Advertisement

Plant Molecular Biology

, Volume 97, Issue 4–5, pp 371–383 | Cite as

Concurrent modifications in the three homeologs of Ms45 gene with CRISPR-Cas9 lead to rapid generation of male sterile bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)

  • Manjit Singh
  • Manish Kumar
  • Marc C. Albertsen
  • Joshua K. Young
  • A. Mark Cigan
Article

Abstract

Key message

Hexaploid bread wheat is not readily amenable to traditional mutagenesis approaches. In this study, we show efficient utilization of CRISPR-Cas system and Next Generation Sequencing for mutant analysis in wheat.

Abstract

Identification and manipulation of male fertility genes in hexaploid bread wheat is important for understanding the molecular basis of pollen development and to obtain novel sources of nuclear genetic male sterility (NGMS). The maize Male sterile 45 (Ms45) gene encodes a strictosidine synthase-like enzyme and has been shown to be required for male fertility. To investigate the role of Ms45 gene in wheat, mutations in the A, B and D homeologs were produced using CRISPR-Cas9. A variety of mutations in the three homeologs were recovered, including a plant from two different genotypes each with mutations in all three homeologs. Genetic analysis of the mutations demonstrated that all three wheat Ms45 homeologs contribute to male fertility and that triple homozygous mutants are required to abort pollen development and achieve male sterility. Further, it was demonstrated that a wild-type copy of Ms45 gene from rice was able to restore fertility to these wheat mutant plants. Taken together, these observations provide insights into the conservation of MS45 function in a polyploid species. Ms45 based NGMS can be potentially utilized for a Seed Production Technology (SPT)-like hybrid seed production system in wheat.

Keywords

Wheat Ms45 Pollen development Male sterility CRISPR-Cas 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Kara Califf for valuable comments and editorial assistance in preparation of this manuscript. The authors also thank Tracey Fisher, Maria Federova, and Jim Gaffney for their critical review of the manuscript. Technical help provided by Myeong-Je Cho and Sergei Svitashev for plant transformation, Wang-Nan Hu for QRT-PCR, and Katherine Thilges for microscopy is gratefully acknowledged.

Author contributions

Conceptualization: Mark Cigan, Manjit Singh, Josh Young, Investigation: Manjit Singh, Manish Kumar, Josh Young, Writing—original draft: Manjit Singh, Mark Cigan, Writing—review & editing: Manjit Singh, Mark Cigan, Marc Albertsen.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

All authors are current or former employees of DuPont Pioneer. MS and AMC are inventors on a provisional patent application on this work and are current or former employees of DuPont Pioneer, who owns the patent application.

Supplementary material

11103_2018_749_MOESM1_ESM.docx (48 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 47 KB)

