Advertisement

Enculturation and narrative practices

  • Regina E. Fabry
Article
  • 128 Downloads

Abstract

Recent work on enculturation suggests that our cognitive capacities are significantly transformed in the course of the scaffolded acquisition of cognitive practices such as reading and writing. Phylogenetically, enculturation is the result of the co-evolution of human organisms and their socio-culturally structured cognitive niche. It is rendered possible by evolved cerebral and extra-cerebral bodily learning mechanisms that make human organisms apt to acquire culturally inherited cognitive practices. In addition, cultural learning allows for the intergenerational transmission of relevant knowledge and skills. Ontogenetically, enculturation is associated with neural plasticity and the development of new motor routines and action schemas. It relies on scaffolded learning that structures novice-teacher interactions. The acquisition of reading and writing are paradigm examples of enculturation. Based on an empirically informed analysis of the components of enculturation, I will apply the emerging account of enculturated cognition to narrative practices. To date, research on the impact of narratives on the constitution of the self and our understanding of folk psychology has not paid much attention to the question how narratives are influenced by cumulative cultural evolution and our capacity to acquire reading and writing during ontogeny. I will argue that textual narratives, above and beyond oral narratives, provide genuinely new ways of narration. Therefore, the enculturated interaction with textual narratives has the potential to contribute to a better understanding of ourselves and other cognitive agents.

Keywords

Enculturation Narrative practice Neural plasticity Embodied cognition Literacy Scaffolded learning Cognitive niche Cumulative cultural evolution 

Notes

Acknowledgements

I am very grateful to Karin Kukkonen, Markus Pantsar, and the members of the research group on Literature, Cognition and Emotion at the University of Oslo for their invaluable feedback on earlier versions of this paper. I would also like to thank two anonymous reviewers for their helpful and constructive comments.

References

  1. Altmann, U., Bohrn, I. C., Lubrich, O., Menninghaus, W., & Jacobs, A. M. (2014). Fact vs fiction - how paratextual information shapes our reading processes. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 9, 22–29.  https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nss098.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, M. L. (2010). Neural reuse: a fundamental organizational principle of the brain. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(4), 245–26.Google Scholar
  3. Anderson, M. L. (2015). After phrenology: Neural reuse and the interactive brain. Cambridge, Mass. MIT Press.Google Scholar
  4. Anderson, M. L. (2016). Neural reuse in the organization and development of the brain. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 58(Suppl 4), 3–6.  https://doi.org/10.1111/dmcn.13039.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Anderson, M. L., & Finlay, B. L. (2014). Allocating structure to function: The strong links between neuroplasticity and natural selection. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 1–16.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00918.
  6. Ansari, D. (2012). Culture and education: New frontiers in brain plasticity. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16(2), 93–95.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2011.11.016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ansari, D. (2015). Mind, brain, and education: A discussion of practical, conceptual, and ethical issues. In J. Clausen & N. Levy (Eds.), Handbook of Neuroethics (pp. 1703–1719). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.Google Scholar
  8. Aristotle. (2013). Poetics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Auster, P., & Coetzee, J. M. (2014). Here and now: Letters 2008–2011. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  10. Baron-Cohen, S. (1997). Mindblindness: An essay on autism and theory of mind. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Pess.Google Scholar
  11. Ben-Shachar, M., Dougherty, R. F., Deutsch, G. K., & Wandell, B. A. (2011). The development of cortical sensitivity to visual word forms. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23(9), 2387–2399.  https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2011.21615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Berninger, V., Yates, C., Cartwright, A., Rutberg, J., Remy, E., & Abbott, R. (1992). Lower-level developmental skills in beginning writing. Reading and Writing, 4(3), 257–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Boyd, R., Richerson, P. J., & Henrich, J. (2011). The cultural niche: Why social learning is essential for human adaptation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(Supplement 2), 10918–10925.Google Scholar
  14. Bray, J. (2000). “Attending to the minute”: Richardson’s revisions of italics in Pamela. In J. Bray, M. Handley, & A. C. Henry (Eds.), Ma(r)king the text: the presentation of meaning on the literary page (pp. 105–119). Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  15. Braze, D., Mencl, W. E., Tabor, W., Pugh, K. R., Todd Constable, R., Fulbright, R. K., … Shankweiler, D. P. (2011). Unification of sentence processing via ear and eye: An fMRI study. Cortex, 47(4), 416–431.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2009.11.005.
  16. Brem, S., Bach, S., Kucian, K., Guttorm, T. K., Martin, E., Lyytinen, H., … Richardson, U. (2010). Brain sensitivity to print emerges when children learn letter-speech sound correspondences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(17), 7939–7944.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0904402107.
  17. Brennan, J., & Pylkkänen, L. (2012). The time-course and spatial distribution of brain activity associated with sentence processing. NeuroImage, 60(2), 1139–1148.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.01.030.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Carreiras, M., Armstrong, B. C., Perea, M., & Frost, R. (2014). The what, when, where, and how of visual word recognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18(2), 90–98.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2013.11.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Clark, A. (1997). Being there: Putting brain, body, and world together again. Cambridge, Mass. MIT Press.Google Scholar
  20. Clark, A. (2006). Language, embodiment, and the cognitive niche. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10(8), 370–374.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2006.06.012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Clark, A. (2008). Supersizing the mind: Embodiment, action, and cognitive extension. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Coltheart, M. (2007). Modeling reading. In M. J. Snowling & C. Hulme (Eds.), The science of reading: A handbook (pp. 6–23). Malden: Blackwell Pub.Google Scholar
  23. Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R., & Ziegler, J. (2001). DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108(1), 204–256.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.108.1.204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Constable, R. T., Pugh, K. R., Berroya, E., Mencl, W. E., Westerveld, M., Ni, W., & Shankweiler, D. (2004). Sentence complexity and input modality effects in sentence comprehension: an fMRI study. NeuroImage, 22(1), 11–21.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.01.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Davies, S. (2014). Art and aesthetic behaviors as possible expressions of our biologically evolved human nature. Philosophy Compass, 9(6), 361–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Dehaene, S. (2005). Evolution of human cortical circuits for reading and arithmetic: The “neuronal recycling” hypothesis. In S. Dehaene, J.-R. Duhamel, M. D. Hauser, & G. Rizzolatti (Eds.), From monkey brain to human brain: A Fyssen Foundation Symposium (pp. 133–157). Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  27. Dehaene, S. (2010). Reading in the brain: The new science of how we read. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  28. Dehaene, S. (2011). The number sense: How the mind creates mathematics (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Dehaene, S., Pegado, F., Braga, L. W., Ventura, P., Filho, G. N., Jobert, A., et al. (2010). How learning to read changes the cortical networks for vision and language. Science, 330(6009), 1359–1364.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1194140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. DeMarco, A. T., Wilson, S. M., Rising, K., Rapcsak, S. Z., & Beeson, P. M. (2017). Neural substrates of sublexical processing for spelling. Brain and Language, 164, 118–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Dennett, D. C. (1991). Consciousness explained. Boston: Little, Brown and Co..Google Scholar
  32. Dewey, J. (1997). Experience and education. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  33. Donald, M. (1991). Origins of the modern mind: Three stages in the evolution of culture and cognition. Cambridge, Mass. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Dounskaia, N., van Gemmert, A. W. A., & Stelmach, G. E. (2000). Interjoint coordination during handwriting-like movements. Experimental Brain Research, 135(1), 127–140.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s002210000495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Dutilh Novaes, C. (2014). Formal languages in logic: A philosophical and cognitive analysis. Cambridge, Mass. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Estany, A., & Martínez, S. (2014). “Scaffolding” and “affordance” as integrative concepts in the cognitive sciences. Philosophical Psychology, 27, 98–111.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2013.828569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Fabry, R. E. (2015). Enriching the notion of enculturation: Cognitive integration, predictive processing, and the case of reading acquisition - A commentary on Richard Menary. In T. Metzinger & J. M. Windt (Eds.), Open MIND (pp. 1–23). Frankfurt am Main: MIND Group.Google Scholar
  38. Fabry, R. E. (2017). Betwixt and between: The enculturated predictive processing approach to cognition. Synthese, 1–36.Google Scholar
  39. Feyereisen, P., Van de Wiele, M., & Dubois, F. (1988). The meaning of gestures: What can be understood without speech? European Bulletin of Cognitive Psychology, 8(1), 3–25.Google Scholar
  40. Fischer-Lichte, E. (1983). Semiotik des Theaters: Das System der theatralischen Zeichen (Vol. 1). Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag.Google Scholar
  41. Fitzgerald, J., & Shanahan, T. (2000). Reading and writing relations and their development. Educational Psychologist, 35(1), 39–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Friederici, A. D. (2012). The cortical language circuit: From auditory perception to sentence comprehension. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16(5), 262–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Frith, U. (1980). Unexpected spelling problems. In U. Frith (Ed.), Cognitive processes in spelling (pp. 495–515). London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  44. Frith, U. (1985). Beneath the surface of developmental dyslexia. In K. E. Patterson, J. C. Marshall, & M. Coltheart (Eds.), Surface dyslexia. Neuropsychological and cognitive studies of phonological reading (pp. 301–330). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  45. Gaillard, W. D., Balsamo, L. M., Ibrahim, Z., Sachs, B. C., & Xu, B. (2003). fMRI identifies regional specialization of neural networks for reading in young children. Neurology, 60(1), 94–100.  https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.60.1.94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Gallagher, S. (2005). How the body shapes the mind. Oxford, New York: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Goldin-Meadow, S., & Alibali, M. W. (2013). Gesture’s role in speaking, learning, and creating language. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 257–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Goldman, A. I. (2006). Simulating minds: The philosophy, psychology, and neuroscience of mindreading. Oxford. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Gopnik, A., & Meltzoff, A. N. (1997). Words, thoughts, and theories. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Pess.Google Scholar
  50. Harris, R. (1989). How does writing restructure thought? Language & Communication, 9(2–3), 99–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Heersmink, R. (2017). Distributed selves: Personal identity and extended memory systems. Synthese, 194(8), 3135–3151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Henrich, J. P. (2016). The secret of our success: How culture is driving human evolution, domesticating our species, and making us smarter. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Heyes, C. (2012). Grist and mills: On the cultural origins of cultural learning. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 367(1599), 2181–2191.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2012.0120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Heyes, C. (2016). Born pupils? Natural pedagogy and cultural pedagogy. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11(2), 280–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Heyes, C. M., & Frith, C. D. (2014). The cultural evolution of mind reading. Science, 344(6190), 12430911–12430916.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Huestegge, L., Radach, R., Corbic, D., & Huestegge, S. M. (2009). Oculomotor and linguistic determinants of reading development: A longitudinal study. Vision Research, 49(24), 2948–2959.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2009.09.012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Hustvedt, S. (2011). The shaking woman or a history of my nerves. London: Sceptre.Google Scholar
  58. Hutto, D. D. (2008). The narrative practice hypothesis: Clarifications and implications. Philosophical Explorations, 11(3), 175–192.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13869790802245679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Hutto, D. D., & Kirchhoff, M. D. (2015). Looking beyond the brain: Social neuroscience meets narrative practice. Cognitive Systems Research, 34, 5–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Jones, D., & Christensen, C. A. (1999). Relationship between automaticity in handwriting and students’ ability to generate written text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(1), 44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Joseph, H. S. S. L., & Liversedge, S. P. (2013). Children’s and adults’ on-line processing of syntactically ambiguous sentences during reading. PLoS One, 8(1).  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0054141.
  62. Kafka, F. (1988). Diaries: 1910–1923. New York: Schocken Books.Google Scholar
  63. Kandel, S., & Perret, C. (2015). How does the interaction between spelling and motor processes build up during writing acquisition? Cognition, 136, 325–336.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2014.11.014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Kaplan, J. T., Gimbel, S. I., Dehghani, M., Immordino-Yang, M. H., Sagae, K., Wong, J. D., et al. (2017). Processing narratives concerning protected values: A cross-cultural investigation of neural correlates. Cerebral Cortex, 27(2), 1428–1438.Google Scholar
  65. Kendon, A. (1994). Do gestures communicate? A review. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 27(3), 175–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Kersey, A. J., & James, K. H. (2013). Brain activation patterns resulting from learning letter forms through active self-production and passive observation in young children. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 1–15.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Kidd, D. C., & Castano, E. (2013). Reading literary fiction improves theory of mind. Science, 342(6156), 377–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Kline, M. A. (2015). How to learn about teaching: an evolutionary framework for the study of teaching behavior in humans and other animals. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 38, 1–70.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X14000090.
  69. Krämer, S. (2003). Writing, notational iconicity, calculus: On writing as a cultural technique. MLN, 118(3), 518–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Kukkonen, K. (forthcoming-a). How the novel found its feet: Embodiment in eighteenth-century fiction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  71. Kukkonen, K. (forthcoming-b). The curse of realism: Cognitive narratology and the historical dimension. Partial Answers.Google Scholar
  72. Laland, K. N. (2017). Darwin’s unfinished symphony: how culture made the human mind. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  73. Lamarque, P. (2004). On not expecting too much from narrative. Mind and Language, 19(4), 393–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Langer, J. A., & Applebee, A. N. (1986). Reading and writing instruction: Toward a theory of teaching and learning. Review of Research in Education, 13(1), 171–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Ludersdorfer, P., Kronbichler, M., & Wimmer, H. (2015). Accessing orthographic representations from speech: The role of left ventral occipitotemporal cortex in spelling. Human Brain Mapping, 36(4), 1393–1406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Mar, R. A., Oatley, K., Hirsh, J., dela Paz, J., & Peterson, J. B. (2006). Bookworms versus nerds: Exposure to fiction versus non-fiction, divergent associations with social ability, and the simulation of fictional social worlds. Journal of Research in Personality, 40(5), 694–712.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2005.08.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Maurer, U., Brem, S., Kranz, F., Bucher, K., Benz, R., Halder, P., et al. (2006). Coarse neural tuning for print peaks when children learn to read. NeuroImage, 33(2), 749–758.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.06.025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. McCandliss, B. D., Cohen, L., & Dehaene, S. (2003). The visual word form area: Expertise for reading in the fusiform gyrus. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(7), 293–299.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00134-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. McNeill, D., & Levy, E. (1982). Conceptual representations in language activity and gesture. In R. J. Jarvella & W. Klein (Eds.), Speech, place, and action (pp. 271–295). Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley.Google Scholar
  80. Menary, R. (2007a). Cognitive integration: Mind and cognition unbounded. Basingstoke, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Menary, R. (2007b). Writing as thinking. Language Sciences, 29(5), 621–632.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2007.01.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Menary, R. (2008). Embodied narratives. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 15(6), 63–84.  https://doi.org/10.1080/03069880802088952.Google Scholar
  83. Menary, R. (2010). Dimensions of mind. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 9(4), 561–578.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-010-9186-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Menary, R. (2012). Cognitive practices and cognitive character. Philosophical Explorations, 15(2), 147–164.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13869795.2012.677851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Menary, R. (2013). The hand, an organ of the mind: What the manual tells the mental. In Z. Radman (Ed.), The enculturated hand (pp. 349–367). Cambridge: Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  86. Menary, R. (2014). Neural plasticity, neuronal recycling and niche construction. Mind and Language, 29(3), 286–303.  https://doi.org/10.1111/mila.12051.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Menary, R. (2015). Open MIND. In T. Metzinger & J. M. Windt (Eds.), Mathematical cognition: A case of enculturation (pp. 1–20). Frankfurt am: Main: MIND Group.Google Scholar
  88. Mesoudi, A., Laland, K. N., Boyd, R., Buchanan, B., Flynn, E., McCauley, R. N., … Tennie, C. (2013). The cultural evolution of technology and science. In P. J. Richerson & M. H. Christiansen (Eds.), Cultural evolution: society, technology, language, and religion (pp. 193–216). Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  89. de Montaigne, M. (1993). The complete essays. London: Penguin Classics.Google Scholar
  90. Odling-Smee, J., & Laland, K. N. (2011). Ecological inheritance and cultural inheritance: What are they and how do they differ? Biological Theory, 6(3), 220–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Olson, D. R. (1994). The world on paper: the conceptual and cognitive implications of writing and reading. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  92. Ong, W. J. (2012). Orality and literacy: the technologizing of the word. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  93. Pammer, K., Hansen, P. C., Kringelbach, M. L., Holliday, I., Barnes, G., Hillebrand, A., … Cornelissen, P. L. (2004). Visual word recognition: The first half second. NeuroImage, 22(4), 1819–1825.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.05.004.
