Skip to main content
Log in

The Cogito and the Metaphysics of Mind

  • Published:
Philosophical Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Descartes used the cogito to make two points the epistemological point that introspection affords us absolute certainty of our existence, and the metaphysical point that subjects are thinking things logically distinct from bodies. Most philosophers accept Descartes’s epistemological claim but reject his metaphysical claim. I argue that we cannot do this if the cogito works, then subjects are non-physical. Although I refrain from endorsing an argument for dualism based on this conditional, I discuss how such an argument would differ from the conceivability arguments pursued by Descartes in the Sixth Meditation and by contemporary philosophers. Unlike those arguments, this argument would not be refuted by the discovery of a posteriori identities between physical and phenomenological properties. In other words, it is possible to argue for substance dualism even if phenomenal properties are physical properties.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • K. Balog (1999) ArticleTitle‘Conceivability, Possibility, and the Mind-Body Problem’ Philosophical Review 108 497–528 Occurrence Handle10.2307/2998286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D. Chalmers (1996) ‘The Conscious Mind: In Search of a Fundamental Theory’ Oxford University Press Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Hill B. McLaughlin (1999) ArticleTitle‘There are Fewer Things in Reality Than Are Dreamt of in Chalmers’s Philosophy’ Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 59 446–454

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Hintikka (1962) ArticleTitle‘Cogito, Ergo Sum: Inference or Performance?’ Philosophical Review 71 3–32 Occurrence Handle10.2307/2183678

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • F. Jackson (1982) ArticleTitle‘Epiphenomenal Qualia’ Philosophical Quarterly 32 127–136

    Google Scholar 

  • F. Jackson (1998) ‘From Metaphysics to Ethics Oxford University Press New York

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Kim (1997) ArticleTitle‘The Mind-Body Problem: Taking Stock After Forty Years’ Noûs 31 185–207

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Kripke (1972) Naming and Necessity Harvard University Press Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Levine (1998) ArticleTitle‘Conceivability and the Metaphysics of Mind’ Noûs 32 449–480

    Google Scholar 

  • T. Nagel (1974) ArticleTitle‘What Is It Like To Be A Bat?’ Philosophical Review 88 435–450 Occurrence Handle10.2307/2183914

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • T. Nagel (1998) ArticleTitle‘Conceiving the Impossible and the Mind-Body Problem’ Philosophy 285 337–352 Occurrence Handle10.1017/S0031819198000035

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, H. (1967): ‘The Nature of Mental States’, Originally appeared as ‘Psychological Predicates’ in W. H. Capitan and D. D. Merrill (eds.), Art, Mind and Religion, Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press. Reprinted (1975) in Putnam, Mind, Language and Reality: Philosophical Papers, Volume 2.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 429–440.

  • Treanor, N. (2004): “Consciousness and Causal Processes” (unpublished).

  • M. Wilson (1976) ArticleTitle‘Descartes: The Epistemological Argument for Mind-Body Distinctness’ Noûs 101 3–15 Occurrence Handle10.2307/2214469

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nick Treanor.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Treanor, N. The Cogito and the Metaphysics of Mind. Philos Stud 130, 247–271 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-004-4512-y

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-004-4512-y

Keywords

Navigation