Advertisement

Discovering the structures of lived experience

Towards a micro-phenomenological analysis method
  • Claire PetitmenginEmail author
  • Anne Remillieux
  • Camila Valenzuela-Moguillansky
Article

Abstract

This paper describes a method for analyzing a corpus of descriptions collected through micro-phenomenological interviews. This analysis aims at identifying the structure of the singular experiences which have been described, and in particular their diachronic structure, while unfolding generic experiential structures through an iterative approach. After summarizing the principles of the micro-phenomenological interview, and then describing the process of preparation of the verbatim, the article presents on the one hand, the principles and conceptual devices of the analysis method and on the other hand several dimensions of the analysis process: the modes of structural unfolding of generic structures, the mutual guidance of the processes of structural and experiential unfolding, the tracking of analysis processes, and finally the assessment of analysis results.

Keywords

Entretien d’explicitation Micro-phenomenology Micro-phenomenological interview Micro-phenomenological analysis Qualitative analysis Diachronic structure Synchronic structure 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank Shirley Carter-Thomas for the linguistic revision of the article.

References

  1. Balas-Chanel, A. (2013). La pratique réflexive: un outil de développement des compétences infirmières. México: Elsevier Masson.Google Scholar
  2. Balzani, C., Naudin, J., & Vion-Dury, J. (2014). Phénoménologie expérientielle de l’écoute musicale en psychiatrie. Annales Médico-psychologiques, Revue Psychiatrique, 172(7), 524–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bénézech, M. (2007). Vérité et mensonge: l'évaluation de la crédibilité en psychiatrie légale et en pratique judiciaire. Annales Médico-psychologiques, Revue Psychiatrique, 165(5), 351–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bitbol, M., & Petitmengin, C. (2013). A defense of introspection from within. Constructivist Foundations, 8(3), 269–279.Google Scholar
  5. Bitbol, M., & Petitmengin, C. (2016). On the possibility and reality of introspection. Mind and Matter, 14(1), 51–75.Google Scholar
  6. Bitbol, M., & Petitmengin, C. (2017). Neurophenomenology and the micro-phenomenological interview. In S. Schneider & M. Velmans (Eds.), The Blackwell companion to consciousness (2nd ed.). Hoboken: Wiley & Sons. Google Scholar
  7. Bourvis, N., & Vion-Dury, J. (2016). Phénoménologie expérientielle de l’algie vasculaire de la face (AVF). Annales Médico-psychologiques, Revue Psychiatrique, 175(3), 247–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cavaletti, F., & Heimann, K. (forthcoming). Longing for tomorrow: phenomenology, cognitive psychology, and the methodological bases of exploring time experience in depression. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences.Google Scholar
  9. Créno, L. & Cahour, B. (2016). Les cadres surchargés par leurs emails : déploiement de l’activité et expérience vécue. Revue @ctivités, 13(1).Google Scholar
  10. Delattre, P. (1971). Système, structure, fonction, évolution. Paris: Maloine.Google Scholar
  11. Depraz, N. (2014). Attention et vigilance. Paris: PUF.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Depraz, N., Varela, F. J., & Vermersch, P. (2003). On becoming aware. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
  13. Depraz, N., Gyemant, M., & Desmidt, T. (2017). A first-person analysis using third-person data as a generative method: A case study of surprise in depression. Constructivist Foundations, 12(2), 190–203.Google Scholar
  14. Gallagher, S. (2000). Philosophical conceptions of the self: Implications for cognitive science. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3(1), 14–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gallagher, S. (2003). Phenomenology and experimental design: Toward a phenomenologically enlightened experimental science. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 10(9–10), 85–99.Google Scholar
  16. Gendlin, E. (1962). Experiencing and the Creation of Meaning. Northwestern. University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Gendlin, E. (1996). Focusing Oriented Psychotherapy. New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  18. Giorgi, A., Giorgi, B., & Morley, J. (2017). The descriptive phenomenological psychological method. In C. Willig & W. S. Rogers (Eds.), The sage handbook of qualitative research in psychology (pp. 176–192). London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Goodwin, C., & Heritage, J. (1990). Conversation analysis. Annual Review of Anthropology, 19(1), 283–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gore, G., Rix-Lièvre, G., Wathelet, O., & Cazemajou, A. (2012). Eliciting the tacit: interviewing to understand bodilyexperience. In J. Skinner (Ed.), The interview: an ethnographic approach (pp. 127–142). London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  21. Gould, C., Froese, T., Barrett, A. B., Ward, J., & Seth, A. K. (2014). An extended case study on the phenomenology of spatial form synaesthesia. Frontiers in Human Neurosciences, 8, 433.Google Scholar
  22. Hogan, T., Hinrichs, U., & Hornecker, E. (2015). The Elicitation Interview Technique: Capturing People's Experiences of Data Representations. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 22(12), 2579–2593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Horwitz, E. B., Stenfords, C., & Osika, W. (2018). Writer's Block Revisited: A Micro-Phenomenological Case Study on the Blocking Influence of an Internalized Voice. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 25(3-4), 9–28.Google Scholar
  24. Lé, F., & Peugeot-Petitmengin, C. (1988). Quelques problèmes liés à l'introduction du concept de généralisation/spécialisation dans le modèle Entité/Relation. Modèles et Bases de Données, 10, 3–16.Google Scholar
  25. Malterud, K. (2012). Systematic text condensation: A strategy for qualitative analysis. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 40(8), 795–805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. McNeill, D. (1992). Hand and mind: What gestures reveal about thought. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  27. McNeill, D. (2005). Gesture & thought. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Merleau-Ponty, M. (1948/1966). Sens et non-sens. Paris: Editions Nagel.Google Scholar
  29. Molinier, C. (2004). Adverbes d'habitude et phrases habituelles. In Plenat M. (2004). L'emprise du sens. Structures linguistiques et interprétations (pp. 207-215). Amsterdam: Editions Rodopi.Google Scholar
  30. Ollagnier-Beldame, M. & Coupé, C. (forthcoming). Meeting you for the first time: descriptive categories of an intersubjective experience. Constructivist Foundations.Google Scholar
  31. Paillé, P., & Muchielli, A. (2012). L'analyse qualitative en sciences humaines et sociales. Paris: Armand Collin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Petitmengin, C. (1999). The intuitive experience. In F. Varela & J. Shear (Eds.), The view from within. first-person approaches to the study of consciousness (pp. 43–77). Exeter: Imprint Academic.Google Scholar
  33. Petitmengin, C. (2001). L'expérience intuitive. Paris: L'Harmattan.Google Scholar
  34. Petitmengin, C. (2006). Describing one’s subjective experience in the second person: An interview method for the science of consciousness. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Science, 5, 229–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Petitmengin, C. (2007). Towards the source of thoughts. The gestural and transmodal dimension of lived experience. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 14(3), 54–82.Google Scholar
  36. Petitmengin, C. (2010). A neuro-phenomenological study of epileptic seizure anticipation. In: Daniel Schmicking and Shaun Gallagher (Ed.), Handbook of Phenomenology and Cognitive Sciences (pp. 471-499). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  37. Petitmengin, C. (2011). Describing the experience of describing? The blind spot of introspection. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 18(1), 44–62.Google Scholar
  38. Petitmengin, C. (2016). The scientist's body at the source of meaning. In D. Schoeller & V. Saller (Eds.), Thinking thinking. Practicing radical reflection (pp. 28–49). Freiburg / München: Verlag Karl Aber.Google Scholar
  39. Petitmengin, C. (2017). Enaction as a lived experience. Towards a radical neurophenomenology. Constructivist Foundations, 12(2), 139–147.Google Scholar
  40. Petitmengin, C., & Bitbol, M. (2009). The validity of first-person descriptions as authenticity and coherence. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 16(10–12), 363–404.Google Scholar
  41. Petitmengin, C., Navarro, V., & Le Van Quyen, M. (2007). Anticipating seizure: Pre-reflective experience at the center of neuro-phenomenology. Consciousness and Cognition, 16, 746–764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Petitmengin, C., Bitbol, M., Nissou, J. M., Pachoud, B., Curalucci, C., Cermolacce, M., & Vion-Dury, J. (2009). Listening from within. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 16(10–12), 252–284.Google Scholar
  43. Petitmengin, C., Remillieux, A., Cahour, B., & Carter-Thomas, S. (2013). A gap in Nisbett and Wilson’s findings? A first-person access to our cognitive processes. Consciousness and Cognition, 22(2), 654–669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Petitmengin, C. (2014). Comment on Vermersch's book "Explicitation et Phénoménologie". Journal of Consciousness Studies, 21(11-12), 196–201.Google Scholar
  45. Petitmengin, C., Van Beek, M., Bitbol, M., Nissou, J.-M., & Roepstorff, A. (2017). What is it like to meditate? Methods and issues for a micro-phenomenological description of meditative experience. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 24(5–6), 170–198.Google Scholar
