Humean laws and explanation
A common objection to Humeanism about natural laws is that, given Humeanism, laws cannot help explain their instances, since, given the best Humean account of laws, facts about laws are explained by facts about their instances rather than vice versa. After rejecting a recent influential reply to this objection that appeals to the distinction between scientific and metaphysical explanation, I will argue that the objection fails by failing to distinguish between two types of facts, only one of which Humeans should regard as laws. I will then conclude by rebutting a variant of this objection that appeals to a principle of metaphysical explanation recently put forward by Kit Fine.
KeywordsHumeanism Laws Explanation Grounding Kit Fine David Lewis
Thanks goes to Alex Skiles, Shyam Nair, a referee for Philosophical Studies and an audience at the 2014 Australasian Association of Philosophy conference for helpful comments and discussion.
- Hájek, A. (1996). “Mises redux”—redux: Fifteen arguments against finite frequentism. Erkenntnis, 45(2–3), 209–227.Google Scholar
- Hawking, S. (1988). A brief history of time. London: Bantam Press.Google Scholar
- Kim, J. (1993). Mechanism, purpose, and explanatory exclusion. In Supervenience and mind (pp. 237–264). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Menzies, P. (1993). Laws, modality, and humean supervenience. In J. Bacon, K. Campbell, & L. Reinhardt (Eds.), Ontology, causality and mind: Essays in honour of D. M. Armstrong. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Miller, E. (2014). Humean scientific explanation. Philosophical Studies, 1–22. doi:10.1007/s11098-014-0351-7, ISSN 0031-8116.Google Scholar
- Psillos, S. (2002). Causation and explanation. Oxford: Acumen.Google Scholar
- Sider, T. (2003). Reductive theories of modality. In M. J. Loux & D. W. Zimmerman (Eds.), Oxford handbook of metaphysics (pp. 180–208). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Strevens, M. (2008). Depth: An account of scientific explanation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Tooley, M. (1977). The nature of laws. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 7(4), 667–698.Google Scholar
- Wertheim, M. (1997). Phthagoras’ trousers: God, physics and the gender wars. London: Fourth Estate.Google Scholar
- Wilson, A. (MS). Metaphysical causation. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar