Skip to main content
Log in

Nature of the Interference Mechanism of Sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.) Straw

  • Published:
Plant and Soil Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.) straw left in the field after harvest interferes with the growth of winter and summer weeds. In the last years, there was a progressive move away from burning sugarcane straw to retaining it on the soil surface after harvest to prevent soil degradation and environmental pollution. Water-soluble phenolics leachated from straw into soil may suppress weed growth. A study was carried out to investigate (1) the effect of biotic (unautoclaved) soil treated with burned and unburned sugarcane straw leachates on seedling growth and foliar proline content of beggarticks (Bidens subalternans L.) and wild mustard (Brassica campestris L.), (2) the modification of sugarcane straw phytotoxicity in abiotic (autoclaved) soil and biotic (unautoclaved) soil plus activated charcoal, and (3) changes of inorganic ions and phenolic contents in biotic soil after treatment with burned and unburned sugarcane straw leachate. Unburned straw leachate significantly inhibited root elongation of 7-d-old beggarticks and wild mustard seedlings. Burned straw leachate did not affect seedling growth of the assayed weeds suggesting that organic straw phytotoxins were involved. Experiments with activated charcoal, however, did not provide clear evidence supporting the involve of organic molecules in straw phytotoxicity. Unburned straw leachate incorporated in biotic soil was more inhibitory than in abiotic soil on root growth suggesting that microbial activity is involved in sugarcane straw interference. There was no evidence of nutrient microbial immobilization. Unburned sugarcane straw leachate increased total phenolic content in biotic soil more than in abiotic soil or biotic soil plus charcoal. Burned sugarcane straw leachate did not increase phenolic compounds levels in biotic soil. Linear regression analysis indicated a strong correlation between levels of soil phenolic contents and root growth inhibition. Soil characteristics evaluated in soil treated with burned and unburned sugarcane straw leachate suggest that straw phytotoxicity is related with organic molecules, such as phenolic compounds, rather than to variations in inorganic nutrients. Unburned straw leachate induced proline accumulation in seedling leaves of both beggarticks and wild mustard. Proline foliar content was higher in seedlings grown in biotic soil than in seedlings grown in biotic soil plus charcoal suggesting that straw organic constituents induced proline accumulation. Proline foliar content of seedlings grown in biotic soil treated with burned straw leachate was not significantly different from water control. The present study showed that sugarcane straw leachate interferes with seedling growth of beggarticks and wild mustard and that water-soluble phenolics can play a role in the seedling growth inhibition of the assayed weeds.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • S E Allen (1989) Chemical Analysis of Ecological Materials Blackwell Scientific Publishers London

    Google Scholar 

  • L S Bates R P Waldren I D Teare (1973) ArticleTitleRapid determination of free proline for water stress studies Plant Soil 39 205–207 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00018060 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DyaE3sXlsVGitLk%3D

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • U Blum (1996) ArticleTitleAllelopathic interactions involving phenolic acids J. Nematol. 28 259–267 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DyaK1cXjsVOmsrc%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • R Boopathy T Beary P J Templet (2001) ArticleTitleMicrobial decomposition of post-harvest sugarcane residue Bioresour. Technol. 79 29–33 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0960-8524(01)00034-7 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3MXktFeju7g%3D Occurrence Handle11396904

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • G J Carvalho L A B Andrade M B Gomide P A M Figueiredo (1996) ArticleTitleAllelopathical potentialities of senescent leaves and “green leaves+tips” of sugar cane, in different concentrations of dry matter, upon the germination of lettuce seeds Unimar Ciências 5 19–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheremisinoff P N and Ellerbusch F 1978 Carbon Adsorption Handbook. Ann Arbor Science Publishers.