  46. Petreca B., Sharon Baurley S., & Bianchi-Berthouze N. (2015). How do designers feel textiles? Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction (ACII) International Conference Proceedings, 982-987.Google Scholar
  47. Petreca, B. (2016). An understanding of embodied textile selection processes and a toolkit to support them. Unpublished PhD Thesis. Royal College of Art, London.Google Scholar
  48. Przyrembel, M., & Singer, T. (2018). Experiencing meditation – Evidence for differential effects of three contemplative mental practices in micro-phenomenological interviews. Consciousness and Cognition, 62, 82–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Quidu, M., & Favier-Ambrosini, B. (2014). L’articulation des données en première et troisième personnes. De la genèse d'une méthodologie originale en sciences du sport. Intellectica, 62, 7–34.Google Scholar
  50. Remillieux, A. (2014). Les coulisses d’une invention: Une description expérientielle du processus d’invention technique. (Behind the scenes of an invention: An experiential description of the technical invention process). Intellectica, 61, 273–310.Google Scholar
  51. Remillieux, A., Petitmengin, C., Ermine, J.-L., & Blatter, C. (2010). Knowledge sharing in change management : A case study in the French railways company. Journal of Knowledge Management Practice, 11(3).Google Scholar
  52. Riessman C. K. (2005). Narrative analysis. In Narrative, Memory & everyday life (pp. 1–7). Huddersfield: University of Huddersfield.Google Scholar
  53. Rolland, C., Foucault, O., & Benci, G. (1988). Conception de systèmes d'information. La méthode Remora. Paris: Eyrolles.Google Scholar
  54. Smith, J. A. (2011). Evaluating the contribution of interpretative phenomenological analysis. Health Psychology Review, 5, 9–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Smith, J. A., & Osborn, M. (2003). Interpretative phenomenological analysis. In J. A. Smith (Ed.), Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to research methods. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  56. Smith, J. M., & Smith, D. C. P. (1977). Database abstractions: Aggregation and generalization. ACM/TODS, 2, 2.Google Scholar
  57. Smith, J. A., Flowers, P., & Larkin, M. (2009). Interpretative phenomenological analysis: Theory, method, research. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  58. Sowa, J. F. (1984). Conceptual structures: Information processing in mind and machine. Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  59. Thurmond, V. (2001). The point of triangulation. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 33(3), 254–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Tracy, S. (2013). Qualitative research methods: Collecting evidence, crafting analysis, communicating impact. Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  61. Valenzuela-Moguillansky, C. (2013). Pain and body awareness. An exploration of the bodily experience of persons suffering from fibromyalgia. Constructivist Foundations, 8(3), 339–350.Google Scholar
  62. Valenzuela-Moguillansky, C., O’Regan, J. K., & Petitmengin, C. (2013). Exploring the subjective experience of the “rubber hand” illusion. Frontiers in Human Neurosciences, 7, 659.Google Scholar
  63. Valenzuela-Moguillansky, C., & Vásquez-Rosati, A. (Forthcoming). An Analysis Procedure for the Micro- Phenomenological Interview.Google Scholar
  64. Vásquez-Rosati, A. (2017). Body Awareness to Recognize Feelings: The Exploration of a Musical Emotional Experience. Constructivist Foundations, 12(2), 219–226.Google Scholar
  65. Van-Quynh, A. (2017). Intuition in Mathematics: a Perceptive Experience. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, 48(1), 1–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Vermersch, P. (2006). Vécus et couches des vécus. Expliciter, 66, 32–47.Google Scholar
  67. Vermersch, P. (2009). Describing the practice of introspection. In C. Petitmengin (Ed.), Ten years of viewing from within. The legacy of Francisco Varela (pp. 20–57). Exeter: Imprint Academic.Google Scholar
  68. Vermersch, P. (2012). Explicitation et phénoménologie. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar
  69. Vermersch, P. (2017). L’entretien d’explicitation. Originally published in 1994. Paris: ESF.Google Scholar
  70. Vrij, A., & Granhag, P. A. (2012). Eliciting cues to deception and truth: What matters are the questions asked. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 1(2), 110–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Weisen, M. (Forthcoming). Bringing the architectural thinking of Juhani Pallasmaa and Peter Zumthor into dialogue with the lived experiences of visitors: an empirical micro-phenomenological study at Kolumba Museum. In Installations as a phenomenological and cognitive experience. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institut Mines-Télécom Business SchoolParisFrance
  2. 2.Archives Husserl, École Normale SupérieureParisFrance
  3. 3.Laboratory of Micro-phenomenologyParisFrance
  4. 4.Laboratorio de Fenomenología Corporal y Experiencia Musical, Facultad de PsicologíaUniversidad Diego PortalesSantiagoChile

Personalised recommendations