Philosophical Studies

, Volume 174, Issue 11, pp 2709–2729 | Cite as

In defense of the metaphysics of race

Article

Abstract

In this paper I defend the metaphysics of race as a valuable philosophical project against deflationism about race. The deflationists argue that metaphysical debate about the reality of race amounts to a non-substantive verbal dispute that diverts attention from ethical and practical issues to do with ‘race.’ In response, I show that the deflationists mischaracterize the field and fail to capture what most metaphysicians of race actually do in their work, which is almost always pluralist and very often normative and explicitly political. Even if debates about the reality of race turn out to be verbal disputes, they are substantive, and worth having.

Keywords

Metaphysics Deflationism Racial naturalism Social constructionism about race Anti-realism about race 

Notes

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank an audience at Macquarie University’s philosophy seminar series for their feedback, and especially Paul Formosa for a particularly helpful question. I am grateful to Paul Griffiths and the group of philosophers of biology at the University of Sydney for their comments on an earlier draft of this paper, and to Frances Olive for her useful suggestions. An anonymous referee offered very helpful comments, and to them I am also grateful. This work was funded by a Macquarie University Research Fellowship.

References

  1. Andreasen, R. (1998). A new perspective on the race debate. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 49(2), 199–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Appiah, A. (1985). The uncompleted argument: Du Bois and the illusion of race. Critical Inquiry, 12(1), 21–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Appiah, A. (1998). Race, culture, identity: Misunderstood connections. In A. Appiah & A. Gutmann (Eds.), Color conscious: The political morality of race (pp. 30–105). New Jersey: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Appiah, A. (2006). How to decide if races exist. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 106, 365–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blum, L. (2002). “I’m not a racist, but…” The moral quandary of race. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Blum, L. (2010). Racialized groups: The sociohistorical consensus. The Monist, 93(2), 298–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brigandt, I. (2003). Species pluralism does not imply species eliminativism. Philosophy of Science, 70, 1305–1316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chalmers, D. (2011). Verbal disputes. Philosophical Review, 120(4), 515–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Diaz-Leon, E. (2015). What is social construction? European Journal of Philosophy, 23(4), 1137–1152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dupré, J. (1995). The disorder of things: Metaphysical foundations of the disunity of science. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Dupré, J. (Ed.). (2002). On the impossibility of a monistic account of species. In Humans and other animals (pp. 59–80). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Feldman, M. W., & Lewontin, R. C. (2008). Race, ancestry, and medicine. In B. Koenig, S. S.-J. Lee, & S. S. Richardson (Eds.), Revisiting race in a genomic age (pp. 89–101). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Gannett, L. (2010). Questions asked and unasked: How by worrying less about the “really real” philosophers of science might better contribute to debates about genetics and race. Synthese, 177, 363–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Glasgow, J. (2009). A theory of race. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. Glasgow, J., & Woodward, J. M. (2015). Basic racial realism. Journal of the American Philosophical Association, 1(3), 449–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Goldenberg, M. J. (2007). The problem of exclusion in feminist theory and politics: A metaphysical investigation into constructing a category of “woman”. Journal of Gender Studies, 16(2), 139–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hardimon, M. O. (2003). The ordinary concept of race. The Journal of Philosophy, 100(9), 437–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hardimon, M. O. (2013). Race concepts in medicine. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 38, 6–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Haslanger, S. (2000). Feminism in metaphysics: Negotiating the natural. In M. Fricker & J. Hornsby (Eds.), The Cambridge companion to feminism in philosophy (pp. 107–126). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Haslanger, S. (2012). Resisting reality: Social construction and social critique. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hochman, A. (2013a). Against the new racial naturalism. The Journal of Philosophy, 110(6), 331–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hochman, A. (2013b). Racial discrimination: How not to do it. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 44(3), 278–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hochman, A. (2014). Unnaturalised racial naturalism. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 46, 79–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hochman, A. (2015). Of Vikings and Nazis: Norwegian contributions to the rise and the fall of the idea of a superior Aryan race. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 54, 84–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hochman, A. (2016). Race: Deflate or pop? Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 57, 60–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kaplan, J. M., & Winther, R. G. (2013). Prisoners of abstraction? The theory and measure of genetic variation, and the very concept of “race”. Biological Theory, 7, 401–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kitcher, P. (1999). Race, ethnicity, biology, culture. In L. Harris (Ed.), Racism (pp. 87–120). New York: Humanity Books.Google Scholar
  28. Lee, S. S.-J., Mountain, J., & Koenig, B. (2001). The meanings of “race” in the new genomics: Implications for health disparities research. Yale Journal of Health Policy, Law, and Ethics, 1, 33–75.Google Scholar
  29. Lemeire, O. (2016). Beyond the realism debate: The metaphysics of “racial” distinctions. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 59, 47–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Leroi, A. L. (2005). A family tree in every gene. Journal of Genetics, 84(1), 3–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ludwig, D. (2015). Against the new metaphysics of race. Philosophy of Science, 82(2), 244–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lynch, M. P. (2006). ReWrighting pluralism. The Monist, 89(1), 63–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mallon, R. (2006). “Race”: Normative, not metaphysical or semantic. Ethics, 116(3), 525–551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. McPherson, L. K. (2015). Deflating “race”. Journal of the American Philosophical Association, 1(4), 674–693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mills, C. W. (1998). Blackness visible: Essays on philosophy and race. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Mills, C. W. (2005). Reconceptualizing race and racism? A critique of J. Angelo Corlett. Journal of Social Philosophy, 36(4), 546–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Outlaw, L. T. (1996). On race and philosophy. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  38. Pierce, J. (2014). A realist metaphysics of race: A context-sensitive, short-term retentionist, long-term revisionist approach. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  39. Pigliucci, M. (2013). What are we to make of the concept of race? Thoughts of a philosopher–scientist. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 44(3), 272–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Pigliucci, M., & Kaplan, J. (2003). On the concept of biological race and its applicability to humans. Philosophy of Science, 70(5), 1161–1172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Root, M. (2000). How we divide the world. Philosophy of Science, 67, S628–S639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Serre, D., & Pääbo, S. (2004). Evidence for gradients of human genetic diversity within and among continents. Genome Research, 14, 1679–1685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Spencer, Q. (2013a). Biological theory and the metaphysics of race: A reply to Kaplan and Winther. Biological Theory, 8(1), 114–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Spencer, Q. (2013b). Introduction to “Is there space for race in evolutionary biology?”. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 44, 247–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Spencer, Q. (2014). A radical solution to the race problem. Philosophy of Science, 81(5), 1025–1038.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Stich, S. (1996). Deconstructing the mind. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Sundstrom, R. R. (2002a). Race as a human kind. Philosophy & Social Criticism, 28(1), 91–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Sundstrom, R. R. (2002b). “Racial” nominalism. Journal of Social Philosophy, 33(2), 193–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Taylor, P. C. (2000). Appiah’s uncompleted argument: WEB Du Bois and the reality of race. Social Theory and Practice, 26(1), 103–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Taylor, P. C. (2004). Race: A philosophical introduction. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  51. Uidhir, C. M., & Magnus, P. D. (2011). Art concept pluralism. Metaphilosophy, 42(1–2), 83–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Winther, R. G. (2014). The genetic reification of “race”?: A story of two mathematical methods. Critical Philosophy of Race, 2(2), 204–223.Google Scholar
  53. Zack, N. (1994). Race and mixed race. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  54. Zack, N. (2002). Philosophy of science and race. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyMacquarie UniversitySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations