Skip to main content
Log in

Giant prolactinomas: clinical manifestations and outcomes of 16 Arab cases

  • Published:
Pituitary Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The management of giant prolactinomas remains a major challenge, despite dopamine agonists being the first line of treatment, owing to its efficacy to normalize prolactin levels and reduce tumor volume. The aim of this study is to characterize the therapeutic aspects, manifestations and outcomes of 16 cases of giant prolactinomas admitted at a single tertiary center in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Methods

Retrospective data collection involving 16 Saudi patients diagnosed with giant prolactinoma at the Pituitary Clinic in King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia between January 2006 and July 2012.

Results

A total of 16 patients (ten males; six females) with age of diagnosis between 21 and 55 years (mean 34.9 years) were included in the analysis. The most common presenting features include headache, visual defects and sexual dysfunction. Baseline mean serum prolactin level were extremely high for both sexes which eventually decreased by as much as 97 % after cabergoline treatment. Serum prolactin concentrations completely normalized in six patients and significantly decreased in five patients 3–5 times that of normal range. Tumor volume also decreased by an average of 86 % for males and 87 % for females. Two patients had no tumor size change with cabergoline and required surgery.

Conclusion

Findings indicate that cabergoline provides dramatic clinical improvements with excellent safety profile. Cabergoline should therefore be considered as the primary therapy for giant prolactinomas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ciccarelli A, Daly AF, Beckers A (2005) The epidemiology of prolactinomas. Pituitary 8(1):3–6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Schaller B (2005) Gender-related differences in prolactinomas. A clinicopathological study. Neuro Endocrinol Lett 26(2):152–159

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Shrivastava RK, Arginteanu MS, King WA, Post KD (2002) Giant prolactinomas: clinical management and long-term follow up. J Neurosurg 97(2):299–306

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Murphy FY, Vesely DL, Jordan RM, Flanigan S, Kohler PO (1987) Giant invasive prolactinomas. Am J Med 83(5):995–1002

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Corsello SM, Ubertini G, Altomare M, Lovicu RM, Migneco MG, Rota CA, Colosimo C (2003) Giant prolactinomas in men: efficacy of cabergoline treatment. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 58(5):662–670

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Gillam MP et al (2006) Advances in the treatment of prolactinomas. Endocr Rev 27(5):485–534

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Cho EH, Lee SA, Chung JY, Koh EH, Cho YH, Kim JH, Kim CJ, Kim MS (2009) Efficacy and safety of cabergoline as first line treatment for invasive giant prolactinoma. J Korean Med Sci 24(5):874–878

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hofle G, Gasser R, Mohsenipour I, Finkenstedt G (1998) Surgery combined with dopamine agonists versus dopamine agonists alone in long-term treatment of macroprolactinoma: a retrospective study. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes 106(3):211–216

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Pinzone JJ, Katznelson L, Danila DC, Pauler DK, Miller CS, Klibanski A (2000) Primary medical therapy of micro- and macroprolactinomas in men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 85(9):3053–3057

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Berezin M, Shimon I, Hadani M (1995) Prolactinoma in 53 men: clinical characteristics and modes of treatment (male prolactinoma). J Endocrinol Invest 18(6):436–441

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Maiter D, Delgrange E (2014) The challenges in managing giant prolactinomas. Eur J Endocrinol 170(6):R213–R227

  12. Acharya SV, Gopal RA, Menon PS, Bandgar TR, Shah NS (2010) Giant prolactinoma and effectiveness of medical management. Endocr Pract 16(1):42–46

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hulting AL, Muhr C, Lundberg PO, Werner S (1985) Prolactinomas in men: clinical characteristics and the effect of bromocriptine treatment. Acta Med Scand 217(1):101–109

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Wu ZB, Yu CJ, Su ZP, Zhuge QC, Wu JS, Zheng WM (2006) Bromocriptine treatment of invasive giant prolactinomas involving the cavernous sinus: results of a long-term follow up. J Neurosurg 104(1):54–61

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Colao A, Vitale G, Cappabianca P, Briganti F, Ciccarelli A, De Rosa M, Zarrilli S, Lombardi G (2004) Outcome of cabergoline treatment in men with prolactinoma: effects of a 24-month treatment on prolactin levels, tumor mass, recovery of pituitary function, and semen analysis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 89(4):1704–1711

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Shimon I, Benbassat C, Hadani M (2007) Effectiveness of long-term cabergoline treatment for giant prolactinoma: study of 12 men. Eur J Endocrinol 156(2):225–231

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Minniti G, Jaffrain-Rea ML, Santoro A, Esposito V, Ferrante L, Delfini R, Cantore G (2002) Giant prolactinomas presenting as skull base tumors. Surg Neurol 57(2):99–103 (discussion 103–104)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Acharya SV, Gopal RA, Menon PS, Bandgar TR, Shah NS (2010) Giant prolactinoma and effectiveness of medical management. Endocr Pract 16(1):42–46

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Molitch ME (2003) Dopamine resistance of prolactinomas. Pituitary 6(1):19–27

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Symon L, Jakubowski J, Kendall B (1979) Surgical treatment of giant pituitary adenomas. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 42(11):973–982

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Pia HW, Grote E, Hildebrandt G (1985) Giant pituitary adenomas. Neurosurg Rev 8(3–4):207–220

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Vroonen L, Jaffrain-Rea ML, Petrossians P, Tamagno G, Chanson P, Vilar L, Borson-Chazot F, Naves LA, Brue T, Gatta B, Delemer B, Ciccarelli E, Beck-Peccoz P, Caron P, Daly AF, Beckers A (2012) Prolactinomas resistant to standard doses of cabergoline: a multicenter study of 92 patients. Eur J Endocrinol 167(5):651–662

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Odin P, Oehlwein C, Storch A, Polzer U, Werner G, Renner R, Shing M, Ludolph A, Schuler P (2006) Efficacy and safety of high-dose cabergoline in Parkinson’s disease. Acta Neurol Scand 113(1):18–24

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Moraes AB, Silva CM, Vieira Neto L, Gadelha MR (2013) Giant prolactinomas: the therapeutic approach. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 79(4):447–456

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study has been supported by a small grant from the College of Medicine, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mussa H. Almalki.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Almalki, M.H., Buhary, B., Alzahrani, S. et al. Giant prolactinomas: clinical manifestations and outcomes of 16 Arab cases. Pituitary 18, 405–409 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11102-014-0588-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11102-014-0588-3

Keywords

Navigation