Plant and Soil

, Volume 293, Issue 1–2, pp 79–89 | Cite as

In-situ phytoextraction of Ni by a native population of Alyssum murale on an ultramafic site (Albania)

  • Aida Bani
  • Guillaume EchevarriaEmail author
  • Sulejman Sulçe
  • Jean Louis Morel
  • Alfred Mullai
Regular Article


Ultramafic outcrops are widespread in Albania and host several Ni hyperaccumulators (e.g., Alyssum murale Waldst. & Kit.). A field experiment was conducted in Pojske (Eastern Albania), a large ultramafic area in which native A. murale was cultivated. The experiment consisted in testing the phytoextraction potential of already installed natural vegetation (including A. murale) on crop fields with or without suitable fertilisation. The area was divided into six 36-m2 plots, three of which were fertilised in April 2005 with (NPK + S). The soil (Magnesic Hypereutric Vertisol) was fully described as well as the mineralogy of horizons and the localisation of Ni bearing phases (TEM-EDX and XRD). Ni availability was also characterised by Isotopic Exchange Kinetics (IEK). The flora was fully described on both fertilised and unfertilised plots and the plant composition (major and trace elements) and biomass (shoots) harvested individually were recorded.

The soil had mainly two Ni-bearing phases: high-Mg smectite (1.3% Ni) and serpentine (0.7% Ni), the first one being the source of available Ni. Ni availability was extremely high according to IEK and confirmed by Ni contents in Trifolium nigriscens Viv. reaching 1,442 mg kg−1 (A new hyperaccumulator?). Total biomass yields were 6.3 t ha−1 in fertilised plots and 3.2 t ha−1 in unfertilised plots with a highly significant effect: fertilisation increased dramatically the proportion of A. murale in the plots (2.6 t ha−1 vs. 0.2 t ha−1). Ni content in the shoots of A. murale reached 9,129 mg kg−1 but metal concentration was not significantly affected by fertilisation. Phytoextracted Ni in total harvest reached 25 kg Ni ha−1 on the fertilised plots. It was significantly lower in unfertilised plots (3 kg Ni ha−1). Extensive phytomining on such sites could be promising in the Albanian context by domesticating already installed natural populations with fertilisation.


In-situ phytoremediation Hyperaccumulator plant Nickel Phytomining Bioavailability Serpentine 



The Authors wish to thank the French Embassy in Tirana (Albania) for the doctoral scholarship of Aida Bani.


