Advertisement

Philosophical Studies

, Volume 174, Issue 11, pp 2787–2794 | Cite as

On fair countable lotteries

Article

Abstract

Two reverse supertasks—one new and one invented by Pérez Laraudogoitia (Philos Stud 168:619–628, 2014)—are discussed. Contra Kerkvliet (Log Anal, 2016) and Pérez Laraudogoitia, it is argued that these supertasks cannot be used to conduct fair infinite lotteries, i.e., lotteries on the set of natural numbers with a uniform probability distribution. The new supertask involves an infinity of gods who collectively select a natural number by each removing one ball from a collection of initially infinitely many balls in a reverse omega-sequence of actions.

Keywords

Reverse supertasks Uniform probability distributions Countable additivity axiom 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The reverse supertask of Sect. 1 is, essentially, of my invention. I first presented it in an unpublished paper, from which Timber Kerkvliet learned about it. In my original version, each god halved the number of balls in the collection. Timber Kerkvliet found it simpler to work with the version in which each god just removes a single ball. I also realized that the formalism of this paper would be more elegant with that version, and I therefore adopted it. I have benefitted from discussions about this supertask with Jon Pérez Laraudogoitia, Øystein Linnebo, Martin Jullum, Phil Chodrow, Laureano Luna, Carl Baker, Federico Luzzi, Thomas Brouwer, Andreas Fjellstad, Crispin Wright, John Norton, and Timber Kerkvliet.

References

  1. Benardete, J. A. (1964). Infinity: An essay in metaphysics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  2. de Finetti, B. (1974). Theory of probability. Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
  3. Howson, C. (2014). Finite additivity, another lottery paradox and conditionalisation. Synthese, 191, 989–1012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Kerkvliet, T. (2016). The supertask of an infinite lottery. Logique & Analyse, 59. http://www.logiqueetanalyse.be/.
  5. Kolmogorov, A. N. (1933). Grundbegriffe der Wahrscheinlichkeitsrechnung. Berlin: Verlag von Julius Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Pérez Laraudogoitia, J. (2011). The inverse spaceship paradox. Synthese, 178, 429–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Pérez Laraudogoitia, J. (2014). The supertask argument against countable additivity. Philosophical Studies, 168, 619–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Van Leer Jerusalem InstituteJerusalemIsrael

Personalised recommendations