Skip to main content
Log in

Experimental philosophy without intuitions: an illustration of why it fails

  • Book Review
  • Published:
Philosophical Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Machery’s book is an effort to show how experimental philosophy can be valuable without the perephenelia of intuitions. I argue that the effort fails.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Machery calls it ‘Method of Cases 2.0’.

  2. If this went by a bit fast, see Part II of Cappelen 2018 for elaboration.

References

  • Blackburn, S. (1999). Think: A compelling introduction to philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandom, R. B. (2001). Modality, normativity, and intentionality. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 63(3), 611–623.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burge, T. (1979). Individualism and the mental. Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 4(1), 73–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cappelen, H. (2012). Philosophy without intuitions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cappelen, H. (2018). Fixing language: An essay on conceptual engineering. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cappelen, H., & Deutsch, M. E. (2018). The crisis of method in contemporary analytic philosophy. Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 1(05). https://ndpr.nd.edu/news/the-crisis-of-method-in-contemporary-analytic-philosophy/

  • Deutsch, M. (2015). The myth of the intuitive. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Haslanger, S. (2000). Gender and race: (What) are they? (What) do we want them to be? Noûs, 34(1), 31–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knobe, J., & Nichols, S. (2008). An experimental philosophy Manifesto. In J. Knobe & S. Nichols (Eds.), Experimental philosophy (pp. 3–14). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kripke, S. A. (1980). Naming and necessity. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Machery, E. (2017). Philosophy within its proper bounds. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Machery, E., Mallon, R., Nichols, S., & Stich, S. (2004). Semantics, cross-cultural style. Cognition, 92(3), 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, J. (2012). Intuitions and experiments: A defense of the case method in epistemology. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 85(3), 495–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, H. (1975). The meaning of ‘meaning’. Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 7, 131–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scharp, K. (2013). Replacing truth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, T. (1994). Vagueness. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Thanks to Derek Ball, Josh Dever, Edouard Machery for useful discussions, and to Matt Mckeever for detailed comments and suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Herman Cappelen.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cappelen, H. Experimental philosophy without intuitions: an illustration of why it fails. Philos Stud 179, 309–317 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-020-01581-1

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-020-01581-1

Keywords

Navigation