Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Plant–soil relationships of the invasive annual grass Taeniatherum caput-medusae: a reciprocal transplant experiment

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
Plant and Soil Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The annual grass Taeniatherum caput-medusae (L.) Nevski (medusahead) is highly invasive on rangelands of the western United States. It originates from the Mediterranean basin and was introduced accidentally into North America in the late 1800s. To increase our knowledge of the soil factors that may contribute to its invasiveness, we conducted a reciprocal transplant experiment. Seed sources used were from an invasive population in northeastern California, USA and from a native population in southern France. Four soils were used: two from northeastern California, invaded (USI) and non-invaded (USN) by T. caput-medusae; two from southern France, with T. caput-medusae occupied (FR+) and a similar soil presently unoccupied (FR−) by T. caput-medusae. Treatments were control and autoclaved. Seeds were sown in containers (six replicates) for each soil and treatment combination of the reciprocal planting matrix and allowed to grow for 60 days. Following harvest, above-ground and below-ground tissue was dried and weight recorded separately. Above-ground tissue was analyzed for nutrient concentrations and various soil nutrient pools were quantified. Above-ground mass of T. caput-medusae was greatest in the USN soil and least in the FR- soil. Growth was affected by significant seed source × soil and treatment × soil interactions. French seed produced larger plants than did US seed when grown in the USN soil. For the USI soil, plant growth was significantly greater in the autoclaved soil than control. Availability of soil Fe, Mn, and ortho-P were significant predictors of plant growth as shown by stepwise regression. Moreover, the positive effect on growth of T. caput-medusae, due to autoclaving of USI soil, may be partially a consequence of elevated nutrient availability. Our data also suggests that US seed may have evolved a greater ability to uptake Mn from soil than French seed. Elevated soil nutrient availability in our western United States study area is a potential factor explaining the invasiveness of T. caput-medusae.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson BH, Magdoff FR (2005) Autoclaving soil samples affects algal-available phosphorus. J Environ Qual 34:1958–1963

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bais HP, Vepachedu R, Gilroy S, Callaway RM, Vivanco JM (2003) Allelopathy and exotic plants: from genes to invasion. Science 301:1377–1380

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Beckstead J, Parker IM (2003) Invasiveness of Ammophila arenaria: release from soil-borne pathogens? Ecology 84:2824–2831

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belnap J, Phillips SL (2001) Soil biota in an ungrazed grassland: response to annual grass (Bromus tectorum) invasion. Ecol Appl 11:1261–1275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blank RR (2002) Amidohydrolase activity, soil N status, and the invasive crucifer Lepidium latifolium. Plant Soil 239:155–163

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks ML (2003) Effects of increased soil nitrogen on the dominance of alien plants in the Mojave Desert. J Appl Ecol 40:344–353

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckley YM, Downey P, Fowler SV, Hill R, Memmot J, Norambuena H, Pitcairn M, Shaw R, Sheppard AW, Winks C, Wittenberg R, Reese M (2003) Are invasives bigger? A global study of seed size variation in two invasive shrubs. Ecology 84:1434–1440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bundy LG, Meisinger JJ (1994) Nitrogen availability indices. In: Weaver RW, Angel JS, Bottomley PS (eds) Methods of soil analysis, part 2 microbiological and biochemical properties. Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. Inc., Madison, WI, pp 951–984

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke MJW, Grime JP (1996) An experimental study of plant community invasibility. Ecology 77:776–790

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Callaway RM, Aschehoug ET (2000) Invasive plants versus their new and old neighbors: a mechanism for exotic invasion. Science 290:731–733

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Callaway RM, Ridenour WM (1999) Novel weapons: invasive success and the evolution of increased competitive ability. Front Ecol Environ 2:436–443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Callaway RM, Thelen G, Rodriguez A, Holben WE (2004) Release from inhibitory soil biota in Europe and positive plant–soil feedback in North America promote invasion Nature 427:731–733

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Campillo R, Andrade O, Contreras E (2001) Variaciones del contenido de Mn de dos suelos sometidos a esterilización y su efecto sobre la pudricion radical del trigo o “mal de pie” (Variation on Mn content of sterilized soil and their effect on take-all disease of wheat). Agricultura Técnica (Chile) 61:339–351

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawley MJ (1987) What makes a community invasible? In: Gray AJ, Crawley MJ, Edwards PJ (eds) Colonization, succession and stability. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 429–453

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Antonio CM, Vitousek PM (1992) Biological invasions by exotic grasses, the grass/fire cycle, and global change. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 23:63–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl BE, Tisdale EW (1975) Environmental factors related to medusahead distribution. J Range Manage 28:463–468

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis MA, Grime JP, Thompson K (2000) Fluctuating resources in plant communities: a general theory of invasibility. J Ecol 88:528–534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elton CS (1958) The ecology of invasions by animals and plants. Methuen, London, 181 pp

  • Fenn ME, Baron JS, Allen EB, Rueth HM, Nydick KR (2003) Ecological effect of nitrogen deposition in the Western United States. BioScience 53:404–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green EK, Galatowitsch SM (2001) Differences in wetland plant community establishment with additions of nitrate-N and invasive species (Phalaris arundinacea and Typha glauca). Can J Bot 79:170–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herbold B, Moyle PB (1986) Introduced species and vacant niches. Am Nat 128:751–760

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hierro JL, Callaway RM (2003) Allelopathy and exotic plant invasion. Plant Soil 256:29–39

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hierro JL, Maron JL, Callaway RM (2005) A biogeographical approach to plant invasions: the importance of studying exotics in their introduced and native range. J Ecol 93:5–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hinz HL, Schwarzlaender M (2004) Comparing invasive plants from their native and exotic range: what can we learn for biological control? Weed Technol 18:1533–1541