  • B R Dalton (1999) The ocurrence and behavior of plant phenolic acids in soil environments and their potential involvement in allelochemical interference interactions: methodological limitations in establishing conclusive proof of allelopathy Inderjit K M M Dakshini C L Foy (Eds) Principles and Practices in Plant Ecology: Allelochemical Interactions CRC Press Boca Raton, Florida 57–74

    Google Scholar 

  • N T Faithfull (2002) Methods in Agricultural Chemical Analysis: A Practical Handbook CABI Publis New York

    Google Scholar 

  • B A Hamdi Inderjit M Olofsdotter J C Streibig (2001) ArticleTitleLaboratory bioassay for phytotoxicity: an example from wheat straw Agron. J. 93 43–48

    Google Scholar 

  • J L Harper (1977) Population Biology of Plants Academic Press London

    Google Scholar 

  • Inderjit (2001) ArticleTitleSoils: environmental effect on allelochemical activity Agron. J. 93 79–84 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3MXitl2mu7s%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Inderjit K M M Dakshini (1999) Bioassays for allelopathy: Interactions of soil organic and inorganic constituents Inderjit K M M Dakshini C L Foy (Eds) Principles and Pratices in Plant Ecology: Allelochemical Interactions CRC Press Boca Raton, Florida 35–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Inderjit C L Foy (1999) ArticleTitleNature of the interference mechanism of mugwort (Artemisia vulgaris) Weed Technol. 13 176–182

    Google Scholar 

  • Inderjit J Weiner (2001) ArticleTitlePlant allelochemical interference or soil chemical ecology? Persp Plant Ecol. Evol. Syst. 4 4–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Inderjit D S Rawat C L Foy (2004) ArticleTitleMultifaceted approach to determine rice straw phytotoxicity Can. J. Bot. 82 168–176 Occurrence Handle10.1139/b03-137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R A Liebl A D Worsham (1983) ArticleTitleInhibition of pitted morningglory (Ipomoea lacunose L.) and certain other weed species by phytotoxic components of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) straw J. Chem. Ecol. 9 1027–1043 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00982209 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DyaL2cXjsFar

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lorenzi H J, Gandini M O, Gazon A L, 1989 Trash blankets: The potential to control weeds and the effect on ratoon cane development. Proceedings of the 20th ISSCT, 571–575

  • C Manechini (2000) ArticleTitleThe impact of cane trash on weed control Int. Cane Energy News 2 7–9

    Google Scholar 

  • P Ramos N Pedrol (2001) Free proline quantification M J Reigosa (Eds) Handbook of Plant Ecophysiology Techniques Kluwer academic publishers New York 365–682

    Google Scholar 

  • Sampietro D A, Vattuone M A, Isla M I, 2005 Plant growth inhibitors isolated from sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum) straw. J. Plant Physiol. (in press)

  • J Scandaliaris F Pérez Zamora M Rufino E Romero M Morandini (2002) ArticleTitleLa cosecha verde como estrategia para disminuir el impacto ambiental de la caña de azúcar Avance Agroindustrial 1 14–17

    Google Scholar 

  • S K Schmidt R Ley (1999) Microbial competition and soil structure limit the expression of allelochemicals in nature K M M Inderjit Dakshini C L Foy (Eds) Principles and Practices in Plant Ecology: Allelochemical Interactions CRC Press Boca Raton, Florida 339–352

    Google Scholar 

  • T Swain W E Hillis (1959) ArticleTitleThe phenolic constituents of Prunus domestica L. – the quantitative analysis of phenolic constituents J. Sci. Food Agric. 10 63–68 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DyaG1MXltFylug%3D%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • A Walkley I A Black (1934) ArticleTitleAn examination of Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method Soil Sci. 37 29–37 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DyaA2cXitlGmug%3D%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • T S C Wang J Yang T Chuang (1967) ArticleTitleSoil phenolic acids as plant growth inhibitors Soil Sci. 103 239–246 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DyaF2sXhtFCrsrc%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • D A Wardle M C Nilsson (1997) ArticleTitleMicrobe–plant competition, allelopathy in arctic plants Oecologia 109 291–293 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s004420050086

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Diego A. Sampietro.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sampietro, D.A., Vattuone, M.A. Nature of the Interference Mechanism of Sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.) Straw. Plant Soil 280, 157–169 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-005-2856-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-005-2856-5

Keywords

Navigation