Abstract
The objective of this study is to assess the secretory pattern of GH after Oral Glucose Tolerance Test (OGTT) or day-curve (DC), in relation with IGF-I and to evaluate the influence of therapy on OGTT. A retrospective analysis in 279 OGTTs performed in 93 acromegalic patients in our unit from January 1988 to December 2005, in 77 patients also DC data were retrived. GH concentration was evaluated by 3 different systems (RIA, IRMA and chemiluminescence assays), and IGF-I by two RIAs. About 12% of OGTT samples were discordant with the baseline, while discordance between nadir and 120th minute was much lower (5%), with all discordant values, except one, near the cut-off lines. Correlation between DC and OGTT data was around 0.99 among all values, discordance rate between nadir and minimum DC was much lower than that with mean DC. In almost 80% of cases there was a complete concordance between OGTT and DC results, and in about 30% IGF-I was discordant with GH. Correlation analysis between IGF-I and GH was highest with DC data and lowest with OGTT baseline (T0). Considering different treatments discrepancy rates between GH and IGF-I were comparable. The best GH parameter is the minimum GH DC, although in the clinical practice the evaluation of OGTT GH in association with IGF-I is the most practical approach. In this case, the basal and T120 GH values can replace multiple sampling. Different treatment modalities do not influence the discordance rate between GH and IGF-I.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Melmed S (2006) Medical progress: acromegaly. N Engl J Med 355:2558–2573
Alexander L, Appleton D, Hall R, Ross WM, Wilkinson R (1980) Epidemiology of acromegaly in the Newcastle region. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 12:71–79
Bengtsson BA, Eden S, Ernest I, Oden A, Sjogren B (1988) Epidemiology and long-term survival in acromegaly. A study of 166 cases diagnosed between 1955 and 1984. Acta Med Scand 223:327–335
Colao A, Ferone D, Marzullo P, Lombardi G (2004) Systemic complications of acromegaly: epidemiology, pathogenesis, and management. Endocr Rev 25:102–152
Holdaway IM, Rajasoorya C (1999) Epidemiology of acromegaly. Pituitary 2:29–41
Holdaway IM, Rajasoorya RC, Gamble GD (2004) Factors influencing mortality in acromegaly. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 89:667–674
Strasburger CJ (2005) IGF-I and mortality in patients with acromegaly. J Endocrinol Invest 28:78–80
Giustina A, Barkan A, Casanueva FF, Cavagnini F, Frohman L, Ho K, Veldhuis J, Wass J, von Werder K, Melmed S (2000) Criteria for cure of acromegaly: a consensus statement. J Clin Endocr Metab 85:526–529
Trainer PJ (2002) Editorial: acromegaly–consensus, what consensus? J Clin Endocrinol Metab 87:3534–3536
Clemmons DR (2011) Consensus statement on the standardization and evaluation of growth hormone and insulin-like growth factor assays. Clin Chem 57:555–559
Minuto F, Resmini E, Boschetti M, Arvigo M, Sormani MP, Giusti M, Ferone D, Barreca A (2004) Assessment of disease activity in acromegaly by means of a single blood sample: comparison of the 120th minute postglucose value with spontaneous GH secretion and with the IGF system. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 61:138–144
expert committee on the diagnosis, classification of diabetes mellitus (2003) Report of the Expert Committee on the diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care 26(Suppl 1):S5–S20
Carmichael JD, Bonert VS, Mirocha JM, Melmed S (2009) The utility of oral glucose tolerance testing for diagnosis and assessment of treatment outcomes in 166 patients with acromegaly. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 94:523–527
Bland JM, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1:307–310
Grottoli S, Razzore P, Gaia D, Gasperi M, Giusti M, Colao A, Ciccarelli E, Gasco V, Martino E, Ghigo E, Camanni F (2003) Three-hour spontaneous GH secretion profile is as reliable as oral glucose tolerance test for the diagnosis of acromegaly. J Endocrinol Invest 26:123–127
Ribeiro-Oliveira A Jr, Faje AT, Barkan AL (2011) Limited utility of oral glucose tolerance test in biochemically active acromegaly. Eur J Endocrinol 164:17–22
Melmed S, Casanueva F, Cavagnini F, Chanson P, Frohman LA, Gaillard R, Ghigo E, Ho K, Jaquet P, Kleinberg D, Lamberts S, Laws E, Lombardi G, Sheppard MC, Thorner M, Vance ML, Wass JA, Giustina A (2005) Consensus statement: medical management of acromegaly. Eur J Endocrinol 153:737–740
Melmed S, Colao A, Barkan A, Molitch M, Grossman AB, Kleinberg D, Clemmons D, Chanson P, Laws E, Schlechte J, Vance ML, Ho K, Giustina A (2009) Guidelines for acromegaly management: an update. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 94:1509–1517
Arafat AM, Mohlig M, Weickert MO, Perschel FH, Purschwitz J, Spranger J, Strasburger CJ, Schofl C, Pfeiffer AF (2008) Growth hormone response during oral glucose tolerance test: the impact of assay method on the estimation of reference values in patients with acromegaly and in healthy controls, and the role of gender, age, and body mass index. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 93:1254–1262
Murray RD, Kim K, Ren SG, Chelly M, Umehara Y, Melmed S (2004) Central and peripheral actions of somatostatin on the growth hormone-IGF-I axis. J Clin Invest 114:349–356
Barkan AL, Beitins IZ, Kelch RP (1988) Plasma insulin-like growth factor-I/somatomedin-C in acromegaly: correlation with the degree of growth hormone hypersecretion. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 67:69–73
Barreca A, Ciccarelli E, Minuto F, Bruzzi P, Giordano G, Camanni F (1989) Insulin-like growth factor I and daily growth hormone profile in the assessment of active acromegaly. Acta Endocrinol Copenh 120:629–635
Melmed S (2009) Acromegaly pathogenesis and treatment. J Clin Invest 119:3189–3202
Acknowledgments
This study was partially supported by grants from MIUR (2002067251-001, 2007RFFFFN_005), from University of Genova and by grant from Italian Minister of Instruction, University and Research (PRIN 2008 n. 2008LFK7J5_004).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Minuto, F.M., Resmini, E., Boschetti, M. et al. Biochemical diagnosis and assessment of disease activity in acromegaly: a two-decade experience. Pituitary 15, 215–221 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11102-011-0313-4
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11102-011-0313-4