Skip to main content
Log in

Serpentine and Nonserpentine Achillea millefolium Accessions Differ in Serpentine Substrate Tolerance and Response to Organic and Inorganic Amendments

  • Published:
Plant and Soil Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Subgrade serpentine substrates are exceptionally difficult to revegetate due to multiple limitations including low N, P, and K, low Ca:Mg molar ratios, high levels of heavy metals including Ni, Cr, and Co, low organic matter, low CEC, and low water holding capacity. To examine the influence of plant origin on the success of the revegetation of serpentine substrates, granite and serpentine accessions of Achillea millefolium were grown on subgrade serpentine substrate amended with yard waste compost, slow-release NPK fertilizer, and/or CaSO4 · 2H2O (gypsum). The goals of this study were to: (1) identify the substrate amendment combination that maximized establishment of A. millefolium on serpentine substrate, (2) compare seedling establishment, survival, and growth of the serpentine and granite A. millefolium accessions in order to determine if a serpentine edaphic ecotype of A. millefolium exists and if this ecotype is superior to the granite accession for the establishment of vegetation on serpentine substrate and (3) if a serpentine edaphic ecotype of A. millefolium does exist, what physiological features with respect to mineral nutrition convey a higher tolerance of serpentine for this ecotype than the nonserpentine ecotype. Seedling establishment, survival, and growth were greatest for A. millefolium when the subgrade serpentine substrate was amended with 30% (v/v) compost and 220 mg kg substrate−1 each of N, P, and K. The serpentine A. millefolium accession displayed a greater tolerance of the subgrade serpentine substrate, serpentine topsoil, and the amended subgrade serpentine substrate than the granite accession. Higher capacity of the serpentine A. millefolium accession for selective Ca translocation from roots to the shoot resulted in a significantly higher shoot Ca:Mg molar ratio than the granite accession and appeared to be the most important physiological feature conveying greater tolerance of the serpentine accession for serpentine substrates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • S Baccouch A Chaoui E El Ferjani (1998) ArticleTitleNickel toxicity: Effects on growth and metabolism of maize J. Plant Nutr. 21 577–599 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DyaK1cXhvVOlsL4%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • R Burt M Fillmore M A Wilson E R Gross R W Langridge D A Lammers (2001) ArticleTitleSoil properties of selected pedons on ultramafic rocks in Klamath mountains, Oregon Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 32 2145–2175 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3MXns1Wltr4%3D Occurrence Handle10.1081/CSS-120000275

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • S P Carter J Proctor D R Slingsby (1988) ArticleTitleThe effects of fertilization on part of the Keen of Hamar serpentine, Shetland Trans. Bot. Soc. Edinburgh 45 97–105

    Google Scholar 

  • A Chiarucci S Maccherini I Bonini V Dominicis ParticleDe (1999) ArticleTitleEffects of nutrient addition on community productivity and structure of serpentine vegetation Plant Biol. 1 121–126 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DyaK1MXht1Sjsrk%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • J Clausen D Keck W M Hiesey (1948) Experimental studies on the nature of species. III. Environmental responses of climatic races of Achillea Carnegie Institution of Washington, publication 581 Washington, D.C 129

    Google Scholar 

  • S S Cooke (1994) The edaphic ecology of two western north American composite species University of Washington Seattle, Washington 288

    Google Scholar 

  • Dumas J B A, 1831 Procédés de l’analyse organique. Annales Chimiques et Physiques. 2 47:198–213. from Bremner J M and Mulvaney C S. 1982. Nitrogen pp. 595–624 In Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 2. Chemical and Microbiological Properties, Agronomy Monograph No. 9, Eds. A L Page, R H Miller and D R Keeney. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, Wisconsin. 1188 pp.

  • R Gabbrielli T Pandolfini O Vergnano M R Palandri (1990) ArticleTitleComparison of two serpentine species with different nickel tolerance strategies Plant Soil 122 271–277 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DyaK3cXktVGit7Y%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • R L Halstead (1968) ArticleTitleEffect of different amendments on yield and composition of oats grown on a soil derived from serpentine material Can. J. Soil Sci. 48 301–305 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DyaF1cXltVGgu74%3D Occurrence Handle10.4141/cjss68-041

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • L F Huenneke S P Hamburg R Koide H A Mooney P M Vitousek (1990) ArticleTitleEffects of soil resources on plant invasion and community structure in Californian serpentine grassland Ecology 71 478–491 Occurrence Handle10.2307/1940302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • W R Johnston J Proctor (1981) ArticleTitleGrowth of serpentine and non-serpentine races of Festuca rubra in solutions simulating the chemical conditions in a toxic serpentine soil J. Ecol. 69 855–869 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DyaL38XmslOmsg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.2307/2259641

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Keeney D R and Nelson D W 1982 Nitrogen-inorganic forms. Pages 643–689 In Methods of Soil Analysis, part 2. Chemical and Microbiological Properties, Agronomy Monograph No. 9, Eds. A L Page, R H Miller and D R Keeney. ASA, Madison, Wisconsin. 1188 pp.

