass flow and diffusion to nitrate transport towards roots. Z Pflanzenernahr Bodenk 160:171–178

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kalra Y (1998) Handbook of reference methods for plant analysis. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL

    Google Scholar 

  • Kommedahl T, Linck AJ, Bernardini JV (1957) The toxic effect of quackgrass on growth of alfalfa. Phytopathol 47:526

    Google Scholar 

  • Korhammer SA, Haslinger E (1994) Isolation of a biologically active substance from rhizomes of quackgrass [Elymus repens (L.) Gould]. J Agric Food Chem 42:2048

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Leeson JY, Thomas AG, Brenzil CA (2003) Saskatchewan weed survey of cereal, oilseed and pulse crops in 2003. Weed survey series 02–1. Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Saskatoon, SK, Canada

    Google Scholar 

  • Liberloo M, Calfapietra C, Lukac M, Godbold D, Luos ZB, Polle A, Hoosbeek MR, Kull O, Marek M, Raines C, Rubino M, Taylor G, Scarascia-Mugnozza G, Ceulemans R (2006) Woody biomass production during the second rotation of a bio-energy Populus plantation increases in a future high CO2 world. Glob Chang Biol 12:1094–1106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marschner H (1995) Mineral nutrition of higher plants. Academic Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Nambiar EKS, Sands R (1993) Competition for water and nutrients in forests. Can J For Res 23:1955–1968

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norby RJ, Kozlowski TT (1980) Allelopathic potential of ground cover species on Pinus resinosa seedlings. Plant Soil 57:363–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Obaid KA, Qasem JR (2005) Allelopathic activity of common weed species on vegetable crops grown in Jordan. Allelopath J 15:221–235

    Google Scholar 

  • Plhak F (2003) Nitrogen supply through transpiration mass flow can limit nitrogen nutrition of plants. Plant Soil Environ 49:473–479

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulz M, Friebe A, Kuck P, Seipel M, Schnabl H (1994) Allelopathic effects of living quackgrass (Agropyron-Repens L) – identification of inhibitory allelochemicals exuded from rhizome borne roots. Angew Bot 68:195–200

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shock CC, Feibert EBG, Saunders LD, Seddigh M (2002) Initial growth of irrigated hybrid poplar decreased by ground covers. West J Appl For 17:61–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Sixto H, Grau JM, Garcia-Baudin JM (2001) Assessment of the effect of broad-spectrum pre-emergence herbicides in poplar nurseries. Crop Prot 20:121–126

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart-Wade SM, Neumann S, Collins LL, Boland GJ (2002) The biology of Canadian weeds. 117. Taraxacum officinale G. H. Weber ex Wiggers. Can J Plant Sci 82:825–853

    Google Scholar 

  • Strebel O, Duynisveld WHM (1989) Nitrogen supply to cereals and sugar-beet by mass-flow and diffusion on a silty loam soil. Z Pflanzenernahr Bodenk 152:135–141

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson DG, Pitt DG (2003) A review of Canadian forest vegetation management research and practice. Ann For Sci 60:559–572

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Rees KCJ, Hoskins JA, Hoskins WD (1994) Analyzing root competition with dirichlet tessellation for wheat on three landscape positions. Soil Sci Soc Am J 58:423–432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner RG, Little KM, Richardson B, McNabb K (2006) The role of vegetation management for enhancing productivity of the world's forests. Forestry 79:57–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wardle DA, Nilsson M, Gallet C, Zackrisson O (1998) An ecosystem-level perspective of allelopathy. Biol Rev 73:305–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watt MS, Downes GM, Whitehead D, Mason EG, Richardson B, Grace JC, Moore JR (2005) Wood properties of juvenile Pinus radiata growing in the presence and absence of competing understorey vegetation at a dryland site. Trees Struct Funct 19:580–586

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner PA, Rioux R (1977) Biology of Canadian Weeds.24. Agropyron repens (L) Beauv. Can J Plant Sci 57:905–919

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson JB (1988) Shoot competition and root competition. J Appl Ecol 25:279–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yemshanov D, McKenney DW, Hatton T, Fox G (2005) Investment attractiveness of afforestation in Canada inclusive of carbon sequestration benefits. Can J Agric Econ 53:307–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zak DR, Pregitzer KS, Curtis PS, Vogel CS, Holmes WE, Lussenhop J (2000) Atmospheric CO2, soil-N availability, and allocation of biomass and nitrogen by Populus tremuloides. Ecol Appl 10:34–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Zsuffa L, Giordano E, Pryor LD, Stettler RF (1996) Trends in poplar culture: some global and regional perspectives. In: Stettler RF, Bradshaw HDJ, Heilman PE, Hinckley TM (eds) Biology of Populus and its implications for management and conservation. NRC Research Press, Ottawa, Canada, pp 515–539

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Doug Jackson and Ashley Anholt for their help with the experiment and Bill Schroeder of AAFC-PFRA Shelterbelt Centre for the supply of hybrid poplar cuttings. This project was funded by the Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada Strategic Grants Program.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ken C. J. Van Rees.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Ismael Cakmak.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kabba, B.S., Knight, J.D. & Van Rees, K.C.J. Growth of hybrid poplar as affected by dandelion and quackgrass competition. Plant Soil 298, 203–217 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-007-9355-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-007-9355-9

Keywords

Navigation