Five novel transcription factors as potential regulators of OsNHX1 gene expression in a salt tolerant rice genotype
- 1.3k Downloads
This manuscript reports the identification and characterization of five transcription factors binding to the promoter of OsNHX1 in a salt stress tolerant rice genotype (Hasawi). Although NHX1 encoding genes are known to be highly regulated at the transcription level by different abiotic stresses, namely salt and drought stress, until now only one transcription factor (TF) binding to its promoter has been reported. In order to unveil the TFs regulating NHX1 gene expression, which is known to be highly induced under salt stress, we have used a Y1H system to screen a salt induced rice cDNA expression library from Hasawi. This approach allowed us to identify five TFs belonging to three distinct TF families: one TCP (OsPCF2), one CPP (OsCPP5) and three NIN-like (OsNIN-like2, OsNIN-like3 and OsNIN-like4) binding to the OsNHX1 gene promoter. We have also shown that these TFs act either as transcriptional activators (OsPCF2, OsNIN-like4) or repressors (OsCPP5, OsNIN-like2) and their encoding genes are differentially regulated by salt and PEG-induced drought stress in two rice genotypes, Nipponbare (salt-sensitive) and Hasawi (salt-tolerant). The transactivation activity of OsNIN-like3 was not possible to determine. Increased soil salinity has a direct impact on the reduction of plant growth and crop yield and it is therefore fundamental to understand the molecular mechanisms underlying gene expression regulation under adverse environmental conditions.
OsNHX1 is the most abundant K+-Na+/H+ antiporter localized in the tonoplast and its gene expression is induced by salt, drought and ABA. To investigate how OsNHX1 is transcriptionally regulated in response to salt stress in a salt-tolerant rice genotype (Hasawi), a salt-stress-induced cDNA expression library was constructed and subsequently screened using the yeast one-hybrid system and the OsNHX1 promoter as bait. Five transcription factors (TFs) belonging to three distinct TF families: one TCP (OsPCF2), one CPP (OsCPP5) and three NIN-like (OsNIN-like2, OsNIN-like3 and OsNIN-like4) were identified as binding to OsNHX1 promoter. Transactivation activity assays performed in Arabidopsis and rice protoplasts showed that OsPCF2 and OsNIN-like4 are activators of the OsNHX1 gene expression, while OsCPP5 and OsNIN-like2 act as repressors. The transactivation activity of OsNIN-like3 needs to be further investigated. Gene expression studies showed that OsNHX1 transcript level is highly induced by salt and PEG-induced drought stress in both shoots and roots in both Nipponbare and Hasawi rice genotypes. Nevertheless, OsNHX1 seems to play a particular role in shoots in response to drought. Most of the TFs binding to OsNHX1 promoter showed a modest transcriptional regulation under stress conditions, however, in response to most of the conditions studied, the OsPCF2 was induced earlier than OsNHX1, indicating that OsPCF2 may activate OsNHX1 gene expression. In addition, although the OsNHX1 response to salt and PEG-induced drought stress in either shoots or roots was quite similar in both rice genotypes, the expression of OsPCF2 in roots under salt stress and the OsNIN-like4 in roots subjected to PEG was mainly up-regulated in Hasawi, indicating that these TFs may be associated with the salt and drought stress tolerance observed for this genotype.
KeywordsSalt stress Drought NHX1 PCF2 CPP5 NIN-like
DMA was financed by Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia (FCT) through the fellowship SFRH/BD/65229/2009. NS was supported by Programa Ciência 2007 and FCT Investigator, financed by POPH (QREN).
This work was funded by Research unit GREEN-it “Bioresources for Sustainability” (UID/Multi/04551/2013) and by FCT project PTDC/BIA_BCM/099836/2008.
D.M.A. performed all the experiments (rice treatments, cDNA library construction, Y1H screening, transctivation analysis, cellular localization, RT-qPCR), analyzed the data, and wrote the article. GG was involved in salt treatments and salt stress evaluation, GG, M.M.O. and N.J.M.S conceived the project and M.M.O. and N.J.M.S revised the article.
