Skip to main content
Log in

The Mystery of Direct Perceptual Justification

  • Published:
Philosophical Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In at least some cases of justified perceptual belief, our perceptual experience itself, as opposed to beliefs about it, evidences and thereby justifies our belief. While the phenomenon is common, it is also mysterious. There are good reasons to think that perceptions cannot justify beliefs directly, and there is a significant challenge in explaining how they do. After explaining just how direct perceptual justification is mysterious, I considerMichael Huemer’s (Skepticism and the Veil of Perception, 2001) and Bill Brewer’s (Perception and Reason, 1999) recent, but radically different, attempts to eliminate it. I argue that both are unsuccessful, though a consideration of their mistakes deepens our appreciation of the mystery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • W. Alston (1996) ‘Concepts of Epistemic Justification’ P. Moser (Eds) Empirical Knowledge Rowman and Littlefield Lanham, Maryland

    Google Scholar 

  • L. Bonjour (1985) The Structure of Empirical Knowledge Harvard University Press Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • L. Bonjour (1998) In Defense of Pure Reason Cambridge University Press Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • B. Brewer (1999) Perception and Reason Oxford University Press Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Casullo, A. (1988a): ‘Revisability, Reliabilism and a priori Knowledge’,Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 49.

  • Casullo, A. (1988b): ‘Necessity, Certainty and the A priori’, Canadian Journal of Philosophy 18.

  • S. Cohen (1984) ArticleTitle‘Justification and Truth’ Philosophical Studies 46 279–295 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00372907

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuemerton, R. (2001): ‘Brewer, Direct Realism and Acquaintance with Acquaintance’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research

  • M. Huemer (2001) Skepticism and the Veil of Perception Rowman and Littlefield Lanham, Maryland

    Google Scholar 

  • K. Lehrer (1990) A Theory of Knowledge Westview Press Boulder, CO

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Plantinga (1993) Warrant and Proper Function Oxford University Press Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • L. Pojman (1993) A Theory of Knowledge Wadsworth Press Belmont, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Pollock (1987) Contemporary Theories of Knowledge Rowman and Littlefield Lanham, Maryland

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Sosa (1991) Knowledge in Perspective Cambridge University Press Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Steup (1996) Introduction to Contemporary Epistemology Prentice-Hall Upper Saddle River, NJ

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter Markie.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Markie, P. The Mystery of Direct Perceptual Justification. Philos Stud 126, 347–373 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-004-7795-0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-004-7795-0

Keywords

Navigation