Bargaining and the impartiality of the social contract
The question of what a group of rational agents would agree on were they to deliberate on how to organise society is central to all hypothetical social contract theories. If morality is to be based on a social contract, we need to know the terms of this contract. One type of social contract theory, contractarianism, aims to derive morality from rationality alone. Contractarians need to show, amongst other things, that rational and self-interested individuals would agree on an impartial division of a cooperative surplus. But it is often claimed that contractarians cannot show this without introducing moral assumptions. This paper argues that on the right understanding of the question contractarians are asking, these worries can be answered. Without relying on moral assumptions, the paper offers a novel derivation of symmetry, which is the axiom responsible for the impartiality of the most famous economic bargaining solutions appealed to by contractarians.
KeywordsContractarianism Game theory Bargaining Symmetry
I would like to thank Arthur Ripstein, Olivier Roy, Sergio Tenenbaum, and Joseph Heath for helpful feedback on drafts of this paper. An audience at LMU Munich also provided helpful comments, and I benefitted from conversation with David Gauthier. I am grateful for travel funding from the International Balzan Prize Foundation as part of Ian Hacking’s ‘Styles of Reasoning’ project.
- Braithwaite, R. (1955). Theory of games as a tool for the moral philosopher. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Gaertner, W. (2006). A primer in social choice theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Gauthier, D. (1969). The logic of Leviathan. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
- Gauthier, D. (1986). Morals by agreement. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Gauthier, D. (1993). Uniting separate persons. In D. Gauthier & R. Sugden (Eds.), Rationality, justice and the social contract. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
- Goodin, R. (1993). Equal rationality and initial endowments. In D. Gauthier & R. Sugden (Eds.), Rationality, justice and the social contract. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
- Hajek, A. (2007). Most counterfactuals are false. Unpublished manuscript. http://philrsss.anu.edu.au/people-defaults/alanh/papers/MCF.
- Hobbes, T. (1651/2010). In I. Shapiro (Ed.), Leviathan: Or the matter, forme, and power of a common-wealth ecclesiasticall and civill. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
- Kraus, J., & Coleman, J. (1991). Morality and the theory of rational choice. In P. Vallentyne (Ed.), Contractarianism and rational choice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Schelling, T. (1960). The strategy of conflict. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Zeuthen, F. (1930). Problems of monopoly and economic welfare. London: Routledge.Google Scholar