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hironaka M (1961) The relative rate of root development of cheatgrass and medusahead. J Range Manage 14:263–267

    Google Scholar 

  • Klironomos JN (2002) Feedback with soil biota contributes to plant rarity and invasiveness in communities. Nature 417:67–70

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lindsay WL, Norvell WA (1978) Development of a DTPA soil test for zinc, iron, manganese, and copper. Soil Sci Soc Am J 42:421–428

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lusk WC, Jones MB, Torell DT, McKell CM (1961) Medusahead palatability. J Range Manage 14:249–251

    Google Scholar 

  • Mack RN, Simberloff D, Lonsdale WM, Evans H, Clout M, Bazzaz FA (2000) Biotic invasions: causes, epidemiology, global consequences, and control. Ecol Appl 10:689–710

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maron JL, Vilá M, Bommarco R, Elmendorf S, Beardsley P (2004) Rapid evolution of an invasive plant. Ecol Monogr 74:261–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller RO (1998) High-temperature oxidations: dry ashing. In: Handbook of reference methods for plant analysis. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, pp 53–56

  • Miller HC, Clausnitzer D, Borman MM (1999) Medusahead. In: Sheley RL, Petroff JK (eds) Biology and management of noxious rangeland weeds. Oregon State Univ. Press, Corvallis, OR, pp 271–281

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell CE, Power AG (2003) Release of invasive plants from fungal and viral pathogens. Nature 421:625–627

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Monaco TA, Mackown CT, Johnson DA, Jones TA, Norton JN, Norton JA, Redingaugh MG (2003) Nitrogen effects on seed germination and seedling growth. J Range Manage 56:646–653

    Google Scholar 

  • Mubarek A, Olsen RA (1976) Immiscible displacement of the soil solution by centrifugation. Soil Sci Soc Am J 40:329–331

    Google Scholar 

  • Reznick DN, Ghalambor CK (2001) The population ecology of contemporary adaptations: what empirical studies reveal about the conditions that promote adaptive evolution. Genetica 112–113:183–198

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rovira AD, Bowen GD (1966) The effects of micro-organisms upon plant growth II. Detoxication of heat-sterilized soils by fungi and bacteria. Plant Soil 25:129–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute (1999) SAS System. Version 8. SAS, Cary, NC

    Google Scholar 

  • Sforza R, Eken C, Hayat R, Widmer TL (2004) First evaluation of Ustilago phrygica for the biological control of Taeniatherum caput-medusae (Triticeae). In: Proceedings of the XIIeme colloque International sur la bıologie des mauvaises herbes, Dijon, France, 31 Aug.–2 Sept., 2004, pp 407–412

  • Siegwart M, Bon MC, Widmer TL, Crespy N, Sforza R (2003) First report of Fusarium arthrosporioides on Medusahead (Taeniatherum caput-medusae) and preliminary tests for host-specificity. Plant Pathol 52:416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suding KN, LeJeune KD, Seastedt TR (2004) Competitive impacts and responses of an invasive weed: dependencies on nitrogen and phosphorus availability. Oecologia 141:526–535

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tabatabai MA (1994) Soil enzymes. In: Weaver RW, Angle JS, Bottomley PS (eds) Methods of soil analysis part 2 microbiological and biochemical properties. Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. Inc., Madison, WI, pp 775–834

    Google Scholar 

  • Thébaud C, Simberloff D (2001) Are plants really larger in their introduced ranges? Am Nat 157:231–236

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Widmer TL, Sforza R (2004) Exploration for plant pathogens against Taeniatherum caput-medusae (medusahead). In: Cullen JM, Briese DT, Kriticos DJ, Lonsdale WM, Morin L, Scott JK (eds) Proceedings of the XI international symposium on biological control of weeds. CSIRO Entomology, Canberra, Australia, pp 193–197

    Google Scholar 

  • Willis AJ, Blossey B (1999) Benign environments do not explain the increased vigour of non-indigenous plants: a cross-continental transplant experiment. Biocontrol Sci Technol 9:567–577

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young JA, Evans RA (1970) Invasion of medusahead into the Great Basin. Weed Sci 18:89–97

    Google Scholar 

  • Young JA, Evans R (1982) Ecology and management of medusahead (Taeniatherum caput-medusae ssp. asperum (Simk) Melderis). Great Basin Natur 52:245–252

    Google Scholar 

  • Young JA, Evans RA, Major J (1972) Alien plants in the Great Basin. J Range Manage 25:194–201

    Google Scholar 

  • Young JA, Trent JD, Blank RR, Palmquist DE (1998) Nitrogen interactions with medusahead (Taeniatherum caput-medusae ssp. asperum) seedbanks. Weed Sci 46:191–195

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ziska LH (2003) Evaluation of the growth response of six invasive species to past, present and future atmospheric carbon dioxide. J Exp Bot 54:395–404

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

We thank Tye Morgan, Benoît Nusillard, and Olivier Simonot for their technical assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. USDA-Agricultural Research Service, Exotic and Invasive Weed Research Unit, 920 Valley Road, Reno, NV, 89512, USA

    Robert R. Blank

  2. USDA-Agricultural Research Service, European Biological Control Laboratory, Montpellier, France

    René Sforza

Authors
  1. Robert R. Blank
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. René Sforza
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert R. Blank.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Hans Lambers

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Blank, R.R., Sforza, R. Plant–soil relationships of the invasive annual grass Taeniatherum caput-medusae: a reciprocal transplant experiment. Plant Soil 298, 7–19 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-007-9308-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-007-9308-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation