Advertisement

Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences

, Volume 15, Issue 2, pp 305–313 | Cite as

Jonathan Berger and Gabe Turow (eds.), Music, science, and the rhythmic brain: cultural and clinical implications

Routledge, New York/Oxford, 2011, 215pp., ISBN 978-0-415-89059-5, $150
  • J. A. Judge
Article
  • 328 Downloads

The effects of musical rhythm on the brain, body and nervous system is the focus of a dynamic research programme in music psychology. However, this research tends to take the experience of the individual Western listener, considered in isolation from his or her listening culture, as its locus of study. Collective experiences of musical rhythm are not given as much attention, which may well be problematic, given that most of the world’s musical cultures are more participatory—involving significant interaction between performers and listeners, and sometimes a dissolution of this distinction almost entirely—than the Western tradition. The aim of this volume is to make progress towards the reconciliation of cognitive and ethnographic research into musical rhythm. The contributing authors, who come from a variety of disciplines, attempt to foster a discussion of rhythmic ‘entrainment’ (a central posit of rhythm research, which will be introduced below) in a way that considers its...

References

  1. Davies, S. (2012). The artful species: aesthetics, art, and evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Deutsch, D. (Ed.). (2013). The psychology of music (3rd ed.). London: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  3. Grahn, J. A., & Brett, M. (2007). Rhythm and beat perception in motor areas of the brain. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19(5), 893–906.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Grahn, J. A., & Rowe, J. B. (2009). Feeling the Beat: premotor and striatal interactions in musicians and nonmusicians during beat perception. The Journal of Neuroscience, 29(3), 7540–7548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hallam, S., Cross, I., & Thaut, M. (2009). The Oxford handbook of music psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Judge, J. A. (2015). ‘Does the ‘missing fundamental’ require an inferentialist explanation?’ Topoi (Special Issue on Perception without Representation).Google Scholar
  7. Kirschner, S., & Tomasello, M. (2010). Joint music making promotes prosocial behavior in 4-year-old children. Evolution and Human Behavior, 31(5), 354–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Lakens, D. (2010). Movement synchrony and perceived entitativity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(5), 701–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. London, J. (2004). Hearing in time: psychological aspects of musical meter. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Macrae, C. N., Duffy, O. K., Miles, L. K., & Lawrence, J. (2008). A case of hand waving: action synchrony and person perception. Cognition, 109(1), 152–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Orlandi, N. (2014). The innocent eye: why vision is not a cognitive process. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Patel, A. (2008). Music, language, and the brain. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Zentner, M., & Eerola, T. (2010). Rhythmic engagement with music in infancy. PNAS, 107(13), 5748–5773.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of MusicUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK

Personalised recommendations