Cultural appropriation and oppression
- 1.3k Downloads
In this paper, I present an outline of the oppression account of cultural appropriation and argue that it offers the best explanation for the wrongfulness of the varied and complex cases of appropriation to which people often object. I then compare the oppression account with the intimacy account defended by C. Thi Nguyen and Matt Strohl. Though I believe that Nguyen and Strohl’s account offers important insight into an essential dimension of the cultural appropriation debate, I argue that justified objections to cultural appropriation must ultimately be grounded in considerations of oppression as opposed to group intimacy. I present three primary objections to the intimacy account. First, I suggest that in its effort to explain expressive appropriation claims (those that purportedly lack an independent ground), the intimacy account doubles down on the boundary problem. Second, I question whether group intimacy possess the kind of bare normativity that Nguyen and Strohl claim for it. Finally, I argue that these objections give us reason to accept the importance of group intimacy to the cultural appropriation debate, but question the source of its significance as identified by Nguyen and Strohl.
KeywordsCultural appropriation Oppression Culture Essentialism
This paper has benefited from helpful discussions with Shen-yi Liao, Nick Riggle, Thi Nguyen, Matt Strohl, and audience members at the 2018 APA Pacific Division meeting in San Diego. Special thanks to Dominic McIver Lopes and Margaret Moore. Some parts of this paper were further developed in blog posts at Aesthetics for Birds: thanks to Alex King for feedback and providing an excellent venue for work in aesthetics. Thanks always to Jackie Hatala Matthes.
- Appiah, K. A. (2006). Whose culture is it, anyway? In Cosmopolitanism (pp. 115–135). New York: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
- Cooper, B. (2015). Iggy Azalea’s post-racial mess: America’s oldest race tale, remixed. Salon. https://www.salon.com/2014/07/15/iggy_azaleas_post_racial_mess_americas_oldest_race_tale_remixed/.
- Hladki, J. (1994). Problematizing the issue of cultural appropriation. Alternate Routes, 11, 95–119.Google Scholar
- Hurka, T. (1999). Should Whites write about minorities? In Principles: Short essays on ethics (2nd ed.). Toronto: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar
- Keeshig-Tobias, L. (1990). The magic of others. In L. Scheier, S. Sheard, & E. Wachtel (Eds.), Language in her eye: Views on writing and gender by Canadian women writing in English. Toronto: Coach House Press.Google Scholar
- Matthes, E. H. (2017). Repatriation and the radical redistribution of art. Ergo, 4(32), 931–953.Google Scholar
- Matthes, E. H. (2018). The ethics of cultural heritage. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/ethics-cultural-heritage/.
- Mezey, N. (2007). The paradoxes of cultural property. Columbia Law Review, 107, 2004–2046.Google Scholar
- Todd, L. (1990). Notes on appropriation. Parallelogramme, 16(1), 24–33.Google Scholar
- Todd, L. (1992). What more do they want? In G. McMaster & L.-A. Martin (Eds.), Indigena: Contemporary native perspectives in Canadian art. Vancouver: Douglas & McIntyre.Google Scholar
- Valdman, M. (2009). A theory of wrongful exploitation. Philosophers’ Imprint, 9(6), 1–14.Google Scholar
- Walsh, A. N., & Lopes, D. M. (2012). Objects of appropriation. In J. O. Young & C. G. Brunk (Eds.), The ethics of cultural appropriation (pp. 211–234). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
- Young, I. M. (2011). Five faces of oppression. In Justice and the politics of difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Ziff, B., & Rao, P. V. (Eds.). (1997). Borrowed power. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar