Abstract
Vague subjective probability may be modeled by means of a set of probability functions, so that the represented opinion has only a lower and upper bound. The standard rule of conditionalization can be straightforwardly adapted to this. But this combination has difficulties which, though well known in the technical literature, have not been given sufficient attention in probabilist or Bayesian epistemology. Specifically, updating on apparently irrelevant bits of news can be destructive of one’s explicitly prior expectations. Stability of vague subjective opinion appears to need a more complex model.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
P. Gardenfors (1975) ArticleTitle‘Qualitative Probability as an Intensional Logic’ Journal of Philosophical Logic 4 171–185
Grove, A.J. and Halpern, J.Y. (1998): ‘Updating Sets of Probabilities,’ Proceedings of the Fourteenth Conference on Uncertainty in AI, 173–182; text available at http://www.cs.cornell.edu/home/halpern/papers/bas.pdf.
J.Y. Halpern M. Tuttle (1993) ArticleTitle‘Knowledge, Probability, and Adversaries’ Journal of the Association for Computing Machinery 40 917–962
J.Y. Halpern R. Fagin N. Megiddo (1990) ArticleTitle‘A Logic for Reasoning about Probabilities’ Information and Computation 87 78–128
I. Levi (1974) ArticleTitle‘On Indeterminate Probabilities’ The Journal of Philosophy 71 391–418
T. Seidenfeld L. Wasserman (1993) ArticleTitle‘Dilation for Sets of Probabilities’ Annals of Statistics 21 1139–1154
B. Fraassen Particlevan (1990) ‘Figures in a Probability Landscape’ M. Dunn A. Gupta (Eds) Truth or Consequences Kluwer Dordrecht 345–356
B. Fraassen Particlevan (1995) ArticleTitle‘Fine-grained Opinion, Conditonal Probability, and the Logic of Belief’ Journal of Philosophical Logic 24 349–377 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF01048352
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Van Fraassen, B.C. Vague Expectation Value Loss. Philos Stud 127, 483–491 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-004-7821-2
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-004-7821-2