  94. Parviainen, T., Helenius, P., Poskiparta, E., Niemi, P., & Salmelin, R. (2006). Cortical sequence of word perception in beginning readers. Journal of Neuroscience, 26(22), 6052–6061.  https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0673-06.2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Phillips, J. G., Ogeil, R. P., & Best, C. (2009). Motor constancy and the upsizing of handwriting. Human Movement Science, 28(5), 578–587.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2009.07.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Planton, S., Jucla, M., Roux, F.-E., & Démonet, J.-F. (2013). The “handwriting brain”: A meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies of motor versus orthographic processes. Cortex, 49(10), 2772–2787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Price, C. J., & Devlin, J. T. (2003). The myth of the visual word form area. NeuroImage, 19(3), 473–481.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00084-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Price, C. J., & Devlin, J. T. (2004). The pro and cons of labelling a left occipitotemporal region “the visual word form area”. NeuroImage, 22(1), 477–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Price, C. J., & Devlin, J. T. (2011). The Interactive Account of ventral occipitotemporal contributions to reading. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15(6), 246–253.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2011.04.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Purcell, J. J., Napoliello, E. M., & Eden, G. F. (2011a). A combined fMRI study of typed spelling and reading. NeuroImage, 55(2), 750–762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Purcell, J., Turkeltaub, P. E., Eden, G. F., & Rapp, B. (2011b). Examining the central and peripheral processes of written word production through meta-analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Purcell, J. J., Jiang, X., & Eden, G. F. (2017). Shared orthographic neuronal representations for spelling and reading. NeuroImage, 147, 554–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Rapp, B., & Lipka, K. (2011). The literate brain: The relationship between spelling and reading. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23(5), 1180–1197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Rayner, K. (2009). Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62(8), 1457–1506.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210902816461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Rayner, K., Foorman, B. R., Perfetti, C. A., Pesetsky, D., & Seidenberg, M. S. (2001). How psychological science informs the teaching of reading. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 2(2), 31–74.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1529-1006.00004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Rayner, K., Juhasz, B. J., & Pollatsek, A. (2007). Eye movements during reading. In M. J. Snowling & C. Hulme (Eds.), The science of reading: A handbook (pp. 79–97). Malden: Mass.: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  107. Roepstorff, A., Niewöhner, J., & Beck, S. (2010). Enculturing brains through patterned practices. Neural Networks, 23(8–9), 1051–1059.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neunet.2010.08.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Rousseau, J. J. (2008). Confessions. Oxford. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  109. Rowlands, M. (1999). The body in mind: Understanding cognitive processes. Cambridge, Mass. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  110. Sacks, O. (2015). On the move: A life. London: Picador.Google Scholar
  111. Schechtman, M. (2007). Stories, lives, and basic survival: A refinement and defense of the narrative view. In D. D. Hutto (Ed.), Narrative and understanding persons (pp. 155–178). Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Seassau, M., Bucci, M.-P., & Paterson, K. (2013). Reading and visual search: A developmental study in normal children. PLoS One, 8(7), 1–11.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0070261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Snowling, M. J. (2000). Dyslexia (2nd ed.). Malden: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
  114. Sterelny, K. (2003). Thought in a hostile world: The evolution of human cognition. Malden, Mass. Blackwell.Google Scholar
  115. Sterelny, K. (2012). The evolved apprentice: How evolution made humans unique. Cambridge, Mass. MIT Press.Google Scholar
  116. Sterelny, K. (2016). Cumulative cultural evolution and the origins of language. Biological Theory, 11(3), 173–186.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13752-016-0247-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Stotz, K. (2010). Human nature and cognitive–developmental niche construction. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 9(4), 483–501.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-010-9178-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Strawson, G. (2004). Against narrativity. Ratio, 17(4), 428–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. Sugiyama, M. S. (2001). Narrative theory and function: Why evolution matters. Philosophy and Literature, 25(2), 233–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. Teulings, H.-L., Thomassen, A. J. W. M., & Van Galen, G. P. (1983). Preparation of partly precued handwriting movements: The size of movement units in handwriting. Acta Psychologica, 54(1), 165–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. Turkeltaub, P. E., Gareau, L., Flowers, D. L., Zeffiro, T. A., & Eden, G. F. (2003). Development of neural mechanisms for reading. Nature Neuroscience, 6(7), 767–773.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1065.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. Vogel, A. C., Petersen, S. E., & Schlaggar, B. L. (2014). The VWFA: It’s not just for words anymore. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 1–10.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00088.
  123. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, Mass. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  124. Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17(2), 89–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. Ziegler, J. C., & Goswami, U. (2006). Becoming literate in different languages: similar problems, different solutions. Developmental Science, 9(5), 429–436.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2006.00509.x.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Experimental Psychology and Cognitive ScienceJustus Liebig University of GiessenGiessenGermany

Personalised recommendations