  • W Koerselman A F M Meuleman (1996) ArticleTitleThe vegetation N:P ratio: a new tool to detect the nature of nutrient limitation J. Appl. Ecol. 33 1441–1450 Occurrence Handle10.2307/2404783

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R T Koide L F Huenneke S P Hamburg H A Mooney (1988) ArticleTitleEffects of applications of fungicide, phosphorus and nitrogen on the structure and productivity of an annual serpentine plant community Funct. Ecol. 2 335–344 Occurrence Handle10.2307/2389406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • A R Kruckeberg (1950) An experimental inquiry into the nature of endemism on serpentine soils University of California Berkeley, California 154

    Google Scholar 

  • A R Kruckeberg (1984) California Serpentines: Flora, Vegetation, Geology, Soils And Management Problems University of California Press Berkeley, California 180

    Google Scholar 

  • A R Kruckeberg (2002) Geology and Plant Life. The Effects of Landforms and Rock Types on Plants University of Washington Press Seattle, Washington 362

    Google Scholar 

  • W L Lindsay W A Norvell (1978) ArticleTitleDevelopment of a DTPA soil test for zinc, iron, manganese, and copper Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 42 421–428 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DyaE1cXltVKntLs%3D Occurrence Handle10.2136/sssaj1978.03615995004200030009x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • A Lombini E Dinelli C Ferrari A Simoni (1998) ArticleTitlePlant-soil relationships in the serpentinite screes of Mt. Prinzera (Northern Apennines, Italy) J. Geo. Expl. 64 19–33 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DyaK1MXis1yntA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0375-6742(98)00017-X

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • O P Madhok R B Walker (1969) ArticleTitleMagnesium nutrition of two species of sunflower Plant Physiol. 44 1016–1022 Occurrence Handle16657149 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DyaF1MXltVSqsro%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • H Marschner C Richter (1974) ArticleTitleCalcium-transport in wurzeln von mais- und bohnenkeimpflanzen Plant Soil 40 193–210 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DyaE2cXotFeksg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00011422

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • H Marschner (2002) Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants Academic Press San Diego, California 889

    Google Scholar 

  • T R Moore R C Zimmermann (1977) ArticleTitleEstablishment of vegetation on serpentine asbestos mine wastes, southeastern Quebec, Canada J.Appl. Ecol. 14 589–599 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DyaE2sXltlart7Y%3D Occurrence Handle10.2307/2402569

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • L Nagy J Proctor (1997) ArticleTitlePlant growth and reproduction on a toxic alpine ultramafic soil: adaptation to nutrient limitation New Phytol. 137 267–274 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DyaK2sXnvFagsLo%3D Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1469-8137.1997.00799.x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • O’Dell R E, James J J and Richards J H (in press) Congeneric serpentine and nonserpentine shrubs differ more in leaf Ca:Mg than in tolerance of low N, low P, or heavy metals. Plant and Soil.

  • Olsen S R and Sommers L E 1982 Phosphorus. pp. 403–430 In Methods of Soil Analysis, part 2. Chemical and Microbiological Properties. Ed. A Klute ASA Monograph Number 9, Madison, Wisconsin. 1159 pp.

  • B A Roberts J Proctor (1992) The Ecology of Areas with Serpentinized Rocks. A World View Kluwer Academic Publishers Boston, Massachusetts 472

    Google Scholar 

  • J D Rhoades S Miyamoto (1990) Testing Soils for Salinity R L Westerman (Eds) Soil Testing and Plant Analysis EditionNumber3 SSSA, Madison Wisconsin, USA 299–336

    Google Scholar 

  • J O Sawyer T Keeler-Wolf (1995) A Manual of California Vegetation California Native Plant Society Sacramento, California 471

    Google Scholar 

  • P R Shewry P J Peterson (1976) ArticleTitleDistribution of chromium and nickel in plants and soil from serpentine and other sites J. Ecol. 64 195–212 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DyaE28XktF2qsbk%3D Occurrence Handle10.2307/2258691

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas G W 1982 Exchangeable cations. Pages 159–165 In Methods of Soil Analysis, part 2. Chemical and Microbiological Properties. Ed. A Klute. ASA Monograph Number 9, Madison, Wisconsin. 1159 pp.

  • S N Turitzin (1982) ArticleTitleNutrient limitations to plant growth in a California serpentine grassland Am. Midl. Nat. 107 95–99 Occurrence Handle10.2307/2425191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R B Walker H M Walker P R Ashworth (1955) ArticleTitleCalcium-magnesium nutrition with special reference to serpentine soils Plant Phys. 30 214–221 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DyaG2MXos1eqtg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1104/pp.30.3.214

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • A Westerbergh (1994) ArticleTitleSerpentine and nonserpentine Silene dioica plants do not differ in nickel tolerance Plant Soil 167 297–303 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DyaK2MXks1Chs7s%3D Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00007956

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ryan E. O’Dell.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

O’Dell, R.E., Claassen, V.P. Serpentine and Nonserpentine Achillea millefolium Accessions Differ in Serpentine Substrate Tolerance and Response to Organic and Inorganic Amendments. Plant Soil 279, 253–269 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-005-2360-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-005-2360-y

Keywords

Navigation