Plant and Soil

, Volume 272, Issue 1–2, pp 11–27 | Cite as

Variation in relative growth rate of 20 Aegilops species (Poaceae) in the field: The importance of net assimilation rate or specific leaf area depends on the time scale

  • Rafael Villar
  • Teodoro Marañón
  • José Luis Quero
  • Pilar Panadero
  • Francisco Arenas
  • Hans Lambers
Article

Abstract

Field experiments reporting the relative growth rate (RGR) patterns in plants are scarce. In this study, 22 herbaceous species (20 Aegilops species, Amblyopyrum muticum and Triticum aestivum) were grown under field conditions to assess their RGR, and to find out if the differences in RGR amongst species were explained by morphological or physiological traits. Plants were cultivated during two months, and five harvests (every 13–19 days) were carried out. Factors explaining between-species differences in RGR varied, depending on whether short (13–19 days) or longer periods (62 days) were considered. RGR for short periods (4 growth periods of 13–19 days each) showed a positive correlation with net assimilation rate (NAR), but there was no significant correlation with leaf area ratio (LAR) (with the exception of the first growth period). In contrast, when growth was investigated over two months, RGR was positively correlated with morphological traits (LAR, and specific leaf area, SLA), but not with physiological traits (NAR). A possible explanation for these contrasting results is that during short growth periods, NAR exhibited strong variations possibly caused by the variable field conditions, and, consequently NAR mainly determined RGR. In contrast, during a longer growth period (62 days) the importance of NAR was not apparent (there was no significant correlation between RGR and NAR), while allocation traits, such as LAR and SLA, became most relevant.

Keywords

biomass allocation growth analysis leaf area ratio RGR SLA wild wheat 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Antúnez, I, Retamosa, E C, Villar, R 2001Relative growth rate in phylogenetically related deciduous and evergreen woody speciesOecologia128172180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Atkin, O K, Botman, B, Lambers, H 1996The causes of inherently slow growth in alpine plants: An analysis based on the underlying carbon economies of alpine and lowland Poa speciesFunct. Ecol.10698707Google Scholar
  3. Cakmak, I, Cakmak, O, Eker, S, Ozdemir, A, Watanabe, N, Braun, H J 1999Expression of high zinc efficiency of Aegilopstauschii and Triticum monococcum in synthetic hexaploid wheatsPlant Soil215203209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cornelissen, J H C, Castro Diez, P, Hunt, R 1996Seedling growth allocation and leaf attributes in a wide range of woody plant species and typesJ. Ecol.84755765Google Scholar
  5. Groot, C C, Marcelis, L F M, Boogaard, R, Kaiser, W M, Lambers, H 2003Interaction of nitrogen and phosphorus nutrition in determining growthPlant Soil248257268Google Scholar
  6. García, D, Rodríguez, J, Panadero, P, Marañón, T, Villar, R 1997

    Tasas de crecimiento en 21 especies de trigo silvestre y su relación con la tasa de fotosíntesis y la concentración de nitrógeno foliar

    Sarmiento, RLeidi, E OTroncoso, A eds. Nutrición mineral de las plantas en la agricultura sostenible.Junta de Andalucía Consejería de Agricultura y PescaSevilla8390
    Google Scholar
  7. Garnier, E 1992Growth analysis of congeneric annual and perennial grass speciesJ. Ecol.80665675Google Scholar
  8. Garnier, E, Freijsen, A H J 1994

    On ecological inference from laboratory experiments conducted under optimum conditions

    Roy, JGarnier, E eds. A Whole Perspective on Carbon-Nitrogen InteractionsSPB Academic PublishingThe Hague267292
    Google Scholar
  9. Grime, J P, Hunt, R 1975Relative growth-rate: Its range and adaptive significance in a local floraJ. Ecol.63393422Google Scholar
  10. Higgs, D E B, James, D B 1969Comparative studies on the biology of upland grasses I. Rate of dry matter production and its control in four grass speciesJ. Ecol.57553563Google Scholar
  11. Hoffmann, W A, Poorter, H 2002Avoiding bias in calculations of relative growth rateAnn. Bot.803742Google Scholar
  12. Hunt, R 1990Basic Growth AnalysisUnwin Hyman LtdLondon112Google Scholar
  13. Hunt, R 2003

    Growth Analysis, Individual Plants

    Thomas, BMurphy, D JMurray, D eds. Encyclopaedia of Applied Plant SciencesAcademic PressLondon579588
    Google Scholar
  14. Hunt, R, Causton, D R, Shipley, B, Askew, P 2002A modern tool for classical plant growth analysisAnn. Bot.90485488PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Hunt, R, Parson, I T 1974A computer program for deriving growth-functions in plant growth-analysisJ. Appl. Ecol.11297307Google Scholar
  16. Konings, H 1989

    Physiological and morphological differences between plants with a high NAR or a high LAR as related to environmental conditions

