References
Calhoun, C., Warner, M., & Van Antwerpen, J. (2007). Varieties of secularism in a secular age. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Daston, L., & Galison, P. (2007). Objectivity. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Evans, R., & Collins, H. (2007). Rethinking expertise. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Galison, P., & Stump, D. (1996). The disunity of science. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
Goodenough, W. H. (1996). Navigation in the Western Carolines: A traditional science. In L. Nader (Ed.), Naked science: Anthropological inquiry into boundaries, power, and knowledge. New York: Routledge.
Hacking, I. (1983). Representing and intervening. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Harding, S. (Ed.). (1987). Feminism and methodology: Social science issues. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Harding, S. (1991). Strong objectivity and socially situated knowledge. In S. Harding (Ed.), Whose science? Whose knowledge?. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
Harding, S. (Ed.). (1993). The “Racial” economy of science: Toward a democratic future. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Harding, S. (Ed.). (2004). The feminist standpoint theory reader. New York: Routledge.
Harding, S. (Ed.). (2011). The postcolonial science and technology studies reader. Durham: Duke University Press.
Hollinger, D. (1996). Science, jews, and secular culture. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Jacob, M. (1988). The cultural meanings of the scientific revolution. New York: Knopf.
Jakobsen, J. R., & Pellegrini, A. (Eds.). (2008). Secularisms. Durham: Duke University Press.
Jasanoff, S. (Ed.). (2004). States of knowledge: The co-production of science and social order. New York: Routledge.
Jasanoff, S. (Ed.). (2005). Designs on nature: Science and Democracy in Europe and the United States. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Tersity Press.
Kellert, S. H., Longino, H. E., & Waters, C. K. (Eds.). (2006). Scientific pluralism. Minn: Minneapolis.
Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Levey, G. B., & Modood, T. (Eds.). (2009). Secularism, religion and multicultural citizenship. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Mendieta, E., & VanAntwerpen, J. (Eds.). (2011). The power of religion in the public sphere. New York: Columbia University Press.
Muhlhausler, P. (2001). Ecolinguistics, linguistic diversity, ecological diversity. In L. Maffi (Ed.), On biocultural diversity: Linking language, knowledge, and the environment. Washington: Smithsonian Institution Press.
Padovani, F., Richardson, A., & Tsou, J. Y. (Eds.). (2015). Objectivity in science: New perspectives from science and technology studies. New York: Springer.
Proctor, R. (1991). Value-free science? Purity and power in modern knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Reisch, G. A. (2005). How the cold war transformed philosophy of science: To the icy slopes of logic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Richardson, A. W. (2006). The many unities of science: Politics, semantics, and ontology. In S. H. Kellert, H. E. Longino, & C. K. Waters (Eds.), Scientific pluralism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Sands, K. (2008). Feminisms and secularisms. In J. R. Jakobsen & A. Pellegrini (Eds.), Secularisms. Durham: Duke University Press.
Scott, C. (1996). Science for the west, myth for the rest? In L. Nader (Ed.), Naked Science. New York: Routledge.
Selin, H. (2007). Encyclopedia of the history of science, technology and medicine in non-western cultures (2nd ed.). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Visvanathan, N., et al. (Eds.). (2011). The women, gender, and development reader (2nd ed.). New York: Zed Books.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Harding, S. Précis of Objectivity and diversity: another logic of scientific research . Philos Stud 174, 1801–1806 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-016-0835-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-016-0835-8