Antony, L. M. (1999). Multiple realizability, projectability, and the reality of mental properties. Philosophical Topics, 26, 1–24.
Antony, L. M., & Levine, J. (1997). Reduction with autonomy. Philosophical Perspectives, 11, 83–105.
Armstrong, D. M. (1983). What is a law of nature?. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Block, N. (1995). The mind as the software of the brain. In D. N. Osherson, L. Gleitman, S. M. Kosslyn, S. Smith, & S. Sternberg (Eds.), An Invitation to cognitive science (pp. 170–185). Cambridge: MIT Press.
Cartwright, N. (2007). Hunting causes and using them. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Clarke, C. Manuscript A. How to define higher level explanations. Unpublished Manuscript.
Clarke, C. Manuscript B. Micro structuralism defended via difference making principles. Unpublished Manuscript.
Fodor, J. (1974). Special sciences (or: The disunity of science as a working hypothesis). Synthese, 28, 97–115.
Fodor, J. (1997). Special sciences: still autonomous after all these years. Philosophical Perspectives, 11, 149–163.
Franklin-Hall, L. R. Forthcoming. High-level explanation and the interventionist’s ’variables problem’. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, axu040.
Garfinkel, A. (1981). Forms of explanation. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Goodman, N. (1954). Fact, fiction and forecast. Athlone. Citations refer to 2nd edition (Harvard University Press, 1983).
Haug, M. C. (2011a). Abstraction and explanatory relevance; or, why do the special sciences exist? Philosophy of Science, 78, 1143–1155.
Haug, M. C. (2011b). Natural properties and the special sciences. The Monist, 94, 244–266.
Hempel, C. G., & Oppenheim, P. (1948). Studies in the logic of explanation. Philosophy of Science, 15, 135–175.
Jackson, F., & Pettit, P. (1992). In defence of explanatory ecumenism. Economics and Philosophy, 8, 1–21.
Jaworski, W. (2002). Multiple-realizability, explanation and the disjunctive move. Philosophical Studies, 108, 289–308.
Kincaid, H. (1986). Reduction, explanation and individualism. Philosophy of Science, 53, 492–513. Cited as revised in Kincaid (1997b) chapter 3.
Kincaid, H. (1987). Supervenience doesn’t entail reducibility. Southern Journal of Philosophy, 25, 342–356.
Kincaid, H. (1988). Supervenience and explanation. Synthese, 77, 251–281.
Kincaid, H. (1990). Molecular biology and the unity of science. Philosophy of Science, 57, 575–593. Cited as revised in Kincaid (1997b) chapter 4.
Kincaid, H. (1993). The empirical nature of the individualism-holism dispute. Synthese, 97, 229–247. Cited as revised in Kincaid (1997b) chapter 2.
Kincaid, H. (1996). Philosophical foundations of the social sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kincaid, H. (1997a). Defending non-reductive unity. Chapter 5 of individualism and the unity of science. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield. Revision of Kincaid (1987) and Kincaid (1988).
Kincaid, H. (1997b). Individualism and the unity of the sciences. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.
Kitcher, P. (1981). Explanatory unification. Philosophy of Science, 48, 507–531.
Kitcher, P. (1984). 1953 and all that. A tale of two sciences. Philosophical Review, 93, 335–373.
Kitcher, P. (1989). Explanatory unification and the causal structure of the world. In P. Kitcher & W. Salmon (Eds.), Scientific explanation (pp. 410–505). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Lange, M. (2009). Laws and lawmakers: Science, metaphysics, and the laws of nature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lewis, D. K. (1986). Causal explanation. In Philosophical Papers (Vol. 2, pp. 214–40). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Little, D. (1993). On the scope and limits of generalizations in the social sciences. Synthese, 97, 183–207.
MacDonald, G. (1985). Modified methodological individualism. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 86, 199–211.
MacDonald, G. (1992). Reduction and evolutionary biology. In D. Charles & K. Lennon (Eds.), Reduction, explanation and realism (pp. 69–96). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Marchionni, C. (2008). Explanatory pluralism and complementarity: From autonomy to integration. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 38, 314–333.
Marras, A. (1993). Psychophysical supervenience and nonreductive materialism. Synthese, 95, 275–304.
Owens, D. (1989). Levels of explanation. Mind, 98, 59–79.
Pereboom, D., & Kornblith, H. (1991). The metaphysics of irreducibility. Philosophical Studies, 63, 125–145.
Potochnik, A. (2010). Levels of explanation reconceived. Philosophy of Science, 77, 59–72.
Putnam, H. (1967). Psychological predicates. In W. Capitan & D. Merrill (Eds.), Art, mind and religion (pp. 37–48). Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press. Cited as reprinted in Putnam (1975b).
Putnam, H. (1973). Reductionism and the nature of psychology. Cognition, 2, 131–146. Cited as revised in Putnam (1975c).
Putnam, H. (1975a). Mind language and reality: Philosophical papers (Vol. 2). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Putnam, H. (1975b). The nature of mental states. In Putnam 1975a (pp. 429–441).
Putnam, H. (1975c) Philosophy and our mental life. In Putnam 1975a (pp. 291–303).
Sawyer, R. K. (2002). Nonreductive individualism: Part I—supervenience and wild disjunction. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 32, 537–559.
Shaprio, L., & Sober, E. (2012). Against proportionality. Analysis, 72, 89–93.
Sober, E. (1988). Confirmation and law-likeness. Philosophical Review, 97, 93–98.
Sober, E. (1999). The multiple realizability argument against reductionism. Philosophy of Science, 66, 542–564.
Strevens, M. (2008). Depth: An account of scientific explanation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Weatherson, B. (2012). Explanation, idealisation and the goldilocks problem. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 84, 461–473.
Weslake, B. (2010). Explanatory depth. Philosophy of Science, 77, 273–294.
Woodward, J. (2003). Making things happen: A theory of causal explanation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Woodward, J., & Hitchcock, C. (2003). Explanatory generalizations, Part I: A counterfactual account. Nous, 37, 1–24.
Yablo, S. (1992). Mental causation. Philosophical Review, 101, 245–280.
Ylikoski, P., & Kuorikoski, J. (2010). Dissecting explanatory power. Philosophical Studies, 148, 201–219.