Philosophical Studies

, Volume 153, Issue 1, pp 95–107 | Cite as

The metasemantics of memory



In Sven Bernecker’s excellent new book, Memory, he proposes an account of what we might call the “metasemantics” of memory: the conditions that determine the contents of the mental representations employed in memory. Bernecker endorses a “pastist externalist” view, according to which the content of a memory-constituting representation is fixed, in part, by the “external” conditions prevalent at the (past) time of the tokening of the original representation (the one from which the memory-constituting one is causally derived). Bernecker argues that the best version of a pastist externalism about memory contents will have the result that there can be semantically-induced memory losses in cases involving unwitting “world-switching”. The burden of this paper is to show that Bernecker’s argument for this conclusion does not succeed. My arguments on this score have implications for our picture of mind-world relations, as these are reflected in a subject’s attempts to recall her past thoughts.


Semantics Metasemantics Memory Externalism World-switching 


  1. Bernecker, S. (2009). Memory: A philosophical study. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Burge, T. (1993). Content preservation. Philosophical Review, 102(4), 457–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Gibbons, (1996). Externalism and knowledge of content. Philosophical Review, 105(3).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Goldberg, S. (2005). (Non-standard) lessons from world-switching cases. Philosophia, 32(1), 95–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Goldberg, S. (2007a). Anti-individualism: Mind and language, knowledge and justification. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Goldberg, S. (2007b). Semantic externalism and epistemic illusion. In S. Goldberg (Ed.), Internalism and externalism in semantics and epistemology (pp. 235–252). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Goldberg, S. (2007c). Anti-individualism, content preservation, and discursive justification. Noûs, 41(2), 178–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyNorthwestern UniversityEvanstonUSA

Personalised recommendations