Advertisement

Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences

, Volume 17, Issue 1, pp 99–116 | Cite as

Sharing the dance – on the reciprocity of movement in the case of elite sports dancers

  • Jing HeEmail author
  • Susanne Ravn
Article

Abstract

In his recent works on daily face-to-face encounters, Zahavi claims that the phenomenon of sharing involves reciprocity. Following Zahavi’s line of thought, we wonder what exactly reciprocity amounts to and how the shared experience emerges from the dynamic process of interaction. By turning to the highly specialized field of elite sports dance, we aim at exploring the way in which reciprocity unfolds in intensive deliberate practices of movement. In our analysis, we specifically argue that the ongoing dynamics of two separate flows of movement constitute a shared experience of dancing together. In this sense, moving together, in sports dance, is a practical way of understanding each other. In agreement with Zahavi, our analysis emphasizes the bi-directed nature of sharing. However, at the same time, we contribute to Zahavi’s ongoing endeavour as the special case of sports dance reveals how reciprocity can be deliberately shaped through the mutual coordination and affective bound dynamics of movement. Our article thus both pursues the methodological point that qualitative research of expert competences can constructively enrich phenomenological analysis and indicates how movement can be fundamental to the reciprocity of shared experience.

Keywords

Movement Affectivity Shared intentionality Coordination Connection Interdisciplinary methodology 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We wish to thank the sports dancers Bjørn Bitsch & Ashli Williamson and Martino Zanibellato & Michelle Abildtrup who kindly gave their time to participate in the study. We would also like to express our sincere gratitude to the anonymous reviewers for providing us with constructive comments and suggestions.

References

  1. Allen-Collinson, J. (2009). Sporting embodiment: sports studies and the (continuing) promise of phenomenology. Qualitative Research in Sport and Exercise, 1(3), 279–296.Google Scholar
  2. Bratman, M. E. (1993). Shared intention. Ethics, 104(1), 97–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bratman, M. E. (2007). Structures of agency. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bratman, M. E. (2009). Modest sociality and the distinctiveness of intention. Philosophical Studies, 144, 49–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Colombetti, G. (2014). The feeling body: affective science meets the enactive mind. Cambridge: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Colombetti, G. (2015). Enactive affectivity, extended. Topoi, 1–11.doi: 10.1007/s11245-015-9335-2.Google Scholar
  7. De Jaegher, H., & Di Paolo, E. (2007). Participatory sense-making. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 6(4), 485–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Flyvbjerg, B. (2011). Case study. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The sage handbook of qualitative research (pp. 301–316). Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar
  9. Froese, T., & Gallagher, S. (2010). Phenomenology and artificial life: toward a technological supplementation of phenomenological methodology. Husserl Studies, 26(2), 83–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fuchs, T., & De Jaegher, H. (2009). Enactive intersubjectivity: participatory sense-making and mutual incorporation. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 8, 465–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fuchs, T., & Koch, S. C. (2014). Embodied affectivity: on moving and being moved. Frontiers in Psychology. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00508.Google Scholar
  12. Gallagher, S. (2012). Taking stock of phenomenology futures. The Southern Journal of Philosophy, 50, 304–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gallagher, S., & Francesconi, D. (2012). Teaching phenomenology to qualitative researchers, cognitive scientists, and phenomenologists. The Indo-Pacific Journal of Phenomenology, 12, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gallagher, S., & Zahavi, D. (2008). The phenomenological mind. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. Gilbert, M. (2009). Shared intention and personal intentions. Philosophical Studies, 14, 167–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gilbert, M. (2013). Joint commitment: How we make the social world. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hammersley, M., & Atkinson, P. (2007). Ethnography – Principles in practice (3rd ed.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. Høffding, S., & Martiny, K. (2015). Framing a phenomenological interview: what, why and how. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences. doi: 10.1007/s11097-015-9433-z.Google Scholar
  19. Leder, D. (1990). The absent body. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  20. Legrand, D., & Ravn, S. (2009). Perceiving subjectivity in bodily movement: the case of dancers. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 8, 389–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. León, F., & Zahavi, D. (2016). Phenomenology of experiential sharing: The contribution of Schutz and Walther. In Salice, A., & Schmid, H. B. (Eds.), The phenomenological approach to social reality: History concepts, problems. Springer, 219–234.Google Scholar
  22. Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962). Phenomenology of perception. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  23. Montero, B. (2010). Does bodily awareness interfere with highly skilled movement? Inquiry, 53(2), 105–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Potter, C. (2008). Sense of motion, senses of self: Becoming a dancer. Ethnos, 73(4), 444–465.Google Scholar
  25. Ravn, S. (2016). Phenomenological analysis. In B. Smith & A. Sparkes (Eds.), International handbook of qualitative methods in sport and exercise. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. Ravn, S., & Christensen, M. K. (2014). Listening to the body? How phenomenological insight can be used to explore a golfer’s experience of the physicality of her body. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 6, 462–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ravn, S., & Hansen, H. P. (2013). How to explore dancers’ sense experiences? A study of how multi-sited fieldwork and phenomenology can be combined. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 5, 196–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rothfield, P. (2005). Differentiating phenomenology and dance. Topoi, 24(1), 43–53.Google Scholar
  29. Schmid, H. B. (2009). Plural Action: Essays in philosophy and social science. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Schmid, H. B. (2014). Plural self-awareness. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 13, 7–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Searle, J. R. (1990). Collective intentions and actions. In P. Cohen, J. Morgan, & M. E. Pollack (Eds.), Intentions in communication (pp. 401–416). Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  32. Searle, J. R. (1999). Neither phenomenological description nor rational reconstruction: reply to Dreyfus. Revue Internationale de Philosophie, 2(217), 277–284.Google Scholar
  33. Sheets-Johnstone, M. (1999). The primacy of movement. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  34. Sheets-Johnstone, M. (2012). From movement to dance. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 11(1), 39–57.Google Scholar
  35. Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  36. Stern, D. N. (1985). The interpersonal world of the infant: A view from psychoanalysis and developmental psychology. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  37. Thorpe, H. (2012). The ethnographic (I)nterview in the sports field: Towards a postmodern sensibility. In K. Young & M. Atkinson (Eds.), Qualitative research on sport and physical culture (pp. 51–78). Bingley: Emerald Group.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Tomasello, M. (2014). A natural history of human thinking. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Tummolini, L. (2014). Making our ends meet: shared intention, goal adoption and the third-person perspective. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 13, 75–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. van Manen, M. (1990). Researching lived experience. London: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  41. Zahavi, D. (2005). Subjectivity and selfhood: Investigating the first-person perspective. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  42. Zahavi, D. (2014). Self and other: Exploring subjectivity, empathy, and shame. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Zahavi, D. (2015). You, me and we: the sharing of emotional experiences. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 22, 84-101.Google Scholar
  44. Zahavi, D., & Satne, G. (2015). Varieties of shared intentionality: Tomasello and classical phenomenology. In J. A. Bell, A. Cutrofello, & P. M. Livingston (Eds.), Beyond the analytic-continental divide: Pluralist philosophy in the twenty-first century (pp. 305–325). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  45. Zahavi, D., & Rochat, P. (2015). Empathy ≠ sharing: perspectives from phenomenology and developmental psychology. Consciousness and Cognition, 36, 543–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyEast China Normal UniversityShanghaiChina
  2. 2.Department of Sports Science and Clinical BiomechanicsUniversity of Southern DenmarkOdenseDenmark

Personalised recommendations