Philosophical Studies

, Volume 163, Issue 1, pp 133–149 | Cite as

How many thoughts are there? Or why we likely have no Tegmark duplicates\( 10^{{10^{115} }} \) m away

Article

Abstract

Physicist Max Tegmark argues that if there are infinite universes or sub-universes, we will encounter our exact duplicates infinite times, the nearest within \( 10^{{10^{115} }} \) m. Tegmark assumes Humean supervenience and a finite number of possible combinations of elementary quantum states. This paper argues on the contrary that Tegmark’s argument fails to hold if possible thoughts, persons, and life histories are all infinite in number. Are there infinite thoughts we could possibly think? This paper will show that there are. If so, then it is not only Tegmark’s specific claim about our duplication that is called into question. We additionally acquire another strong argument against Humean supervenience.

Keywords

Supervenience Multiverse Personal identity Mind–body Number of mental states 

References

  1. Abelson, R. (1970). A refutation of mind–body identity. Philosophical Studies, 21(6), 85–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adams, D. (2004). The Hitchhiker’s guide to the galaxy. New York: Harmony.Google Scholar
  3. Audi, R. (1994). Dispositional beliefs and dispositions to believe. Nous, 28(4), 419–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Burge, T. (1979). Individualism and the mental. Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 4, 73–121.Google Scholar
  5. Chalmers, D. (1996). The conscious mind. New York: Oxford.Google Scholar
  6. Clatterbaugh, K. C. (1972). A reply to an attempted refutation of mind–body identity. Philosophical Studies, 23(1–2), 111–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Davidson, D. (2003). A coherence theory of truth. In S. Clough (Ed.), Siblings under the skin: Feminism, social justice and analytic philosophy (pp. 117–140). Aurora, Co: The Davies Group.Google Scholar
  8. Gleick, J. (2011). The information: A history, a theory, a flood. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
  9. Goldberg, D. (2009). A user’s guide to the universe. http://usersguidetotheuniverse.com/?p=421. Accessed 19 Aug 2011.
  10. Gould, S. J. (1992). Bully for brontosaurus. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  11. Greene, B. (2011). The hidden reality: Parallel universes and the deep laws of the cosmos. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
  12. Grunbaum, A. (1972). Abelson on Feigl’s mind–body identity thesis. Philosophical Studies, 23(1–2), 119–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Guth, A. (1998). The inflationary universe. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  14. Horst, S. (2003). The computational model of mind. Stanford encyclopedia (online). http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/computational-mind/. Accessed 19 Aug 2011.
  15. Jackson, F. (1982). Epiphenomenal qualia. Philosophical Quarterly, 32, 127–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Karakostas, V. (2009). Humean supervenience in the light of contemporary science. International Journal for Ontology and Metaphysics, 10, 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kripke, S. (1972). Naming and Necessity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Lewis, D. (1983). New work for a theory of universals. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 61, 343–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lewis, D. (1986). Philosophical papers (Vol. II). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Lewis, D. (1994). Humean supervenience debugged. Mind, 103, 473–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Munafo, R. (2010). Large numbers. http://www.mrob.com/pub/math/largenum.html. Accessed 19 Aug 2011.
  22. Rescher, N., & Grim, P. (2008). Plenum theory. Nous, 42(3), 422–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Saka, P. (2007). Spurning charity. Axiomathes, 17, 197–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Schirokauer, O., & Kadane, J. B. (2007). Uniform distributions on the natural numbers. Journal of Theoretical Probability, 20(3), 429–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Schwitzgebel, E. (2006). Belief. In Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/belief/#2.1. Accessed 19 Aug 2011.
  26. Stroud, B. (1984). The significance of philosophical scepticism. New York: Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Taboga, M. (2010). Lectures on probability, statistics, and econometrics: Zero probability events. http://www.statlect.com/subon/probab2.htm. Accessed 19 Aug 2011.
  28. Tegmark, M. (2003). Parallel universes. Scientific American, 288, 41–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Tegmark, M. (2009a). The inflationary multiverse. In B. Carr (Ed.), Universe or multiverse?. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Tegmark, M. (2009b). http://space.mit.edu/home/tegmark/crazy.html. Accessed 19 Aug 2011.
  31. Tipler, F. J. (1995). The physics of immortality. New York: Anchor.Google Scholar
  32. Wadia, P. S. (1972). On ‘A refutation of mind–body identity’. Philosophical Studies, 23(1–2), 113–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Womack, D. (2010). Big numbers. http://www.windermerechessclub.org.uk/DAVID/Big%20numbers%20RV1%204300%20w.htm. Accessed 19 Aug 2011.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Culture and CommunicationDrexel UniversityPhiladelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations