, Volume 45, Issue 1, pp 51–58 | Cite as

Elevated CO2 mitigates the adverse effects of drought on daytime net ecosystem CO2 exchange and photosynthesis in a Florida scrub-oak ecosystem

  • J. H. Li
  • D. P. Johnson
  • P. Dijkstra
  • B. A. Hungate
  • C. R. Hinkle
  • B. G. Drake
Original Papers


Drought is a normal, recurrent feature of climate. In order to understand the potential effect of increasing atmospheric CO2 concentration (C a) on ecosystems, it is essential to determine the combined effects of drought and elevated C a (EC) under field conditions. A severe drought occurred in Central Florida in 1998 when precipitation was 88 % less than the average between 1984 and 2002. We determined daytime net ecosystem CO2 exchange (NEE) before, during, and after the drought in the Florida scrub-oak ecosystem exposed to doubled C a in open-top chamber since May 1996. We measured diurnal leaf net photosynthetic rate (P N) of Quercus myrtifolia Willd, the dominant species, during and after the drought. Drought caused a midday depression in NEE and P N at ambient CO2 concentration (AC) and EC. EC mitigated the midday depression in NEE by about 60 % compared to AC and the effect of EC on leaf P N was similar to its effect on NEE. Growth in EC lowered the sensitivity of NEE to air vapor pressure deficit under drought. Thus EC would help the scrub-oak ecosystem to survive the consequences of the effects of rising atmospheric CO2 on climate change, including increased frequency of drought, while simultaneously sequestering more anthropogenic carbon.

