Abstract
The causal theory of reasons holds that acting for a reason entails that the agent’s action was caused by his or her beliefs and desires. While Donald Davidson (1963) and others effectively silenced the first objections to the theory, a new round has emerged. The most important recent attack is presented by Jonathan Dancy in Practical Reality (2000) and subsequent work. This paper will defend the causal theory against Dancy and others, including Schueler (1995), Stoutland (1999, 2001), and Ginet (2002).
Dancy observes that our reasons are neither psychological states nor causes, and that our reasons can be both motivating and normative. I argue that these observations are fully compatible with the causal theory. According to the reductive version I develop for both cognitive and optative reasons, what it is for an action to be done for a reason is for certain beliefs and desires to cause the action in a particular way. Our reasons for action are the objects of some of those beliefs and desires. The causal process has two stages. This theory explains not only Dancy’s observations, but also many other facts about reasons that alternative theories leave unexplained. I argue against Schueler and others that the non-appetitive desires entailed by acting for reasons are no less distinct and independent causal factors than the beliefs entailed. I go on to rebut arguments that the relation between psychological states and actions cannot be causal because it is non-empirical, rational, normative, or non-deterministic, and that explanations in terms of psychological causes are incompatible with explanations in terms of reasons.
I make no claim here about the precise adequacy of the theoretical definitions I present. My goal is to show that a systematic theory along these lines is the most promising and fruitful approach to understanding an important aspect of human nature.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Alston, W.P. (1967d): ‘Wants, Actions, and Causal Explanations’, in H.N. Castaneda (ed.), Minds, Intentionality, and Perception (pp. 301–341), Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press.
Anscombe, G.E.M. (1957): Intention, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Armstrong, D.M. (1973): Belief, Truth, and Knowledge, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Audi, R. (1971): ‘Intentionalistic Explanations of Action’, Metaphilosophy 2, 241–250.
Audi, R. (1982): ‘A Theory of Practical Reasoning’, American Philosophical Quarterly 19, 25–39.
Audi, R. (1986a): ‘Intending, Intentional Action, and Desire’, in J. Marks (ed.), The Ways of Desire (pp. 17–38), Precedent Press.
Audi, R. (1986b): ‘Acting for Reasons’, Philosophical Review 95, 511–546.
Blackburn, S. (1995): ‘Practical Tortoise Raising’, Mind 104, 695–711.
Brandt, R.B. and Kim, J. (1963): ‘Wants as Explanations of Actions’, Journal of Philosophy 60, 425–435.
Broome, J. (1997): ‘Reasons and Motivation’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 71(Suppl.), 131–146.
Chisholm, R.M. (1964): ‘The Descriptive Element in the Concept of Action’, Journal of Philosophy 61, 613–625.
Clarke, R. (2002): ‘Libertarian Views: Critical Survey of Noncausal and Event-Causal Accounts of Free Agency’, in R. Kane (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Free Will (pp. 356–385), Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dancy, J. (1994-1995): ‘Why There Is Really No Such Thing as the Theory of Motivation’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 95, 1–18.
Dancy, J. (2000): Practical Reality, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dancy, J. (forthcoming): ‘Precís’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research.
Dancy, J. (forthcoming): ‘Replies’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research.
Dancy, J. (forthcoming): ‘Two Ways of Explaining Actions’, in J. Hyman and H. Steward (eds.), Action and Agency, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Darwall, S. (forthcoming): ‘Desires, Reasons, and Causes’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research.
Darwall, S. (2001): ‘Because I Want It’, Social Philosophy and Policy 18, 129–153.
Davidson, D. (1963): ‘Actions, Reasons, and Causes’, Journal of Philosophy 60, 685–700.
Davis, W.A. (1977): ‘Reasons’, in A Systematization of Commonsense Psychology (pp. 344–403), Ph.D. Dissertation, Princeton University.
Davis, W.A. (1984b): ‘The Two Senses of Desire’, Philosophical Studies 45, 181–195.
Davis, W.A. (2003): Meaning, Expression, and Thought, New York: Cambridge University Press.
Davis, W.A. (forthcoming): ‘Psychologism and Humeanism’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research.
Donnellan, K. (1967): ‘Reasons and Causes’, in P. Edwards (ed.), Encyclopedia of Philosophy (pp. 85–88), New York: Macmillan Publishing Co.
Dretske, F. (1989): ‘Reasons and Causes’, Philosophical Perspectives 3, 1–15.
Falk, W.D. (1963): ‘Action-Guiding Reasons’, Journal of Philosophy 60, 703–718.
Fetzer, J. (ed.) (1988): Probability and Causality: Essays in Honor of Wesley C. Salmon, Dordrecht: D. Reidel.
Foot, P. (1972): ‘Reasons for Actions and Desires’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 46(Suppl.), 203–210.
