Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of continuously recorded plant-based water stress indicators for young lemon trees

  • Published:
Plant and Soil Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

Continuously recorded plant-based water stress indicators (sap flow and parameters derived from trunk diameter fluctuations) were compared in potted young lemon trees (Citrus limon (L.) Burm. fil, cv. Verna) grafted on sour orange (C. aurantium L.) rootstock submitted to deficit irrigation. Daily maximum (MXTD) and minimum (MNTD) trunk diameters and daily trunk diameter shrinkage (MDS) were directly influenced by the water supply to the trees from the soil. The continuously recorded plant-based water stress indicators presented different degrees of sensitivity when used to estimate the water status of the plants. Sap flow (SF) and MDS were more immediate and sensitive than MXTD and MNTD. However, the higher signal intensity: noise for SF and the fact that its signal intensities remained clearly above unity during the stress period, indicating that the soil water was depleted, point to the greater reliability of this indicator. Also, the possibility of developing further baseline relationships between SF and air vapour pressure deficit in fully irrigated trees in field conditions increases the feasibility of using this parameter in automatic irrigation systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

ΘV :

volumetric soil water content

Ψmd :

midday leaf water potential

Ψpd :

predawn leaf water potential

Ψp :

leaf turgor potential

g l :

leaf conductance

MDS:

maximum daily trunk shrinkage

MNTD:

minimum daily trunk diameter

MXTD:

maximum daily trunk diameter

Pn :

net photosynthesis

SF:

sap flow

TDF:

trunk diameter fluctuations

VPD:

air vapour pressure deficit

References

  • Alarcón J J, Domingo R, Green S, Sánchez-Blanco M J, Rodríguez P and Torrecillas A 2000 Sap flow as an indicator of transpiration and the water status of young apricot trees. Plant Soil 227, 77–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ameglio T, Archer P, Cohen M, Valancogne C, Daudet F A, Dayau S and Cruiziat P 1998 Significance and limits in the use of predawn leaf water potential for tree irrigation. Plant Soil 207, 155–167.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cabibel B and Isberie C 1997 Flux de sève et alimentation hydrique de cerisiers irrigués ou non en localisation. Agronomie 17, 97–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen M, Ameglio T, Cruiziat P, Archer P, Valancogne C and Ferré L 1993 Las relaciones hí dricas en el nogal: consumo de agua e indicadores de estrés hídrico. I Simposium Hispano-Portugués de Relaciones Hídricas en las Plantas. Palma de Mallorca. p. 93–96.

  • Fereres E and Goldhamer D A 2003 Suitability of stem diameter variations and water potential as indicators for irrigation scheduling of almond trees. J. Hort. Sci. Biotech. 78, 139–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernández J E, Palomo M J, Díaz-Espejo A and Girón I F 1997 Calibrating the compensation heat-pulse technique for measuring sapflowin olive. In Symposium Acta. pp. 22–26. III International Symposium on Olive Growing, Crete (Greece).

  • Fernández J E, Palomo M J, Díaz-Espejo A, Clothier B E, Green S R, Girón I F and Moreno F 2001 Heat-pulse measurements of sap flow in olives for automating irrigation: tests, root flow and diagnostics of water stress. Agr. Water Manage. 51, 99–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garnier E and Berger A 1986 Effect of water stress on stem diameter changes of peach trees growing in the field. J. Appl. Ecol. 23, 193–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ginestar C 1995 Efecto del estés hídrico en distintos períodos fenológicos en plantaciones de cítricos jóvenes regados por goteo. Tesis Doctoral. Universidad Politécnica de Valencia. 188 p.

  • Goldhamer D A and Fereres E 2001 Irrigation scheduling protocols using continuously recorded trunk diameter measurements. Irrig. Sci. 20, 115–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldhamer D A, Fereres E and Salinas M 2003 Can almond trees directly dictate their irrigations needs?. Calif. Agric. 57, 138–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldhamer D A, Fereres E, Mata M, Girona J and Cohen M 1999 Sensitivity of continuous and discrete plant and soil water status monitoring in peach trees subjected to deficit irrigation. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 124, 437–444.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green S R and Clothier B E 1988 Water use of kiwifruit vines and apple trees by the heat-pulse technique. J. Exp. Bot. 39, 115–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green S R and Clothier B E 1995 Root water uptake by kiwifruit vines following partial wetten of the root zone. Plant Soil 39, 115–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hale M G and Orcutt D M 1987 The Physiology of Plants under Stress. John Wiley & Sons. New York. 206 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsiao T C 1990 Measurements of plant water status. In Irrigation of agricultural crops (Monograph no. 30). Eds. B A Stewart and D R Nielsen. pp. 243–279. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, Wis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huguet J G, Li S H, Lorendeau J Y and Pelloux G 1992 Specific micromorphometric reactions of fruit trees to water stress and irrigation scheduling automation. J. Hort. Sci. 67, 631–640.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katerji N, Tardieu F, Bethenod O and Quetin P 1994 Behaviour of maize stem diameter during drying cycles: comparison of two methods for detecting water stress. Crop Sci. 34, 165–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katerji N, Itier B and Ferreira I 1988 Etude de quelques critères indicateurs de l’état hydrique d’une culture de tomate en région semi-aride. Agronomie 8, 425–433.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molz F J and Klepper B 1972 Radial propagation of water potential in stems. Agron. J. 64, 469–473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moreno F, Fernández J E, Clothier B E and Green S R 1996 Transpiration and root water uptake by olive trees. Plant Soil 184, 85–96.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ortuño M F 2004 Medidas de flujo de savia y variaciones micrométricas del tronco como indicadores del estado hídrico del limonero. Tesis Doctoral. Universidad de Murcia. 289 pp.

  • Remorini D and Massai R 2003 Comparison of water status indicators for young peach trees. Irrig. Sci. 22, 39–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz-Sánchez M C, Domingo R, Savé R, Biel C and Torrecillas A 1997 Effects of water stress and rewatering on leaf water relations of lemon plants. Biol. Plant. 39, 923–931.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swanson R H and Whitfield D W A 1981 A numerical analysis of heat pulse velocity theory and practice. J. Exp. Bot. 32, 221–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savé R, Biel C, Domingo R, Ruiz-Sánchez M C, Torrecillas A 1995 Some physiological and morphological characteristics of citrus plants for drought resistance. Plant Sci. 110, 167–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Topp G C and Davis J L 1985 Time-domain reflectometry (TDR) and its application to irrigation scheduling. Adv. Irrig. 3, 107–127.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Torrecillas.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ortuño, M.F., Alarcón, J.J., Nicolás, E. et al. Comparison of continuously recorded plant-based water stress indicators for young lemon trees. Plant Soil 267, 263–270 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-005-0108-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-005-0108-3

Key words

Navigation