Would this paper exist if I hadn’t written it?
- 337 Downloads
This paper wants to know whether it would exist, or could exist, in worlds in which I didn't write it. Before we can answer this question, we first of all have to inquire as to what, exactly, this paper is. After exploring two forms of Platonism (pure and impure), and a theory that defines literary works in terms of events, I shall argue that the term ‘this paper’ is actually infected with ambiguity. Does this paper need me? It depends upon what you mean by ‘this paper’. I lay out the options for what you might mean, and answer the question for each of the options.
KeywordsOntology Art Literature
Thanks to Carl Mosser, Phil Swenson, Evan Fales, Ross Inman, Natalja Deng, Dustin Crummett, Robin Dembroff, Jeff Speaks, Tzvi Novick, Curtis Franks, and Gaby Lebens for very helpful conversations about these topics, and to all of the other people I’ve harangued about the nature of literary works. Thanks also to the anonymous reviewers who have helped me to improve this paper immeasurably. Any remaining faults in this paper, are mine alone—More accurately, I take responsibility for the possible referents of ‘this paper’ that anybody actually authored!
- Currie, G. (1989). An ontology of art. New York: St Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
- Davidson, D. (1980). Essays on actions and events. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
- Dilworth, J. (2005). Review of David Davies, Art as performance. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 63(1), 77–80.Google Scholar
- Goodman, N. (1978). Ways of world making. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
- Goodman, J. (2004). A defense of creationism in fiction. Grazer Philosophische Studien, 67, 131–155.Google Scholar
- Goodman, N., & Elgin, C. (1988). Reconceptions in philosophy and other arts and sciences. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Irvin, S. (2014). Review of art and art-attempts. Notre Dame Review of Books. http://ndpr.nd.edu/news/46001-art-and-art-attempts/
- Kim, J. (1976). Events as property exemplifications. In M. Brand & D. Walton (Eds.), Action theory. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.Google Scholar
- Lebens, S. (2010). On judgement: A multiple relation. PhD Thesis. Birkbeck College, London.Google Scholar
- Lessing, A. (1995). What is wrong with a forgery? In A. Neil & A. Ridley (Eds.), Arguing about art. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
- Levinson, J. (1990). Music, art and metaphysics. Ithica and London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
- Lewis, D. (1986). On the plurality of worlds. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
- Thomasson, A. (1999). Fiction and metaphysics. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
- Thomasson, A. (2004). The ontology of art. In P. Kivy (Ed.), Blackwell guide to aesthetics. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
- van Inwagen, P. (1977). Creatures of fiction. American Philosophical Quarterly, 24, 299–308.Google Scholar
- Wollheim, R. (1980). Art and its objects (2nd ed.). Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
- Wolterstorff, N. (1980). Works and worlds of art. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
- Yagisawa, T. (1999). Against creationism in fiction. Philosophical Perspectives, 15, 153–172.Google Scholar
- Ziff, P. (1972). What is said. In D. Davidson & G. Harman (Eds.), Semantics of natural language. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.Google Scholar