    Lambers, HCambridge, M LKonings, HPons, T L eds. Causes and Consequences of Variation in Growth Rate and Productivity of Higher PlantsSPB Academic PublishingThe Hague101123
    Google Scholar
  17. Lambers, H, Chapin, F S,III, Pons, T L 1998Plant physiological ecologySpringer-VerlagNew York540Google Scholar
  18. Lambers, H, Poorter, H 1992Inherent variation in growth rate between higher plants: A search for physiological causes and ecological consequencesAdv. Ecol. Res.23187261Google Scholar
  19. Lambers, H, Vanden Boogaard, R, Veneklaas, E J, Villar, R 1995Effects of global environmental change on carbon partitioning in vegetative plants of Triticum aestivum and closely related Aegilops speciesGlobal Change Biol.1397406Google Scholar
  20. Loveys, B R, Scheurwater, I, Pons, T L, Fitter, A H, Atkin, O K 2002Growth temperature influences the underlying components of relative growth rate: An investigation using inherently fast- and slow- growing plant speciesPlant Cell Environ.25975997Google Scholar
  21. Marañón, T 1989Variations in seed size and germination in three Aegilops speciesSeed Sci. Technol.17583588Google Scholar
  22. Marañón, T, Grubb, P J 1993Physiological basis and ecological significance of the seed size and relative growth rate relationship in Mediterranean annualsFunct. Ecol.7591599Google Scholar
  23. Poorter, H, Bergkotte, M 1992Chemical composition of 24 wild species differing in relative growth ratePlant Cell Environ.15221229Google Scholar
  24. Poorter, H, Garnier, E 1996Plant growth analysis: An evaluation of experimental design and computational methodsJ. Exp. Bot.4713431351Google Scholar
  25. Poorter, H, Garnier, E 1999

    Ecological significance of inherent variation in relative growth rate and its components

    Pugnaire, FValladares, F eds. Handbook of Functional Plant EcologyMarcel Dekker Inc.New York82120
    Google Scholar
  26. Poorter, H, Pothmann, P 1992Growth and carbon economy of a fast- and slow- growing grass species as dependent on ontogenyNew Phytol.120159166Google Scholar
  27. Poorter, H, Remkes, C 1990Leaf area ratio and net assimilation rate of 24 wild species differing in relative growth rateOecologia83553559Google Scholar
  28. Poorter, H, Werf, A 1998

    Is inherent variation in RGR determined by LAR at low irradiance and by NAR at high irradiance? A review of herbaceous species

    Lambers, HPoorter, HVuuren, MMI eds. Inherent Variation in Plant Growth Physiological Mechanisms and Ecological ConsequencesBackhuys PublishersLeiden309336
    Google Scholar
  29. Romero, J M, Marañón, T 1994Long-term responses of Melilotus segetalis to salinity. I Growth and partitioningPlant Cell Environ.1712431248Google Scholar
  30. Shipley, B 2000aPlasticity in relative growth rate and its components following a change in irradiancePlant Cell Environ.2312071216Google Scholar
  31. Shipley, B 2000bCause and Correlation in Biology. Structural Equations and Causal InferenceCambridge University PressA User’s Guide to Path Analysis317Google Scholar
  32. Shipley, B 2002Trade-offs between net assimilation rate and specific leaf area in determining relative growth rate: Relationship with daily irradianceFunct. Ecol.16682689Google Scholar
  33. Shipley, B 2004Analysing the allometry of multiple interacting traits PerspectPlant Ecol.6235241Google Scholar
  34. Statsoft Inc 1997 Statistica for Windows Release 5.1. Computer Program Manual. Tulsa OK, USA.Google Scholar
  35. Valladares, F, Martinez-Ferri, E, Balaguer, L, Perez-Corona, E, Manrique, E 2000Low leaf-level response to light and nutrients in Mediterranean evergreen oaks: A conservative resource-use strategy?New Phytol.1487991Google Scholar
  36. Andel, J, Jager, J C 1981Analysis of growth and nutrition of six plant species of woodland clearingsJ. Ecol.69871882Google Scholar
  37. Boogaard, R, Goubitz, S, Veneklaas, E, Lambers, H 1996Carbon and nitrogen economy of 4 Triticumaestivum cultivars differing in relative growth rate and water use efficiencyPlant Cell Environ.199981004Google Scholar
  38. Boogaard, R, Villar, R 1998

    Variation in growth and water-use efficiency – a comparison of Aegilops species and Triticumaestivum L. cultivars

    Lambers, HPoorter, HVuuren, M M I eds. Inherent Variation in Plant Growth. Physiological Mechanisms and Ecological ConsequencesBackhuys PublishersLeiden289308
    Google Scholar
  39. Slageren, M W 1994Wild Wheats: A Monograph of Aegilops L and Amblyopyrum Jaub and Spach Eig PoaceaeAgricultural University WageningenThe Netherlands512Google Scholar
  40. Villar, R, Veneklaas, E J, Jordano, P, Lambers, H 1998Relative growth rate and biomass allocation in 20 Aegilops (Poaceae) speciesNew Phytol.140425437Google Scholar
  41. Wright, I J, Westoby, M 2001Understanding seedling growth relationships through specific leaf area and leaf nitrogen concentration: Generalisations across growth forms and growth irradianceOecologia1272129Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rafael Villar
    • 1
  • Teodoro Marañón
    • 2
  • José Luis Quero
    • 1
    • 3
  • Pilar Panadero
    • 2
  • Francisco Arenas
    • 2
  • Hans Lambers
    • 4
  1. 1.Area de Ecología, Facultad de CienciasUniversidad de CórdobaCórdobaSpain
  2. 2.IRNACSICSevillaSpain
  3. 3.Departamento de Biología Animal y Ecología, Facultad de CienciasUniversidad de GranadaGranadaSpain
  4. 4.School of Plant Biology, Faculty of Natural and Agricultural SciencesThe University of Western AustraliaCrawleyAustralia

Personalised recommendations