Advertisement

Philosophical Studies

, Volume 172, Issue 6, pp 1651–1660 | Cite as

Soames on Frege: provoking thoughts

  • Michael Beaney
Article
  • 273 Downloads

Abstract

In this symposium contribution I critically review the first two chapters, on Frege, in Volume 1 (The Founding Giants) of The Analytic Tradition in Philosophy by Scott Soames.

Keywords

Gottlob frege Scott soames History of analytic philosophy Identity of thoughts 

References

  1. Beaney, M. (1996). Frege: Making sense. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
  2. Beaney, M. (2005). Sinn, Bedeutung and the paradox of analysis. In Beaney and Reck, IV, pp. 288–310.Google Scholar
  3. Beaney, M. (2006). Soames on philosophical analysis. Philosophical Books, 7, 255–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beaney, M. (2007). Frege’s use of function-argument analysis and his introduction of truth-values as objects. Grazer Philosophische Studien, 75, 93–123.Google Scholar
  5. Beaney, M. (2011). Frege. In B. Lee (Ed.), Philosophy of language: The key thinkers (pp. 33–55). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  6. Beaney, M. (Ed.). (2013a). The Oxford handbook of the history of analytic philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Beaney, M. (2013b). Analytic philosophy and history of philosophy: The development of the idea of rational reconstruction. In E. H. Reck (Ed.), The historical turn in analytic philosophy (pp. 231–260). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Beaney, M. (2014). ‘Gottlob Frege’, Oxford Bibliographies in Philosophy, D. Pritchard (ed.), New York: Oxford University Press. www.oxfordbibliographies.com/browse?module_0=obo-9780195396577
  9. Beaney, M., & Reck, E. H. (Eds.). (2005). Gottlob Frege: Critical assessments of leading philosophers (Vols. 4). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Burgess, J. P. (2005). Fixing frege. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Currie, G. (1982). Frege: An introduction to his philosophy. Sussex: Harvester Press.Google Scholar
  12. Dejnozka, J. (1981). Frege on identity. International Studies in Philosophy, 13, 31–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dejnozka, J. (1996). The ontology of the analytic tradition and its origins. Lanham: Littlefield Adams.Google Scholar
  14. Dummett, M. (1973). Frege: Philosophy of language (2nd ed.). London: Duckworth, 1981.Google Scholar
  15. Dummett, M. (1981). The interpretation of Frege’s philosophy. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
  16. Dummett, M. (1988) Ursprünge der analytischen Philosophie, Frankfurt: Suhrkamp; rev. and publ. in English as Dummett 1993.Google Scholar
  17. Dummett, M. (1991). Frege: Philosophy of mathematics. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
  18. Dummett, M. (1993). Origins of analytical philosophy. London: Duckworth; rev. English ed. of Dummett 1988.Google Scholar
  19. Frege, G. (1874). Methods of calculation based on an extension of the concept of quantity [magnitude], tr. H. Kaal in Frege 1984, pp. 56–92.Google Scholar
  20. Frege, G. (1879). Begriffsschrift, eine der arithmetischen nachgebildete Formelsprache des reinen Denkens, Halle: L. Nebert; Preface and most of Part I tr. M. Beaney in Frege 1997, pp. 47–78.Google Scholar
  21. Frege, G. (<1884). Dialogue with Pünjer on existence, tr. in Frege 1979, pp. 53–67.Google Scholar
  22. Frege, G. (1884). Die Grundlagen der Arithmetik, Breslau: W. Koebner; selections tr. M. Beaney in Frege 1997, pp. 84–129.Google Scholar
  23. Frege, G. (1891). Function und Begriff, Jena: Hermann Pohle; tr. P. T. Geach as ‘Function and Concept’ in Frege 1997, pp. 130–148.Google Scholar
  24. Frege, G. (1892a). Über Sinn und Bedeutung, Zeitschrift für Philosophie und philosophische Kritik, 100: 25–50; tr. M. Black as ‘On Sense and Reference’ in Frege 1997, pp. 151–171.Google Scholar
  25. Frege, G. (1892b). Über Begriff und Gegenstand’, Vierteljahrsschrift für wissenschaftliche Philosophie, 16: 192–205; tr. P. T. Geach as ‘On Concept and Object’ in Frege 1997, pp. 181–193.Google Scholar
  26. Frege, G. (1893/1903). Grundgesetze der Arithmetik, begriffsschriftlich abgeleitet, Jena: H. Pohle, vol. I 1893, vol. II 1903; selections tr. M. Beaney and P. T. Geach in Frege 1997, pp. 194–223, 258–289.Google Scholar
  27. Frege, G. (1906). A brief survey of my logical doctrines, tr. in Frege 1979, pp. 197–202; extract in Frege 1997, pp. 299–300.Google Scholar
  28. Frege, G. (1914). Logic in mathematics; tr. in Frege 1979, pp. 203–250; extract in Frege 1997, pp. 308–318.Google Scholar
  29. Frege, G. (1918). Der Gedanke. Eine logische Untersuchung, Beiträge zur Philosophie des deutschen Idealismus, 1: 58–77; tr. P. T. Geach as ‘Thought’ in Frege 1997, pp. 325–345.Google Scholar
  30. Frege, G. (1979). Posthumous writings, tr. P. Long and R. White, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  31. Frege, G. (1984). Collected papers on mathematics, logic, and philosophy. In B. McGuinness (Ed.), tr. M. Black et al., Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  32. Frege, G. (1997). The Frege reader, with an introd. by M. Beaney (ed.), Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  33. Kaplan, D. (1977). Demonstratives. In J. Almog, J. Perry, & H. Wettstein (Eds.), Themes from Kaplan (pp. 481–563). Oxford: Oxford University Press. 1989.Google Scholar
  34. Kneale, W., & Kneale, M. (1962). The development of logic. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  35. Kremer, M. (2010). Sense and reference: The origins and development of the distinction. In M. Potter & T. Ricketts (Eds.), The Cambridge companion to Frege (pp. 220–292). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kripke, S. (2008). Frege’s theory of sense and reference: Some exegetical notes. Theoria, 74, 181–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Perry, J. (1977). Frege on demonstratives. Philosophical Review, 86, 474–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Perry, John. (1979). The problem of the essential indexical. Noûs, 13, 3–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Rayo, A. (2002). Frege’s unofficial arithmetic. Journal of Symbolic Logic, 67, 1623–1638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Resnik, M. (1980). Frege and the philosophy of mathematics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Soames, S. (2003). Philosophical analysis in the twentieth century, vol. 1: The Dawn of Analysis, vol. 2: The age of meaning. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Soames, S. (2014) The analytic tradition in philosophy, vol. 1: The founding giants. New Jersey: Princeton Univesity Press.Google Scholar
  43. Textor, M. (2011). Frege on sense and reference. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Thau, M., & Caplan, B. (2000). What’s puzzling Gottlob Frege? Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 31, 159–200.Google Scholar
  45. Thiel, C. (2005). Not arbitrarily and out of a craze for novelty: The Begriffsschrift 1879 and 1893’, tr. M. Beaney in Beaney and Reck 2005, II, pp. 13–28.Google Scholar
  46. Wright, C. (1983). Frege’s conception of numbers as objects. Aberdeen: Aberdeen University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Yourgrau, P. (1982). Frege, Perry, and demonstratives. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 12, 725–752.Google Scholar
  48. Yourgrau, P. (1986–1987). The path back to Frege. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 87: 169–210.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyUniversity of YorkHeslington, YorkUK

Personalised recommendations