Plant and Soil

, Volume 293, Issue 1–2, pp 7–21 | Cite as

Nickel bioavailability in an ultramafic toposequence in the Vosges Mountains (France)

  • V. Chardot
  • G. EchevarriaEmail author
  • M. Gury
  • S. Massoura
  • J. L. Morel
Regular Article


A serpentinised harzburgite outcrop located in the Vosges Mountains hosts a population of the Ni-hyperaccumulator Thlaspi caerulescens J. & C. Presl. A complete study was undertaken to relate the variability of Ni availability along the ultramafic toposequence to pedogenesis, soil mineralogy and functioning with X-Ray Diffraction, Transmission Electron Microscope observations coupled with Isotopic Exchange Kinetics and diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid extraction of Ni. The soil profiles ranging from Dystric Cambisol to Hypermagnesic Hypereutric Cambisol were distributed unevenly along the toposequence probably due to geochemical variability of the bedrock and also complex quaternary erosion features. The richest soils were characterised by slight mineral weathering leading to Ni, Cr and Fe accumulation in the B horizons whereas the lowest saturated soils had very low-metal contents. Most soil minerals were inherited from the parent materials and there were only few traces of formation of secondary minerals. Primary minerals (e.g. serpentine, chlorite) contained low Ni concentrations (0.2%) whereas neoformed goethite, mainly in the B horizons of the richest soils, contained up to 4.3% Ni. Ni was probably sorbed onto amorphous Fe oxy−hydroxide particles (oxalate extraction) rather than incorporated within the crystal lattice of goethite. Ni availability in the B horizon of Hypereutric Cambisols was extremely high and so was the oxalate extractable Fe. At the toposequence level, there was a high level of Ni availability in the least weathered soils and a very low-availability level in the more intensively weathered soils (strongly acidic pH). Ni availability was unexpectedly positively correlated to pH and was controlled by soil mineralogy and Ni-bearing mineral phases. Ni hyperaccumulation (above 1,000 mg kg−1) by native T. caerulescens was only reached in the Ni-rich soils as a consequence of the local edaphic factors. Ni uptake by T. caerulescens is strongly regulated by Ni availability in soils and therefore related to pedogenesis.


Ultramafics Bioavailability Soil mineralogy Isotopic exchange kinetics Thlaspi caerulescens Metal hyperaccumulators 



The study was funded by a grant from the Fédération de Recherche “Eau-Sol-Terre” (INPL-UHP-CNRS-INRA) of Nancy, France. The authors would especially like to thank Dr. Jafaar Ghambaja and Philippe Lambert for the TEM and XRD analyses and interpretation and Hélène Molins for her valuable help in field and lab work.


