Desert, responsibility, and justification: a reply to Doris, McGeer, and Robinson
- 265 Downloads
Building Better Beings: A Theory of Moral Responsibility argues that the normative basis of moral responsibility is anchored in the effects of responsibility practices. Further, the capacities required for moral responsibility are socially scaffolded. This article considers criticisms of this account that have been recently raised by John Doris, Victoria McGeer, and Michael Robinson. Robinson argues against Building Better Beings’s rejection of libertarianism about free will, and the account of desert at stake in the theory. considers methodological questions that arise from the account of desert, providing some additional resources for thinking about these issues within the framework of the account. McGeer objects to the particular mode of justification used to motivate the prescriptive aspect of the account. This article presents replies to each of these lines of response.
KeywordsMoral responsibility Desert Libertarianism Retribution Consequentialism Free will
My thanks to Kevin Timpe for organizing the book symposium from which this exchange is drawn. Also, my thanks to Michael Bratman, Stephen Morris, Dan Speak, and Kevin Timpe for feedback on aspects of this article.
- Ayer, A. J. (1954). Freedom and necessity. In Philosophical essays (pp. 271–84). London and Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar
- Doris, J. (2015). Doing without (arguing about) desert. Philosophical Studies. doi: 10.1007/s11098-015-0477-2.
- Hart, H. L. A. (1959). Prolegomenon to the principles of punishment. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society New Series, 60, 1–26.Google Scholar
- Levy, N. (2014). Review of building better beings: A theory of moral responsibility. The Philosophical Quarterly, 64 (257), 661–664.Google Scholar
- McCormick, K. (2015). Companions in innocence: Defending a new methodological assumption about moral responsibility. Philosophical Studies, 172 (2), 515–533.Google Scholar
- McGeer, V. (2015). Building a better theory of responsibility. Philosophical Studies. doi: 10.1007/s11098-015-0478-1.
- Moore, G. E. (1912). Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Nahmias, E. (2014). Response to Misirlisoy and Haggard and to Björnsson and Pereboom. In W. Sinnott-Armstrong (Ed.), Moral psychology volume 4: Free will and moral responsibility (pp. 43–57). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Robinson, M. (2015). Revisionism, libertarianism, and naturalistic plausibility. Philosophical Studies, 1–8. doi: 10.1007/s11098-015-0479-0.
- Schlick, M. (1939). When is a man responsible? In The problems of ethics (pp. 143–158). New York: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
- Sommers, T. (2013). Review of building better beings: A theory of moral responsibility. Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews https://ndpr.nd.edu/news/42827-building-better-beings-a-theory-of-moral-responsibility/.
- Strawson, P. F. (1962). Freedom and resentment. Proceedings of the British Academy, 48, 1–25.Google Scholar
- Vargas, M. (2015a). Responsibility and the limits of conversation. Criminal Law and Philosophy. doi: 10.1007/s11572-015-9365-2.
- Vargas, M. (2015b). Précis of building better beings: A theory of moral responsibility. Philosophical Studies. doi: 10.1007/s11098-015-0476-3