  1. Baker AJM, Brooks RR (1989) Terrestrial higher plants which hyperaccumulate metalic elements—A review of their distribution, ecology and phytochemistry. Biorecovery 1:81–126Google Scholar
  2. Brady KU, Kruckeberg AR, Bradshaw HD (2005) Evolutionary ecology of plant adaptation to serpentine soils. 36:243–266Google Scholar
  3. Bennett FA, Tyler EK, Brooks RR, Greg PEH, Stewart RB (1999) Fertilisation of hyperaccumulators to enhance their potential for phytoremediation and phytomining. In: Brooks RR (ed) Plants that hyperaccumulate heavy metals. CAB International, Wallingford, Oxon, UK, pp 249–259Google Scholar
  4. Boyd RS, Jaffré T (2001) Phytoenrichement of soil content by Sebertia acuminata in New Caledonia and the concept of elemental alelopathy. S Afri J Sci 97:535–538Google Scholar
  5. Boyd RS, Martens SN (1998) The significance of metal hyperaccumulation for biotic interactions. Chemoecology 8:1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brooks RR, Yang XH (1984) Element levels and relationships in the endemic serpentine flora of the Great Dyke, Zimbabwe and their significance as controlling factors for this flora. Taxon 33:392–399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brooks RR (1987) In: Dudley TR (ed) Serpentine and its vegetation. Dioscorides, Portland, OR, 454 ppGoogle Scholar
  8. Chaney RL, Malik M, Li YM, Brown SL, Brewer EP, Angle JS, Baker AJM (1997) Curr Opin Biotechnol 8:279–284Google Scholar
  9. Chaney RL, Angle JS, Baker AJM, Li YM (1998) Method for phytomining of nickel, cobalt and other metals from soils. US Patent, No. 5,711,784Google Scholar
  10. Chardot V, Massoura ST, Echevarria G, Reeves RD, Morel JL (2005) Phytoextraction potential of the nickel hyperaccumulators Leptoplax emarginata and Bornmuellera tymphaea. Int J Phytoremediation 7:323–335PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Davis MA, Boyd RS, Cane JH (2001) Host switching does not circumvent the Ni-based defense of the Ni hyperaccumulator streptanthus polygaloides (Brassicaceae). S Afr J Sci 97:554–557Google Scholar
  12. Decarreau A, Colin F, Herbillon A, Manceau A, Nahon D, Paquet H, Trauth-Badaud D, Trescases JJ (1987) Domain segregation in Ni-Fe-Mg smectites. Clays Clay Miner 35:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Echevarria G, Leclerc-Cessac E, Fardeau JC, Morel JL (1998) Assessment of phytoavailability of Ni in soils. J Environ Qual 27:1064–1070CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Echevarria G, Massoura T, Sterckeman T, Morel JL (2006) Assessment and control of the bioavalability of nickel in soils. Environ Toxicol Chem 25:643–651PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kumar PBAN, Dushenkov V, Motto H, Raskin I (1995) Phytoextraction: the use of plants to remove heavy metals from soils. Environ Sci Technol 29:1232–1238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kukier U, Peters CA, Chaney JS, Angle JS, Roseberg RJ (2004) The effect of pH on metal accumulation in two Alyssum species. J Environ Qual 32:2090–2102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Li YM, Chaney RL, Angle JS, Baker AJM (2000) Phytoremediation of heavy metal contaminated soilsK. In: Wise DL (ed) Bioremediation of contaminated soils. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 837–884Google Scholar
  18. Li YM, Chaney RL, Brewer E, Angle JS, Nelkin J (2003a) Phytoextractrion of nickel and cobalt by hyperaccumulator Alyssum species grown on nickel-contaminated soils. Environ Sci Technol 37:1463–1468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Li YM, Chaney RL, Brewer E, Roseberg R, Angle JS, Baker AJM, Reeves RD, Nelkin J (2003b) Development of a technology for commercial phytoextraction of nickel: economic and technical considerations. Plant Soil 249:107–115Google Scholar
  20. Lindsay WL, Norvell WA (1978) Development of DTPA soil test for zinc, iron, manganese, and copper. Soil Sci Soc Am J 42:421–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Massoura ST, Echevarria G, Becquer T, Ghanbaja J, Leclerc-Cessac E, Morel JL (2006) Nickel bearing phases and availability in natural and anthropogenic soils. Geoderma 136:28–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Massoura ST, Echevarria G, Leclerc-Cessac E, Morel JL (2004) Response of excluder, indicator, and hyperaccumulator plants to nickel availability in soils. Aust J Soil Res 42:933–938CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Proctor J (1971) The plant ecology of serpentine. III. The influence of a high magnesium/calcium ratio and high nickel and chromium levels in some British and Swedish serpentine soils. J Ecol 59:827–842CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Robinson BH, Chiarucci A, Brooks RR (1997) The nickel hyperaccumulator plant Alyssum bertolonii as a potential agent for phytoremediation and phytomining of nickel. J Geochem Explor 59:75–86Google Scholar
  25. Shallari S, Schwartz C, Hasko A, Morel JL (1998) Heavy metals in soils and plants of serpentine and industrial sites of Albania. Sci Total Environ 209:133–142PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Stevanovic V, Tan K, Iatrou G (2003) Distribution of the endemic Balkan flora on serpentine I—obligate serpentine endemics. Plant Syst Evol 242:149–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Walker RB (1954) The ecology of serpentine soils. II. Factors affecting plant growth on serpentine soils. Ecology 35:258–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Aida Bani
    • 1
    • 2
  • Guillaume Echevarria
    • 2
    Email author
  • Sulejman Sulçe
    • 1
  • Jean Louis Morel
    • 2
  • Alfred Mullai
    • 3
  1. 1.Agro-Environmental DepartmentAgricultural University of TiranaKamezAlbania
  2. 2.Laboratoire Sols et EnvironnmentINPL-ENSAIA/INRA UMR 1120, Nancy-UniversitéVandoeuvre-les-NancyFrance
  3. 3.Institute of Biological ResearchTiranaAlbania

Personalised recommendations