  1. Alexander EB (1988) Morphology, fertility, and classification of productive soils on serpentinized peridotite in California (USA). Geoderma 41:337–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alexander EB (2004) Varieties of ultramafic soil formation, plant cover and productivity. In: Boyd RS, Baker AJM, Proctor J (eds) Ultramafic rocks: Their soils, vegetation and fauna. Proceedings of the 4th international conference on serpentine ecology. Science Reviews, St. Albans, Herts, UK, pp 9–17Google Scholar
  3. Anderson PR, Christensen TH (1988) Distribution coefficients of Cd, Co, Ni, and Zn in soils. Journal of Soil Science 39:15–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baker AJM, McGrath SP, Sidoli CMD, Reeves RD (1994) The possibility of in situ heavy metal decontamination of polluted soils using crops of metal-accumulating plants. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 11:41–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Becquer T, Bourdon E, Pétard J (1995) Disponibilité du nickel le long d’une toposéquence de sols développés sur roches ultramafiques de Nouvelle-Calédonie. Comptes rendus de l’Académie des Sciences Paris, Série IIa 321:585–592Google Scholar
  6. Becquer T, Pétard J, Duwig C, Bourdon E, Moreau R, Herbillon AJ (2001) Mineralogical, chemical and charge properties of geric Ferralsols from New Caledonia. Geoderma 103:291–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Becquer T, Quantin C, Rotté-Capet S, Ghambaja J, Mustin C, Herbillon AJ (2006) Sources of trace metals in Ferralsols in New Caledonia. European Journal of Soil Science 57:200–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bonifacio E, Zanini E, Boero V, Franchini-Angela M (1997) Pedogenesis in a soil catena on serpentinite in northwestern Italy. Geoderma 75:33–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brooks RR (1987) Serpentine and its vegetation: A multidisciplinary approach. Dioscorides Press, Portland, ORGoogle Scholar
  10. Bulmer CE, Lavkulich LM, Schreier HE (1992) Morphology, chemistry and mineralogy of soils derived from serpentinite and tephra in southwestern British Columbia. Soil Science 154:72–82Google Scholar
  11. Caillaud J, Proust D, Righi D, Martin F (2004) Fe-rich clays in a weathering profile developed from serpentinite. Clays and Clay Minerals 52:779–791CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Churchman GJ (2000) The alteration and formation of soil minerals by weathering. In Sumner ME (ed) Handbook of soil science. CRC, FL, USA, pp F3–F76Google Scholar
  13. Duvigneaud P (1966) Note sur la biogéochimie des serpentines du sud ouest de la France. Bulletin de la Société royale de Botanique de Belgique 99:271–329Google Scholar
  14. Echevarria G, Morel JL, Fardeau JC, Leclerc-Cessac E (1998) Assessment of phytoavailability of nickel in soils. Journal of Environmental Quality 27:1064–1070CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Echevarria G, Massoura S, Sterckeman T, Becquer T, Schwartz C, Morel JL (2006) Assessment and control of the bioavailability of Ni in soils. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 25:643–651PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gasser UG, Dahlgren RA (1994) Solid–phase speciation and surface association of metals in serpentinitic soils. Soil Science 158:409–420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gasser UG, Juchler WA, Hobson WA, Sticher H (1995) The fate of chromium and nickel in subalpine soils derived from serpentine. Canadian Journal of Soil Science 75:187–195Google Scholar
  18. Jaffré T, Brooks RR, Lee J, Reeves RD (1976) Sebertia acuminata: a hyperaccumulator of nickel from New Caledonia. Science 193:579–580CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Lee BD, Sears KS, Graham RC, Amrhein C, Vali H (2003) Secondary mineral genesis from chlorite and serpentine in an ultramafic soil toposequence. Soil Science Society of America Journal 67:1309–1317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lindsay WL, Norvell WA (1978) Development of DTPA soil test for zinc, iron, manganese and copper. Soil Science Society of America Journal 42:421–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Massoura ST (2004) Spéciation et phytodisponibilité du nickel dans les sols. Doctoral dissertation, Institut National Polytechnique de Lorraine, Nancy, FranceGoogle Scholar
  22. Massoura ST, Echevarria G, Becquer T, Ghambaja J, Leclerc-Cessac E, Morel JL (2006) Nickel bearing phases and availability in natural and anthropogenic soils. Geoderma 136:28–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Massoura ST, Echevarria G, Leclerc-Cessac E, Morel JL (2004) Response of excluder, indicator, and hyperaccumulator plants to nickel availability in soils. Australian Journal of Soil Research 42:933–938CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. McKeague JJ, Day JA (1966) Dithionite and oxalate extractable Fe and Al as aids in differentiating different classes of soils. Canadian Journal of Soil Science 46:13–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mehra OP, Jackson ML (1960) Iron oxides removal from soils and clays by dithionite-citrate systems buffered with sodium bicarbonate. In: Swineford A (ed.) Proceedings of the 7th nat. conf. clay minerals. Pergamon Press, Elmsdorf, NY, pp 317–342Google Scholar
  26. O’Hanley DS (1996) Serpentinites: Records of tectonic and petrological history. In: Oxford monographs on geology and geophysics. Oxford University Press, New York, 277 pGoogle Scholar
  27. Peer WA, Mahmoudian M, Freeman JL, Lahner B, Richards EL, Reeves RD, Murphy AS, Salt DE (2006) Assessment of plants from the Brassicaceae family as genetic models for the study of nickel and zinc hyperaccumulation. New Phytologist 172:248–260PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Quantin C, Becquer T, Rouiller JH, Berthelin J (2001) Oxide weathering and trace metal release by bacterial reduction in a New Caledonia Ferralsol. Biogeochemistry 53:323–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rabenhorst MC, Foss JE, Fanning DS (1982) Genesis of Maryland soils formed from serpentinite. Soil Science Society of America Journal 46:607–616CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Reeves RD, Schwartz C, Morel JL, Edmondson J (2001) Distribution and metal-accumulating behavior of Thlaspi caerulescens and associated metallophytes in France. International Journal of Phytoremediation 3:1–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sarret G, Balesdent J, Bouziri L, Garnier JM, Marcus MA, Geoffroy N, Panfili F, Manceau A (2004) Zn speciation in the organic horizon of a contaminated soil by micro-X-ray fluorescence, micro- and powder-EXAFS spectroscopy, and isotopic dilution. Environmental Science and Technology 38:2792–2801PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Schwertmann U, Latham M (1986) Properties of iron oxides in New Caledonian oxisols. Geoderma 39:105–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Shallari S, Echevarria G, Schwartz C, Morel JL (2001) Availability of nickel in soils for the hyperaccumulator Alyssum murale (Waldst. and Kit.). South African Journal of Science 97:568–570Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • V. Chardot
    • 1
  • G. Echevarria
    • 1
    Email author
  • M. Gury
    • 1
  • S. Massoura
    • 1
    • 2
  • J. L. Morel
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratoire Sols et EnvironnementUMR INPL-INRA 1120Vandoeuvre-les-Nancy CedexFrance
  2. 2.Andra (Agence nationale pour la gestion des déchets radioactifs)Chotenay-Malabry CedexFrance

Personalised recommendations