Gauthier, D. (1963): Practical Reasoning, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ginet, C. (1989): ‘Reasons Explanations of Action: An Incompatibilist account’, Philosophical Perspectives 3, 17–46.
Ginet, C. (2002): ‘Reasons Explanations of Action: Causalist versus Noncausalist Accounts’, in R. Kane (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Free Will (pp. 386–405), Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Goldman, A. (1970): A Theory of Human Action, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Grice, H.P. (1961): ‘The Causal Theory of Perception’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 35(Suppl.), 121–152.
Gustavson, D. (1973): ‘A Critical Survey of the Reasons vs. Causes Argument in Recent Philosophy of Action’, Metaphilosophy 4, 269–297.
Horgan, T. and Tienson, J. (eds.) (1991): Connectionism and the Philosophy of Mind, Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Hornsby, J. (1993): ‘Agency and Causal Explanation’, in J. Heil and A. Mele (eds.), Mental Causation (1995) (pp. 161–185), Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kane, R. (2002): ‘Some Neglected Paths in the Free Will Labyrinth’, in R. Kane (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Free Will (pp. 407–437), Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lewis, D. (1966): ‘An Argument for the Identity Theory’, Journal of Philosohpy 63, 17–25.
Locke, D. (1974): ‘Actions, Reasons and Causes’, American Philosophical Quarterly 11, 169–179.
Locke, D. (1982): ‘Beliefs, Desires and Reasons for Actions’, American Philosophical Quarterly 19, 241–249.
Macdonald, C. and Macdonald, G. (eds.) (1995): Connectionism: Debates in Psychological Explanation, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Marks, J. (1986): ‘The Difference between Motivation and Desire’, in J. Marks (ed.), The Ways of Desire (pp. 133–147), Chicago: Precedent Press.
McDowell, J. (1978): ‘Are Moral Requirements Hypothetical Imperatives?’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 52(Suppl.), 13–29.
McFetridge, I.G. (1978): ‘Are Moral Requirements Hypothetical Imperatives?’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 52(Suppl.), 31–42.
McGinn, C. (1979): ‘Action and Its Explanation’, in N. Bolton (ed.), Philosophical Problems in Psychology (pp. 20–42). London: Methuen.
McQueen, D. (1973): ‘Belief and Reasons for Belief’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 47, 69–86.
Melden, A.I. (1961): Free Action, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Mele, A. (1989): ‘Motivational Internalism: The Powers and Limits of Practical Reasoning’, Philosophia 19, 417–436
Mele, A. and Moser, P. (1994): ‘Intentional Action’, Noûs 28, 39–68. Reprinted in A. Mele (ed.) 1997: The Philosophy of Action (pp. 223-255), Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Nagel, T. (1970): The Possibility of Altruism, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Parfit, D. (1997): ‘Reasons and Motivation’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 71(Suppl.), 99–130.
Peters, R.S. (1958): The Concept of Motivation, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Pettit, P. and Smith, M. (1990): ‘Backgrounding Desire’, Philosophical Review 99, 565–592.
Rachels, J. (1971): ‘Reasons for Action’, Canadian Journal of Philosophy 1, 173–188.
Rumelhart, D.E. and McClelland, J.L. (1986): Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Schueler, G.F. (1995): Desire: Its Role in Practical Reason and the Explanation of Action, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Schwayder, D.S. (1965): The Stratification of Behavior, New York: Humanities Press.
Smith, M. (1987): ‘The Humean Theory of Motivation’, Mind 96, 36–61.
Smith, M. (1995): ‘Internal Reasons’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 55, 109–131.
Stoutland, F. (1970): ‘The Logical Connection Argument’, in N. Rescher (ed.), Studies in the Theory of Knowledge (pp. 117–129), Oxford: Oxford University Press. American Philosophical Quarterly Monograph Series No. 4.
Stoutland, F. (1999): ‘Intentionalists and Davidson on Rational Explanation’, in G. Meggle (ed.), Actions, Norms, Values (pp. 191–208), Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Stoutland, F. (2001): ‘Responsive Action and the Belief-Desire Model’, Grazer-Philosophische-Studien 61, 83–106.
Taylor, R. (1960): ‘I Can’, Philosophical Review 69.
Taylor, R. (1966): Action and Purpose, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Von Wright, G.H. (1971): Explanation and Understanding, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Wallace, R.J. (1990): ‘How to Argue about Practical Reason’, Mind 99, 355–385.
Wallace, R.J. (1999): ‘Introduction’, in R.J. Wallace (ed.), Reason, Emotion, and Will (pp. xi–xxiv), Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing Co.
Williams, B. (1979): ‘Internal and External Reasons’, in R. Harrison (ed.), Rational Action, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Williams, B. (1989): ‘Internal Reasons and the Obscurity of Blame’, Logos 10, 1–11.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Davis, W.A. Reasons and psychological causes. Philos Stud 122, 51–101 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-005-7249-3
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-005-7249-3