Philosophical Studies

, Volume 165, Issue 3, pp 1195–1206 | Cite as

Reply to Kriegel, Smithies, and Spener

  • Eric Schwitzgebel
Article
  • 173 Downloads

References

  1. Bayne, T., & Spener, M. (2010). Introspective humility. Philosophical Issues, 20, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chalmers, D. J. (1996). The conscious mind. Oxford: Oxford.Google Scholar
  3. Christensen, D. (2010). Higher-order evidence. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 81, 185–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Condillac, E. B. de. (1754/1982). A treatise on the sensations. In Philosophical writings of Étienne Bonnot, abbé de Condillac (Vol. 1, F. Philip, Trans.). Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  5. Friedman, M. I., Ulrich, P., & Mattes, R. D. (1999). A figurative measure of subjective hunger sensations. Appetite, 32, 395–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gopnik, A., & Schwitzgebel, E. (1998). Whose concepts are they, anyway? The role of philosophical intuition in empirical psychology. In M. R. DePaul & W. Ramsey (Eds.), Rethinking intuition. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  7. James, W. (1890/1981). Principles of psychology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Kriegel, U. (2013). A hesitant defense of introspection. Philosophical Studies. doi:10.1007/s11098-013-0148-0.
  9. Mangan, B. (2001). Sensation’s ghost: The non-sensory fringe of consciousness. Psyche, 7(18). http://www.theassc.org/files/assc/2509.pdf.
  10. Mattes, R. D. (2010). Hunger and thirst: Issues in measurement and prediction of eating and drinking. Physiology & Behavior, 100, 22–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Mattes, R. D., Hollis, J., Hayes, D., & Stunkard, A. J. (2004). Appetite: Measurement and manipulation misgivings. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 105(Supplement), 87–97.Google Scholar
  12. Montaigne, M. de. (1580/1948). The complete essays of Montaigne. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Schwitzgebel, E. (2011). Perplexities of consciousness. Cambridge, MA: MIT.Google Scholar
  14. Schwitzgebel, E. (2012). Introspection, what? In D. Smithies & D. Stoljar (Eds.), Introspection and consciousness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Schwitzgebel, E. (2013a). The crazyist metaphysics of mind. Manuscript. http://faculty.ucr.edu/~eschwitz.
  16. Schwitzgebel, E. (2013b). The problem of known illusion and the resemblance of experience to reality. Manuscript. http://faculty.ucr.edu/~eschwitz.
  17. Smithies, D. (2012a). A simple theory of introspection. In D. Smithies & D. Stoljar (Eds.), Introspection and consciousness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Smithies, D. (2012b). Mentalism and epistemic transparency. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 90, 723–741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Smithies, D. (2013). On the unreliability of introspection. Philosophical Studies. doi:10.1007/s11098-013-0150-6.
  20. Spener, M. (2013). Moderate scepticism about introspection. Philosophical Studies. doi:10.1007/s11098-013-0151-5.
  21. Strawson, P. F. (1959). Individuals. London: Methuen.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eric Schwitzgebel
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyUniversity of California at RiversideRiversideUSA

Personalised recommendations