- Andrés Z, Perez-Hormaeche J, Leidi EO, Schlucking K, Steinhorst L, McLachlan DH, Schumacher K, Hetherington AM, Kudla J, Cubero B, Pardo JM (2014) Control of vacuolar dynamics and regulation of stomatal aperture by tonoplast potassium uptake. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111:E1806–E1814. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1320421111 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Anthony RG, Henriques R, Helfer A, Meszaros T, Rios G, Testerink C, Munnik T, Deak M, Koncz C, Bogre L (2004) A protein kinase target of a PDK1 signalling pathway is involved in root hair growth in Arabidopsis. EMBO J 23:572–581. DOI: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600068 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Barragán V, Leidi EO, Andrés Z, Rubio L, De Luca A, Fernández JA, Cubero B, Pardo JM (2012) Ion exchangers NHX1 and NHX2 mediate active potassium uptake into vacuoles to regulate cell turgor and stomatal function in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 24:1127–1142. doi: 10.1105/tpc.111.095273 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Bassil E, Tajima H, Liang YC, Ohto MA, Ushijima K, Nakano R, Esumi T, Coku A, Belmonte M, Blumwald E (2011a) The Arabidopsis Na+/H+ antiporters NHX1 and NHX2 control vacuolar pH and K+ homeostasis to regulate growth, flower development, and reproduction. Plant Cell 23:3482–3497. DOI: 10.1105/tpc.111.089581
- Bassil E, Ohto MA, Esumi T, Tajima H, Zhu Z, Cagnac O, Belmonte M, Peleg Z, Yamaguchi T, Blumwald E (2011b) The Arabidopsis intracellular Na+/H+ antiporters NHX5 and NHX6 are endosome associated and necessary for plant growth and development. Plant Cell 23:224–239. DOI: 10.1105/tpc.110.079426
- Castaings L, Camargo A, Pocholle D, Gaudon V, Texier Y, Boutet-Mercey S, Taconnat L, Renou JP, Daniel-Vedele F, Fernández E, Meyer C, Krapp A (2009) The nodule inception-like protein 7 modulates nitrate sensing and metabolism in Arabidopsis. Plant J 57:426–435. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2008.03695.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cvitanich C, Pallisgaard N, Nielsen KA, Hansen AC, Larsen K, Pihakaski-Maunsbach K, Marcker KA, Jensen EO (2000) CPP1, a DNA-binding protein involved in the expression of a soybean leghemoglobin c3 gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:8163–8168. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.090468497 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Djanaguiraman M, Prasad P.V.V. (2012) Effects of salinity on ion transport, water relations and oxidative damage. In: Springer-Verlag New, York Inc. (eds) Ecophysiology and responses of plants under salt stress. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Fedorova E, Zink D (2008) Nuclear architecture and gene regulation. Biochim Biophys Acta 1783:2174–2184. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2008.07.018
- Gregorio GB, Senadhira D, Mendoza RD (1997) Screening rice for salinity tolerance. IRRI Discussion Paper Series No. 22Google Scholar
- Kumari S, Sabharwal VP, Kushwaha HR, Sopory SK, Singla-Pareek SL, Pareek A (2009) Transcriptome map for seedling stage specific salinity stress response indicates a specific set of genes as candidate for saline tolerance in Oryza sativa L. Funct Integr Genomics 9:109–123. doi: 10.1007/s10142-008-0088-5 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Leidi EO, Barragán V, Rubio L, El-Hamdaoui A, Ruiz MT, Cubero B, Fernández JA, Bressan RA, Hasegawa PM, Quintero FJ, Pardo JM (2010) The AtNHX1 exchanger mediates potassium compartmentation in vacuoles of transgenic tomato. Plant J 61:495–506. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2009.04073.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Maggio A, Zhu J-K, Hasegawa PM, Bressan RA (2006) Osmogenetics: Aristotle to Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 18:1542–1557. doi: 10.1105/tpc.105.040501
- Michael G, André L (2002) Global impact of salinity and agricultural ecosystems. In: Läuchli A, Lüttge U (eds), Salinity: environment—plants—molecules. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dodrecht, pp 3–20Google Scholar
- Mohammadi-Nejad G, Arzani A, Reza AM, Singh RK, Gregorio GB (2008) Assessment of rice genotypes for salt tolerance using microsatellite markers associated with the saltol QTL. Afr J Biotechnol 6:730–736Google Scholar
- Ouyang S, Zhu W, Hamilton J, Lin H, Campbell M, Childs K, Thibaud-Nissen F, Malek RL, Lee Y, Zheng L, Orvis J, Haas B, Wortman J, Buell CR (2007) The TIGR rice genome annotation resource: improvements and new features. Nucleic Acids Res 35:D883–D887. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkl976 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Reguera M, Bassil E, Tajima H, Wimmer M, Chanoca A, Otegui MS, Paris N, Blumwald E (2015) pH regulation by NHX-type antiporters is required for receptor-mediated protein trafficking to the vacuole in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 27:1200–1217. doi: 10.1105/tpc.114.135699 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Santos AP, Serra T, Figueiredo DD, Barros P, Lourenço T, Chander S, Oliveira MM, Saibo NJ (2011) Transcription regulation of abiotic stress responses in rice: a combined action of transcription factors and epigenetic mechanisms. OMICS 15:839–857. doi: 10.1089/omi.2011.0095 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Walia H, Wilson C, Condamine P, Liu X, Ismail AM, Zeng L, Wanamaker SI, Mandal J, Xu J, Cui X, Close TJ (2005) Comparative transcriptional profiling of two contrasting rice genotypes under salinity stress during the vegetative growth stage. Plant Physiol 139:822–835. doi: 10.1104/pp.105.065961 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Xuea Z-Y, Zhia D-Y, Xueb G-P, Zhangc H, Zhaoc Y-X, Xiaa G-M (2004) Enhanced salt tolerance of transgenic wheat (Tritivum aestivum L.) expressing a vacuolar Na+/H+ antiporter gene with improved grain yields in saline soils in the field and a reduced level of leaf Na+. Plant Sci 167:849–859CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Yoshida S, Forno D, Cock J, Gomez K (1976) Laboratory manual for physiological studies of rice. Internationa Rice Research Instirute (IRRI), ManilaGoogle Scholar