Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Changes in multi-modality management of acromegaly in a tertiary centre over 2 decades

  • Published:
Pituitary Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Acromegaly is a rare disease associated with chronic multisystem complications. New therapeutic strategies have emerged in the last decades, combining pituitary transsphenoidal surgery (TSS), radiotherapy or radiosurgery (RXT) and medical treatments.

Methods

This retrospective monocentric study focused on presentation, management and outcome of acromegaly patients diagnosed between 2000 and 2020, still followed up in 2020, with a minimum follow-up of 1 year, and comparison of the first vs. second decade of the study.

Results

275 patients were included, 50 diagnosed before 2010 and 225 after 2010. 95% of them had normal IGF-1 levels (with or without treatment) at the last follow-up. Transsphenoidal surgery was more successful after 2010 (75% vs. 54%; p < 0.01), while tumor characteristics remained the same over time. The time from first treatment to biochemical control was shorter after 2010 than before (8 vs. 16 months; p = 0.03). Since 2010, RT was used less frequently (10% vs. 32%; p < 0.01) but more rapidly after surgery (26 vs. 53 months; p = 0.03). In patients requiring anti-secretory drugs after TSS, the time from first therapy to biochemical control was shorter after 2010 (16 vs. 29 months; p < 0.01). Tumor size, tumor invasiveness, baseline IGF-1 levels and Trouillas classification were identified as predictors of remission.

Conclusion

The vast majority of patients with acromegaly now have successful disease control with a multimodal approach. They reached biochemical control sooner in the most recent half of the study period. Future work should focus on those patients who are still uncontrolled and on the sequelae of the disease.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

References

  1. Brue T, Rahabi H, Barry A, Barlier A, Bertherat J, Borson-Chazot F et al (2023) Position statement on the diagnosis and management of acromegaly: the French National Diagnosis and Treatment Protocol (NDTP). Ann Endocrinol (Paris) 84(6):697–710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ando.2023.08.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Melmed S (2006) Medical progress: acromegaly. N Engl J Med 355(24):2558–2573. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra062453

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Colao A, Ferone D, Marzullo P, Lombardi G (2004) Systemic complications of acromegaly: epidemiology, pathogenesis, and management. Endocr Rev 25(1):102–152. https://doi.org/10.1210/er.2002-0022

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Maione L, Brue T, Beckers A, Delemer B, Petrossians P, Borson-Chazot F et al (2017) Changes in the management and comorbidities of acromegaly over three decades: the French acromegaly registry. Eur J Endocrinol 176(5):645–655. https://doi.org/10.1530/EJE-16-1064

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Maione L, Chanson P (2019) National acromegaly registries. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab 33(2):101264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beem.2019.02.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Caron P, Brue T, Raverot G, Tabarin A, Cailleux A, Delemer B et al (2019) Signs and symptoms of acromegaly at diagnosis: the physician’s and the patient’s perspectives in the ACRO-POLIS study. Endocrine 63(1):120–129. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12020-018-1764-4

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Fleseriu M, Biller BMK, Freda PU, Gadelha MR, Giustina A, Katznelson L et al (2021) A Pituitary Society update to acromegaly management guidelines. Pituitary 24(1):1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11102-020-01091-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Fleseriu M, Fuhrer-Sakel D, van der Lely AJ, De Marinis L, Brue T, van der Lans-Bussemaker J et al (2021) More than a decade of real-world experience of pegvisomant for acromegaly: ACROSTUDY. Eur J Endocrinol 185(4):525–538. https://doi.org/10.1530/EJE-21-0239

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Kerbel J, Cano-Zaragoza A, Espinosa-Dorado R, Garcia de la Torre KE, Mercado M. 2023 Real World Data on the Epidemiology, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Acromegaly: A Registries-based Approach. Arch Med Res. 54(6): 102856. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arcmed.2023.102856

  10. Albarel F, Castinetti F, Morange I, Conte-Devolx B, Gaudart J, Dufour H et al (2013) Outcome of multimodal therapy in operated acromegalic patients, a study in 115 patients. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 78(2):263–270. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2265.2012.04492.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Micko AS, Wohrer A, Wolfsberger S, Knosp E (2015) Invasion of the cavernous sinus space in pituitary adenomas: endoscopic verification and its correlation with an MRI-based classification. J Neurosurg 122(4):803–811. https://doi.org/10.3171/2014.12.JNS141083

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Trouillas J, Roy P, Sturm N, Dantony E, Cortet-Rudelli C, Viennet G et al (2013) A new prognostic clinicopathological classification of pituitary adenomas: a multicentric case-control study of 410 patients with 8 years post-operative follow-up. Acta Neuropathol 126(1):123–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-013-1084-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Raverot G, Dantony E, Beauvy J, Vasiljevic A, Mikolasek S, Borson-Chazot F et al (2017) Risk of recurrence in pituitary neuroendocrine tumors: a prospective study using a five-tiered classification. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 102(9):3368–3374. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2017-00773

