Are perspectival shapes seen or imagined? An experimental approach
This paper proposes a novel experimental approach that would help to determine whether perspectival shapes, such as the elliptical profile of a tilted plate or coin, are part of perceptual experience. If they are part of perceptual experience, then it should be possible to identify these shapes simply by attending appropriately to them. Otherwise, in order to identify perspectival shapes they must first be constructed in the visual imagination. We propose that these accounts of perspectival identification can be tested by measuring the interference between visual and verbal working memory load, respectively, and the identification of perspectival shapes in the appearance of a 3D object.
KeywordsVision Perception Perspective Imagination Attention Working memory
We wish to thank Galia Avidan, Robert Briscoe, Zohar Bronfman, Randy Clarke, Paul Conway, Baruch Eitam, Jonathan Folstein, Nurit Gronau, Sean Kelly, Arnon Keren, Ariel Meirav, Lior Shmuelof, Mark Wagner, Aaron Wilbur, Wayne Wu, Yaffa Yeshurun, and two anonymous referees for helpful feedback and discussion.
- Gao, Q., Chen, Z., & Russell, P. (2007). Working Memory Load and the Stroop Interference Effect. New Zealand Journal of Psychology, 36(3), 146.Google Scholar
- Gibson, J. J. (1950). The Perception Of The Visual World. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
- Gibson, J. J. (1986). The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Grush, R. (2004). The emulation theory of representation: Motor control, imagery, and perception. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27, 377–442.Google Scholar
- Hellie, B. (2006). Beyond Phenomenal Naiveté. Philosophers’ Imprint, 6(2). Retrieved from www.philosophersimprint.org/006002/.
- Hibbard, P. B., Haines, A. E., & Hornsey, R. L. (2017). Magnitude, precision, and realism of depth perception in stereoscopic vision. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 2(1), 25.Google Scholar
- Lycan, W. G. (1996). Consciousness and Experience. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Mack, A. (1978). Three modes of visual perception. In M. H. Pick (Ed.), Modes of perceiving and information processing (pp. 171–186). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Noë, A. (2004). Action in Perception. Cambridge.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Palmer, S. E. (1999). Vision Science: Photons to Phenomenology. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Park, S., Kim, M. S., & Chun, M. M. (2007). Concurrent working memory load can facilitate selective attention: evidence for specialized load. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33(5), 1062.Google Scholar
- Pohl, C., Kiesel, A., Kunde, W., & Hoffmann, J. (2010). Early and late selection in unconscious information processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36(2), 268.Google Scholar
- Rock, I. (1983). The Logic of Perception. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Schwitzgebel, E. (2011). Perplexities of consciousness. MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Siewert, C. (2006). Is the appearance of shape protean? Psyche, 12(3), 1–16.Google Scholar
- Smith, A.D. (2002). The Problem of Perception. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Thouless, R. H. (1931a). Phenomenal regression to the real object. Part I. The British Journal of Psychology, 21, 339–359.Google Scholar
- Thouless, R. H. (1931b). Phenomenal regression to the real object. Part II. The British Journal of Psychology, 22, 1–30.Google Scholar
- Tye, M. (2002). Consciousness, Color, and Content. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar