Philosophical Studies

, Volume 165, Issue 3, pp 1177–1186 | Cite as

On the unreliability of introspection

Article

Abstract

In his provocative and engaging new book, Perplexities of Consciousness, Eric Schwitzgebel makes a compelling case that introspection is unreliable in the sense that we are prone to ignorance and error in making introspective judgments about our own conscious experience. My aim in this commentary is to argue that Schwitzgebel’s thesis about the unreliability of introspection does not have the damaging implications that he claims it does for the prospects of a broadly Cartesian approach to epistemology.

Keywords

Introspection Self-knowledge Consciousness Experience Unreliability Brute error Basing error Cartesian epistemology Eric Schwitzgebel 

References

  1. Bayne, T., & Spener, M. (2010). Introspective humility. Philosophical Issues, 20, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Burge, T. (1988). Individualism and self-knowledge. Journal of Philosophy, 85, 649–663.Google Scholar
  3. Kriegel, U., & Horgan, T. (2007). Phenomenal epistemology: What is consciousness that we may know it so well? Philosophical Issues, 17, 123–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. MacPherson, F. (2010). A disjunctive theory of introspection: A reflection on zombies and Anton’s Syndrome. Philosophical Issues, 20, 226–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Schwitzgebel, E. (2011). Perplexities of consciousness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Schwitzgebel, E. (2012). Introspection, what? In D. Smithies & D. Stoljar (Eds.), Introspection and consciousness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Smithies, D. (2012a). A simple theory of introspection. In D. Smithies & D. Stoljar (Eds.), Introspection and consciousness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Smithies, D. (2012b). Mentalism and epistemic transparency. The Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 90, 723–742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Smithies, D. (forthcoming). The role of experience in a priori justification. Synthese.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyOhio State UniversityColumbusUSA

Personalised recommendations