Advertisement

Philosophical Studies

, Volume 150, Issue 3, pp 429–438 | Cite as

Transcendental idealism among the Jersey metaphysicians

  • Gordon BelotEmail author
Article

Abstract

Some questions are posed for van Fraassen, concerning the role and status of metaphysics in his Scientific Representation.

Keywords

van Fraassen Metaphysics Transcendental idealism New Jersey 

References

  1. Arntzenius, F. (1991). State-spaces and meaning relations among predicates. Topoi, 10, 35–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chalmers, D. (2009). Ontological anti-realism. In D. Chalmers, D. Manley, & R. Wasserman (Eds.), Metametaphysics: New essays on the foundations of ontology (pp. 77–129). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Jauernig, A. (2007). Must empiricism be a stance, and could it be one? How to be an empiricist and a philosopher at the same time. In B. Monton (Ed.), Images of empiricism: Essays on science and stances, with a reply from Bas C. van Fraassen (pp. 271–318). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Langton, R. (2004). Elusive knowledge of things in themselves. In F. Jackson & G. Priest (Eds.), Lewisan themes: The philosophy of David K. Lewis (pp. 130–137). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Lewis, D. (1986a). Causation. In Philosophical papers, Vol. II (pp. 159–213). Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  6. Lewis, D. (1986b). Counterfactual dependence and time’s arrow. In Philosophical papers, Vol. II (pp. 32–66). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Lewis, D. (1986c). A subjectivist’s guide to objective chance. In Philosophical papers, Vol. II (pp. 83–132). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Lewis, D. (2009). Ramseyan humility. In D. Braddon-Mitchell & R. Nola (Eds.), Conceptual analysis and philosophical naturalism (pp. 203–222). Cambridge, MA: MIT PressGoogle Scholar
  9. Stalnaker, R. (1979). Anti-essentialism. Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 4, 343–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. van Fraassen, B. (1967). Meaning relations among predicates. Noûs , 1, 161–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. van Fraassen, B. (1970). An introduction to the philosophy of time and space (1st ed.). New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  12. van Fraassen, B. (1972). Earman on the causal theory of time. Synthese, 24, 87–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. van Fraassen, B. (1980). The scientific image. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. van Fraassen, B. (1985). An Introduction to the philosophy of time and space (2nd ed.). New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  15. van Fraassen, B. (1989). Laws and symmetry. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. van Fraassen, B. (1991). Quantum mechanics: An empiricist view. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. van Fraassen, B. (2002). The empirical stance. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  18. van Fraassen, B. (2006). One hundred and fifty years of philosophy. Topoi, 25, 123–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. van Fraassen, B. (2007). From a view of science to a new empiricism. In B. Monton (Ed.), Images of empiricism: Essays on science and stances, with a reply from Bas C. van Fraassen (pp. 337–383). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  20. van Fraassen, B. (2008). Scientific representation: Paradoxes of perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  21. van Fraassen, B. (2009). Can empiricism leave realism behind? Toward a dialogue with transcendentalists. In: M. Bitbol, P. Kerszberg, & J. Petitot (Eds.), Constituting objectivity: Trascendental perspectives on modern physics (pp. 459–479). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborUSA

Personalised recommendations