Skip to main content

Application of Cas12a and nCas9-activation-induced cytidine deaminase for genome editing and as a non-sexual strategy to generate homozygous/multiplex edited plants in the allotetraploid genome of tobacco

Plant Molecular Biology volume 101, pages 355–371 (2019)Cite this article

Key message

Protoplasts can be used for genome editing using several different CRISPR systems, either separately or simultaneously, and that the resulting mutations can be recovered in regenerated non-chimaeric plants.

Abstract

Protoplast transfection and regeneration systems are useful platforms for CRISPR/Cas mutagenesis and genome editing. In this study, we demonstrate the use of Cpf1 (Cas12a) and nCas9-activation-induced cytidine deaminase (nCas9-Target-AID) systems to mutagenize Nicotiana tabacum protoplasts and to regenerate plants harboring the resulting mutations. We analyzed 20 progeny plants of Cas12a-mediated phytoene desaturase (PDS) mutagenized regenerants, as well as regenerants from wild-type protoplasts, and confirmed that their genotypes were inherited in a Mendelian manner. We used a Cas9 nickase (nCas9)-cytidine deaminase to conduct C to T editing of the Ethylene receptor 1 (ETR1) gene in tobacco protoplasts and obtained edited regenerates. It is difficult to obtain homozygous edits of polyploid genomes when the editing efficiency is low. A second round of mutagenesis of partially edited regenerants (a two-step transfection protocol) allowed us to derive ETR1 fully edited regenerants without the need for sexual reproduction. We applied three different Cas systems (SaCas9, Cas12a, and nCas9-Traget AID) using either a one-step or a two-step transfection platform to obtain triply mutated and/or edited tobacco regenerants. Our results indicate that these three Cas systems can function simultaneously within a single cell.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

43,34 €

Price includes VAT (Finland)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

References

  • Andersson M, Turesson H, Nicolia A, Fält AS, Samuelsson M, Hofvander P (2017) Efficient targeted multiallelic mutagenesis in tetraploid potato (Solanum tuberosum) by transient CRISPR-Cas9 expression in protoplasts. Plant Cell Rep 36:117–128

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Andersson M, Turesson H, Olsson N, Fält AS, Ohlsson P, Gonzalez MN, Samuelsson M, Hofvander P (2018) Genome editing in potato via CRISPR-Cas9 ribonucleoprotein delivery. Physiol Plant 164:378–384

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cao WH, Liu J, He XJ, Mu RL, Zhou HL, Chen SY, Zhang JS (2007) Modulation of ethylene responses affects plant salt-stress responses. Plant Physiol 143:707–719

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Collier R, Thomson JG, Thilmony R (2018) A versatile and robust Agrobacterium-based gene stacking system generates high-quality transgenic Arabidopsis plants. Plant J 95:573–583

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Endo A, Masafumi M, Kaya H, Toki S (2016) Efficient targeted mutagenesis of rice and tobacco genomes using Cpf1 from Francisella novicida. Sci Rep 6:38169

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Fossi M, Amundson K, Kuppu S, Britt A, Comai L (2019) Regeneration of Solanum tuberosum plants from protoplasts induces widespread genome instability. Plant Physiol 180:78–86

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Gao L, Cox DBT, Yan WX, Manteiga JC, Schneider MW, Yamano T, Nishimasu H, Nureki O, Crosetto N, Zhang F (2017) Engineered Cpf1 variants with altered PAM specificities. Nat Biotechnol 35:789–792

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hall AE, Bleecker AB (2003) Analysis of combinatorial loss-of-function mutants in the Arabidopsis ethylene receptors reveals that the ers1 etr1 double mutant has severe developmental defects that are EIN2 dependent. Plant Cell 15:2032–2041

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hill JT, Demarest BL, Bisgrove BW, Su YC, Smith M, Yost HJ (2014) Poly peak parser: method and software for identification of unknown indels using Sanger sequencing of PCR products. Dev Dyn 243:1632–1636