References

  1. Adugna A, Nanda G, Singh K, Bains N (2004) A comparison of cytoplasmic and chemically-induced male sterility systems for hybrid seed production in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Euphytica 135:297–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ (1990) Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol 215:403–410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Belhaj K, Chaparro-Garcia A, Kamoun S, Nekrasov V (2013) Plant genome editing made easy: targeted mutagenesis in model and crop plants using the CRISPR/Cas system. Plant Methods 9:39CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Cameron P, Fuller CK, Donohoue PD, Jones BN, Thompson MS, Carter MM, Gradia S, Vidal B, Garner E, Slorach EM, Lau E, Banh LM, Lied AM, Edwards LS, Settle AH, Capurso D, Llaca V, Deschamps S, Cigan M, Young JK, May AP (2017) Mapping the genomic landscape of CRISPR–Cas9 cleavage. Nat Methods 14:600.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.4284 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chen L, Liu Y-G (2014) Male sterility and fertility restoration in crops. Annu Rev Plant Biol 65:5.1–5.28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cigan AM, Unger E, Xu R-J, Kendall TL, Fox TW (2001) Phenotypic complementation of ms45 maize requires tapetal expression of MS45. Sex Plant Reprod 14:135–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cigan AM, Unger-Wallace E, Haug-Collet K (2005) Transcriptional gene silencing as a tool for uncovering gene function in maize. Plant J 43:929–940CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cigan AM, Haug-Collet K, Clapp J (2014) Transcriptional silencing of heterologous anther promoters in maize: a genetic method to replace detasseling for seed production. Plant Reprod 27:109–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cigan AM, Singh M, Benn G, Feigenbutz L, Kumar M, Cho M-J, Svitashev S, Young J (2017) Targeted mutagenesis of a conserved anther-expressed P450 gene confers male sterility in monocots. Plant Biotechnol J 15:379–389.  https://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.12633 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ding Y, Li H, Chen L-L, Xie K (2016) Recent advances in genome editing using CRISPR/Cas9. Front Plant Sci.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.00703 Google Scholar
  11. Dobritsa A, Nishikawa S-I, Preuss D, Urbanczyk-Wochniak E, Sumner L, Hammond A, Carlson A, Swanson R (2009) LAP3, a novel plant protein required for pollen development, is essential for proper exine formation. Sex Plant Reprod 22:167–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dong C, Dalton-Morgan J, Vincent K, Sharp P (2009) A modified TILLING method for wheat breeding. Plant Genome 2:39–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gaffney J, Anderson J, Franks C, Collinson S, MacRobert J, Woldemariam W, Albertsen M (2016) Robust seed systems, emerging technologies, and hybrid crops for Africa. Glob Food Secur 9:36–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gao H, Smith J, Yang M, Jones S, Djukanovic V, Nicholson MG, West A, Bidney D, Falco SC, Jantz D, Lyznik LA (2010) Heritable targeted mutagenesis in maize using a designed endonuclease. Plant J 61:176–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jacobs TB, LaFayette PR, Schmitz RJ, Parrott WA (2015) Targeted genome modifications in soybean with CRISPR/Cas9. BMC Biotechnol 15:16.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12896-015-0131-2 CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Karvelis T, Gasiunas G, Young J, Bigelyte G, Silanskas A, Cigan M, Siksnys V (2015) Rapid characterization of CRISPR-Cas9 protospacer adjacent motif sequence elements. Genome Biol 16:253.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-015-0818-7 CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Kaul MLH (1988) Gene-cytoplasmic male sterility. In: Kaul MLH (ed) Male sterility in higher plants. Springer, Berlin, pp 97–192.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-83139-3_3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kempe K, Gils M (2011) Pollination control technologies for hybrid breeding. Mol Breed 27:417–437.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11032-011-9555-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Krasileva KV, Vasquez-Gross HA, Howell T, Bailey P, Paraiso F, Clissold L, Simmonds J, Ramirez-Gonzalez RH, Wang X, Borrill P (2017) Uncovering hidden variation in polyploid wheat. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 114:E913–E921CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Longin CFH, Mühleisen J, Maurer HP, Zhang H, Gowda M, Reif JC (2012) Hybrid breeding in autogamous cereals. Theor Appl Genet 125:1087–1096.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-012-1967-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ma H (2005) Molecular genetic analysis of microsporogenesis and microgametogenesis in flowering plants. Annu Rev Plant Biol 56:393–434.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.arplant.55.031903.141717 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ma J, Stiller J, Wei Y, Zheng Y-L, Devos KM, Doležel J, Liu C (2014) Extensive Pericentric rearrangements in the bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotype “chinese spring” revealed from chromosome shotgun sequence data. Genome Biol Evol 6:3039–3048.  https://doi.org/10.1093/gbe/evu237 CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. McRae DH (1985) Advances in chemical hybridization. In: Plant breeding reviews. Wiley, Hoboken, pp 169–191.  https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118061008.ch3 Google Scholar
  24. Mette MF, Gils M, Longin CFH, Reif JC (2015) Hybrid breeding in wheat. In: Ogihara Y, Takumi S, Handa H (eds) Advances in wheat genetics: from genome to Field: Proceedings of the 12th International Wheat Genetics Symposium. Springer, Tokyo, pp 225–232.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-55675-6_24 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mukai Y, Tsunewaki K (1979) Basic studies on hybrid wheat breeding. Theor Appl Genet 54:153–160.  https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00263045 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Peng R, Lin G, Li J (2016) Potential pitfalls of CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing. FEBS J 283:1218–1231.  https://doi.org/10.1111/febs.13586 doiCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pickett AA, Galwey NW (1997) A further evaluation of hybrid wheat. Plant Varieties Seeds 10:15–32Google Scholar