Aditional key words

air vapor pressure deficit net ecosystem CO2 exchange open-top chamber Quercus myrtifolia stomatal conductance 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Anderson, P.D., Tomlinson, P.T.: Ontogeny affects response of northern red oak seedlings to elevated CO2 and water stress. I. Carbon assimilation and biomass production.-New Phytol. 140: 477–491, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Atkinson, C.J., Taylor, J.M., Wilkins, D., Besford, R.T.: Effects of elevated CO2 on chloroplast components, gas exchange and growth of oak and cherry.-Tree Physiol. 17: 319–325, 1997.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Beerling, D.J., Heath, J., Woodward, F.I., Mansfield, T.A.: Drought-CO2 interactions in trees: Observations and mechanisms.-New Phytol. 134: 235–242, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bunce, J.A.: Stomatal conductance, photosynthesis and respiration of temperate deciduous tree seedlings grown outdoors at an elevated concentration of carbon dioxide.-Plant Cell Environ. 15: 541–549, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bussis, D., Kauder, F., Heineke, D.: Acclimation of potato plants to polyethylene glycol-induced water deficit. I. Photosynthesis and metabolism.-J. exp. Bot. 49: 1349–1360, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ceulemans, R., Mousseau, M.: Effects of elevated atmospheric CO2 on woody plants.-New Phytol. 127: 425–446, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Curtis, P.S.: A meta-analysis of leaf gas exchange and nitrogen in trees grown under elevated carbon dioxide.-Plant Cell Environ. 19: 127–137, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Damesin, C., Rambal, S.: Field study of leaf photosynthetic performance by a Mediterranean deciduous oak tree (Quercus pubescens) during a severe summer drought.-New Phytol. 131: 159–167, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dijkstra, P., Hymus, G.J., Colavito, D., Vieglais, D.A., Cundari, C.M., Johnson, D.P., Hungate, B.A., Hinkle, C.R., Drake, B.G.: Elevated atmospheric CO2 stimulates aboveground biomass in a fire-regenerated scrub-oak ecosystem.-Global Change Biol. 8: 90–103, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dixon, M., le Thiec, D., Garrec, J.P.: The growth and gas exchange responses of soil-plant Norway spruce [Picea abies (L.) Karst.] and red oak (Quercus rubra L.) exposed to elevated CO2 and to naturally occurring drought.-New Phytol. 129: 265–273, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dore, S., Hymus, G.J., Johnson, D.P., Hinkle, C.R., Valentini, R., Drake, B.G.: Cross validation of open-top chamber and eddy covariance measurements of ecosystem CO2 exchange in a Florida scrub-oak ecosystem.-Global Change Biol. 9: 84–95, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Epron, D., Dreyer, E., Bréda N.: Photosynthesis of oak trees [Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl.] during drought under field conditions: diurnal course of net CO2 assimilation and photochemical efficiency of photosystem II.-Plant Cell Environ. 15: 809–820, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. García-Plazaola, J.I., Faria, T., Abadía, J., Abadía, A., Chaves, M.M., Pereira, J.S.: Seasonal changes in xanthophyll composition and photosynthesis of cork oak (Quercus suber L.) leaves under a Mediterranean climate.-J. exp. Bot. 48: 1667–1674, 1997.Google Scholar
  14. Hoerling, M., Kumar, A.: The perfect ocean for drought.-Science 299: 691–694, 2003.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Körner, C.: Towards a better experimental basis for upscaling plant responses to elevated CO2 and climate warming.-Plant Cell Environ. 18: 1101–1110, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lawlor, D.W., Mitchell, R.A.C.: The effect of increasing CO2 on crop photosynthesis and productivity: a review of field studies.-Plant Cell Environ. 14: 807–818, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Maier-Maercker, U.: Dynamics of change in stomatal response and water status of Picea abies during a persistent drought period: a contribution to the traditional view of plant water relations.-Tree Physiol. 18: 211–222, 1988.Google Scholar
  18. Mailander, J.L.: Climate of the Kennedy Space Center and Vicinity.-US Aeronautics and Space Administration Technical Memorandum 103498. 1990.Google Scholar
  19. Matthews, M.A., Boyer, J.S.: Acclimation of photosynthesis to low leaf water potentials.-Plant Physiol. 74: 161–166, 1984.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mooney, H.A., Drake, B.G., Luxmoore, R.J., Oechel, W.C., Pitelka, L.F.: Predicting ecosystem responses to elevated CO2 concentrations. What has been learned from laboratory experiments on plant physiology and field observations?-BioScience 41: 96–104, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Morison, J.I.L.: Response of plants to CO2 under water limited conditions.-Vegetatio 104/105: 193–209, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Norby, R.J., Luo, Y.Q.: Evaluating ecosystem responses to rising atmospheric CO2 and global warming in a multi-factor world.-New Phytol. 162: 281–293, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Panek, J.A., Goldstein, A.H.: Response of stomatal conductance to drought in ponderosa pine: implications for carbon and ozone uptake.-Tree Physiol. 21: 337–344, 2001.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Panković, D., Sakač, Z., Kevrešan, S., Plesničar, M.: Acclimation to long-term water deficit in the leaves of two sunflower hybrids: photosynthesis, electron transport and carbon metabolism.-J. exp. Bot. 50: 127–138. 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Roden, J.S., Ball, M.C.: The effect of elevated [CO2] on growth and photosynthesis of two eucalyptus species exposed to high temperatures and water deficits.-Plant Physiol. 111: 909–919, 1996.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Roeckner, E.: Past, present and future levels of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere and model projections of related climatic changes.-J. exp. Bot. 43: 1097–1109, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Scarascia-Mugnozza, G.P., De Angelis, G., Matteucci, R.V., Valentini, R.: Long-term exposure to elevated [CO2] in a natural Quercus ilex L. community: net photosynthesis and photochemical efficiency of PSII at different levels of water stress.-Plant Cell Environ. 19: 643–654, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Talbott, L.D., Rahveh, E., Zeiger, E.: Relative humidity is a key factor in the acclimation of stomatal response to CO2.-J. exp. Bot. 54: 2141–2147, 2003.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Volkmar, K.M., Woodbury, W.: Plant-water relationships.-In: Pessarakli, M. (ed.): Handbook of Plant and Crop Physiology. Pp. 23–43. Marcel Dekker, New York-Basel-Hong Kong 1995.Google Scholar
  30. Will, R.E., Teskey, R.O.: Effect of irradiance and vapour pressure deficit on stomatal response to CO2 enrichment of four tree species.-J. exp. Bot. 48: 2095–2102, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Woodward, F.I.: Climate and Plant Distribution.-Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1987.Google Scholar
  32. Wullschleger, S.D., Tschaplinski, T.J., Norby, R.J.: Plant water relations at elevated CO2-implications for water-limited environments.-Plant Cell Environ. 25: 319–331, 2002.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Institute of Experimental Botany, ASCR 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. H. Li
    • 1
  • D. P. Johnson
    • 1
  • P. Dijkstra
    • 2
  • B. A. Hungate
    • 2
  • C. R. Hinkle
    • 3
  • B. G. Drake
    • 1
  1. 1.Smithsonian Environmental Research CenterEdgewaterUSA
  2. 2.Department of Biological Sciences and Merriam-Powell Center for Environmental ResearchNorthern Arizona UniversityFlagstaffUSA
  3. 3.Dynamac CorporationUSA

Personalised recommendations