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hu X, Wang C, Liu Q, Fu Y, Wang K (2017) Targeted mutagenesis in rice using CRISPR-Cpf1 system. J Genet Genom 44:71–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu JH, Miller SM, Geurts MH, Tang W, Chen L, Sun N, Zeina CM, Gao X, Rees HA, Lin Z, Liu DR (2018) Evolved Cas9 variants with broad PAM compatibility and high DNA specificity. Nature 556:57–63

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Jinek M, Chylinski K, Fonfara I, Hauer M, Doudna JA, Charpentier E (2012) A programmable dual-RNA-guided DNA endonuclease in adaptive bacterial immunity. Science 337:816–821

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Kaya H, Mikami M, Endo A, Endo M, Toki S (2016) Highly specific targeted mutagenesis in plants using Staphylococcus aureus Cas9. Sci Rep 6:26871

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Kim H, Kim ST, Ryu J, Kang BC, Kim JS, Kim SG (2017) CRISPR/Cpf1-mediated DNA-free plant genome editing. Nat Commun 8:14406

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Kleinstiver BP, Prew MS, Tsai SQ, Topkar VV, Nguyen NT, Zheng Z, Gonzales AP, Li Z, Peterson RT, Yeh JR, Aryee MJ, Joung JK (2015) Engineered CRISPR-Cas9 nucleases with altered PAM specificities. Nature 523:481–485

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Komor AC, Kim YB, Packer MS, Zuris JA, Liu DR (2016) Programmable editing of a target base in genomic DNA without double-stranded DNA cleavage. Nature 533:420–424

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Komor AC, Zhao KT, Packer MS, Gaudelli NM, Waterbury AL, Koblan LW, Kim YB, Badran AH, Liu DR (2017) Improved base excision repair inhibition and bacteriophage Mu Gam protein yields C:G-to-T: a base editors with higher efficiency and product purity. Sci Adv 3(8):eaao4774

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Lee L-Y, Fang M-J, Kuang L-Y, Gelvin SB (2008) Vectors for multi-color bimolecular fluorescence complementation to investigate protein-protein interactions in living plant cells. Plant Meth 4:24

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee L-Y, Wu F-H, Hsu C-T, Shen S-C, Yeh H-Y, Liao D-C, Fang M-J, Liu N-T, Yen Y-C, Dokládal L, Sykorová E, Gelvin SB, Lin CS (2012) Screening a cDNA library for protein-protein interactions directly in planta. Plant Cell 24:1746–1759

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Li JF, Norville JE, Aach J, McCormack M, Zhang D, Bush J, Church GM, Sheen J (2013) Multiplex and homologous recombination-mediated genome editing in Arabidopsis and Nicotiana benthamiana using guide RNA and Cas9. Nat Biotechnol 31:688–691

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Li J, Sun Y, Du J, Zhao Y, Xia L (2017) Generation of targeted point mutations in rice by a modified CRISPR/Cas9 system. Mol Plant 10:526–529

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lin C-S, Hsu C-T, Yang L-H, Lee L-Y, Fu J-Y, Cheng Q-W, Wu F-H, Hsiao H-C, Zhang Y, Zhang R, Chang W-J, Yu C-T, Wang W, Liao L-J, Gelvin SB, Shih MC (2018) Application of protoplast technology to CRISPR/Cas9 mutagenesis: from single-cell mutation detection to mutant plant regeneration. Plant Biotechnol J 16:1295–1310

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Lu Y, Zhu JK (2017) Precise editing of a target base in the rice genome using a modified CRISPR/Cas9 system. Mol Plant 10:523–525

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ma X, Zhang Q, Zhu Q, Liu W, Chen Y, Qiu R, Wang B, Yang Z, Li H, Lin Y, Xie Y, Shen R, Chen S, Wang Z, Chen Y, Guo J, Chen L, Zhao X, Dong Z, Liu YG (2015) A robust CRISPR/Cas9 system for convenient, high-efficiency multiplex genome editing in monocot and dicot plants. Mol Plant 8:1274–1284

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Marx V (2016) Plants: a tool box of cell-based assays. Nat Meth 13:551–554