  28. Shi J, Cui M, Yang L, Kim Y-J, Zhang D (2015) Genetic and biochemical mechanisms of pollen wall development. Trends Plant Sci 20:741–753.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2015.07.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Singh M, Kumar M, Thilges K, Cho M-J, Cigan AM (2017) MS26/CYP704B is required for anther and pollen wall development in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and combining mutations in all three homeologs causes male sterility. PLoS ONE 12:e0177632.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0177632 CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Slade AJ, Fuerstenberg SI, Loeffler D, Steine MN, Facciotti D (2005) A reverse genetic, nontransgenic approach to wheat crop improvement by TILLING. Nat Biotechnol 23:75–81. http://www.nature.com/nbt/journal/v23/n1/suppinfo/nbt1043_S1.html doi
  31. Song G, Jia M, Chen K, Kong X, Khattak B, Xie C, Li A, Mao L (2016) CRISPR/Cas9: a powerful tool for crop genome editing. Crop J 4:75–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Svitashev S, Young JK, Schwartz C, Gao H, Falco SC, Cigan AM (2015) Targeted mutagenesis, precise gene editing, and site-specific gene insertion in maize using Cas9 and guide RNA. Plant Physiol 169:931–945.  https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.15.00793 CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Svitashev S, Schwartz C, Lenderts B, Young JK, Cigan AM (2016) Genome editing in maize directed by CRISPR–Cas9 ribonucleoprotein complexes. Nat Commun 7:13274.  https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms13274 CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. Tilman D, Balzer C, Hill J, Befort BL (2011) Global food demand and the sustainable intensification of agriculture. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108:20260–20264.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1116437108 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Tucker EJ, Baumann U, Kouidri A, Suchecki R, Baes M, Garcia M, Okada T, Dong C, Wu Y, Sandhu A, Singh M, Langridge P, Wolters P, Albertsen MC, Cigan AM, Whitford R (2017) Molecular identification of the wheat male fertility gene Ms1 and its prospects for hybrid breeding. Nat Commun 8:869CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  36. Wang Y, Cheng X, Shan Q, Zhang Y, Liu J, Gao C, Qiu J-L (2014) Simultaneous editing of three homoeoalleles in hexaploid bread wheat confers heritable resistance to powdery mildew. Nat Biotechnol 32:947–951.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.2969 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Weeks DP (2017) Gene editing in polyploid crops: wheat, camelina, canola, potato, cotton, peanut, sugar cane, and citrus. Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci 149:65–80.  https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.pmbts.2017.05.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. West PC, Gerber JS, Engstrom PM, Mueller ND, Brauman KA, Carlson KM, Cassidy ES, Johnston M, MacDonald GK, Ray DK, Siebert S (2014) Leverage points for improving global food security and the environment. Science 345:325–328.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1246067 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Whitford R, Fleury D, Reif JC, Garcia M, Okada T, Korzun V, Langridge P (2013) Hybrid breeding in wheat: technologies to improve hybrid wheat seed production. J Exp Bot 64:5411–5428.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/ert333 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wilson JA, Ross WM (1962) Male sterility interaction of the Triticum aestivum nucleus and Triticum timopheevi cytoplasm, vol 14, Kyoto University, KyotoGoogle Scholar
  41. Wilson ZA, Zhang D-B (2009) From Arabidopsis to rice: pathways in pollen development. J Exp Bot 60:1479–1492.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erp095 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Woo JW, Kim J, Kwon SI, Corvalan C, Cho SW, Kim H, Kim S-G, Kim S-T, Choe S, Kim J-S (2015) DNA-free genome editing in plants with preassembled CRISPR-Cas9 ribonucleoproteins. Nat Biotechnol 33:1162–1164.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.3389 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wu Y, Fox TW, Trimnell MR, Wang L, Xu R-j, Cigan AM, Huffman GA, Garnaat CW, Hershey H, Albertsen MC (2016) Development of a novel recessive genetic male sterility system for hybrid seed production in maize and other cross-pollinating crops. Plant Biotechnol J 14:1046–1054.  https://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.12477 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Zhang D, Yang L (2014) Specification of tapetum and microsporocyte cells within the anther. Curr Opin Plant Biol 17:49–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Zhang Y, Liang Z, Zong Y, Wang Y, Liu J, Chen K, Qiu J-L, Gao C (2016) Efficient and transgene-free genome editing in wheat through transient expression of CRISPR/Cas9 DNA or RNA. Nat Commun 7:12617.  https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms12617 CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  46. Zhang D, Wu S, An X, Xie K, Zhou Y, Xu L, Fang W, Liu S, Liu S, Zhu T (2017a) Construction of a multi-control sterility system for a maize male-sterile line and hybrid seed production based on the ZmMs7 gene encoding a PHD-finger transcription factor. Plant Biotechnol J.  https://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.12786 Google Scholar
  47. Zhang Y, Bai Y, Wu G, Zou S, Chen Y, Gao C, Tang D (2017b) Simultaneous modification of three homoeologs of TaEDR1 by genome editing enhances powdery mildew resistance in wheat. Plant J 91:714–724.  https://doi.org/10.1111/tpj.13599 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.DuPont PioneerJohnstonUSA
  2. 2.GenusDeForestUSA

Personalised recommendations