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Reid TJ, Post KD, Bruce JN, Nabi Kanibir M, Reyes-Vidal CM, Freda PU (2010) Features at diagnosis of 324 patients with acromegaly did not change from 1981 to 2006: acromegaly remains under-recognized and under-diagnosed. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 72(2):203–208. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2265.2009.03626.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Dupuy O, Petrossian T, Bordier L, Mayaudon H, Bauduceau B (2007) Hypertension and acromegaly in the elderly: French registry data. Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss 100(8):660–663

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bex M, Abs R, T’Sjoen G, Mockel J, Velkeniers B, Muermans K et al (2007) AcroBel–the Belgian registry on acromegaly: a survey of the “real-life” outcome in 418 acromegalic subjects. Eur J Endocrinol 157(4):399–409. https://doi.org/10.1530/EJE-07-0358

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Arosio M, Reimondo G, Malchiodi E, Berchialla P, Borraccino A, De Marinis L et al (2012) Predictors of morbidity and mortality in acromegaly: an Italian survey. Eur J Endocrinol 167(2):189–198. https://doi.org/10.1530/EJE-12-0084

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Mestron A, Webb SM, Astorga R, Benito P, Catala M, Gaztambide S et al (2004) Epidemiology, clinical characteristics, outcome, morbidity and mortality in acromegaly based on the Spanish Acromegaly Registry (Registro Espanol de Acromegalia, REA). Eur J Endocrinol 151(4):439–446. https://doi.org/10.1530/eje.0.1510439

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Sesmilo G, Gaztambide S, Venegas E, Pico A, Del Pozo C, Blanco C et al (2013) Changes in acromegaly treatment over four decades in Spain: analysis of the Spanish Acromegaly Registry (REA). Pituitary 16(1):115–121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11102-012-0384-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kwon O, Song YD, Kim SY, Lee EJ (2013) Rare disease study group S, research committee KES nationwide survey of acromegaly in South Korea. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 78(4):577–85. https://doi.org/10.1111/cen.12020

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Schofl C, Franz H, Grussendorf M, Honegger J, Jaursch-Hancke C, Mayr B et al (2013) Long-term outcome in patients with acromegaly: analysis of 1344 patients from the German Acromegaly Register. Eur J Endocrinol 168(1):39–47. https://doi.org/10.1530/EJE-12-0602

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Slagboom TNA, van Bunderen CC, De Vries R, Bisschop PH, Drent ML (2023) Prevalence of clinical signs, symptoms and comorbidities at diagnosis of acromegaly: a systematic review in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Pituitary 26(4):319–332. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11102-023-01322-7

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Castinetti F, Nagai M, Morange I, Dufour H, Caron P, Chanson P et al (2009) Long-term results of stereotactic radiosurgery in secretory pituitary adenomas. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 94(9):3400–3407. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2008-2772

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Ghajar A, Jones PS, Guarda FJ, Faje A, Tritos NA, Miller KK et al (2020) Biochemical control in acromegaly with multimodality therapies: outcomes from a pituitary center and changes over time. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 105(3):e532–e543. https://doi.org/10.1210/clinem/dgz187

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Nachtigall L, Delgado A, Swearingen B, Lee H, Zerikly R, Klibanski A (2008) Changing patterns in diagnosis and therapy of acromegaly over two decades. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 93(6):2035–2041. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2007-2149

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Sandret L, Maison P, Chanson P (2011) Place of cabergoline in acromegaly: a meta-analysis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 96(5):1327–1335. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2010-2443

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Albarel F, Castinetti F, Morange I, Guibert N, Graillon T, Dufour H et al (2018) Pre-surgical medical treatment, a major prognostic factor for long-term remission in acromegaly. Pituitary 21(6):615–623. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11102-018-0916-0

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the “Association pour le Développement de la Recherche Médicale au Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Marseille” (ADEREM) and by an unrestricted educational grant from IPSEN Pharma.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

V.A and FC wrote the manuscript and prepared figures. V.A, N.S and C.P collected the data. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to F. Castinetti.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

Thierry Brue has received conference/consultancy fees and/or research grants from Association Française contre les Myopathies (AFM Telethon), Ipsen, Lilly, Novartis, Novo-Nordisk, Pfizer and Recordati, and served as clinical trial investigator for Crinetics, Debiopharm, Recordati and Xeris. Frederic Castinetti has received conference/consultancy fees and/or research grants from Ipsen, Recordati rare diseases, and served as clinical trial investigator for Recordati rare diseases.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (PPTX 41 kb)

Supplementary file2 (DOCX 14 kb)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Amodru, V., Sahakian, N., Piazzola, C. et al. Changes in multi-modality management of acromegaly in a tertiary centre over 2 decades. Pituitary (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11102-024-01387-y

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11102-024-01387-y

Keywords

Navigation