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Medgyesy P, Menczel L, Maliga P (1980) The use of cytoplasmic streptomycin resistance: chloroplast transfer from Nicotiana tabacum into Nicotiana sylvestris, and isolation of their somatic hybrids. Mol Gen Genet 179:693–698

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant 15:473–497

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nekrasov V, Staskawicz B, Weigel D, Jones JD, Kamoun S (2013) Targeted mutagenesis in the model plant Nicotiana benthamiana using Cas9 RNA-guided endonuclease. Nat Biotechnol 31:691–693

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nishida K, Arazoe T, Yachie N, Banno S, Kakimoto M, Tabata M, Mochizuki M, Miyabe A, Araki M, Hara KY, Shimatani Z, Kondo A (2016) Targeted nucleotide editing using hybrid prokaryotic and vertebrate adaptive immune systems. Science 353:aaf8729

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • O’Malley RC, Rodriguez FI, Esch JJ, Binder BM, O’Donnell P, Klee HJ, Bleecker AB (2005) Ethylene-binding activity, gene expression levels, and receptor system output for ethylene receptor family members from Arabidopsis and tomato. Plant J 41:651–659

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Qi LS, Larson MH, Gilbert LA, Doudna JA, Weissman JS, Arkin AP, Lim WA (2013) Repurposing CRISPR as an RNA-guided platform for sequence-specific control of gene expression. Cell 152:1173–1183

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Qu X, Hall BP, Gao Z, Schaller GE (2007) A strong constitutive ethylene-response phenotype conferred on Arabidopsis plants containing null mutations in the ethylene receptors ETR1 and ERS1. BMC Plant Biol 7:3

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Ran FA, Cong L, Yan WX, Scott DA, Gootenberg JS, Kriz AJ, Zetsche B, Shalem O, Wu X, Makarova KS, Koonin EV, Sharp PA, Zhang F (2015) In vivo genome editing using Staphylococcus aureus Cas9. Nature 520:186–191

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Ren B, Yan F, Kuang Y, Li N, Zhang D, Lin H, Zhou H (2017) A CRISPR/Cas9 toolkit for efficient targeted base editing to induce genetic variations in rice. Sci China Life Sci 60:516–519

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ren B, Yan F, Kuang Y, Li N, Zhang D, Zhou X, Lin H, Zhou H (2018) Improved base editor for efficiently inducing genetic variations in rice with CRISPR/Cas9-guided hyperactive hAID mutant. Mol Plant 11:623–626

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shan Q, Wang Y, Li J, Zhang Y, Chen K, Liang Z, Zhang K, Liu J, Xi JJ, Qiu JL, Gao C (2013) Targeted genome modification of crop plants using a CRISPR-Cas system. Nat Biotechnol 31:686–688

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sheu JJ, Yu TS, Tong WF, Yu SM (1996) Carbohydrate starvation stimulates differential expression of rice α-amylase genes that is modulated through complicated transcriptional and postranscriptional process. J Biol Chem 27:26998–27004

    Google Scholar 

  • Shimatani Z, Kashojiya S, Takayama M, Terada R, Arazoe T, Ishii H, Teramura H, Yamamoto T, Komatsu H, Miura K, Ezura H, Nishida K, Ariizumi T, Kondo A (2017) Targeted base editing in rice and tomato using a CRISPR-Cas9 cytidine deaminase fusion. Nat Biotechnol 35:441–443

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tang X, Lowder LG, Zhang T, Malzahn AA, Zheng X, Voytas DF, Zhong Z, Chen Y, Ren Q, Li Q, Kirkland ER, Zhang Y, Qi Y (2017) A CRISPR-Cpf1 system for efficient genome editing and transcriptional repression in plants. Nat Plants 3:17018

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vojta A, Dobrinić P, Tadić V, Bočkor L, Korać P, Julg B, Klasić M, Zoldoš V (2016) Repurposing the CRISPR-Cas9 system for targeted DNA methylation. Nucl Acids Res 44:5615–5628

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wang M, Mao Y, Lu Y, Tao X, Zhu JK (2017) Multiplex gene editing in rice using the CRISPR-Cpf1 system. Mol Plant 10:1011–1013

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Woo JW, Kim J, Kwon SI, Corvalán C, Cho SW, Kim H, Kim SG, Kim ST, Choe S, Kim JS (2015) DNA-free genome editing in plants with preassembled CRISPR-Cas9 ribonucleoproteins. Nat Biotechnol 33:1162–1164

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Xie K, Minkenberg B, Yang Y (2015) Boosting CRISPR/Cas9 multiplex editing capability with the endogenous tRNA-processing system. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 112:3570–5357

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Xing HL, Dong L, Wang ZP, Zhang HY, Han CY, Liu B, Wang XC, Chen QJ (2014) A CRISPR/Cas9 toolkit for multiplex genome editing in plants. BMC Plant Biol 14:327

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Xu R, Qin R, Li H, Li D, Li L, Wei P, Yang J (2017) Generation of targeted mutant rice using a CRISPR-Cpf1 system. Plant Biotechnol J 15:713–717

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Zetsche B, Gootenberg JS, Abudayyeh OO, Slaymaker IM, Makarova KS, Essletzbichler P, Volz SE, Joung J, van der Oost J, Regev A, Koonin EV, Zhang F (2015) Cpf1 is a single RNA-guided endonuclease of a class 2 CRISPR-Cas system. Cell 163:759–771

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Zhong Z, Zhang Y, You Q, Tang X, Ren Q, Liu S, Yang L, Wang Y, Liu X, Liu B, Zhang T, Zheng X, Le Y, Zhang Y, Qi Y (2018) Plant genome editing using FnCpf1 and LbCpf1 nucleases at redefined and altered PAM sites. Mol Plant 11:999–1002

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zong Y, Wang Y, Li C, Zhang R, Chen K, Ran Y, Qiu JL, Wang D, Gao C (2017) Precise base editing in rice, wheat and maize with a Cas9-cytidine deaminase fusion. Nat Biotechnol 35:438–440

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zong Y, Song Q, Li C, Jin S, Zhang D, Wang Y, Qiu JL, Gao C (2018) Efficient C-to-T base editing in plants using a fusion of nCas9 and human APOBEC3A. Nat Biotechnol 36:950–953

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge Drs. Masaki Endo and Seiichi Toki of the Plant Genome Engineering Research Unit, Institute of Agrobiological Sciences, National Agriculture and Food Research Organization, for Cas12a plasmids. This research was supported by Academia Sinica, Innovative Translational Agricultural Research Administrative Office (AS-KPQ-107-ITAR-10), and the Ministry of Science and Technology (105-2313-B-001 -007 -MY3), Taiwan.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Agricultural Biotechnology Research Center, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan

    Chen-Tran Hsu, Yu-Jung Cheng, Yu-Hsua Yuan, Wei-Fon Hung, Qiao-Wei Cheng, Fu-Hui Wu & Choun-Sea Lin

  2. Department of Biological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, 47907-1392, USA

    Lan-Ying Lee & Stanton B. Gelvin

Authors
  1. Chen-Tran Hsu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yu-Jung Cheng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yu-Hsua Yuan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Wei-Fon Hung
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Qiao-Wei Cheng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Fu-Hui Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Lan-Ying Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Stanton B. Gelvin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Choun-Sea Lin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

All authors conceived and designed the experiments. CSL, CTH, YJC, QWC, YHY, and WFH performed targeted mutagenesis analysis. CTH and CSL conducted protoplast regeneration. CTH, YJC, QWC, YHY, QWC, FHW, and WFH performed molecular biology experiments. CSL, LYL, and SBG interpreted the data. CSL, LYL, and SBG wrote the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Choun-Sea Lin.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (PDF 23310 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hsu, CT., Cheng, YJ., Yuan, YH. et al. Application of Cas12a and nCas9-activation-induced cytidine deaminase for genome editing and as a non-sexual strategy to generate homozygous/multiplex edited plants in the allotetraploid genome of tobacco. Plant Mol Biol 101, 355–371 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11103-019-00907-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11103-019-00907-w

Keywords

  • CRISPR/Cas
  • Chimeric plants
  • Cas12a
  • Cytidine deaminase
  • Polyploid genome editing